Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms ; 16(1): e12509, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282138

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In older adults, bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) is prevalent, primarily due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). These patients' lower urinary tract symptoms can be treated surgically and with medical therapy. Compared to standard treatment with tamsulosin, Pentoxifylline, a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, could benefit patients with BOO due to its properties on microcirculatory blood flow and oxygenation of ischemic tissues. Hence, this trial intended to study the efficacy of Pentoxifylline combined with tamsulosin in treating BOO patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial recruited 60 patients with BPH from a single center in 2022. Upon consent of patients meeting the eligibility criteria, they were randomly allocated to intervention (Pentoxifylline + tamsulosin) and control (placebo + tamsulosin) groups. The patients were evaluated for international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax ) by uroflowmetry, and post-void residual volume (PVR) by abdominal sonography at the onset of the study and after the 12th week. RESULTS: Patients who used the combination therapy had significantly better results of prostate symptoms and quality of life improvement (IPSS: -36.6%, QoL: -45.3%) compared to patients who received tamsulosin alone (IPSS: -21.2%, QoL: -27.7%) (p < .001). Also, this study shows that the improvement in maximum urinary flow rate and residual volume by combination therapy is significantly higher (Qmax : +42.5%, PVR: -42.6%) compared to monotherapy (Qmax : +25.1%, PVR: -26.1%) (p < .001). CONCLUSION: When combined with tamsulosin, Pentoxifylline could significantly improve the lower urinary symptoms of BPH patients. It is well tolerated, and the treatment outcomes are better in patients who receive the combination of Pentoxifylline and tamsulosin than those who only receive tamsulosin.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior , Pentoxifilina , Hiperplasia Prostática , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Hiperplasia/induzido quimicamente , Hiperplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperplasia/patologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/induzido quimicamente , Microcirculação , Pentoxifilina/uso terapêutico , Próstata/patologia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Tansulosina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/patologia
2.
Oral Health Prev Dent ; 16(6): 499-507, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30574604

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Dysgeusia is an unpleasant alteration in taste. It can affect the nutritional and psychological status and decrease the quality of life of patients. It may be caused by nerve injury, head and neck trauma or surgery, infections, radiotherapy and drugs, but certain aetiological factors have not yet been identified. Understanding dysgeusia as a drug side effect is important for practitioners. The aim of this systematic review was to provide detailed information about dysgeusia in patients receiving different common medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Scopus databases, and studies were selected according to our inclusion criteria. We included studies on human subjects that reported dysgeusia as a drug side effect. RESULTS: Thirty-four eligible studies were included in the systematic review. Thirty-five drugs were found in the literature to be correlated to dysgeusia. The most commonly reported offending drugs were from keratolytic agents, chemotherapeutic and cancer medication, antihistamine, antibiotics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSION: The quality of evidence was low in most reviewed studies. More studies with standard methodology are needed in this field. However, physicians and dental practitioners must consider the probability of dysgeusia as an adverse side effect when prescribing certain medications.


Assuntos
Disgeusia/induzido quimicamente , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA