The safety profile of mesenchymal stem cell therapy administered through intrathecal injections for treating neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Based on previous in vivo studies and human trials, intrathecal cell delivery is a safe and relevant therapeutic tool for improving patient's quality of life with neurological conditions. We aimed to characterise the safety profile of intrathecally delivered Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, KCI-Korean Journal Database, and Web of Science. Databases were searched from their inception until April 13, 2023. Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compared intrathecal delivery of MSCs to controls in adult populations were included. Adverse events (AEs) were pooled and meta-analysed using DerSimonian-Laird random effects models with a correction factor 0.5 added to studies with zero count cells. Pooled AEs were described using Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Then, a random-effects meta-regress model on study-level summary data was performed to explore the relationship between the occurrence of AEs and covariates thought to modify the overall effect estimate. Finally, publication bias was assessed. RESULTS: 303 records were reviewed, and nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis (n = 540 patients). MSCs delivered intrathecally, as compared to controls, were associated with an increased probability of AEs of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (categorised by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events-CTCAE version 5.0) (RR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.19-2.19, I2 = 0%). The random-effects meta-regress model suggested that fresh MSCs increased the probability of occurrence of AEs compared to cryopreserved MSCs (RR: 1.554; p-value = 0.048; 95% CI 1.004-2.404), and the multiple-dose, decreased the probability of AEs by 36% compared to single doses (RR: 0.644; p-value = 0.048; 95% CI 0.416-0.996); however, univariate random effects meta-regression models revealed a not significant association between the occurrence of AEs from MSCs intrathecal delivery and each covariate. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal delivery of MSCs was associated with a slight increase in AEs associated with musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, albeit without serious AEs. We conclude that intrathecal MSCs delivery is safe for patients with neurological conditions. However, further high-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

COVID-19 convalescent plasma composition and immunological effects in severe patients.

Convalescent plasma (CP) has emerged as a treatment for COVID-19. However, the composition and mechanism of action are not fully known. Therefore, we undertook a two-phase controlled study in which, first the immunological and metabolomic status of recovered and severe patients were evaluated. Secondly, the 28-day effect of CP on the immune response in severe patients was assessed. Nineteen recovered COVID-19 patients, 18 hospitalized patients with severe disease, and 16 pre-pandemic controls were included. Patients with severe disease were treated with CP transfusion and standard therapy (i.e., plasma recipients, n = 9) or standard therapy alone (n = 9). Clinical and biological assessments were done on day 0 and during follow-up on days 4, 7, 14, and 28. Clinical parameters, viral load, total immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgA anti-S1-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), autoantibodies, cytokines, T and B cells, and metabolomic and lipidomic profiles were examined. Total IgG and IgA anti-S1-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were key factors for CP selection and correlated with NAbs. In severe COVID-19 patients, mostly interleukin (IL)-6 (P = <0.0001), IL-10 (P = <0.0001), IP-10 (P = <0.0001), fatty acyls and glycerophospholipids were higher than in recovered patients. Latent autoimmunity and anti-IFN-α antibodies were observed in both recovered and severe patients. COVID-19 CP induced an early but transient cytokine profile modification and increases IgG anti-S1-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. At day 28 post-transfusion, a decrease in activated, effector and effector memory CD4+ (P < 0.05) and activated and effector CD8+ (P < 0.01) T cells and naïve B cells (P = 0.001), and an increase in non-classical memory B cells (P=<0.0001) and central memory CD4+ T cells (P = 0.0252) were observed. Moreover, IL-6/IFN-γ (P = 0.0089) and IL-6/IL-10 (P = 0.0180) ratios decreased in plasma recipients compared to those who received standard therapy alone. These results may have therapeutic implications and justify further post-COVID-19 studies.

Evaluación de la costo-efectividad de un modelo integral de tratamiento ambulatorio en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo: aplicación de un modelo de Markov probabilístico / Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of an integral model of ambulatory treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome: application of a probabilistic Markov model / Avaliação da relação custo-eficácia de um modelo integral de tratamento ambulatorial em pacientes com síndrome coronariana aguda: aplicação de um modelo probabilístico de Markov

