Progression of fluid infiltration on non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A comparative analysis with indocyanine green lymphography.

BACKGROUND: Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI) has been reported as valuable for the assessment of lymphedema. However, the correlation between NMRI findings and indocyanine green lymphography (ICG-L) findings remains elusive. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 26 patients diagnosed with breast cancer-related lymphedema. We examined the prevalence of fluid infiltration in eight regions of the upper extremity, the type of fluid distribution, and the dominant segment of edema on NMRI in comparison to the ICG-L stage. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test, Spearman's rank correlation test, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The regional fluid infiltration significantly increased with the progression of the ICG-L stage (hand, forearm, elbow, and upper arm: p = 0.003, <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). The fluid distribution significantly advanced with the progression of the ICG-L stage as follows (rs = 0.80; p < 0.001): no edema in ICG-L stage 0, edema in either the hand or elbow in ICG-L stage I, edemas in both the elbow and hand in ICG-L stage II, three segmental edemas centered on the forearm or elbow in ICG-L stage III, and edema encompassing the entire upper limb in ICG-L stage IV-V. Additionally, the dominant segment of edema tended to shift from the hand to the elbow and further to the forearm as the ICG-L stage progressed (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fluid infiltration observed on NMRI exhibited distinct patterns with the progression of the ICG-L stage. We believe that anatomical information regarding fluid distribution would potentially contribute to optimizing surgical efficacy.

Characteristic Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Computed Tomography Findings in Lower Extremity Lymphedema: Comparison to Indocyanine Green Lymphography.

Introduction: Evaluation of lymph circulation is significant in lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) management. Single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) has been introduced for lymphedema evaluation, but its characteristic findings are yet fully clarified. The purpose of this study was to reveal typical SPECT-CT findings in secondary LEL by contrasting with indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography findings. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective case-control study. Medical charts of cancer survivors who underwent SPECT-CT and ICG lymphography for secondary LEL were reviewed. Lymphedematous limbs were defined as ICG lymphography stage I-V and non-lymphedematous limbs were defined as ICG lymphography stage 0. Characteristic SPECT-CT findings were identified in early phase and delay phase, and prevalence of the findings was compared between lymphedematous limbs and non-lymphedematous limbs. Results: Thirty-four limbs of 17 patients were included in this study; 6 (17.6%) non-lymphedematous limbs and 28 (82.4%) lymphedematous limbs. Four characteristic SPECT-CT findings were identified; delayed enhancement of the main lower leg lymphatic pathway (DML), few delayed inguinal lymph nodes enhancement (FDN), early phase discontinuous enhancement of the main lymphatic pathway (EDM), and nonenhancement of the deep lymphatic pathways in early phase (NDE). Between lymphedematous and non-lymphedematous limbs, there were statistically significant differences in FDN (64.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.004) and EDM (67.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.002). Conclusions: FDN and EDM are characteristic SPECT-CT findings in secondary LEL.

Evaluation of the Superficial Collecting Lymph Vessels' Vasa Vasorum in Lymphoedematous Limbs Using Video Capillaroscopy.

OBJECTIVE: The pre-collecting and collecting lymph vessels have smooth muscle cells, and sufficient perfusion is vital to maintain their function. Although the vasa vasorum of the collecting lymph vessels (VVCL) have been histologically investigated, little is known about their physiology. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between morphology and blood flow of the VVCL in lymphoedematous limbs. METHODS: Medical records of lower extremity lymphoedema patients who underwent video capillaroscopy observation during supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery were reviewed. The collecting lymph vessels, dissected for LVA, were examined under video capillaroscopy (GOKO Bscan-ZD, GOKO Imaging Devices Co., Japan) with a magnification of 175x and 620x. Blood flow velocity of the VVCL was calculated by measuring the red blood cell movement using software (GOKO-VIP ver. 1.0.0.4, GOKO Imaging Devices Co., Japan). Based on the video capillaroscopy findings, the VVCL were grouped according to their morphology; the VVCL morphology types and blood flow velocity were then compared according to the lymphosclerosis severity grade. RESULTS: Sixty-seven lymph vessels in 20 lower extremity lymphoedema patients were evaluated, including s0 in 19 (28.4%), s1 in 34 (50.7%), s2 in 10 (14.9%), and s3 in four (6.0%) lymph vessels. The VVCLs were grouped into four types: type 1 (n = 4), type 2 (n = 37), type 3 (n = 19), and type 4 (n = 7). Blood flow velocity of the VVCL ranged 0 - 189.3 µm/sec (average 26.40 µm/sec). There were statistically significant differences in VVCL morphology (p < .001) and blood flow velocity (p < .001) according to lymphosclerotic severity. CONCLUSION: Vasa vasorum of the collecting lymph vessels could be grouped into four types with different characteristics. Morphological and physiological changes of the VVCL were related to sclerotic changes of the collecting lymph vessels.

Dermal-adipose lymphatic flap venous wrapping: A novel lymphaticovenous shunt method for progression of upper extremity lymphedema with severe lymphosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Upper extremity lymphedema (UEL) causes a significant deterioration in the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. Lymphaticovenous shunt creation will address the pathophysiology of obstructive UEL; however, its efficacy has been limited for those with UEL progression due to lymphosclerosis. In the present study, we evaluated the feasibility of a new lymphaticovenous shunt method for progression of UEL. METHODS: A total of 37 patients who had undergone dermal-adipose lymphatic flap venous wrapping (DALF-VW) for the treatment of UEL progression refractory to previous lymphaticovenular anastomosis were included. A DALF was created where indocyanine green lymphography had shown dermal backflow and was wrapped with a reflux-free recipient vein. The patients' medical records were reviewed to obtain the clinical and intraoperative findings. The patient and vessel characteristics and postoperative results were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients with unilateral UEL were included. All DALF-VW procedures were performed under local infiltration anesthesia, with 98 shunts created in 37 limbs (2.6 shunts per limb). The diameter of the vein used for DALF-VW ranged from 1.7 to 3.3 mm (average, 2.39 mm). The operative time ranged from 25 to 139 minutes (average, 47.8 minutes). The differences in the lymphedema quality of life score (45.6 ± 21.1 vs 32.5 ± 21.1; P = .009), UEL index (131.4 ± 18.2 vs 123.1 ± 16.4; P = .042), and frequency of cellulitis (0.8 ± 1.3 vs 0.2 ± 0.5 times annually; P = .010) before and after DALF-VW were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: DALF-VW was effective for UEL progression that was refractory to previous lymphaticovenular anastomosis surgery. DALF-VW could be a useful option for UEL progression with severe lymphosclerosis.

Domino Free Flap Transfer Using a Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap for the Toe Flap Donor Site.

BACKGROUND: Toe-to-hand transfer is a favorable option for finger reconstruction, but donor site healing can be challenging. The superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap has yet to be used widely for toe reconstruction. The purpose of this report was to validate the efficacy of the sequential simultaneous free SCIP flap transfer for the toe flap donor site in a consecutive case series. METHODS: The medical records of 18 consecutive patients who underwent a simultaneous SCIP flap transfer and a toe-to-hand transplant were reviewed. Free SCIP flap reconstruction was performed in a simultaneous 2-team approach. The SCIP flaps were transferred to various toe flap donor sites: a great toe wraparound flap in 9 cases, a second toe distal phalangeal flap in 4 cases, a great toe osteo-onycho-cutaneous flap in 3 cases, a twisted wraparound flap in 1 case, and a great toe hemipulp flap in 1 case. RESULTS: The size of the SCIP flap ranged from 5 × 3 to 16 × 8 cm. A mean of the total operative time was 229.2 minutes (range, 118-441 minutes; SD, 75.8 minutes). All the SCIP and toe flaps survived completely. Minor wound dehiscence was seen in 2 cases, and the wound healed by conservative treatment. The mean follow-up period was 23.7 months (range, 7-44 months; SD, 9.7 months). No patient had gait dysfunction postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: A sequential SCIP flap transfer was performed simultaneously without additional time, allowing secure soft tissue coverage of the toe flap donor even with avascular tissue such as bone or tendon exposed. The sequential SCIP flap transfer can be a useful option for reconstruction of toe flap donor site, when multiple microsurgeons and microscopes are available.

Expanding indication of free hypothenar flap transfer: Sequential pedicled ulnar palm flap transfer to a relatively large hypothenar flap donor site.

BACKGROUND: Free hypothenar flap (HTF) transfer allows sensible soft tissue reconstruction of the fingertip. However, HTF is basically indicated for a relatively small soft tissue defect, as width of an HTF is limited up to approximately 20 mm to allow primary donor site closure. Combined with sequential local flap to an HTF donor site, a larger HTF can be used without the contracture risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of free HTF transfer and sequential ulnar palm flap (UPF) transfer (HTF-UPF) for relatively large fingertip reconstructions. METHODS: Medical charts of patients who underwent HTF-UPF for fingertip reconstruction were reviewed. An HTF was designed transversely proximal to the proximal palmar crease, and a slightly smaller hemi-spindle-shaped UPF was designed longitudinally on the mid-lateral aspect of the ulnar palm; the UPF was used to close the HTF donor site. Patient and flap characteristics, intra-operative findings, and postoperative results were evaluated. RESULTS: Twelve patients with average age of 42.7 years were included. HTF-UPF procedure was performed on 12 fingers. HTF's length/width ranged from 45/20 to 70/40 mm (average, 52.5/32.1 mm). UPF's length/width ranged from 40/20 to 55/30 mm (average, 46.7/24.2 mm). Time for sequential UPF transfer ranged from 3 to 9 min (average, 5.1 min). All HTFs and UPFs survived without flap necrosis or scar contracture. Postoperative sensation was comparable with the contralateral fingertip. CONCLUSIONS: HTF-UPF procedure allows relatively large fingertip reconstruction with a minimum risk of HTF donor site contracture.

Anatomical Location of Lymphatic Pathways in the Posterior Thigh.

BACKGROUND: It is necessary for treating lower extremity lymphedema to understand the lymphatic pathways in the extremities. This study aimed to clarify the anatomical locations of lymph vessels in the posterior thigh using indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography. METHODS: Medical records of cancer survivors who underwent ICG lymphography for secondary lymphedema screening from February 2019 to November 2020 were reviewed. Nonlymphedematous limbs without dermal backflow pattern on ICG lymphography (ICG stage 0) were included. Indocyanine green (0.1 mL) was injected intradermally at 2 points in the midlateral thigh, at the levels of one third and two thirds from the popliteal fossa to the gluteal fold in a prone position. Locations of the posterior thigh collecting lymph vessels visualized by ICG lymphography were marked on the skin surface with a pen, and distances from the popliteal fossa to the collecting lymph vessels were measured at the posterior midline in percentage, with the popliteal fossa set as 0% and the gluteal fold as 100%. Based on ICG lymphography findings, the number of the collecting lymph vessels shown as linear pattern and anatomical locations at the posterior thigh midline were investigated. RESULTS: Twenty limbs of 20 cancer survivors were included. Linear pattern was identified in all lower extremities; average number was 2.3 ± 0.7 (range, 1-3). Most collecting lymph vessels shown on ICG lymphography, 26.7% (12 of 45) lymph vessels, were located within 40% to 50% of the region, and 24.4% (11 of 45) lymph vessels within 30% to 40% of the region. CONCLUSIONS: There are 1 or more collecting lymph vessels in the posterior thigh by midlateral thigh ICG injection, which can be addressed for posterior thigh lymphedema.

Radical reduction and reconstruction for male genital elephantiasis: Superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) lymphatic flap transfer after elephantiasis tissue resection.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of elephantiasis, the most severe lymphedema, is challenging. Management of male genital elephantiasis (MGE) is even more challenging than extremity elephantiasis due to its complicated shape and high risk of lymphorrhea and cellulitis. Complete resection of fibrous tissue and lymphatic reconstruction is considered to be ideal for the treatment of MGE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of radical reduction and reconstruction (3R) for isolated MGE. METHODS: Medical charts of patients who underwent 3R were reviewed. The 3R operation consisted of genital fibrous tissue resection and reconstruction of soft tissue and lymphatic structure using superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) lymphatic flap transfer (LFT). No compression was applied postoperatively. Patient and flap characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative results were evaluated. RESULTS: Seven patients were included. MGE included isolated scrotal elephantiasis in 4 cases, and scrotal and penile elephantiasis in 3 cases. Resected tissue volume ranged from 609 to 2304 grams (average, 1511.0 grams). SCIP-LFT was performed in all cases; pedicled full-thickness SCIP-LFT for scrotal reconstruction in all cases, and SCIP pure-skin-perforator flap transfer for penile reconstruction in 3 cases. There was no postoperative genital complication or evidence of genital lymphedema recurrence in the mean follow-up period of 22.7 months. Genital lymphedema scores significantly improved postoperatively (6.7 ± 1.8 vs. 0.3 ± 0.5, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: 3R operation allowed one-stage curative treatment for MGE. LFT has the potential to play an essential role in the prevention of postoperative wound complications and lymphedema recurrence after radical resection of fibrotic tissue.

Lymph-interpositional-flap transfer (LIFT) based on lymph-axiality concept: Simultaneous soft tissue and lymphatic reconstruction without lymph node transfer or lymphatic anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic system is important to maintain homeostasis. Lymph-axiality concept has been reported, which suggests possibility of lymphatic reconstruction using flap transfer without lymph node or supermicrosurgical lymphatic anastomosis. METHODS: Medical charts of 122 free flap reconstruction cases, either with conventional flap transfer (control) or lymph-interpositional-flap transfer (LIFT), for extremity soft tissue defects including lymphatic pathways were reviewed. Lymph vessels' stumps in a flap were placed as close to those in a recipient site as possible under indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography navigation in LIFT group. LIFT group was subdivided into LIFT(+) and LIFT(-) groups; lymph vessels' stumps could be approximated within 2 cm in LIFT(+) group, whereas those could not be in LIFT(-) group. Lymph flow restoration (LFR) and lymphedema development (LED) rates were compared between the groups on postoperative 6 months. RESULTS: No flap included lymph node. LFR was observed in 50 cases and LED in 72 cases. LFR rate in LIFT group (n = 75) was significantly higher than that in control group (n = 47) (57.3% vs. 14.9%; P < 0.001). LED rate in LIFT group was significantly lower than that in control group (20.0% vs. 48.9%; P < 0.001). Sub-group analysis showed significantly higher LFR and lower LED rates in LIFT(+) group (n = 44) than those in LIFT(-) group (n = 31; 88.6% vs. 12.9%; P < 0.001, 4.5% vs. 41.9%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LIFT allows simultaneous soft tissue and lymphatic reconstruction without lymph node transfer or lymphatic anastomosis, which prevents development of secondary lymphedema.