A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Long-Term Outcomes with and without Palifermin in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies.

The incidence of debilitating oral mucositis (OM) can be as high as 99% after myeloablative conditioning regimens preparing patients with hematologic malignancies for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Palifermin (KGF) is a recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor that reduces the incidence and duration of severe OM. The long-term safety of KGF has not been well established, however. In this long-term prospective matched-cohort study, patients who received KGF (cases) and underwent autologous or allogeneic HCT for hematologic malignancies between 2006 and 2013 were matched 1:1 to patients who did not receive KGF (controls). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Other outcomes were disease relapse, new malignancies, pancreatitis, renal failure requiring dialysis, pulmonary complications, cataract surgery, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The analysis population comprised 2191 matched pairs with a wide range of diseases and donor types that received diverse conditioning and GVHD preventive regimens, representing contemporary practice patterns. The median duration of follow-up was 8 years (range, 1 to 12.5 years). In multivariate analyses, the probabilities of OS (relative risk [RR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.12), relapse (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.18), new malignancies (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.18), and cataract surgery (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.50) were not statistically significantly different between cases and controls. In univariate analyses, no increased risks were observed for renal failure requiring dialysis, pancreatitis, acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, interstitial pneumonitis/acute respiratory distress syndrome/idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, or bronchiolitis obliterans/cryptogenic organizing pneumonia/bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia among cases compared with controls. This long-term prospective safety cohort study demonstrates that the KGF group had no increased risk of overall mortality, relapse, new malignancies, or any other key outcome. The broad inclusion criteria allow the results to be generalized to contemporary practice for patients with a wide range of diseases and receiving a wide range of HCT conditioning regimens and graft sources from diverse donor types.

Long-term safety and outcomes in hereditary tyrosinaemia type 1 with nitisinone treatment: a 15-year non-interventional, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Since the EU approval of nitisinone in 2005, prognosis for patients with hereditary tyrosinaemia type 1 has changed dramatically, with patients living with the disease now reaching adulthood for the first time in history. This study aimed to assess the long-term safety and outcomes of nitisinone treatment in patients with hereditary tyrosinaemia type 1. METHODS: We did a non-interventional, non-comparative, multicentre study in 77 sites across 17 countries in Europe and collected retrospective and prospective longitudinal data in patients with hereditary tyrosinaemia type 1 who were treated with oral nitisinone during the study period (Feb 21, 2005, to Sept 30, 2019). There were no specific exclusion criteria. Patients were followed-up with an investigator at least annually for as long as they were treated, or until the end of the study. The primary endpoints, occurrence of adverse events related to hepatic, renal, ophthalmic, haematological, or cognitive or developmental function, were assessed in the complete set (all patients already receiving treatment at the index date [Feb 21, 2005] or starting treatment thereafter) and the index set (the subset of patients who had their first dose on the index date or later only). FINDINGS: 315 patients were enrolled during the study period (complete set). Additionally, data from 24 patients who had liver transplantation or died during the post-marketing surveillance programme were retrieved (extended analysis set; 339 patients). Median treatment duration was 11·2 years (range 0·7-28·4); cumulative nitisinone exposure was 3172·7 patient-years. Patients who were diagnosed by neonatal screening started nitisinone treatment at median age 0·8 months versus 8·5 months in those who presented clinically. Incidences of hepatic, renal, ophthalmic, haematological, or cognitive or developmental adverse events were low. Occurrence of liver transplantation or death was more frequent the later that treatment was initiated (none of 70 patients who started treatment at age <28 days vs 35 [13%] of 268 patients who started treatment at age ≥28 days). 279 (89%) of 315 patients were assessed as having either very good or good nitisinone treatment compliance. Treatment and diet compliance declined as patients aged. Suboptimal plasma phenylalanine and tyrosine levels were observed. The majority of patients were reported to have good overall clinical condition throughout treatment; 176 (87%) of 203 during the entire study, 98% following 1 year of treatment. INTERPRETATION: Long-term nitisinone treatment was well tolerated and no new safety signals were revealed. Life-limiting hepatic disease appears to have been prevented by early treatment start. Neonatal screening was the most effective way of ensuring early treatment. Standardised monitoring of blood tyrosine, phenylalanine, and nitisinone levels has potential to guide individualised therapy. FUNDING: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sobi).

