Mixed hemodiafiltration reduces erythropoiesis stimulating agents requirement in dialysis patients: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Improved responsiveness to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients on on-line post-dilution hemodiafiltration (Post-HDF) compared with conventional hemodialysis (HD) was reported by some authors but challenged by others. This prospective, cross-over randomized study tested the hypothesis that an alternative infusion modality of HDF, mixed-dilution HDF (Mixed HDF), could further reduce ESAs requirement in dialysis patients compared to the traditional Post-HDF. METHODS: One-hundred-twenty prevalent patients from 6 Dialysis Centers were randomly assigned to two six-months treatment sequences: A-B and B-A (A, Mixed HDF; B, Post-HDF). Primary outcome was comparative evaluation of ESA (darbepoetin alfa) requirement and ESA resistance. Treatments efficiency, iron and vitamins status, inflammation and nutrition parameters were monitored. RESULTS: In sequence A, darbepoetin requirement decreased during Mixed HDF from 29.5 to 23.7 µg/month and increased significantly during Post-HDF (32.3 µg/month at 6th month) while, in sequence B, it increased during Post-HDF from 38.2 to 43.7 µg/month and decreased during Mixed HDF (23.9 µg/month at 6th month). Overall, EPO doses at 6 months on Mixed and Post-HDF were 23.8 and 38.4 µg/month, respectively, P < 0.01. A multiple linear model confirmed that Mixed HDF vs Post-HDF reduced significantly ESA requirement and ESA resistance (P < 0.0001), by a mean of 29% (CI 23-35%) in the last three months of the observation periods. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed HDF decreased darbepoetin-alfa requirement in dialysis patients. This might help preventing the untoward side effects of high ESA doses, besides having a remarkable economic impact. Additional evidence is needed to confirm this potential benefit of Mixed-HDF.

Effects of high-volume online mixed-hemodiafiltration on anemia management in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a major comorbidity of patients with end-stage renal disease and poses an enormous economic burden to health-care systems. High dose erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. We explored whether mixed-dilution hemodiafiltration (Mixed-HDF), based on its innovative substitution modality, may improve anemia outcomes compared to the traditional post-dilution hemodiafiltration (Post-HDF). METHODS: We included 174 adult prevalent dialysis patients (87 on Mixed-HDF, 87 on Post-HDF) treated in 24 NephroCare dialysis centers between January 2010 and August 2016 into this retrospective cohort study. All patients were dialyzed three times per week and had fistula/graft as vascular access. Patients were matched at baseline and followed over a one-year period. The courses of hemoglobin levels (Hb) and monthly ESA consumption were compared between the two groups with linear mixed models. RESULTS: Mean baseline Hb was 11.9±1.3 and 11.8±1.1g/dl in patients on Mixed- and Post-HDF, respectively. While Hb remained stable in patients on Mixed-HDF, it decreased slightly in patients on Post-HDF (at month 12: 11.8±1.2 vs 11.1±1.2g/dl). This tendency was confirmed by our linear mixed model (p = 0.0514 for treatment x time interaction). Baseline median ESA consumption was 6000 [Q1:0;Q3:16000] IU/4 weeks in both groups. Throughout the observation period ESA doses tended to be lower in the Mixed-HDF group (4000 [Q1:0;Q3:16000] vs 8000 [Q1:0;Q3:20000] IU/4 weeks at month 12; p = 0.0791 for treatment x time interaction). Sensitivity analyses, adjusting for differences not covered by matching at baseline, strengthened our results (Hb: p = 0.0124; ESA: p = 0.0687). CONCLUSIONS: Results of our explorative study suggest that patients on Mixed-HDF may have clinical benefits in terms of anemia management. This may also have a beneficial economic impact. Future studies are needed to confirm our hypothesis-generating results and to provide additional evidence on the potential beneficial effects of Mixed-HDF.

Intravitreal bevacizumab for surgical treatment of severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role, the safety and the effectiveness of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections as an adjunct to vitrectomy in the management of severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DESIGN: Case-Control Study METHODS: Randomized controlled trial performed on 72 eyes of 68 patients affected by vitreous haemorrhage (VH) and tractional retinal detachment (TRD), which occurred as a consequence of active proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). We randomly assigned eligible patients in a 1: 1: 1 ratio to receive a sham injection or an intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg of bevacizumab, either 7 or 20 days before the vitrectomy. In order to obtain three homogeneous groups of surgical complexity, we assigned to the following preoperative parameters a score from 0 to 3: a) vitreous haemorrhage, b) prior retinal laser-photocoagulation, c) morphological types of retinal detachment such as focal, hammock, central diffuse, table-top. Complete ophthalmic examinations and color fundus photography were performed at baseline and 1, 6, 12, and 24 weeks after the surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative management, safety, efficacy of IVB at different time injection as an adjunct to vitrectomy in the management of severe PDR RESULTS: Group A (sham injection): intraoperative bleeding occurred in 19 cases (79.1%), the use of endodiathermy was necessary in 13 patients (54.1%), relaxing retinotomy was performed on one patient (4.1%), and in four cases (16.6%) iatrogenic retinal breaks occurred. The surgical mean time was 84 minutes (SD 12 minutes). Group B (bevacizumab administered 7 days before vitrectomy): intraoperative bleeding occurred in two cases (8.3%) and the use of endodiathermy was necessary in two patients (8.3%). No iatrogenic breaks occurred during the surgery. The surgical mean time was 65 minutes (SD 18 minutes). Group C (bevacizumab administered 20 days before vitrectomy): intraoperative bleeding occurred in three cases (12.5%), the use of endodiathermy was necessary in three patients (1.5%), and an iatrogenic break occurred in one patient (4.1%) while the delamination of fibrovascular tissue was being performed. The surgical mean time was 69 minutes (SD 21 minutes). The average difference in the surgical time was statistically significant between group A and group B (p = 0.025), and between group A and group C (p = 0.031). At the end of the surgery, the retina was completely attached in all eyes. At the 6-month follow-up, we observed the development of tractional retinal detachment (TRD) in one out of 24 patients from group C (4%). CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative intravitreal injection of bevacizumab may represent a new strategy for the surgical treatment of severe PDR by reducing retinal and iris neovascularization: this would make surgery much easier and safer, thus improving the anatomical and functional prognosis. According to our study, the best surgical results are achieved performing the IVB 7 days preoperatively.