The novel HLA-B*39:199 allele identified in a candidate bone marrow donor.

HLA-B*39:199 differs from HLA-B*39:10:01 by a G → A substitution in exon 5 in codon 282.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Indication Biopsy-Results of a Prospective Single-Center Trial.

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) identifies allograft injury and discriminates active rejection from no rejection. In this prospective study, 106 kidney transplant recipients with 108 clinically indicated biopsies were enrolled at Heidelberg University Hospital between November 2020 and December 2022 to validate the clinical value of dd-cfDNA in a cohort of German patients. dd-cfDNA was quantified at biopsy and correlated to histopathology. Additionally, dd-cfDNA was determined on days 7, 30, and 90 post-biopsy and analyzed for potential use to monitor response to anti-rejection treatment. dd-cfDNA levels were with a median (IQR) % of 2.00 (0.48-3.20) highest in patients with ABMR, followed by 0.92 (0.19-11.25) in patients with TCMR, 0.44 (0.20-1.10) in patients with borderline changes and 0.20 (0.11-0.53) in patients with no signs of rejection. The AUC for dd-cfDNA to discriminate any type of rejection including borderline changes from no rejection was at 0.72 (95% CI 0.62-0.83). In patients receiving anti-rejection treatment, dd-cfDNA levels significantly decreased during the 7, 30, and 90 days follow-up compared to levels at the time of biopsy (p = 0.006, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, dd-cfDNA significantly discriminates active rejection from no rejection. Decreasing dd-cfDNA following anti-rejection treatment may indicate response to therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00023604, identifier DRKS00023604.

Five-year follow-up of a phase I trial of donor-derived modified immune cell infusion in kidney transplantation.

Background: The administration of modified immune cells (MIC) before kidney transplantation led to specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor and a significant increase in regulatory B lymphocytes. We wondered how this approach affected the continued clinical course of these patients. Methods: Ten patients from a phase I clinical trial who had received MIC infusions prior to kidney transplantation were retrospectively compared to 15 matched standard-risk recipients. Follow-up was until year five after surgery. Results: The 10 MIC patients had an excellent clinical course with stable kidney graft function, no donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) or acute rejections, and no opportunistic infections. In comparison, a retrospectively matched control group receiving standard immunosuppressive therapy had a higher frequency of DSA (log rank P = 0.046) and more opportunistic infections (log rank P = 0.033). Importantly, MIC patients, and in particular the four patients who had received the highest cell number 7 days before surgery and received low immunosuppression during follow-up, continued to show a lack of anti-donor T lymphocyte reactivity in vitro and high CD19+CD24hiCD38hi transitional and CD19+CD24hiCD27+ memory B lymphocytes until year five after surgery. Conclusions: MIC infusions together with reduced conventional immunosuppression were associated with good graft function during five years of follow-up, no de novo DSA development and no opportunistic infections. In the future, MIC infusions might contribute to graft protection while reducing the side effects of immunosuppressive therapy. However, this approach needs further validation in direct comparison with prospective controls. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT02560220 (for the TOL-1 Study). EudraCT Number: 2014-002086-30.

