Failure in all steps of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance process is frequent in daily practice.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Failures at any step in the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance process can result in HCC diagnostic delays and associated worse prognosis. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of surveillance failure and its associated risk factors in patients with HCC in Argentina, considering three steps: 1) recognition of at-risk patients, 2) implementation of HCC surveillance, 3) success of HCC surveillance. METHODS: We performed a multi-center cross-sectional study of patients at-risk for HCC in Argentina seen between10.01.2018 and 10.30.2019. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify correlates of surveillance failure. RESULTS: Of 301 included patients, the majority were male (74.8%) with a mean age of 64 years old. At the time of HCC diagnosis, 75 (25%) patients were unaware of their diagnosis of chronic liver disease, and only 130 (43%) patients were under HCC surveillance. Receipt of HCC surveillance was significantly associated with follow-up by a hepatologist. Of 119 patients with complete surveillance, surveillance failure occurred in 30 (25%) patients. Surveillance failure was significantly associated with alpha fetoprotein ≥20 ng/mL (OR 4.0, CI 95% 1.43-11.55). CONCLUSIONS: HCC surveillance failure was frequent in all the evaluated steps. These data should help guide strategies to improve the implementation and results of HCC surveillance in our country.

Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 sobre el trasplante hepático en la argentina. Otro daño colateral / Impact of COVID-19 pandemic in liver transplantation in Argentina. Other collateral damage

Resumen La pandemia COVID-19 declarada en marzo del 2020, ha generado preocupación mundial por su efecto en la salud de la población y el potencial colapso sanitario. La estrategia de "aplanar la curva" mediante el distanciamiento social permitió adaptar los recursos del sistema de salud a pacientes con COVID-19, pero no se pudo prever su repercusión en otras áreas de la salud. El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar las consecuencias de la pandemia sobre el trasplante hepático en general y por hepatocarcinoma (HCC). Fueron realizados los siguientes estudios: a) un análisis retrospectivo utilizando datos del CRESI/INCUCAI para comparar ingreso en lista de espera, mortalidad en lista, donación y trasplante hepático desde 20/03 a 15/08, 2019 e igual periodo de 2020, y b) una encuesta a los centros de trasplante de mayor actividad trasplantológica para valorar el efecto de las medidas tomadas en diferentes situaciones institucionales y regionales. El primer análisis evidenció una disminución del 55% de los trasplantes hepáticos, con una reducción similar en la donación y en el ingreso a lista de espera hepática; mientras que el trasplante por HCC ascendió de 10% en 2019 a 22% en 2020. El segundo análisis, mostró que la tasa de ocupación de camas por pacientes COVID-19/semana fue variable: de 0.4% al 42.0%. El número de cirugías, hepato-bilio-pancreática, resección de HCC y trasplante hepático, se redujeron en 47%, 49%, 31% y 36% respectivamente. La reducción de la actividad trasplantológica afectó mayormente los centros con alta ocupación por COVID-19. El impacto final a largo plazo deberá evaluarse.

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic declared in March 2020, has generated worldwide concern due to its effect on the health of the population and the potential health collapse. The strategy of "flattening the curve" through social distancing made it possible to adapt the resources of the health system to patients with COVID-19, but results in other areas of health could not be predicted. The objective of this work was to analyze the consequences of the pandemic on liver transplantation in general and for hepatocarcinoma (HCC). The following studies were carried out: a) a retrospective analysis using data from the CRESI / INCUCAI to compare admission to the waiting list, mortality on the list, donation and liver transplantation from 03/20 to 08/15, 2019 and the same period in 2020, and b) a survey of the transplant centers with the highest transplant activity to assess the effect of the measures taken in different institutional and regional situations. The first analysis showed a 55% decrease in liver transplants, with a similar reduction in donation and admission to the liver waiting list; while HCC transplantation rose from 10% in 2019 to 22% in 2020. The second analysis showed that the occupancy rate of beds by COVID-19 patients / week was variable: from 0.4% to 42.0%. The number of surgeries, hepato-bilio-pancreatic, resection of HCC and liver transplantation, were reduced by 47%, 49%, 31% and 36% respectively. The reduction in transplant activity mainly affected centers with high occupancy due to COVID-19. The final long-term outcome will need to be assessed.

