Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mymensingh Med J ; 26(4): 705-709, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29208855

RESUMO

Ovarian cancer is the most frequent cause of death from all gynaecological malignancies because of its insidious onset, vague symptoms and late presentation. This cross-sectional study was carried out on purposively selected 43 patients with suspected ovarian tumor in the Department of Radiology and Imaging in collaboration with the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Department of Pathology, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh from January 2015 to December 2016 to assess the diagnostic performance of color Doppler ultrasonography and CA-125 in a combination described as Novel Index in detection of ovarian tumor. Highest number of patients of ovarian tumor 10(23.26%) were in age group 35 to 44 years and 45 to 54 years with a mean of 37.72±15.65 years with a range of 8-70 years. Histopathology findings revealed 19(44.18%) benign tumors and 24(55.82%) malignant tumors. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of Resistance Index (RI) in diagnosis of ovarian tumor were 91.67%, 89.47%, 91.67%, 89.47% and 90.69% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of serum CA-125 were 83.33%, 89.47%, 90.90%, 80.95% and 86.04% respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of Novel index were 95.83%, 89.47%, 92.00%, 94.44% and 93.02% respectively. Novel index showed better diagnostic performance. Based on the current study it is concluded that the combination of color Doppler ultrasonography and serum CA-125 can be useful for diagnosis of ovarian tumor.


Assuntos
Antígeno Ca-125 , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores , Bangladesh , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia
2.
Mymensingh Med J ; 26(2): 223-229, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28588154

RESUMO

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality. The distinction by physical examination of physiologic nodularity from abnormal masses can be difficult, while the clinical differentiation of a malignant mass from a benign one is difficult; the medical as well as potential legal consequences of missing a palpable carcinoma are high. There are significant number of reported cases of false-negative findings on mammography and the great desire not to miss a malignant lesion in the early stage of disease lead to aggressive biopsy, but the biopsy rate for cancer is only 10.0% to 30.0%. This means that 70.0% to 90.0% of breast biopsies are performed for benign diseases, which induce unnecessary patients discomfort and anxiety in addition to increasing costs to the patient. Clearly, there is a great need for development of additional reliable methods to complement the existing diagnostic procedures to avoid unnecessary biopsy. This cross sectional study was carried out on 43 patients having palpable breast mass, attended in the Department of Radiology and Imaging Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Mymensingh from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2013 for the period of two year. These patients were evaluated by USG at the Department of Radiology and Imaging and histopathological examination at the Department of Pathology of the same College to confirm the diagnosis. In diagnosis of malignant mass by USG, 9(20.9%) cases were diagnosed as malignant and 34(79.1%) cases as other than malignant. Eight out of 9 were sonographically diagnosed as malignant lesions also proved as malignant lesion by histopathology and 1 other than malignant. Out of 34 sonographically diagnosed cases of other than malignant lesions 32 were proved histopathologically and 2 did not match with sonographic findings. USG, in diagnosis of malignant lesion, sensitivity was 80.0%, specificity 96.97%, positive predictive value (PPV) (88.89%), negative predictive value 94.12% and accuracy was 93.02% and comparable to other study. In diagnosis of benign lesion by USG, sensitivity was 96.97%, specificity 80.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) (94.12%), negative predictive value 88.89% and accuracy was 93.02%. So, USG is an appropriate imaging method for diagnosis & differential diagnosis of palpable breast mass.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamografia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA