Assessment of lifestyle "vital signs" in healthcare settings.

Unhealthy lifestyles, such as maintenance of poor diets and physical inactivity, are a powerful driver of disease-producing risk factors and chronic illnesses. This has led to an increasing call to assess adverse lifestyle factors in healthcare settings. This approach could be aided by designating health-related lifestyle factors as "vital signs" that can be recorded during patient visits. Just such an approach has been used for assessing patients' smoking habits since the 1990s. In this review, we assess the rationale for addressing six other health-related lifestyle factors, beyond smoking, in patient care settings: physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB), participation in muscle strengthening exercises, mobility limitations, diet, and sleep quality. For each domain, we evaluate the evidence that supports currently proposed ultra-short screening tools. Our analysis indicates strong medical evidence to support the use of one to two-item screening questions for assessing patients' PA, SB, muscle strengthening activities, and presence of "pre-clinical" mobility limitations. We also present a theoretical basis for measuring patients' diet quality through use of an ultrashort dietary screen, based on evaluation of healthy food intake (fruits/vegetables) and unhealthy food intake (high consumption of highly processed meats and/or consumption of sugary foods and beverages) and a proposed evaluation of sleep quality using a single-item screener. The result is a 10-item lifestyle questionnaire that is based on patient self-report. As such, this questionnaire has the potential to be employed as a practical tool for assessing health behaviors in clinical care settings without impairing the normal workflow of healthcare providers.

American Society of Echocardiography Algorithm for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Comparison With CMR.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) algorithm for assessing mitral regurgitation (MR) to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and left ventricular (LV) remodeling following mitral intervention. BACKGROUND: The ASE recommends integrating multiple echocardiographic parameters for assessing MR. The ASE guidelines include an algorithm that weighs the parameters and highlights those considered indicative of definitely mild or definitely severe MR. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 152 (age 62 ± 13 years; 59% male) patients with degenerative MR who underwent ASE algorithm-guided echocardiographic and CMR grading of MR severity. Using the ASE algorithm, patients were graded as definitely mild, grade I, grade II, grade III, grade IV, or definitely severe MR. CMR MR volume was graded as mild (<30 mL), grade II moderate (30-44 mL), grade III moderate (45-59 mL), or severe (≥60 mL). A subgroup of 63 patients underwent successful mitral intervention, of whom 48 had postintervention CMR. RESULTS: Only 52% of patients with definitely severe MR by the ASE algorithm had severe MR by CMR, and 10% had mild MR by CMR. There was an increase in post mitral intervention LV reverse remodeling with worsening MR severity using CMR (P < 0.0001) but not the ASE algorithm (P = 0.07). Severe MR by CMR was an independent predictor of post mitral intervention LV reverse remodeling and definitely severe MR by the ASE algorithm was not. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with degenerative MR, agreement between CMR and the ASE algorithm was suboptimal. Severe MR by CMR was an independent predictor of post mitral intervention LV reverse remodeling, whereas definitely severe MR by the ASE algorithm was not. These findings suggest an important role for CMR in surgical decision making in degenerative MR. (Comparison Study of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Mitral and Aortic Regurgitation; NCT04038879).

Characterization of Primary Mitral Regurgitation With Flail Leaflet and/or Wall-Impinging Flow.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography guidelines note that a flail leaflet is a specific criterion for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and that regurgitant severity is underestimated in wall-impinging jets (Coanda effect). Both findings are often considered to be pathognomonic of severe MR. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the authors sought to determine the association of flail leaflet and Coanda effect with MR severity quantified by means of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: The authors enrolled 158 consecutive patients with primary MR according to echocardiography and CMR. The presence of a flail leaflet or Coanda was determined for each patient. CMR regurgitant volume (RV) and regurgitant fraction (RF) were quantified for all patients. RESULTS: There were 55 patients (35%) with a flail leaflet, 52 (33%) with Coanda, and 22 (14%) with a flail leaflet and Coanda. The mean CMR mitral RV and RF progressively increased in patients without a Coanda or flail, a Coanda, a flail, or a Coanda and a flail (RV: 28 ± 21 mL vs 43 ± 23 mL vs 58 ± 29 mL vs 64 ± 25 mL [P < 0.001]; RF: 25% ± 16% vs 34% ± 14% vs 41% ± 12% vs 45% ± 12% [P < 0.001]). With the use of CMR RV, 35%, 46%, and 59% of patients had severe MR with the presence of a Coanda, flail leaflet, or both, respectively. With the use of CMR RF, 25%, 31%, and 40% of patients had severe MR with the presence of a Coanda, flail leaflet, or both, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While the presence of a flail leaflet and Coanda effect on echocardiography are associated with higher regurgitant volumes and fractions, they are frequently not associated with severe MR as assessed by means of CMR. (Comparison Study of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Mitral and Aortic Regurgitation; NCT04038879).