RESUMO
An 8-year-old boy presenting with left-angle paralysis, tremor in upper and lower extremities, and diplopia was diagnosed with hemorrhage from a mesencephalic cavernous hemangioma. He underwent hemangiomectomy through the occipital transtentorial approach 4 weeks post-hemorrhage, after which Holmes tremor (HT) markedly reduced. A year later, hemangioma has not recurred; he is now independent in his daily activities. Early intervention in the subacute stage allows for the complete removal of brainstem cavernomas (BSCs), with minimal risk of complications or sequelae. Proper timing and surgical approach for BSCs can prevent re-bleeding and improve HT after an initial hemorrhage, without any lasting negative consequences.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico , Hemangioma Cavernoso do Sistema Nervoso Central , Tremor , Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/complicações , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/diagnóstico por imagem , Tremor/etiologia , Tremor/cirurgia , Hemangioma Cavernoso do Sistema Nervoso Central/cirurgia , Hemangioma Cavernoso do Sistema Nervoso Central/complicações , Hemangioma Cavernoso do Sistema Nervoso Central/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemangioma Cavernoso/cirurgia , Hemangioma Cavernoso/complicações , Hemangioma Cavernoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodos , Tronco Encefálico/cirurgia , Tronco Encefálico/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare dynamic-contrast enhanced multirow detector computed tomography (MDCT) including multiplanar reformatted images (MPR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography images for the detection and assessment of locoregional extension of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with and 21 patients without pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent triple-phase MDCT and MRI. Three radiologists independently attempted to detect pancreatic adenocarcinoma and assess locoregional extension in 3 sessions. First session involved MDCT images. In the second session, radiologists had access to coronal and sagittal MPR images together with the axial images (MDCT + MPR). Third session involved MR images. Results were compared with surgical findings using receiver operating characteristic analysis and kappa statistics. RESULTS: Regarding tumor detection, MDCT + MPR had a significantly higher value for areas under the curve (0.96 +/- 0.02) at receiver operating characteristic analysis compared with those of MRI (0.90 +/- 0.03) and MDCT (0.85 +/- 0.04). MDCT + MPR had the highest mean sensitivity (96%), and MRI had the highest mean specificity (98%). For locoregional extension, MDCT + MPR showed the highest kappa values of the study for all factors evaluated (range, 0.63-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, multiphasic MDCT imaging with MPR images was superior to multiphasic MDCT imaging without MPR images and to comprehensive MRI employing 2-D sequences and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for both the detection and assessment of locoregional extension of pancreatic adenocarcinomas. MRI might be used for further lesion characterization regarding its high specificity.