Induction of Long-Lasting Regulatory B Lymphocytes by Modified Immune Cells in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: We recently demonstrated that donor-derived modified immune cells (MICs)-PBMCs that acquire immunosuppressive properties after a brief treatment-induced specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor when administered before kidney transplantation. We found up to a 68-fold increase in CD19 + CD24 hi CD38 hi transitional B lymphocytes compared with transplanted controls. METHODS: Ten patients from a phase 1 clinical trial who had received MIC infusions before kidney transplantation were followed to post-transplant day 1080. RESULTS: Patients treated with MICs had a favorable clinical course, showing no donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies or acute rejections. The four patients who had received the highest dose of MICs 7 days before surgery and were on reduced immunosuppressive therapy showed an absence of in vitro lymphocyte reactivity against stimulatory donor blood cells, whereas reactivity against third party cells was preserved. In these patients, numbers of transitional B lymphocytes were 75-fold and seven-fold higher than in 12 long-term survivors on minimal immunosuppression and four operationally tolerant patients, respectively ( P <0.001 for both). In addition, we found significantly higher numbers of other regulatory B lymphocyte subsets and a gene expression signature suggestive of operational tolerance in three of four patients. In MIC-treated patients, in vitro lymphocyte reactivity against donor blood cells was restored after B lymphocyte depletion, suggesting a direct pathophysiologic role of regulatory B lymphocytes in donor-specific unresponsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that donor-specific immunosuppression after MIC infusion is long-lasting and associated with a striking increase in regulatory B lymphocytes. Donor-derived MICs appear to be an immunoregulatory cell population that when administered to recipients before transplantation, may exert a beneficial effect on kidney transplants. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: MIC Cell Therapy for Individualized Immunosuppression in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients (TOL-1), NCT02560220.

Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Donor-derived modified immune cells (MIC) induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor in preclinical models of transplantation. In a phase I clinical trial (TOL-1 Study), MIC treatment resulted in a cellular phenotype that was directly and indirectly suppressive to the recipient's immune system allowing for reduction of conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we describe a protocol for a randomised controlled, multicentre phase-IIb clinical trial of individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor MIC compared with standard-of-care (SoC) in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sixty-three living donor kidney transplant recipients from six German transplant centres are randomised 2:1 to treatment with MIC (MIC group, N=42) or no treatment with MIC (control arm, N=21). MIC are manufactured from donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells under Good Manufacturing Practice conditions. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy of MIC treatment together with reduced conventional immunosuppressive therapy in terms of achieving an operational tolerance-like phenotype compared with SoC 12 months after MIC administration. Key secondary endpoints are the number of patient-relevant infections as well as a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, graft dysfunction or death. Immunosuppressive therapy of MIC-treated patients is reduced during follow-up under an extended immunological monitoring including human leucocyte antigen-antibody testing, and determination of lymphocyte subsets, for example, regulatory B lymphocytes (Breg) and antidonor T cell response. A Data Safety Monitoring Board has been established to allow an independent assessment of safety and efficacy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been provided by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (AFmu-580/2021, 17 March 2022) and from the Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany (Vorlage-Nr. 4586/02, 21 March 2022). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients and respective donors prior to enrolment in the study. The results from the TOL-2 Study will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals and will be presented at symposia and scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05365672.

Heart transplantation across preformed donor-specific antibody barriers using a perioperative desensitization protocol.

Heart transplantation across preformed donor-specific HLA-antibody barriers is associated with impaired short- and long-term survival. Therefore, in recipients with preformed anti-HLA antibodies, waiting for crossmatch-negative donors is standard practice. As an alternative strategy, recipients with preformed anti-HLA donor specific antibodies have been managed at our institutions with a perioperative desensitization regimen. A retrospective analysis was performed comparing heart transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific HLA-antibodies to recipients without donor-specific antibodies. Recipients with a positive virtual crossmatch received a perioperative desensitization protocol including tocilizumab intraoperatively, plasma exchange and rituximab followed by a six-month course of IgGAM. Among the 117 heart-transplanted patients, 19 (16%) patients underwent perioperative desensitization, and the remaining 98 (84%) patients did not. Cold ischemic time, posttransplant extracorporeal life support for primary graft dysfunction, and intensive care unit stay time did not differ between groups. At 1-year follow-up, freedom from pulsed steroid therapy for presumed rejection and biopsy-confirmed acute cellular or humoral rejection did not differ between groups. One-year survival amounted to 94.7% in the treated patients and 81.4% in the control group. Therefore, heart transplantation in sensitized recipients undergoing a perioperative desensitization appears safe with comparable postoperative outcomes as patients with a negative crossmatch.

Neutralizing antibody response against the B.1.617.2 (delta) and the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variants after a third mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose in kidney transplant recipients.

