Immunotherapy time of infusion impacts survival in head and neck cancer: A propensity score matched analysis.

The adaptive immune response is physiologically regulated by the circadian rhythm. Data in lung and melanoma malignancies suggests immunotherapy infusions earlier in the day may be associated with improved response; however, the optimal time of administration for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is not known. We aimed to evaluate the association of immunotherapy infusion time with overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with HNSCC in an Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective cohort study. 113 patients met study inclusion criteria and 98 patients were included in a propensity score-matched cohort. In the full unmatched cohort (N = 113), each additional 20 % of infusions received after 1500 h conferred an OS hazard ratio (HR) of 1.35 (95 % C.I.1.2-1.6; p-value = 0.0003) and a PFS HR of 1.34 (95 % C.I.1.2-1.6; p-value < 0.0001). A propensity score-matched analysis of patients who did or did not receive ≥20 % of infusions after 1500 h showed that those who were administered ≥20 % of infusions after 1500 h trended towards a shorter OS (HR = 1.35; p-value = 0.26) and a shorter PFS (HR = 1.57, 95 % C.I. 1.02-2.42, p-value = 0.04). Each additional 20 % of infusions received after 1500 h remained robust in the matched cohort multivariable analysis and was associated with shorter OS (adjusted HR = 1.4 (95 % C.I.1.2-1.8), p-value < 0.001). Patients with advanced HNSCC who received more of their infusions in the afternoon were associated with shorter OS and PFS and scheduling immunotherapy infusions earlier in the day may be warranted.

Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative PCR, Digital Droplet PCR, and Next-Generation Sequencing Liquid Biopsies for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancers.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers, including oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC), cervical cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (HPV + SCCA), release circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA) into the blood. The diagnostic performance of ctHPVDNA detection depends on the approaches used and the individual assay metrics. A comparison of these approaches has not been systematically performed to inform expected performance, which in turn affects clinical interpretation. A meta-analysis was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection databases to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ctHPVDNA detection across cancer anatomic sites, detection platforms, and blood components. The population included patients with HPV + OPSCC, HPV-associated cervical cancer, and HPV + SCCA with pretreatment samples analyzed by quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), or next-generation sequencing (NGS). Thirty-six studies involving 2986 patients met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, and quality of each study were assessed and pooled for each analysis. The sensitivity of ctHPVDNA detection was greatest with NGS, followed by ddPCR and then qPCR when pooling all studies, whereas specificity was similar (sensitivity: ddPCR > qPCR, P < 0.001; NGS > ddPCR, P = 0.014). ctHPVDNA from OPSCC was more easily detected compared with cervical cancer and SCCA, overall (P = 0.044). In conclusion, detection platform, anatomic site of the cancer, and blood component used affects ctHPVDNA detection and must be considered when interpreting results. Plasma NGS-based testing may be the most sensitive approach for ctHPVDNA overall.