RESUMEN Objetivo Evaluar la costo-efectividad de un modelo integral de tratamiento ambulatorio en pacientes que presentaron un síndrome coronario agudo. Métodos Se realizó una evaluación económica a partir de un estudio de intervención cuasi-experimental, que incluyó 442 pacientes con edades entre 30 y 70 años, quienes presentaron un síndrome coronario agudo. El grupo de intervención (n = 165) recibió un modelo integral de tratamiento ambulatorio fundamentado en el cuidado gestionado (disease management), mientras que el grupo control (n = 277) recibió rehabilitación cardiovascular convencional. Durante un año de seguimiento, se evaluó la presentación de reeventos cardiovasculares y hospitalizaciones. Se desarrolló un modelo de Markov probabilístico. La perspectiva de estudio se aplicó dentro del Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud Colombiano, incluidos los costos sanitarios directos; el horizonte temporal fue de 50 años con descuentos de 3,42% para costos y efectividades; y la medida de efectividad fue los años de vida ganados ajustados por calidad. Se realizó un análisis de sensibilidad probabilístico y multivariante mediante de la simulación de Montecarlo. Resultados Durante el año de seguimiento, los costos directos relacionados con el valor pagado fueron en promedio de USD 2 577 para el grupo control y USD 2 245 para el grupo de intervención. En el análisis de sensibilidad probabilístico, 91,3% de las simulaciones se ubicaron en el cuadrante correspondiente a costos incrementales negativos y efectividades incrementales positivas (intervención evaluada de menor costo, más efectiva). En las simulaciones, se observó un ahorro promedio anual por paciente de USD 1 215 por cada año de vida ganado ajustado por calidad. Conclusiones El modelo integral de tratamiento ambulatorio implementado en pacientes que sufrieron un síndrome coronario agudo mostró ser menos costoso y más efectivo en comparación con el cuidado convencional. Por ser una alternativa dominante, se recomienda como modelo de cuidado en esta población.

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an integral model of ambulatory treatment in patients who presented an acute coronary syndrome. Methods An economic evaluation was made from a quasi-experimental intervention study, which included 442 patients aged 30 to 70 years who presented an acute coronary syndrome. The intervention group (n = 165) received an integral model of ambulatory treatment based on managed care (disease management), while the control group (n = 277) received conventional cardiovascular rehabilitation. During one year of follow-up, the presentation of cardiovascular events and hospitalizations was evaluated. A probabilistic Markov model was developed. The study perspective was applied within the General System of Health Social Security in Colombia, including the direct health costs; the time horizon was 50 years with discounts of 3.42% for costs and effectiveness; and the measure of effectiveness was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A probabilistic and multivariate sensitivity analysis was performed using the Montecarlo simulation. Results During the year of follow-up, the direct costs related to the value paid were, on average, USD 2 577 for the control group and USD 2 245 for the intervention group. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, 91.3% of the simulations were located in the quadrant corresponding to incremental negative costs and positive incremental effectiveness (evaluated intervention at a lower cost, more effective). In the simulations, an average annual savings per patient of USD 1 215 per QALY was observed. Conclusions The integral model of ambulatory treatment implemented in patients who suffered an acute coronary syndrome was found to be less expensive and more effective compared to conventional care. Considering it is a dominant alternative, it is recommended as a model of care in this population.

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a relação custo-eficácia de um modelo integral de tratamento ambulatorial em pacientes que apresentaram síndrome coronariana aguda. Métodos Uma avaliação econômica foi feita a partir de um estudo de intervenção quase experimental, que incluiu 442 pacientes com idade entre 30 a 70 anos que apresentaram síndrome coronariana aguda. O grupo de intervenção (n = 165) recebeu um modelo integral de tratamento ambulatorial com base em cuidados gerenciados (gerenciamento de doenças), enquanto o grupo controle (n = 277) recebeu reabilitação cardiovascular convencional. Durante um ano de acompanhamento, foi avaliada a apresentação de eventos cardiovasculares e hospitalizações. Um modelo probabilístico de Markov foi desenvolvido. A perspectiva do estudo foi aplicada no Sistema Geral de Segurança Social na Saúde da Colômbia, incluindo os custos diretos de saúde; o horizonte temporal foi de 50 anos com descontos de 3,42% em custos e efetividade; e a medida de eficácia foi os anos de vida ajustados pela qualidade (QALY). Uma análise de sensibilidade probabilística e multivariada foi realizada utilizando a simulação de Montecarlo. Resultados Durante o ano de acompanhamento, os custos diretos relacionados ao valor pago foram, em média, USD 2 577 para o grupo controle e USD 2 245 para o grupo de intervenção. Na análise de sensibilidade probabilística, foram localizadas 91,3% das simulações no quadrante correspondente a custos negativos incrementais e eficácia incremental positiva (intervenção avaliada a menor custo, mais efetiva). Nas simulações, observou-se uma economia anual média por paciente de US $ 1 215 por QALY. Conclusões O modelo integral de tratamento ambulatorial implementado em pacientes que sofreram síndrome coronariana aguda foi considerado menos caro e mais eficaz em comparação com os cuidados convencionais. Por ser uma alternativa dominante, é recomendado como modelo de cuidados nesta população.