Effect of Antibiotic Administration Before Joint Aspiration on Synovial Fluid White Blood Cell Count in Native Joint Septic Arthritis.

Background: This study was performed to assess the impact of preaspiration antibiotics on synovial fluid analysis and timing of operative treatment in native-joint septic arthritis. Methods: We performed a retrospective record review of adult patients from an urban level 1 trauma center with native joint septic arthritis in 2015-2019, identified by means of codes from the International Classification of Diseases (Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine whether antibiotics were associated with lower synovial fluid white blood cell counts (WBCs), the percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMNs), and rate of culture positivity. Secondary analysis included time elapsed from aspiration to surgery. Results: Of the 126 patients with septic joints included, nearly two-thirds (n = 80 [63.5%]) received antibiotics before joint aspiration. The synovial fluid WBC count, percentage of PMNs, and rate of culture positivity were significantly lower in patients who received preaspiration antibiotics than in those who did not (mean WBC count, 51 379.1/µL [standard deviation, 52 576.3/µL] vs 92 162.7/µL [59 330.6/µL], respectively [P < .001]; PMN percentage, 83.6% [20.5%] vs 91.9% [6.0%; P = .01]; and culture positivity, 32.5% vs 59.1% [P = .008]). Multivariable analyses revealed that these associations remained after controlling for potential confounders (change in PMNs, -42 784.60/µL [95% confidence interval, -65 355/µL to -20 213.90/µL [P < .001]; change in PMNs, -7.8% [-13.7% to -1.8%] [P = .01]; odds ratio, 0.39 [.18-.87; P = .02). Patients with a synovial fluid WBC count ≤50 000/µL experienced significant delay in time from joint aspiration to operative intervention (mean [standard deviation], 10.5 [11.3] vs 17.9 [17.2] hours; P = .02). Conclusions: The administration of antibiotics before joint aspiration for suspected septic arthritis appears to decrease the synovial fluid WBC count, the percentage of PMNs, and the rate of culture positivity. Efforts to limit antibiotic administration before joint aspiration are important to minimize diagnostic dilemmas and circumvent treatment delays.

Incidence of Complications and Revision Surgery After High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a well-recognized procedure for its effectiveness in treating symptomatic early knee arthritis and malalignment. Although there are numerous systematic reviews evaluating the management and outcomes after HTO, there are few investigations on complications of this procedure. PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature to determine the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications associated with medial opening wedge and lateral closing wedge HTOs. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were queried for studies reporting complications associated with HTO with or without concomitant procedures. Data including patient characteristics, procedure type, concomitant procedures, follow-up time, and postoperative imaging were extracted. Rates of intra- and postoperative complications, reoperations, and conversion to arthroplasty were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 71 studies were included for analysis, comprising 7836 patients. The overall intraoperative complication rate during HTO was 5.5% (range, 0%-29.3%), and the overall postoperative complication rate was 6.9% (range, 0%-26.6%). The most common intraoperative complication was lateral hinge fracture (incidence, 9.1%; range, 0%-30.4%) in medially based HTOs and peroneal nerve injury in laterally based HTOs (incidence, 3.2%; range, 0%-8.7%). The overall incidence of neurovascular injury after medially or laterally based HTOs was 1.1% (range, 0%-18.9%). The most common postoperative complication was superficial infection (incidence, 2.2%; range, 0%-13%). Of the included studies, 62 included postoperative radiographic analysis, and among those, the incidence of nonunion was 1.9% (range, 0%-15.5%), loss of correction was 1.2% (range, 0%-34.3%), and implant failure was 1.0% (range, 0%-10.2%). Among studies reporting revision surgeries, the overall reoperation rate was 15.5% (range, 0%-70.7%), with the most common type of reoperation being hardware removal (incidence, 10.0%; range, 0%-60%). CONCLUSION: Intraoperatively, medially based HTOs are associated with a 1 in 11 risk of lateral hinge fracture and laterally based HTOs with a 1 in 30 risk of peroneal nerve injury. Postoperative complication rates in the range of 10% to 15% can be expected, including infection (2.9%), loss of correction (1.2%), and nonunion (1.9%). Patients should also be counseled that the reoperation rate is approximately 15%, with hardware removal being the most common procedure.

Predictors of Hardware Removal in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients Undergoing Syndesmotic Ankle Fixation With Screws.

Background: Indications for removal of syndesmotic screws are not fully elucidated. This study aimed to determine factors related to elective syndesmotic screw removal. Methods: Patients who underwent fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries were included. Screw removal was offered after a minimum of 12 weeks after surgery for pain, stiffness or patient desire to remove painful or broken hardware. Patient demographics, surgical data, distance of the syndesmotic screw from the joint, location of the screw at the physeal scar, and number of syndesmotic screws placed were collected for all patients. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the relationship between patient characteristics and screw removal and independent predictors of hardware removal. Results: Of 160 patients, 60 patients (38%) with an average age of 36.1 (range: 18-84) years underwent elective syndesmotic screw removal at a mean of 7 (range, 3-47) months after initial fixation. The most common reason for screw removal (50/60 patients) was ankle stiffness and pain (83%). Patients who underwent screw removal were more likely to be younger (36.1 years ± 13.0 vs 46.6 years ± 18.2, P < .001) and have a lower ASA score (2 ± 0.8 vs 2.1 ± 0.7, P = .003) by bivariate analysis. Of patients who underwent screw removal, 21.7% (13/60) had a broken screw at the time of removal. Whether the screw was placed at the physeal scar was not significantly associated with patient decision for hardware removal (P = .80). Conclusion: Younger and healthier patients were more likely to undergo elective removal of syndesmotic hardware. Screw distance from joint and screw placement at the physeal scar were not significantly associated with hardware removal. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Heterotopic Ossification Remodeling After Acetabular Surgery: A Natural History Case Report.

CASE: A 30-year-old woman presented with a transverse plus posterior wall acetabular fracture and underwent operative fixation through a Kocher-Langenbeck approach. Shared decision was made for no heterotopic ossification (HO) prophylaxis. The patient developed symptomatic HO and was scheduled for resection, which was delayed because of the pandemic. She returned with interval remodeling of HO and symptom resolution. No surgery was required. CONCLUSION: HO is a common complication after acetabular injury. Resection is the treatment of choice for symptomatic HO. We are not aware of other reports of spontaneous remodeling of symptomatic HO such that it no longer required surgery.

Is fixation of the medial malleolus necessary in unstable ankle fractures?

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether the medial malleolus in unstable bi- and tri- malleolar ankle fractures without medial talar displacement should be addressed surgically. This study reviews a fixation protocol for the medial malleolar component of unstable bi- or tri- malleolar ankle fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-seven patients who sustained bi- (AO/OTA 44-B2) or tri- (AO/OTA 44-B3) malleolar ankle fractures between January 2005 and August 2019 at two Level 1 trauma centers were retrospectively identified. Medial malleolar fractures were defined as anterior, supra or intercollicular fractures based on the exit of the posterior fracture line. Fixation of the medial malleolar component was performed based on surgical algorithm. Only large or significantly displaced medial malleolar fractures were fixed if the soft tissues were amenable. Primary outcome measure was the presence of medial-sided ankle pain after operative or non-operative treatment of the medial malleolar fracture after a minimum follow up of 6 months. Presence of pain was defined by a pain score of 3 or higher on a 10-point VAS pain score at the site of the medial malleolar fracture. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the supracollicular group reported the presence of pain when this type was not fixed versus fixed (28 vs 14%, p = 0.0094). Significantly more patients in the anterior collicular subgroup reported the presence of pain when this type was fixed versus not fixed (40 vs 10%, p = 0.0438). There was no difference in the number of patients reporting pain in the intercollicular group when comparing those who were fixed versus not fixed, (21 vs 22%, p = 1.000). CONCLUSIONS: When examining post-operative pain, not all medial malleolar fractures require fixation when appropriately selected based on fracture pattern. Only 10% of patients with anterior collicular fractures reported pain after non operative management. Unsurprisingly, more patients in the supracollicular fractures reported pain without surgery compared to with surgery. Fracture pattern should be considered in the treatment algorithm for the medial malleolar component in bi- and tri- malleolar fractures.