Latin American Association for the study of the liver (ALEH) practice guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) currently represents an epidemic worldwide. NAFLD is the most frequently diagnosed chronic liver disease, affecting 20-30% of the general population. Furthermore, its prevalence is predicted to increase exponentially in the next decades, concomitantly with the global epidemic of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and sedentary lifestyle. NAFLD is a clinical syndrome that encompasses a wide spectrum of associated diseases and hepatic complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Moreover, this disease is believed to become the main indication for liver transplantation in the near future. Since NAFLD management represents a growing challenge for primary care physicians, the Asociación Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Hígado (ALEH) has decided to organize this Practice Guidance for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, written by Latin-American specialists in different clinical areas, and destined to general practitioners, internal medicine specialists, endocrinologists, diabetologists, gastroenterologists, and hepatologists. The main purpose of this document is to improve patient care and awareness of NAFLD. The information provided in this guidance may also be useful in assisting stakeholders in the decision-making process related to NAFLD. Since new evidence is constantly emerging on different aspects of the disease, updates to this guideline will be required in future.

Argentinian clinical practice guideline for surveillance, diagnosis, staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

The A.A.E.E.H has developed this guideline for the best care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Argentina. It was done from May 2018 to March 2020. Specific clinical research questions were systematically searched. The quality of evidence and level of recommendations were organized according to GRADE. HCC surveillance is strongly recommended with abdominal ultrasound (US) every six months in the population at risk for HCC (cirrhosis, hepatitis B or hepatitis C); it is suggested to add alpha-feto protein (AFP) levels in case of inexeperienced sonographers. Imaging diagnosis in patients at risk for HCC has high specificity and tumor biopsy is not mandatory. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer algorithm is strongly recommended for HCC staging and treatment-decision processes. Liver resection is strongly recommended for patients without portal hypertension and preserved liver function. Composite models are suggested for liver transplant selection criteria. Therapies for HCC with robust clinical evidence include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and first to second line systemic treatment options (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab). Immunotherapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab has failed to show statistical benefit but the novel combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has recently shown survival benefit over sorafenib in frontline.

[Impact of COVID-19 pandemic in liver transplantation in Argentina. Other collateral damage]. / Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 sobre el trasplante hepático en la Argentina. Otro daño colateral.

The COVID-19 pandemic declared in March 2020, has generated worldwide concern due to its effect on the health of the population and the potential health collapse. The strategy of "flattening the curve" through social distancing made it possible to adapt the resources of the health system to patients with COVID-19, but results in other areas of health could not be predicted. The objective of this work was to analyze the consequences of the pandemic on liver transplantation in general and for hepatocarcinoma (HCC). The following studies were carried out: a) a retrospective analysis using data from the CRESI / INCUCAI to compare admission to the waiting list, mortality on the list, donation and liver transplantation from 03/20 to 08/15, 2019 and the same period in 2020, and b) a survey of the transplant centers with the highest transplant activity to assess the effect of the measures taken in different institutional and regional situations. The first analysis showed a 55% decrease in liver transplants, with a similar reduction in donation and admission to the liver waiting list; while HCC transplantation rose from 10% in 2019 to 22% in 2020. The second analysis showed that the occupancy rate of beds by COVID-19 patients / week was variable: from 0.4% to 42.0%. The number of surgeries, hepato-bilio-pancreatic, resection of HCC and liver transplantation, were reduced by 47%, 49%, 31% and 36% respectively. The reduction in transplant activity mainly affected centers with high occupancy due to COVID-19. The final long-term outcome will need to be assessed.

La pandemia COVID-19 declarada en marzo del 2020, ha generado preocupación mundial por su efecto en la salud de la población y el potencial colapso sanitario. La estrategia de "aplanar la curva" mediante el distanciamiento social permitió adaptar los recursos del sistema de salud a pacientes con COVID-19, pero no se pudo prever su repercusión en otras áreas de la salud. El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar las consecuencias de la pandemia sobre el trasplante hepático en general y por hepatocarcinoma (HCC). Fueron realizados los siguientes estudios: a) un análisis retrospectivo utilizando datos del CRESI/INCUCAI para comparar ingreso en lista de espera, mortalidad en lista, donación y trasplante hepático desde 20/03 a 15/08, 2019 e igual periodo de 2020, y b) una encuesta a los centros de trasplante de mayor actividad trasplantológica para valorar el efecto de las medidas tomadas en diferentes situaciones institucionales y regionales. El primer análisis evidenció una disminución del 55% de los trasplantes hepáticos, con una reducción similar en la donación y en el ingreso a lista de espera hepática; mientras que el trasplante por HCC ascendió de 10% en 2019 a 22% en 2020. El segundo análisis, mostró que la tasa de ocupación de camas por pacientes COVID-19/semana fue variable: de 0.4% al 42.0%. El número de cirugías, hepato-bilio-pancreática, resección de HCC y trasplante hepático, se redujeron en 47%, 49%, 31% y 36% respectivamente. La reducción de la actividad trasplantológica afectó mayormente los centros con alta ocupación por COVID-19. El impacto final a largo plazo deberá evaluarse.

Trends in liver transplantation for hepatitis C in a country with reduced access to direct-acting antiviral agents.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Access to effective HCV treatment is inequitable globally. We aimed to analyze whether the introduction of effective HCV treatment caused an impact in LT trends in a middle-income country. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of all adult patients who were listed/received a LT in Argentina for HCV, alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), or autoimmune hepatitis/primary biliary cirrhosis (AIH/PBC) from 2007 to 2017. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to identify changes in the cumulative incidence rates in waiting list (WL) registration, WL mortality, and LT. RESULTS: Liver transplantation WL for HCV increased significantly between 2007 and 2014, with an annual percentage change (APC) +7.8%, P = .01, followed by a downward slope from 2014 to 2017 with an APC -9.8%, P = .1. There were no significant changes in WL mortality. LT trends remained stable. LT for HCV without MELD exception points for HCC decreased (APC -6.6%, P = .01), whereas LT for HCV with HCC exception points increased (APC +11.1, P = .01) during the study period. CONCLUSION: Waiting list and LT for HCV without HCC decreased, whereas LT for HCV and HCC increased; this may be related to selective antiviral treatment access for patients with advanced fibrosis.

Visceral Kaposi's sarcoma remission after intestinal transplant. First case report and systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is an infrequent vascular neoplasm commonly diagnosed as an isolated cutaneous lesion that can involve other organs. So far, there are no data in the literature about the development of KS after intestinal transplant. METHODS: In this study, the authors describe a case of "visceral KS" with pulmonary and intestinal involvement and perform a systematic literature review of case reports and single-center series identified in MEDLINE. RESULTS: This case was a 42-year-old man, diagnosed with visceral KS 9 months after receiving an isolated intestinal transplant. He was successfully treated with a combination of sirolimus and liposomal doxorubicin and achieved an 18-month disease-free survival. A total of 54 cases from 27 manuscripts and the present case were analyzed in this study. The mean time from transplant to diagnosis was 17.2 months. Lungs and gastrointestinal tract were the main organs involved. Immunosuppressants were discontinued in two of the three (66.7%) cases, and sirolimus was added in eight cases. Doxorubicin was used in 12 cases. In a univariate analysis, the use of Tacrolimus, type of transplant, and presence of cutaneous KS seem to be the significant predictors of response to therapy and survival; the addition of doxorubicin showed a reduction in graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of KS in posttransplant patients should be designed aiming to obtain a complete response, irrespective of the organ affected. Only recipients who are able to achieve a sustained response would be able to obtain long-term disease-free survival.

[Indications and timing of liver transplantation]. / Indicaciones y oportunidad del trasplante hepático.

Liver transplantation (OLT) is indicated in patients with severe and irreversible acute or chronic liver disease without alternative therapy and in the absence of contraindications. Indications for OLT can be grouped in four categories, namely cirrhosis, fulminant hepatitis, malignant hepatic tumors and liver-based genetic defects that trigger damage of other organs. Patients with cirrhosis should be referred for OLT after the onset of any of the major complications or coagulopathy. Early referral is crucial in fulminant hepatitis due to the high mortality with medical therapy and the unpredictable nature of this condition. Ideal timing for OLT is the moment in the natural history of the disease when the expected survival of patients on the waiting list is higher with than without OLT. Recent data suggest that maximal benefit of OLT is obtained in patients with a MELD score >15. However, in some cases with no imminent risk of death, OLT is indicated to improve quality of life or to prevent contraindications such as progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. At present, there is a marked disproportion between the number of donors available and the growing number of patients listed worldwide, which in turn has resulted in prolongation of the time-interval to OLT and waitlist mortality. The rationale of allocation systems utilizing the MELD score is to prioritize on the waiting list patients with severe liver dysfunction ("the sickest first") and those with hepatocellular carcinoma who may loose the benefits of OLT when waitlist time exceeds eight months.

