Incidence and management of mallet finger in Dutch primary care: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A mallet finger (MF) is diagnosed clinically and can be managed in primary care. The actual incidence of MF and how it is managed in primary care is unknown. AIM: To determine the incidence of MF in primary care and to obtain estimates for the proportions of osseous and tendon MF. An additional aim was to gain insight into the management of patients diagnosed with MF in primary care. DESIGN & SETTING: A cohort study using a healthcare registration database from general practice in the Netherlands. METHOD: Patients aged ≥18 years with a new diagnosis of MF from 1 January 2015-31 December 2019 were selected using a search algorithm based on International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) coding. RESULTS: In total, 161 cases of MF were identified. The mean incidence was 0.58 per 1000 person-years. A radiograph was taken in 58% (n = 93) of cases; 23% (n = 37) of cases had an osseous MF. The most applied strategies were referral to secondary care (45%) or conservative treatment in GP practice (43%). Overall, 7% were referred to a paramedical professional. CONCLUSION: On average, a Dutch GP assesses ≥1 patient with MF per year. Since only a minimal number of patients required surgical treatment and a limited number of GPs requested radiography, the recommendation in the guidelines to perform radiography in all patients with MF should potentially be reconsidered. The purpose of requesting radiographs should not be to distinguish between a tendinogenic or osseous MF, but to assess whether there is a possible indication for surgery.

Hip dysplasia as risk factor for clinically relevant and radiographic hip osteoarthritis: 10-year results from the CHECK cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate hip dysplasia as a risk factor for clinically relevant and incident radiographic hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: From a prospective cohort (CHECK) of 1002 middle-aged, new consulters for hip and/or knee pain, 468 hips (251 individuals) were selected based on hip pain, available lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and absence of definite radiographic hip OA (Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KL) <2) at baseline, as well as available follow-up measures. Clinically relevant hip OA was defined by an expert diagnosis based on clinical and radiographic data obtained between year 5-10 from baseline. Incident radiographic hip OA was defined by KL grade ≥2 or a total hip replacement at the 10-year follow-up. Associations between hip dysplasia (LCEA ≤20°) and outcomes were expressed in odds ratios (OR) adjusted for age, sex and BMI. RESULTS: At baseline, participants had a mean age of 55.5 years (SD 5.4), 88% were female and, on hip level, the prevalence of hip dysplasia was 3.6% (n = 17). After 10 years, hip dysplasia was associated with an increased risk for clinically relevant hip OA (OR 2.80 (95% CI 1.15, 6.79), but not for incident radiographic hip OA (OR 0.78 (95% CI 0.26, 2.30)). CONCLUSION: In the long term, baseline hip dysplasia was associated with an increased risk for clinically relevant hip OA, but not for incident radiographic hip OA. With this in mind, we suggest that future research investigating the link between hip dysplasia and OA strive to include a definition for OA that is clinically relevant.

Arthritis Foundation/HSS Workshop on Hip Osteoarthritis, Part 1: Epidemiology, Early Development, and Cohorts From Around the World.

Far more publications are available for osteoarthritis of the knee than of the hip. Recognizing this research gap, the Arthritis Foundation, in partnership with the Hospital for Special Surgery, convened an in-person meeting of thought leaders to review the state of the science of and clinical approaches to hip osteoarthritis. This article summarizes the recommendations and clinical research gaps gleaned from 5 presentations given in the "how hip osteoarthritis begins" session of the 2023 Hip Osteoarthritis Clinical Studies Conference, which took place on February 17 and 18, 2023, in New York City.

Risk Factors and Population-Attributable Fractions for Incident Hip Osteoarthritis.

