Assessing risk factors for hypertension in young adults with perinatally acquired HIV infection: A case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: Although the risk of AIDS-associated diseases has declined dramatically with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), the incidence rates of chronic non-AIDS-associated diseases in perinatally HIV-infected adults have risen and have not been well characterized. Both traditional and HIV-associated risk factors have been found to contribute to hypertension in non-perinatally HIV-infected adults; whether these same factors contribute to hypertension in perinatally infected adults is not known. The purpose of this study was to determine the socio-demographic, clinical, virological and immunological factors associated with systemic hypertension among a cohort of perinatally HIV-infected adolescents and young adults. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study among a population of adults aged 18-35 years with perinatally acquired HIV infection receiving care at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Covariates assessed included traditional risk factors such as age, family history of hypertension, and smoking, as well as numerous HIV- and antiretroviral-associated covariates, including CD4 nadir. RESULTS: Approximately 31% of the cohort met criteria for hypertension. There were no significant differences in the odds of most traditional or HIV-associated risk factors among perinatally HIV-infected adults with hypertension compared with those with no diagnosis of hypertension. Exposure to lopinavir/ritonavir was associated with greater odds of not having hypertension, while a concurrent diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was associated with greater odds of having hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that most traditional and HIV-related risk factors do not appear to increase the odds of having hypertension in this cohort of individuals. The aetiology of hypertension in this population remains to be elucidated.

Galactomannan antigen detection using bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with hematologic malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is challenging. It is unclear whether galactomannan (GM) results from bronchial wash (BW) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples differ in a clinically meaningful way. RESULTS: Ninety-six paired (BAL and BW) samples from 85 patients were included. The average age was 53 years, 61 % of the patients were male, and 74.1 % had an underlying diagnosis of AML/MDS (ALL 7.1 %, other hematologic malignancy 18.8 %). 57 (67.1 %) patients were neutropenic, and 56 (65.9 %) patients were receiving mold-active drugs at least 48 h prior to bronchoscopy. The overall agreement between GM detection from BW and BAL was 63.5 % (K = 0.152; 95 % CI 0.008-0.311) and 73 % (K = 0.149; 95 % CI 0.048-0.348) at cut off ≥0.5 and ≥1.0, respectively. Among 43 positive samples, using a GM cut-off of 0.5, 39 (90.5 %) were positive in BW samples whereas 12 (29.3 %) were positive in BAL samples. The median level of GM in BW (0.28) samples was significantly higher than in BAL (0.20) samples among 53 samples with negative results (P = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the median GM values between the BW and BAL samples with positive results (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in GM detection between samples with positive and negative results with regard to antifungal, beta lactam antibacterial treatment or neutropenia (60.5 vs 56.6 %; 53.9 vs 46 %; 65.1 vs 54.7 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study examining two collection techniques suggests that BW may have higher diagnostic yield compared to bronchoalveolar lavage for GM detection.