TransCatheter aortic valve implantation and fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus conventional surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass grafting for treatment of patients with aortic valve stenosis and multivessel or advanced coronary disease: The transcatheter valve and vessels trial (TCW trial): Design and rationale.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) frequently present with concomitant obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). In those, current guidelines recommend combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as the preferred treatment option, although this surgical approach is associated with a high rate of clinical events. Combined transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with or without FFR have evolved as a valid alternative for cardiac surgery in patients with AS and multivessel or advanced CAD. To date, no dedicated trial has prospectively evaluated the outcomes of a percutaneous versus surgical treatment for patients with both severe AS and CAD. AIMS: To investigate whether fractional-flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI and TAVI is noninferior to combined CABG and SAVR for the treatment of severe AS and multivessel or advanced CAD. METHODS: The Transcatheter Valve and Vessels (TCW) trial (clinicaltrial.gov: NCT03424941) is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open label, international trial. Patients ≥ 70 years with severe AS and multivessel (≥ 2 vessels) or advanced CAD, deemed feasible by the heart team for both; a full percutaneous or surgical treatment, will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to either FFR-guided PCI followed by TAVI (intervention arm) vs. CABG and SAVR (control arm). The primary endpoint is a patient-oriented composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, disabling stroke, unscheduled clinically-driven target vessel revascularization, valve reintervention, and life threatening or disabling bleeding at 1 year. The TCW trial is powered for noninferiority, and if met, superiority will be tested. Assuming a primary endpoint rate of 30% in the CABG-SAVR arm, with a significance level α of 5%, a noninferiority limit delta of 15% and a loss to follow-up of 2%, a total of 328 patients are needed to obtain a power of 90%. The primary endpoint analysis is performed on an intention-to-treat basis. SUMMARY: The TCW Trial is the first prospective randomized trial that will study if a less invasive percutaneous treatment for severe AS and concomitant advanced CAD (i.e., FFR-guided PCI-TAVI) is noninferior to the guidelines recommended approach (CABG-SAVR).

Disease Severity in Moderate-to-Severe COVID-19 Is Associated With Platelet Hyperreactivity and Innate Immune Activation.

Background: Hemostasis and inflammation are both dysregulated in patients with moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Yet, both processes can also be disturbed in patients with other respiratory diseases, and the interactions between coagulation, inflammation, and disease severity specific to COVID-19 are still vague. Methods: Hospitalized patients with acute respiratory symptoms and with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2)-positive (COVpos) and SARS-CoV2-negative (COVneg) status were included. We assessed adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-, thrombin receptor activator peptide 6 (TRAP)-, and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet reactivity by impedance aggregometry, as well as leukocyte subtype spectrum and platelet-leukocyte aggregates by flow cytometry and inflammatory cytokines by cytometric bead array. Results: ADP-, TRAP-, and AA-induced platelet reactivity was significantly higher in COVpos than in COVneg patients. Disease severity, assessed by sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, was higher in COVpos than in COVneg patients and again higher in deceased COVpos patients than in surviving COVpos. The SOFA score correlated significantly with the mean platelet volume and TRAP-induced platelet aggregability. A larger percentage of classical and intermediate monocytes, and of CD4pos T cells (TH) aggregated with platelets in COVpos than in COVneg patients. Interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist (RA) and IL-6 levels were higher in COVpos than in COVneg patients and again higher in deceased COVpos patients than in surviving COVpos. IL-1RA and IL-6 levels correlated with the SOFA score in COVpos but not in COVneg patients. In both respiratory disease groups, absolute levels of B-cell-platelet aggregates and NK-cell-platelet aggregates were correlated with ex vivo platelet aggegation upon stimulation with AA and ADP, respectively, indicating a universal, but not a COVID-19-specific mechanism. Conclusion: In moderate-to-severe COVID-19, but not in other respiratory diseases, disease severity was associated with platelet hyperreactivity and a typical inflammatory signature. In addition to a severe inflammatory response, platelet hyperreactivity associated to a worse clinical outcome in patients with COVID-19, pointing to the importance of antithrombotic therapy for reducing disease severity.