Seroconversion after COVID-19 vaccination is impaired in kidney transplant recipients. Emerging variants of concern such as the B.1.617.2 (delta) and the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variants pose an increasing threat to these patients. In this observational cohort study, we measured anti-S1 IgG, surrogate neutralizing, and anti-receptor-binding domain antibodies three weeks after a third mRNA vaccine dose in 49 kidney transplant recipients and compared results to 25 age-matched healthy controls. In addition, vaccine-induced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 wild-type, the B.1.617.2 (delta), and the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variants was assessed using a live-virus assay. After a third vaccine dose, anti-S1 IgG, surrogate neutralizing, and anti-receptor-binding domain antibodies were significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients compared to healthy controls. Only 29/49 (59%) sera of kidney transplant recipients contained neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 wild-type or the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant and neutralization titers were significantly reduced compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001). Vaccine-induced cross-neutralization of the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variants was detectable in 15/35 (43%) kidney transplant recipients with seropositivity for anti-S1 IgG, surrogate neutralizing, and/or anti-RBD antibodies. Neutralization of the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variants was significantly reduced compared to neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 wild-type or the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant for both, kidney transplant recipients and healthy controls (p < .001 for all).

Influence of Calcineurin Inhibitor Choice on Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Aged ≥60 Y: A Collaborative Transplant Study Report.

BACKGROUND: Patients aged ≥60 y represent the fastest growing population among kidney transplant recipients and waitlist patients. They show an elevated infection risk and are frequently transplanted with multiple human leukocyte antigen mismatches. Whether the choice of calcineurin inhibitor influences graft survival, mortality, or key secondary outcomes such as infections in this vulnerable recipient population is unknown. METHODS: A total of 31 177 kidney transplants from deceased donors performed between 2000 and 2019 at European centers and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed using multivariable Cox and logistic regression analyses. All recipients were ≥60 y old and received tacrolimus (Tac) or cyclosporine A on an intention-to-treat basis, combined with mycophenolic acid or azathioprine plus/minus steroids. RESULTS: The risk of 3-y death-censored graft loss and patient mortality did not differ significantly between Tac- and cyclosporine A-treated patients (hazard ratio 0.98 and 0.95, P = 0.74 and 0.20, respectively). No difference was found in the overall risk of hospitalization for infection (hazard ratio = 0.95, P = 0.19); however, a lower incidence of rejection treatment (hazard ratio = 0.81, P < 0.001) was observed in Tac-treated patients. Assessment of pathogen-specific hospitalizations revealed no difference in the risk of hospitalization due to bacterial infection (odds ratio = 1.00, P = 0.96), but a significantly higher risk of hospitalization due to human polyomavirus infection was found among Tac-treated patients (odds ratio = 2.45, P = 0.002). The incidence of de novo diabetes was higher for Tac-based immunosuppression (odds ratio = 1.79, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Calcineurin inhibitor selection has no significant influence on death-censored graft survival, mortality, and overall infection risk in ≥60-y-old kidney transplant recipients.

Rare Malignant Indications for Liver Transplantation: A Collaborative Transplant Study Report.

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is by far the leading malignant indication for liver transplantation (LT). Few other malignancies, including cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC), metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NET), and sarcomas of the liver (LSAR), also are commonly accepted indications for LT. However, there is limited information on their outcome after LT. Methods: Graft and patient survival in 14,623 LTs performed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, CCC, NET, and LSAR from 1988 to 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed. Results: The study group consisted of 13,862 patients who had HCC (94.8%), 498 (3.4%) who had CCC, 100 (0.7%) who had NET, and 163 (1.1%) who had LSAR. CCC patients showed a 5-year graft survival rate of 32.1%, strikingly lower than the 63.2% rate in HCC, 51.6% rate in NET, and 64.5% rate in LSAR patients (P < 0.001 for all vs. CCC). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed a significantly higher risk of graft loss and death due to cancer during the first five post-transplant years in CCC vs. HCC patients (HR 1.77 and 2.56; P < 0.001 for both). The same risks were increased also in NET and LSAR patients but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Among patients with rare malignant indications for LT, CCC patients showed significantly impaired graft as well as patient survival compared to HCC patients. The observed differences might challenge traditional decision-making processes for LT indication and palliative treatment in specific hepatic malignancies.

Heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 Prime-Boost Vaccination Induces Strong Humoral Responses among Health Care Workers.

Despite limited data on safety and immunogenicity, heterologous prime-boost vaccination is currently recommended for individuals with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 prime immunization in certain age groups. In this prospective, single-center study we included 166 health care workers from Heidelberg University Hospital who received either heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2, homologous BNT162b2 or homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination between December 2020 and May 2021. We measured anti-S1 IgG, SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibodies, and antibodies against different SARS-CoV-2 fragments 0-3 days before and 19-21 days after boost vaccination. Before boost, 55/70 (79%) ChAdOx1 nCoV-19-primed compared with 44/45 (98%) BNT162b2-primed individuals showed positive anti-S1 IgG with a median (IQR) anti-S1 IgG index of 1.95 (1.05-2.99) compared to 9.38 (6.26-17.12). SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies exceeded the threshold in 24/70 (34%) of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19-primed and 43/45 (96%) of BNT162b2-primed individuals. After boosting dose, median (IQR) anti-S1 IgG index in heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 vaccinees was 116.2 (61.84-170), compared to 13.09 (7.03-29.02) in homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 145.5 (100-291.1) in homologous BNT162b2 vaccinees. All boosted vaccinees exceeded the threshold for neutralization, irrespective of their vaccination scheme. Vaccination was well-tolerated overall. We show that heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 vaccination is safe and induces a strong and broad humoral response in healthy individuals.

Pre-transplant HLA Antibodies and Delayed Graft Function in the Current Era of Kidney Transplantation.

Delayed graft function (DGF) occurs in a significant proportion of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients and was associated with graft injury and inferior clinical outcome. The aim of the present multi-center study was to identify the immunological and non-immunological predictors of DGF and to determine its influence on outcome in the presence and absence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. 1,724 patients who received a deceased donor kidney transplant during 2008-2017 and on whom a pre-transplant serum sample was available were studied. Graft survival during the first 3 post-transplant years was analyzed by multivariable Cox regression. Pre-transplant predictors of DGF and influence of DGF and pre-transplant HLA antibodies on biopsy-proven rejections in the first 3 post-transplant months were determined by multivariable logistic regression. Donor age ≥50 years, simultaneous pre-transplant presence of HLA class I and II antibodies, diabetes mellitus as cause of end-stage renal disease, cold ischemia time ≥18 h, and time on dialysis >5 years were associated with increased risk of DGF, while the risk was reduced if gender of donor or recipient was female or the reason for death of donor was trauma. DGF alone doubled the risk for graft loss, more due to impaired death-censored graft than patient survival. In DGF patients, the risk of death-censored graft loss increased further if HLA antibodies (hazard ratio HR=4.75, P < 0.001) or donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA, HR=7.39, P < 0.001) were present pre-transplant. In the presence of HLA antibodies or DSA, the incidence of biopsy-proven rejections, including antibody-mediated rejections, increased significantly in patients with as well as without DGF. Recipients without DGF and without biopsy-proven rejections during the first 3 months had the highest fraction of patients with good kidney function at year 1, whereas patients with both DGF and rejection showed the lowest rate of good kidney function, especially when organs from ≥65-year-old donors were used. In this new era of transplantation, besides non-immunological factors, also the pre-transplant presence of HLA class I and II antibodies increase the risk of DGF. Measures to prevent the strong negative impact of DGF on outcome are necessary, especially during organ allocation for presensitized patients.

The Differential Influence of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcome After Liver Transplantation for Different Indications-Who Is at Risk? A Collaborative Transplant Study Report.

