RESUMO
Over the last few decades, endovascular revascularization techniques have revolutionized the treatment of peripheral artery disease, offering a less invasive alternative to surgery. However, the successful treatment of heavily calcified lesions is often compromised by various vascular complications, including recoils, dissections, and the need for target vessel reinterventions. This has prompted the development of several tools for lesion preparation, with the aim of achieving better procedural outcomes. This review aims to summarize the main characteristics and current evidence related to the available devices for preparing severely calcified peripheral lesions.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , Doença Arterial Periférica , Calcificação Vascular , Humanos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcificação Vascular/terapia , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endarterectomy is considered the gold standard therapy for common femoral artery (CFA) steno-occlusive lesions, but a significant risk of perioperative mortality and complications has been reported. OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy at a long-term follow-up of patients with CFA steno-occlusive lesions treated with directional atherectomy and drug coated balloon (DCB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this single-center registry, 78 patients (male: 80.7%; age: 71 ± 15 years; occlusions: 25%) with 80 CFA lesions were included, with 39.7% of them undergoing directional atherectomy and drug coated balloon due to critical limb ischemia and 60.3% due to lower-limb intermittent claudication. The long-term follow-up was completed by 75 patients (3 years). The 31 patients with critical ischemia (39.7%) were further subdivided into 20 (25.6%) patients with pain at rest and 11 (14.1%) with trophic changes, ulcers and/or tissue loss. We considered the primary and the secondary outcome, referring, respectively to peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) ≥ 2.4 on duplex or > 50% stenosis on digital subtraction angiography at 36 months and to clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 36 months. RESULTS: The primary and secondary outcome was obtained in 84% and 86.7% of patients, at 36 months of follow up. Bailout stenting was necessary in 6/80 cases (7.5%) for suboptimal result. Freedom from MALE was obtained in 98.6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that directional atherectomy and drug coated balloon strategy for the treatment of CFA lesions is effective at a long-term follow-up and could be considered as a good alternative to surgery.
Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Doença Arterial Periférica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Aterectomia/efeitos adversos , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Artéria Femoral , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Artéria Poplítea , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
AIMS: Surgical endarterectomy is the therapy of choice for atherosclerotic common femoral artery (CFA) obstruction. Recently, some large single-centre series have shown encouraging results for the percutaneous treatment of CFA obstructions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and one-year efficacy of the endovascular treatment of CFA obstructions with combined use of directional atherectomy (DA) and a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2012 and July 2014, 30 consecutive patients with severely calcified obstructions of the common femoral artery were treated in our centre using DA followed by DCB dilatation. Provisional stenting was allowed in the case of a suboptimal result. Twenty cases (66%) were isolated CFA interventions, whereas five (17%) and five (17%) also involved inflow and outflow vessels, respectively. Chronic total CFA occlusions (CTO) were recanalised in six cases (20%). Procedural success was achieved in all cases; stenting was needed in three cases (10%). At one year, restenosis and target lesion revascularisation were observed in two of 30 (6.6%) and one of 30 (3.3%) patients, respectively. The secondary patency rate was 96.7%. CONCLUSIONS: This single-centre prospective study suggests that the combined use of DA and DCB is a safe and effective alternative to surgery, a treatment option for common femoral artery lesions and provides encouraging results in this setting.
Assuntos
Aterectomia , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Stents , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angioplastia com Balão/métodos , Aterectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the success rate and the acute and 12-month clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the contemporary era. BACKGROUND: The technique of PCI involving CTO has improved over time. However, limited data on acute and follow-up results in patients treated with PCI on CTO in recent years are available. METHODS: Four hundred nineteen consecutive patients scheduled for PCI of CTO of > or =30 days of duration were enrolled in 29 centers; 390 CTOs were confirmed in 376 patients in an independent core laboratory. The end points were technical and procedural success, in-hospital and 12-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurrence, and 12-month symptomatic status. RESULTS: Technical and procedural success was obtained in 77.2% and 73.3% of lesions, respectively. In-hospital major adverse cardiac events occurred in 5.1% of patients. Multivariate analysis identified CTO length >15 mm or not measurable, moderate to severe calcifications, duration > or =180 days, and multivessel disease as significant predictors of PCI failure. At 12 months, patients with a successful procedure experienced a lower incidence of cardiac deaths or myocardial infarction (1.05% vs. 7.23%, p = 0.005), a reduced need for coronary artery bypass surgery (2.45% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.0001), and were more frequently free of angina (88.7% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.008) compared with patients who had an unsuccessful procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Successful PCI was achieved in a high percentage of CTOs with a low incidence of complications. At one-year follow-up, patients with successful PCI of a CTO had a significantly better clinical outcome than those whose PCI was unsuccessful.