Correlation of radiological and immunochemical parameters with clinical outcome in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with Bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: Some phase 2 trials had reported encouraging progression-free survival with Bevacizumab in monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy in glioblastoma. However, phase 3 trials showed a significant improvement in progression free survival without a benefit in overall survival. To date, there are no predictive biomarker of response for Bevacizumab in glioblastoma. METHODS: We used Immunochemical analysis on tumor samples and pretreatment and post-treatment perfusion-MRI to try to identify possible predictive angiogenesis-related biomarkers of response and survival in patients with glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in the first recurrence. We analyzed histological parameters: vascular proliferation, mitotic number and Ki-67 index; molecular factors: MGMT promoter methylation, EGFR amplification and EGFR variant III; immunohistochemical: MET, Midkine, HIF1, VEGFA, VEGF-R2, CD44, Olig2, microvascular area and microvascular density; and radiological: rCBV. RESULTS: In the statistical analysis, no significant correlation of any histological, molecular, microvascular or radiological parameters could be demonstrated with the response rate, PFS or OS with bevacizumab treatment. CONCLUSION: Unfortunately, in this histopathological, molecular, immunohistochemical and neuroradiological study we did not find any predictive biomarker of response or survival benefit for Bevacizumab in glioblastoma.

Phacomatosis pigmentokeratotica: a case of HRAS mosaicism causing rhabdomyosarcoma.

A 17-year-old male presented with a large sebaceous naevus (SN) comprising part of his right face and scalp and a speckled lentiginous naevus (SLN) on his left trunk, hip, neck and scalp with a checkerboard pattern. His right oral hemimucosa showed extensive papillomatous lesions, which were contiguous with the upper-lip SN lesions. He also showed extracutaneous manifestations including cardiac, musculoskeletal and ocular alterations. Internally, he had developed two primary rhabdomyosarcomas. DNA samples of the SN, SLN, oral papillomatous hyperplasia and both rhabdomyosarcomas were analysed by Sanger sequencing. An HRAS c.37G>C mutation was detected in all of them. Skin and blood DNA were wild-type. Phacomatosis pigmentokeratotica (PPK) is characterized by the association of an SN with a papular naevus spilus and extracutaneous manifestations. Until recently, the aetiopathogenetic hypothesis of didymosis was accepted. However, in 2013 Groesser et al. proved the existence of an activating HRAS mutation as the cause of this syndrome. A higher incidence of cancer has been observed in germline RASopathies. Furthermore, up to 30% of human cancers show dysregulation of the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK pathways. In our patient, an HRAS mosaic mutation explains not only the cutaneous but also the extracutaneous manifestations. To our knowledge this is the first described case of PPK in which the existence of an HRAS mosaic mutation is the confirmed cause of rhabdomyosarcoma. Furthermore, the HRAS c.37G>C mutation has never been related to any type of rhabdomyosarcoma. Mosaicisms could be underdiagnosed causes of childhood tumours. As dermatologists we stand in a privileged position of being able to detect these alterations.

Leakage decrease detected by dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI predicts survival in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In glioblastoma, tumor progression appears to be triggered by expression of VEGF, a regulator of blood vessel permeability. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits angiogenesis by clearing circulating VEGF, resulting in a decline in the contrast-enhancing tumor, which does not always correlate with treatment response. Our objectives were: (1) to evaluate whether changes in DSC perfusion MRI-derived leakage could predict survival in recurrent glioblastoma, and (2) to estimate whether leakage at baseline was related to treatment outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed DSC perfusion MRI in 24 recurrent glioblastomas treated with bevacizumab as second line chemotherapy. Leakage at baseline and changes in maximum leakage between baseline and the first follow-up after treatment were selected for quantitative analysis. Survival univariate analysis was made constructing survival curves using Kaplan-Meier method and comparing subgroups by log rank probability test. RESULTS: Leakage reduction at 8 weeks after initiation of bevacizumab treatment had a significant influence on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Median OS and PFS were 2.4 and 2.8 months longer for patients with leakage reduction at the first follow-up. Higher leakage at baseline was associated with leakage reduction after treatment. Odds ratio of treatment response was 9 for patients with maximum leakage at baseline >5. CONCLUSIONS: Leakage decrease may predict OS and PFS in recurrent glioblastomas treated with bevacizumab. Leakage reduction postulates as a potential biomarker for treatment response evaluation. Leakage at baseline seems to predict response to treatment, but was not independently associated with survival.

Human papillomavirus combined with cytology and margin status identifies patients at risk for recurrence after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and co-testing to identify recurrence of patients treated by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2-3. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis (R.A.): the medical records of 372 women treated for CIN 2-3 were reviewed. Resection margin, HPV typing, Pap smears, and biopsies post-LEEP were collected. Prospective analysis (P.A.): 97 women were followed post-LEEP by cytology, HPV test and colposcopy every six months. RESULTS: Positive margins were found to be an independent risk factor for recurrent disease (OR 0.192; 95% CI 0.074-0.497 in R.A. and OR 0.096; 95% CI 0.023-0.392 in P.A.). HPV testing showed less sensitivity than cytology (69% vs 84%, respectively in R.A. and 80% vs 100% in P.A.). Co-testing predicted recurrent disease at a sensitivity of 90.6% in R.A. and 100% in P.A. CONCLUSION: Co-testing is the best option in follow-up protocols after treatment for CIN 2-3. If margins are free and co-testing is negative at six and 12 months, 18 months visit could be avoided.