Introduction: Despite increasing awareness of the negative impact of cold ischemia time (CIT) in liver transplantation, its precise influence in different subgroups of liver transplant recipients has not been analyzed in detail. This study aimed to identify liver transplant recipients with an unfavorable outcome due to prolonged cold ischemia. Methods: 40,288 adult liver transplantations, performed between 1998 and 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed. Results: Prolonged CIT significantly reduced graft and patient survival only during the first post-transplant year. On average, each hour added to the cold ischemia was associated with a 3.4% increase in the risk of graft loss (hazard ratio (HR) 1.034, P < 0.001). The impact of CIT was strongest in patients with hepatitis C-related (HCV) cirrhosis with a 24% higher risk of graft loss already at 8-9 h (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05-1.47, P = 0.011) and 64% higher risk at ≥14 h (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.30-2.09, P < 0.001). In contrast, patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and alcoholic cirrhosis tolerated longer ischemia times up to <10 and <12 h, respectively, without significant impact on graft survival (P = 0.47 and 0.42). In HCC patients with model of end-stage liver disease scores (MELD) <20, graft survival was not significantly impaired in the cases of CIT up to 13 h. Conclusion: The negative influence of CIT on liver transplant outcome depends on the underlying disease, patients with HCV-related cirrhosis being at the highest risk of graft loss due to prolonged cold ischemia. Grafts with longer cold preservation times should preferentially be allocated to recipients with alcoholic cirrhosis and HCC patients with MELD <20, in whom the effect of cold ischemia is less pronounced.

Differential Influence of Donor Age Depending on the Indication for Liver Transplantation-A Collaborative Transplant Study Report.

BACKGROUND: Despite steadily increasing donor age, there are no general guidelines for the use of organs from elderly donors in liver transplantation. This study focuses on identifying the recipients who are less affected from an old-donor organ graft and conversely in whom a rather unfavorable outcome is expected because of high donor age. METHODS: Forty-eight thousand two hundred sixty-one adult liver transplantations, performed between 2000 and 2017 and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study, were analyzed. RESULTS: The proportion of ≥65-year-old donors has risen to >33% in recent years. The donor age has an approximately linear influence on graft survival. On average, each year's rise in the donor age was associated with a 0.9% increase in the risk of graft loss (hazard ratio [HR], 1.009; P < 0.001). The impact of donor age was strong in patients with hepatitis C-related cirrhosis (HR, 1.013; P < 0.001), substantial in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (HR, 1.007; P < 0.001) and rather weak in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 1.003; P = 0.038). The increase in the risk of graft loss per year rise in donor age was 1.4% for 18 to 49 year olds, 1.0% for middle-aged, and only 0.4% for ≥60-year-old recipients (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Consequently, older recipients and especially patients with hepatocellular carcinoma seem to be less affected by an increased donor age, whereas the donor age is an important factor in all other patient groups.

Should kidney allografts from old donors be allocated only to old recipients?

In several deceased donor kidney allocation systems, organs from elderly donors are allocated primarily to elderly recipients. The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was implemented in 1999, and since then, especially in Europe, the use of organs from elderly donors has steadily increased. The proportion of ≥60-year-old donors reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) by European centers has doubled, from 21% in 2000-2001 to 42% in 2016-2017. Therefore, in the era of organ shortage it is a matter of debate whether kidney organs from elderly donors should only be allocated to elderly recipients or whether <65-year-old recipients can also benefit from these generally as "marginal" categorized organs. To discuss this issue, a European Consensus Meeting was organized by the CTS on April 12, 2018, in Heidelberg, in which 36 experts participated. Based on available evidence, it was unanimously concluded that kidney organs from 65- to 74-year-old donors can also be allocated to 55- to 64-year-old recipients, especially if these organs are from donors with no history of hypertension, no increased creatinine, no cerebrovascular death, and no other reasons for defining a marginal donor, such as diabetes or cancer.

Transplantation of Marginal Organs: Immunological Aspects and Therapeutic Perspectives in Kidney Transplantation.