Background: Despite the huge burden of hip osteoarthritis (OA) and the lack of effective treatment, research into the primary prevention of hip OA is in its infancy. Purpose: We sought to evaluate risk factors for incident clinical and incident radiographic hip OA among middle-aged and older adults, to evaluate the importance of risk factors from a preventive perspective, and to estimate the percentage of new cases attributable to these risk factors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from the Rotterdam study, an open-population cohort study of individuals aged 55 years or older. Data including baseline age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, education level, diagnosis of diabetes, C-reactive protein (CRP), cam morphology, acetabular dysplasia, radiographic thumb OA, radiographic hip OA, and hip pain were assessed for their association with incident clinical hip OA and incident radiographic hip OA separately, after 11 years of follow-up. The population-attributable fractions (PAFs) of statistically significant modifiable risk factors were calculated, as well. Results: New onset of clinical hip OA was seen in 19.9% (544 of 2729) and incident radiographic hip OA in 9.9% (329 of 3309). Female sex, education level below average (PAF 21.4%), and radiographic hip OA (PAF 3.4%) were statistically significantly associated with incident clinical hip OA. Female sex, age, overweight (PAF 20.0%), cam morphology (PAF 7.9%), acetabular dysplasia (PAF 3.6%), and radiographic thumb OA (PAF 4.7%) were statistically significantly associated with radiographic hip OA. Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis suggests that, from a primary prevention perspective, the most important modifiable risk factors among middle-aged and older individuals may be low educational level for incident clinical hip OA and overweight for incident radiographic hip OA. Further study is warranted.

Diagnostic accuracy of history taking, physical examination and imaging for non-chronic finger, hand and wrist ligament and tendon injuries: a systematic review update.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic work-up for ligament and tendon injuries of the finger, hand and wrist consists of history taking, physical examination and imaging if needed, but the supporting evidence is limited. The main purpose of this study was to systematically update the literature for studies on the diagnostic accuracy of tests for detecting non-chronic ligament and tendon injuries of the finger, hand and wrist. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar ProQuest and Cinahl were searched from 2000 up to 6 February 2019 for identifying studies. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 checklist, and sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were extracted. RESULTS: None of the studies involved history taking. Physical examination, for diagnosing lesions of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), showed Se, Sp, accuracy, PPV and NPV ranging from 58% to 90%, 20% to 69%, 56% to 73%, 53% to 71% and 55% to 65%, respectively. Physical examination in hand and finger injuries the Se, Sp, accuracy, PPV and NPV ranged from 88% to 99%, 75% to 100%, 34% to 88%, 91% to 100% and 75% to 95%, respectively. The accuracy of MRI with high-resolution (3 T) techniques for TFCC and interosseous ligaments of the proximal carpal row ranged from 89% to 91% and 75% to 100%, respectively. The accuracy of MRI with low-resolution (1.5 T) techniques for TFCC and interosseous ligaments of the proximal carpal row ranged from 81% to 100% and 67% to 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of history taking and physical examination for non-chronic finger, hand and wrist ligament and tendon injuries. Although some imaging modalities seemed to be acceptable for the diagnosis of ligament and tendon injuries in the wrist in patients presenting to secondary care, there is no evidence-based advise possible for the diagnosis of non-chronic finger, hand or wrist ligament and tendon injuries in primary care.

Long-term effects of a randomized, controlled, tailor-made weight-loss intervention in primary care on the health and lifestyle of overweight and obese women.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance of weight loss after a diet and exercise intervention is often low. Moreover, short follow-up periods and high attrition rates often impede translation of study results to clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The present study evaluated the long-term effectiveness of a randomized, tailor-made lifestyle intervention, consisting of diet and exercise, on the health and lifestyle of overweight, middle-aged women in primary care. DESIGN: The intervention was part of a randomized controlled trial on the prevention of knee osteoarthritis [PROOF (PRevention of knee Osteoarthritis in Overweight Females) study]. The intervention lasted 2.5 y and consisted of visits to the dietitian and participation in physical activity classes, supervised by a physiotherapist. The outcome of main interest of the present study was weight change (in kg) 6-7 y after randomization. Additionally, the intervention's effect on change in physical activity was investigated. RESULTS: After 6 mo, weight loss was significantly higher in the intervention group (adjusted difference: 1.34 kg; 95% CI: 0.46, 2.22 kg). Over time, this difference decreased and became nonsignificant after 24 mo. Per-protocol analyses showed similar results. After 6 mo, change in physical activity was significantly higher in the intervention group (15.2%; 95% CI: 28.6%, 1.7%). Over time, this difference increased up to 29.8% (95% CI: 2.3%, 57.2%) after 6.6 y of follow-up. Per-protocol analyses showed no significant differences in change in physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: A long-lasting intervention effect on change in physical activity was found, which increased over time. For weight change, smaller differences were found, which decreased over time. In future research, greater intervention effects on weight change are expected when higher compliance rates can be reached. The present study provides important recommendations for future research. The PROOF study was registered at http://www.isrctn.com as ISRCTN42823086.

