Prevalence, molecular markers, and outcome of bronchial squamous carcinoma in situ in high-risk subjects.

Bronchial squamous carcinoma in situ (CIS) is a preinvasive lesion that is thought to precede invasive carcinoma. We conducted prospective autofluorescence and white light bronchoscopy trials between 1992 and 2016 to assess the prevalence, molecular markers, and outcome of individuals with CIS and other preneoplastic bronchial lesions. Biopsies were evaluated at multiple levels and selected biopsies were tested for aneuploidy and DNA sequenced for TP53 mutation. Thirty-one individuals with CIS were identified. Twenty-two cases of CIS occurred in association with concurrent invasive carcinomas. Seven of the invasive tumors were radiographically occult. In two cases, CIS spread from the focus of invasive carcinoma into contralateral lung lobes, forming secondary invasive tumors. In nine cases, CIS occurred as isolated lesions and one progressed to invasive squamous carcinoma at the same site 40 months after discovery. In a second case, CIS was a precursor of carcinoma at a separate site in a different lobe. In seven cases CIS regressed to a lower grade or disappeared. High level chromosomal aneusomy was often associated with TP53 mutation and with invasive carcinoma. CIS most often occurs in association with invasive squamous carcinoma and may extend along the airways into distant lobes. In rare cases, CIS may be observed to directly transform into invasive carcinoma. CIS may be indicative of invasive tumor at a separate distant site. Isolated CIS may regress. Molecular changes parallel histological changes in CIS and may be used to map clonal expansion in the airways.

Validation of the prognostic value of a three-gene signature and clinical parameters-based risk score in prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to validate the prognostic value of the Prostatype® risk score (P-score), which includes a three-gene signature and conventional risk factors, in a retrospective cohort. METHODS: All 716 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2008 to 2010 at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, were included. After excluding patients based on pathological and clinical eligibility criteria, RNA quality, and presence of metastases at diagnosis, a final cohort comprising 316 patients was further analyzed. Expression levels of three genes (IGFBP3, F3, and VGLL3) were measured in archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded core needle biopsies. The gene expression data were combined with clinical parameters (Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen, and clinical tumor stage) to calculate the P-score for each patient. Predictive performance of the P-score in terms of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), distant metastasis and adverse pathological outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: The P-score predicted both PCSM (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.6) and metastasis (HR = 1.46). The P-score had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.93 when predicting the PCSM risk at 10 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.98), which was significantly better than both D'Amico (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.90, p < 0.001) and UCSF-CAPRA (AUC: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.96, p < 0.05). Decision curve analysis showed a higher net benefit of the P-score compared to both D'Amico and CAPRA. All three risk scores performed similarly in the prediction of distant metastases. For patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), a higher P-score correlated with adverse pathological features such as pathologic tumor stage T3-4 (p < 0.0001) and ≥International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 3 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence for the prognostic value of the P-score. The P-score predicted the risk for PCSM more accurately than the D'Amico and CAPRA scores. Performance was similar when predicting the risk for development of distant metastases within 10 years. Moreover, the P-score correlated with adverse pathological outcomes in RP specimens. Thus, the P-score could provide useful information for patients and their doctors to make informed decisions at the time of diagnosis.