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Palifermin in Children and Adolescents with Acute Leukemias Undergoing Myeloablative Therapy and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium Trial.

Currently, effective pharmacologic treatment to reduce severe oral mucositis (OM) resulting from high-dose myeloablative cytotoxic therapy in the pediatric population is not available. Palifermin has been proven to decrease the incidence and duration of severe OM in adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In the pediatric population, however, data on palifermin treatment are limited. A phase I dose-escalation study of palifermin in pediatric patients with acute leukemias undergoing myeloablative HSCT with total body irradiation, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide was performed to determine a safe and tolerable dose and to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and efficacy of palifermin. Twenty-seven patients in 3 age groups (1 to 2, 3 to 11, and 12 to 16 years) and 3 dose levels (40, 60, and 80 µg/kg/day) were studied. There were no deaths, dose-limiting toxicities, or treatment-related serious adverse events. Long-term safety outcomes did not differ from what would be expected in this population. PK data showed no differences between the 3 age groups. Exposure did not increase with increase in dose. The maximum severity of OM (WHO grade 4) occurred in 6 patients (22%), none of whom was in the 80-µg/kg/day dosing group. This study showed that all doses were well tolerated and a good safety profile in all 3 pediatric age groups was seen.

Long-Term Safety Outcomes in Patients with Hematological Malignancies Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Treated with Palifermin to Prevent Oral Mucositis.

The purpose of our study was to compare long-term safety outcomes (overall survival, disease progression, and incidence of secondary malignancies) between palifermin and placebo in the prevention of oral mucositis in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients were enrolled between 1997 and 2005 into 4 phase I to III studies (3 double-blind placebo-controlled and 1 open-label) conducted at 31 sites in Australia, Europe, and the United States. Survival outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival) were compared using hazard ratios (HRs) estimated with a Cox model that included treatment group, baseline age, disease type, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, country, and presence of prior radiotherapy as covariates. The incidence of secondary malignancies was compared with a chi-square test. A total of 672 patients were randomized into the studies (428 palifermin and 244 placebo). The median follow-up time for subjects alive at last visit was 7.9 years (range, .1 to 14.9) for palifermin and 8.8 years (range, .1 to 14.8) for placebo. Palifermin-treated patients had overall survival (HR, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], .78 to 1.31; P = .921) and progression-free survival times (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, .83 to 1.31; P = .733) that were comparable with placebo-treated patients. Secondary malignancies were reported by 13% of palifermin-treated patients versus 11% of placebo patients (P = .477). Breakdown into secondary hematological malignancies (7% versus 6%) or solid tumors (6% versus 6%) did not suggest any differences between the treatment groups. After a follow-up of up to 15 years, comparable long-term safety outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, and incidence of secondary malignancies) were observed for palifermin- and placebo-treated patients undergoing autologous HSCT.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between palifermin and heparin.

Oral mucositis, a severe complication during chemo- and/or radiotherapy, is prevented with palifermin treatment, a recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor (KGF/FGF-7). The FGF family belongs to the larger family of heparin-binding growth factors. Because it has been shown that heparin modulates binding of KGF to the KGF receptor and subsequently affects cellular proliferation induced by the KGF mitogenic signal, it is critical to understand the drug-drug interactions between palifermin and heparin, particularly because of heparin's narrow therapeutic margin. Two studies were performed in healthy subjects to characterize the effect of palifermin on the pharmacodynamics of heparin (activated partial thromboplastin time) and evaluate the impact of heparin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (Ki67 staining of buccal mucosal tissue) of palifermin. Results demonstrated a pronounced pharmacokinetic interaction; heparin coadministration increased the palifermin AUC 4- to 5-fold and decreased its half-life by 40%-45%, suggesting an approximate 70%-80% decrease in palifermin clearance and volume of distribution. These changes in the pharmacokinetics of palifermin during coadministration of heparin, however, did not affect the pharmacodynamic effect of palifermin, or the anticoagulant activity of heparin, and did not lead to increased safety findings. Therefore, these results suggest that dose adjustments for heparin and palifermin are not warranted when administered concurrently.