Biomarkers for osteoarthritis: Can they be used for risk assessment? A systematic review.

The identification of early biochemical predictors of osteoarthritis (OA) has been the focus of much research over the past few years. However, it still is unclear whether current biochemical markers can be used in prognostic risk assessment of OA. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the possible prognostic application of blood and urinary biochemical markers of knee and hip OA. Abstract and full text selection was done by two independent reviewers. A total of 25 relevant publications including 37 biochemical markers of bone and cartilage turnover and inflammation associated with some aspects of OA were reviewed. Most of those biomarkers were studied only once or twice. Due to heterogeneity of both OA-phenotype and determinant among the publications, meta-analysis of the studied biochemical markers was not possible. There was strong evidence for urinary C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type II (uCTX-II) as a prognostic marker for knee OA progression and serum cartilage oligomeric protein (COMP) level as prognostic marker for incidence of knee and hip OA. Evidence for prognostic value of C-reactive protein is still inconclusive. International standardization of future investigations should be pursued to obtain more high-quality, homogenous data on the full spectrum of biochemical OA markers.

What Are the Prognostic Factors for Radiographic Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis? A Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A previous systematic review on prognostic factors for knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression showed associations for generalized OA and hyaluronic acid levels. Knee pain, radiographic severity, sex, quadriceps strength, knee injury, and regular sport activities were not associated. It has been a decade since the literature search of that review and many studies have been performed since then investigating prognostic factors for radiographic knee OA progression. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to provide an updated systematic review of available evidence regarding prognostic factors for radiographic knee OA progression. METHODS: We searched for observational studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Key words were: knee, osteoarthritis (or arthritis, or arthrosis, or degenerative joint disease), progression (or prognosis, or precipitate, or predictive), and case-control (or cohort, or longitudinal, or follow-up). Studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodologic quality according to established criteria for reviews on prognostic factors in musculoskeletal disorders. Data were extracted and results were pooled if possible or summarized according to a best-evidence synthesis. A total of 1912 additional articles were identified; 43 met our inclusion criteria. The previous review contained 36 articles, thus providing a new total of 79 articles. Seventy-two of the included articles were scored high quality, the remaining seven were low quality. RESULTS: The pooled odds ratio (OR) of two determinants showed associations with knee OA progression: baseline knee pain (OR, 2.38 [95% CI, 1.74-3.27) and Heberden nodes (OR, 2.66 [95% CI, 1.46-8.84]). Our best-evidence synthesis showed strong evidence that varus alignment, serum hyaluronic acid, and tumor necrosis factor-α are associated with knee OA progression. There is strong evidence that sex, former knee injury, quadriceps strength, smoking, running, and regular performance of sports are not associated with knee OA progression. Evidence for the majority of determined associations, however, was limited, conflicting, or inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline knee pain, presence of Heberden nodes, varus alignment, and high levels of serum markers hyaluronic acid and tumor necrosis factor-α predict knee OA progression. Sex, knee injury, and quadriceps strength, among others, did not predict knee OA progression. Large variation remains in definitions of knee OA and knee OA progression. Clinical studies should use more consistent definitions of these factors to facilitate data pooling by future meta-analyses.