Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the impact of trabectedin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin on the subsequent treatment in women with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Debulking surgery, followed by taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy has traditionally been the first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. However, most patients will experience recurrence afterwards, and receive subsequent lines of therapy. It has been proposed that extending the treatment-free interval of platinum can improve the response to a subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy, and reduce associated toxicities in women with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. The aim was to determine the impact, in clinical practice, of trabectedin with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (trabectedin/PLD) on the subsequent platinum-based therapy in these patients, and to explore the prognosis for breast cancer gene status and the expression of diverse genes. This was a multicenter, retrospective, postauthorization study that involved 79 patients. Germline or somatic mutations of breast cancer gene 1/2 were present in 21.5%. The median time between trabectedin/PLD and the onset of the subsequent treatment was 6.7 months. The overall response rate during the trabectedin/PLD period was 36.7%. In the subsequent first-line platinum-based therapy, the overall response rate was 51.4%. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 11.8 and 25.4 months, respectively, from the onset of trabectedin/PLD treatment. Partially platinum-sensitive (between 6 and 12 months) and platinum-sensitive patients (treatment-free interval of platinum≥12 months) showed no differences in progression-free survival and overall survival. Grade 3 neutropenia and asthenia were reported in 15.2 and 10.1% of patients, respectively. Most frequent adverse events in more than 10% of patients were neutropenia (45.6%), asthenia (43.0%), nausea (25.3%), and anemia (13.9%). The intercalation with a nonplatinum regimen may improve the response to a subsequent platinum-based therapy in women with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

Neoadjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel for the radical surgical treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in ovarian cancer: a prospective pilot study.

PURPOSE: The admitted benefits of intraperitoneal chemotherapy during postoperative administration for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian origin are limited by their associated morbidity and restricted diffusion by the presence of multiple intra-abdominal adherences. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the security, effectiveness, and cytoreduction optimization of intraperitoneal paclitaxel administration previously to radical surgery/peritonectomy/HIPEC (hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy) either in monotherapy or combined with intravenous carboplatin. METHODS: Prospective pilot study of 10 patients with ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis in stage IIIc-FIGO without previous treatment. After staging of the diseases by laparoscopy, five patients received paclitaxel by weekly intraperitoneal administration (60 mg/m(2), 10 cycles), and other five patients additionally received intravenous carboplatin every 21 days (AUC 6, 4 cycles). Subsequently radical surgery/peritonectomy with HIPEC was performed. RESULTS: The presence of moderate abdominal pain was the most common (70%) side effect associated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel intraperitoneal administration. The intravenous carboplatin administration was not associated with significant increase in adverse effects. It boosted intraperitoneal paclitaxel-associated antitumoral activity with a high average decrease in Index Cancer Peritoneal (21.2 vs. 14.4, P = 0.066) and CA 125(1,053 vs. 346, P = 0.043). All the patients who received combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy obtained R0 cytoreduction. Five-year overall survival was 62%. CONCLUSIONS: The intraperitoneal paclitaxel weekly administration combined with intravenous carboplatin administration prior to radical surgery/peritonectomy with HIPEC is a safe and effective option in the treatment of ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis. This study shows the possibility to investigate other forms of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and their combinations thoroughly.

The role of hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in recurrent ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peritoneal carcinomatosis in women frequently has an ovarian origin. Hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) along with radical surgery/peritonectomy could present a new therapeutic approach with curative intention. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the role of the administration of HIPEC. METHODS: A series of patients (N=26) diagnosed with peritoneal carcinomatosis for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (stage III) from January 1997 to December 2004 submitted to radical surgery/peritonectomy with optimal cytoreduction (R0-R1) were included in this study, 14 treated with HIPEC and 12 without HIPEC. RESULTS: The variables age, histologic type, peritonectomy procedures, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and lymph node affectation were similar in both groups. The 5-year global survival was 58% and 17% (p=0.046), and 67% and 29% in patients with maximal cytoreduction (R0) (p=0.264), in the HIPEC- and non-HIPEC-treated patients, respectively. In patients with optimal cytoreduction and partial peritonectomy, 5-year global survival was also superior in the HIPEC group (75% vs. 11%, p=0.011). Average time free of disease was superior in the HIPEC group (48+/-42 vs. 24+/-21 months), with less reinterventions due to a new reappearance during the first three evolutionary years (2/14 vs. 4/12). Postoperative morbidity did not show substantial differences in both groups and there was no surgical mortality. CONCLUSIONS: HIPEC is a complement to radical surgery/ peritonectomy, which has been shown to be a surgical procedure with high tolerability, low morbimortality, enhanced survival and prolonged disease-free interval in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Radical surgery-peritonectomy and intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in recurrent or primary ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Advanced ovarian cancer typically spreads in a diffuse intra-abdominal fashion. This characteristic suggests that combined radical surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be a useful treatment procedure. The purpose of this study was to review patients submitted to surgical debulking and hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIIC) and to evaluate the potential prognostic survival factors for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in our center. METHODS: A series of patients (N = 33) diagnosed of peritoneal carcinomatosis for epithelial ovarian cancer (stage III) from January 1997 to December 2004 submitted to radical surgery-peritonectomy and HIIC with paclitaxel was included in this study; 19 primary ovarian cancer and 14 recurrent ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Cytoreduction R0 (P = 0.018) and negative lymph nodes (P = 0.005) were covariables for major prognostic survival. Patients with optimal cytoreduction R0 obtained survival rates of 63% at 5 years in recurrent ovarian cancer and 60% in primary ovarian cancer, 71% and 63%, respectively with associated subtotal infra-abdominal peritonectomy, and even better results if negative lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Radical surgery-peritonectomy with HIIQ has been shown to be a surgical procedure with high tolerability, low morbimortality, enhanced survival, and prolonged disease-free interval in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis so much for recurrent or primary ovarian cancer.