Timing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy start for patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The ideal timing for the initiation of chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) in the use of definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for patients with head and neck cancer is not well established. We sought to evaluate the impact of the timing of initiating these two modalities on clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who were treated using definitive chemoradiation from 2012 to 2018 were identified. Patients undergoing re-irradiation, post-op CRT, had recurrent or second primaries, or ECOG 3-4 were excluded. Outcomes including locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated and compared between subgroups of the cohort based on the timing in which chemotherapy or RT were initiated: chemotherapy first, same day start, within 24 h, or start on Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were included for analysis consisting of oropharynx (64%), larynx (22.9%), nasopharynx (6.9%), hypopharynx (3.1%), oral cavity (1.5%), and unknown primary (1.5%). Chemotherapy was administered as bolus cisplatin every 3 weeks in 40% of patients and weekly cisplatin in 60% with a median cumulative dose of 240 mg/m2. In the multivariable analysis (MVA), starting chemotherapy before RT was associated with improved LRC (HR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.99). Three-year LRC for patients starting chemotherapy first was 90.9% compared to 78.2% in those starting RT first. In the MVA, cisplatin regimen and cumulative cisplatin dose were associated with improved OS, while no factors were significantly associated with DC or PFS. CONCLUSION: Starting chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy improves LRC, but did not impact DC, PFS, or OS. Clinical outcomes were not different when stratifying by the other differences in the timing of initiating chemotherapy or RT.

Safety of propranolol for infantile hemangioma in infants less than five weeks corrected age.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Propranolol is used to treat problematic infantile hemangiomas (IHs), but its safety in infants <5 weeks corrected age has not been established. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of propranolol for treatment of IH in infants <5 weeks corrected age, or 45 weeks corrected gestational age (CGA). METHODS: We performed a single institution, retrospective review of patients treated with propranolol prior to the age of 6 months between 2017 and 2021. Patient characteristics, location of hemangioma(s), weight at initiation of treatment, dosing information, side effects, response, and duration of treatment were documented. RESULTS: Of 200 patients with IH treated with propranolol, 24 started treatment prior to 45 weeks CGA. Mean CGA at initiation of treatment was 42 weeks. Sixty-seven percent were female and 75% were white, non-Hispanic. Mean duration of treatment was 255 days. Twenty-two patients (92%) had clear benefit from treatment at a dose of 1-3 mg/kg/day. The most common side effects were sleep disturbance (21%), irritability (17%), and cool hands/feet (13%). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of 24 patients with corrected age <5 weeks (CGA <45 weeks), propranolol was safe and effective for the treatment of infantile hemangiomas. Larger, prospective studies are indicated to investigate propranolol in this age group.

Assessment of rasburicase utilization for tumor lysis syndrome management in pediatric and adult patients in the inpatient and outpatient settings.

INTRODUCTION: At Wake Forest Baptist Health, an adult tumor lysis syndrome pocket card was created in order to optimize management of tumor lysis syndrome and outline specific recommendations for the use of rasburicase. Due to the increased use of rasburicase at our institution and its cost, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the utilization of rasburicase for the management of tumor lysis syndrome in pediatric and adult patients in the inpatient and outpatient settings. METHODS: This was an observational, single-center, non-randomized, retrospective chart review conducted between September 2018 and August 2019. The primary objective was to evaluate the utilization of rasburicase and appropriateness for the management of tumor lysis syndrome in pediatric and adult patients based on the Wake Forest Baptist Health tumor lysis syndrome pocket card. The secondary objectives were to assess response to prophylactic and treatment doses of rasburicase and to quantify drug cost versus expense of rasburicase utilization. RESULTS: Overall, 64 patients (57 adults and 7 pediatric patients) were included in the study. Rasburicase use for tumor lysis syndrome indication adhered to the pocket card 64% of the time. Appropriate fluids and/or allopurinol were initiated in only 34% of patients. For monitoring, 80% of patients had all necessary tumor lysis syndrome laboratory values collected after rasburicase administration. All 11 patients (17%) who received rasburicase in the outpatient setting did not have follow-up labs collected. Of the patients who had tumor lysis syndrome laboratory values collected post rasburicase, 39% were appropriately timed to accurately assess efficacy of rasburicase with the median time of laboratory monitoring after rasburicase being 6.5 h. Response was observed with rasburicase 3 mg (92%), 6 mg (100%), and weight-based dosing (100%). The wholesale acquisition cost per patient was $5203 (1101-10,406). The potential cost savings of using the 3 mg dose versus the 6 mg dose for the patients who did not meet tumor lysis syndrome treatment recommendations based on the Wake Forest Baptist Health pocket card was estimated to be $36,419.46. CONCLUSION: There are several opportunities for improvement in tumor lysis syndrome management and rasburicase utilization at our institution. This study will lead to the implementation of formal restrictions for rasburicase use and selection of rasburicase dose. Updating the rasburicase order panel to include appropriate prophylaxis and require input of uric acid level, populating pertinent tumor lysis syndrome laboratory values on the order verification screen for pharmacists to appropriately assess if rasburicase meets the institution restriction criteria, and providing education to providers on the appropriate ordering and timing of labs.