Impingement and perforation of the anterior femoral cortex in cephalomedullary nailing: Systematic review and surgical techniques.

BACKGROUND: Anterior femoral cortical impingement and perforation are known risks of cephalomedullary nailing. The incidence of and risk factors for these findings have not been fully established in the literature. The purpose of this review was to answer: (1) What is the incidence of anterior femoral cortical impingement and perforation associated with cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femur fractures? (2) How does incidence vary by nail radius of curvature (ROC)? (3) What populations are at increased risk of impingement and perforation? (4) What surgical techniques prevent their occurrence? HYPOTHESIS: Our hypothesis was that impingement would be a relatively common finding following cephalomedullary nailing, and perforation would be much less frequent but still an appreciable risk. Secondarily, nails with a larger ROC would have a higher rate of impingement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this systematic review, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles from 1990-2020 written in English using the terms "cephalomedullary nail" or "femoral nail" and "perforation" or "impingement", and similar words. Inclusion criteria were studies discussing the complication of anterior femoral cortical impingement or perforation associated with the use of a cephalomedullary nail. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Rates of anterior femoral cortical impingement or perforation, patient demographics, nail type, and ROC were extracted. Surgical techniques to prevent perforation were qualitatively reviewed. RESULTS: The rate of anterior cortical impingement with long cephalomedullary nails was 17.2% (192/1117 patients) and with short nails was 29.2% (176/602). The rate of anterior cortical perforation with long nails was 1.0% (11/1116) and with short nails was 0% (0/234). Long nails with ROC>150cm showed an impingement rate of 10.9% (62/567) and perforation rate of 1.1% (7/617 patients). Nails with ROC 150cm or 100cm had an impingement rate of 1.1% (1/93) and perforation rate of 0% (0/93). DISCUSSION: Impingement and perforation of the anterior femoral cortex during cephalomedullary nailing are appreciable risks that surgeons should anticipate and avoid, especially in certain populations and with nails with larger ROC. Surgeons may consider use of long nails with ROC 150cm and below, given a nearly 10-fold lower incidence of impingement and no reported perforations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.

Inflammatory and Coagulative Considerations for the Management of Orthopaedic Trauma Patients With COVID-19: A Review of the Current Evidence and Our Surgical Experience.

Mounting evidence suggests that the pathogenesis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) involves a hyperinflammatory response predisposing patients to thromboembolic disease and acute respiratory distress. In the setting of severe blunt trauma, damaged tissues induce a local and systemic inflammatory response through similar pathways to COVID-19. As such, patients with COVID-19 sustaining orthopaedic trauma injuries may have an amplified response to the traumatic insult because of their baseline hyperinflammatory and hypercoagulable states. These patients may have compromised physiological reserve to withstand the insult of surgical intervention before reaching clinical instability. In this article, we review the current evidence regarding pathogenesis of COVID-19 and its implications on the management of orthopaedic trauma patients by discussing a case and the most recent literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Prognostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Knee pain correlates with union after tibial nailing.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the change in quantitatively scored knee pain during union. DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data over a 15-year period. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients treated with an intramedullary nail were evaluated for knee pain and union. Four hundred twenty-eight patients with 443 tibia fractures were included. INTERVENTION: All tibia fractures were treated with an intramedullary nail. OUTCOMES: Patient-based knee pain was scored from 0 to 3. Fracture union was also graded using a modified Hammer score based on cortical bridging and remodeling. RESULTS: We found a significant inverse association between pain and union score (P < 0.01). In contradistinction, there was not a correlation between time from surgery and pain (P = 0.13). Because union score and time were related, a model was created with both parameters. This model demonstrated a statistical correlation with union score (P < 0.01), but not for time from surgery (P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: We postulated that knee pain may correlate with either union or time from surgery. We found a statistically significant, negative correlation between knee pain and fracture union. There was no such association between pain and time from surgery.