Recent data from the World Population Prospects projects that, by 2050, nearly all regions in the world will have a quarter or more of the population aged 60 and above. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a high global prevalence (~13%) worldwide, and the prevalence of chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease increase with age. Kidney transplantation remains the best therapeutic option for end-stage kidney disease, offering a survival benefit in comparison with dialysis maintenance for most patients. This review focuses on immunological aspects of kidney transplantation in older patients and marginal donors, i.e., 60 years or older deceased kidney donors or 50-59 years old deceased kidney donors with comorbidities. Clinical outcomes of kidney recipients in terms of renal and patient survival are more than acceptable even for patients over 70. In this population, the first cause of graft loss is death with a functional graft. However, the inherent issues of these transplantations are the acceptance or refusal of frail kidney from an old donor and the increased immunogenicity of these organs in balance with potential frail and immunosenescent recipients. Finally, the immunosuppressive regimen itself is a challenge for the future of the transplant, to prevent adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity and higher risk of infections or cancer in a population already at risk. Belatacept may have a good place in the immunosuppressive strategy to improve efficacy and the safety posttransplantation.

Pulse Pressure and Outcome in Kidney Transplantation: Results From the Collaborative Transplant Study.

BACKGROUND: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are important predictors of graft and patient survival in renal transplantation. Pulse pressure (PP), the difference between systolic and diastolic pressure, has been associated with cardiovascular and renal morbidity in nontransplant epidemiological studies and clinical trials. METHODS: In this large retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, transplant recipients from 1995 to 2015 were examined for patient and death-censored graft survival. RESULTS: In 43 006 recipients, a higher 1-year PP was significantly associated with inferior 10-year patient and death-censored graft survival. In patients 60 years or older, SBP but not DBP was associated with 10-year survival, an effect that was pronounced in patients with a normal SBP of <140 mm Hg and an increased PP of 60 mm Hg or greater, highlighting the superior impact of PP on survival in elderly recipients. In recipients 60 years or older, higher PP was associated with increased mortality due to circulatory system diseases but not to infection or cancer. The combination of PP 60 mm Hg or greater and high SBP of 140 mm Hg or greater showed the strongest association with death-censored graft survival across all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: We found convincing evidence that PP 1-year posttransplant is predictive of patient survival, especially in elderly recipients with normal SBP. Combined analysis of SBP and PP showed that high PP confers additional predictive information for patient survival beyond that derived from analysis of SBP alone. With regard to prediction of death-censored graft survival, the combination of high SBP and high PP showed the best correlation across all age groups.

Pretransplant Cancer in Kidney Recipients in Relation to Recurrent and De Novo Cancer Incidence Posttransplantation and Implications for Graft and Patient Survival.

BACKGROUND: Whether kidney transplant recipients who were treated for a malignant tumor before transplantation are at an increased risk of developing a tumor posttransplantation has not been adequately quantified and characterized. METHODS: We studied more than 270 000 patients on whom pretransplant and posttransplant malignancy data were reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study. More than 4000 of these patients were treated for pretransplant malignancy. The posttransplant tumor incidence in these patients was compared to that in recipients without a pretransplant tumor. Cox regression, considering multiple confounders, was applied. RESULTS: Significant increases in posttransplant tumor incidence with hazard ratio ranging from 2.10 to 5.47 (all P < 0.001) were observed for tumors in the site-specific pretransplant locations, suggesting tumor recurrences. There were also significantly increased de novo tumors in new locations with hazard ratio ranging from 1.28 to 1.89. Pretransplant basal cell carcinoma of the skin and male genital cancer were associated with significantly increased death-censored graft survival, suggesting impaired immune responsiveness against transplanted kidneys. Time interval from pretransplant tumor occurrence to transplantation and posttransplant mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor treatment was not found to be of significant relevance in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who experienced a pretransplant tumor are at significant risk of tumor recurrence, regardless of the length of interval between tumor treatment and transplantation. There is also some increased risk for de novo tumors, suggesting impaired immune surveillance. Impaired tumor immunity appears to extend to a lower rate of transplant rejection because patients with pretransplant tumors tended to show improved death-censored graft survival.