Indicaciones y oportunidad del trasplante hepático / Indications and timing of liver transplantation

El trasplante hepático (TH) está indicado en pacientes con enfermedades hepáticas agudas o crónicas severas e irreversibles para las cuales no exista un tratamiento alternativo y en ausencia de contraindicaciones. Las indicaciones de TH pueden ser agrupadas en cuatro categorías: cirrosis hepática, hepatitis fulminante, tumores hepáticos y defectos genéticos de origen hepático que producen daño en otros órganos. Deben ser derivados para TH los pacientes con cirrosis que desarrollen cualquier complicación mayor o coagulopatía. La derivación precoz es "la clave del éxito" en la hepatitis fulminante por el alto riesgo de muerte y por tener una evolución mayormente impredecible. La oportunidad del TH es el momento en la historia natural de la hepatopatía cuando la sobrevida esperada es mayor con TH que en lista de espera. Estudios recientes han sugerido que el máximo beneficio del TH se obtiene en pacientes con MELD >15. Sin embargo, en algunos casos sin riesgo de muerte inminente, el objetivo del TH es mejorar la calidad de vida o prevenir contraindicaciones como la progresión del hepatocarcinoma cuando el tiempo de espera excede los 8 meses. Actualmente existe una marcada desproporción entre el número de donantes disponibles y el número creciente de potenciales receptores, lo que ha determinado un incremento progresivo del tiempo y mortalidad en lista. La racionalidad de distribuir los órganos en base al score de MELD es otorgar prioridad en la lista a los candidatos más enfermos y a aquellos que no pueden esperar como los pacientes con hepatocarcinoma.

Liver transplantation (OLT) is indicated in patients with severe and irreversible acute or chronic liver disease without alternative therapy and in the absence of contraindications. Indications for OLT can be grouped in four categories, namely cirrhosis, fulminant hepatitis, malignant hepatic tumors and liver-based genetic defects that trigger damage of other organs. Patients with cirrhosis should be referred for OLT after the onset of any of the major complications or coagulopathy. Early referral is crucial in fulminant hepatitis due to the high mortality with medical therapy and the unpredictable nature of this condition. Ideal timing for OLT is the moment in the natural history of the disease when the expected survival of patients on the waiting list is higher with than without OLT. Recent data suggest that maximal benefit of OLT is obtained in patients with a MELD score >15. However, in some cases with no imminent risk of death, OLT is indicated to improve quality of life or to prevent contraindications such as progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. At present, there is a marked disproportion between the number of donors available and the growing number of patients listed worldwide, which in turn has resulted in prolongation of the time-interval to OLT and waitlist mortality. The rationale of allocation systems utilizing the MELD score is to prioritize on the waiting list patients with severe liver dysfunction ("the sickest first") and those with hepatocellular carcinoma who may loose the benefits of OLT when waitlist time exceeds eight months.

Early and frequent histological recurrence of Crohn's disease in small intestinal allografts.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence of Crohn's disease in small intestinal allografts, although rarely described, can cause serious morbidity and jeopardize graft survival among transplant recipients with Crohn's disease. However, systematic studies to determine the frequency, predictors, and clinical implications of recurrent Crohn's disease have not been reported METHODS: We analyzed our transplant program's experience with small intestinal allografts in patients with Crohn's disease based on retrospective review of clinical and pathological records and corresponding pathology slides. RESULTS: Of 67 patients undergoing 70 transplantations between 1998 and 2004, six adults (three males, three females; mean age 48.1 years) had Crohn's disease complicated by short gut syndrome and total parenteral nutrition failure. Four survivors surveyed endoscopically for a mean 29 (range, 20-40) months and underwent a mean 37 endoscopic examinations with biopsies (range, 31-44) while on maintenance immunosuppression. Despite absence of any endoscopic or clinical manifestations of Crohn's disease throughout this period, two patients had granulomatous enteritis characteristic of Crohn's disease in multiple biopsies, one patient in 8/44 examinations (18%) ranging from 34 days to 20 months postoperatively and the other in 6/32 examinations (19%) ranging from 20 days to 22 months postoperatively. No comparable changes occurred in 57 other patients without Crohn's disease followed endoscopically under the same protocol CONCLUSIONS: Histological recurrence of Crohn's disease may occur in small intestinal allografts despite the absence of endoscopic and clinical disease manifestations. Such recurrences are probably not rare, may occur as early as 3 weeks after transplantation, and do not necessarily portend early clinical recurrence or mandate aggressive therapy to prevent allograft loss.