No Increase in Colon Cancer Risk Following Induction with Neu5Gc-Bearing Rabbit Anti-T Cell IgG (ATG) in Recipients of Kidney Transplants.

Because of a mutation of the gene allowing the synthesis of the Neu5Gc form of neuraminidic acid, humans lack the Neu5Gc present in other mammals and develop anti-Neu5Gc. However, humans can absorb dietary Neu5Gc and normal colon epithelium displays minute amounts of Neu5Gc. The potential "physiological" formation of in situ immune complexes has been proposed as a risk factor for colon cancer and as the link between red meat-rich diet and colon carcinoma. In this article, we took advantage of evidence that polyclonal rabbit IgG (ATG) elicits an immune response against Neu5Gc and we consulted a large data base of allograft recipients treated or not with animal-derived IgG to discuss this hypothesis. Based on data from 173,960 and 38,505 patients without and with ATG induction, respectively, we found no evidence that exposure to higher levels of anti-Neu5Gc is associated with a higher incidence of colon carcinoma.

Impact of age at diagnosis on disease progression in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: The median age of diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is ∼30-40 years. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyse disease progression and liver-dependent survival in patients diagnosed with PSC after 50 years of age. METHODS: Patients with PSC were analysed with regard to their age at diagnosis. Patients with a first diagnosis of PSC after the age of 50 years were considered as the late-onset group. RESULTS: A total of 32/215 (14.9%) patients were diagnosed with PSC after 50 years of age. The proportion of females was significantly higher among patients with late-onset PSC (48.4 vs. 27.3%; p = 0.02). Patients with later diagnosis required dilatation therapy more often due to dominant stenosis (84.2 vs. 53.1%; p = 0.01) and suffered from recurrent cholangitis more often (48.3 vs. 21.0%; p = 0.003). Patients with late-onset PSC had reduced transplantation-free survival (10.5 ± 0.6 years vs. 20.8 ± 1.7 years, p < 0.0001), with progredient liver failure and cholangiocarcinoma as the leading causes of death. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with later age at diagnosis of PSC displayed a different clinical phenotype with a different sex ratio, immune status and an increased risk for progressive liver failure and biliary malignancies.

Association of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies with graft histology, function and survival in paediatric renal transplant recipients.

Background: We analysed in a carefully phenotyped cohort of paediatric patients the association of serum angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) with specific histological lesions and with graft function and survival in conjunction with overall and complement-binding donor-specific human leucocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA). Methods: Sera of 62 patients at the time of renal graft biopsy for clinical indication >1 year post-transplant were assessed for AT1R-Ab by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and for DSA and C1q-fixing DSA by single-antigen bead technology. Results: Serum AT1R-Ab concentration was significantly higher in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) than in T-cell-mediated rejection or control. By receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal AT1R-Ab cut-off value discriminating between patients with features of ABMR and those without was 9.5 U/mL. A total of 6 of 28 patients (21.4%) with ABMR were only positive for AT1R-Ab. Patients with AT1R-Ab and HLA-DSA double positivity had a significantly higher vascular micro-inflammation score than DSA-negative patients. The 5-year graft survival was only 59% in the AT1R-Ab-positive group compared with 87% in the AT1R-Ab-negative group. Patients with AT1R-Ab and HLA-DSA double positivity tended to have a more rapid decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) than patients who were only positive for AT1R-Ab or HLA-DSA. In a multivariate Cox regression model of non-invasive factors, C1q-positive HLA-DSA, eGFR and AT1R-Ab positivity were significantly associated with accelerated graft function decline. Conclusions: Serum AT1R-Ab positivity in the context of an indication biopsy >1 year post-transplant is associated with the histopathology of ABMR and is an independent non-invasive risk factor for adverse graft outcome.