Contemporary Immunosuppression Management and 1-Year Outcomes in Dual Organ Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There have been limited reports on immunosuppression strategies and outcomes in dual organ heart transplant populations, primarily from before the 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation policy change. Recent data suggested that outcomes with heart-lung and heart-liver transplants remained comparable in the new allocation era, yet heart-kidney recipients have worse 1-year survival. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study evaluated adult heart-kidney, heart-liver, and heart-lung transplant recipients from September 2019 to May 2023. Immunosuppression regimen, infectious complications, and graft outcomes were collected for 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients (kidney n = 20, liver n = 9, and lung n = 7) were included in this study. Basiliximab was the most commonly employed induction strategy across the organ groups (12/20 in kidney, 4/9 in liver, and 7/7 in lung). All patients were on triple immunosuppression at 12 months posttransplant with prednisone wean achieved in one heart-liver recipient. Infection complications were frequently reported (95% kidney, 75% liver, 100% lung group). One patient went back to dialysis due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. One chronic lung allograft dysfunction was reported, but no other severe biopsy-proven rejection or retransplant was reported. The 1-year survival was 85% (17/20) in heart-kidney, 78% (7/9) in heart-liver, and 86% (6/7) in heart-lung recipients. CONCLUSION: This study summarized real-world immunosuppression strategies and outcomes in dual organ heart transplant recipients.

Immune cell function assay and T lymphocyte counts lack association with rejection or infection in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Immune cell function assay (ICFA) and CD3 lymphocyte counts have been considered to be useful in discerning the overall intensity of immunosuppression in pediatric orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients. METHODS: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate trends of ICFA and CD3 lymphocyte counts and their association with adverse outcomes post-OHT. RESULTS: A total of 381 ICFA and 493 CD3 laboratory values obtained in 78 patients within six months post-OHT were analyzed. There were 14 patients treated for biopsy-proven acute rejection, four of whom had ISHLT grade 2R/3A rejection. In patients with rejection versus those without, CD3 and ICFA values were 122 (IQR 74.5-308) cells/mm2 and 224.5 (IQR 132-343.5) ng/ml compared to 231.8 (IQR 68-421) cells/m2 and 191 (IQR 81.5-333) ng/mL (p = NS for both). Twenty-six patients had at least one detectable cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia within the study timeframe. In patients with viremia versus those without, CD3 and ICFA values were 278.5 (IQR 68-552) cells/mm2 and 130 (IQR 48-284) ng/ml compared to 195 (IQR 74.5-402.5) cells/mm2 and 212 (IQR 89-342) ng/ml (p = NS for both). CONCLUSIONS: No association was found between these immune markers and adverse outcomes. In the absence of larger pediatric studies justifying the role of these tests in identifying elevated risk profiles post OHT, we do not recommend their routine use.

Pre-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Rituximab for Epstein-Barr Virus and Post-Lymphoproliferative Disorder Prophylaxis in Alemtuzumab Recipients.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation and EBV-related post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are often fatal complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The risk of EBV reactivation may be mitigated by depletion of B cells with rituximab. Starting in January 2020, allo-HSCT recipients undergoing T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab received 1 dose of rituximab before transplantation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation and EBV-PTLD in recipients of allo-HSCT and in vivo T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab who received pre-HSCT rituximab compared to patients who did not. This was a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients who consecutively received an HLA-identical allo-HSCT between January 2019 and May 2021 and in vivo T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab. Patients were included in the rituximab cohort if they received rituximab within 6 months before their transplantation. The primary endpoint was incidence of EBV reactivation at day 180 among those receiving pre-HSCT rituximab versus those not receiving rituximab. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of EBV-PTLD at 1 year, time to engraftment, immune reconstitution, and incidence of infections and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at day 180. Eighty-six consecutive patients who received an allo-HSCT with alemtuzumab T-cell depletion were reviewed; 43 patients who received pre-HSCT rituximab after our protocol modification were compared to 43 patients who did not receive pre-HSCT rituximab before this change. Median age was 57 (interquartile range [IQR] 40-69) years, and the majority of patients had acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Baseline characteristics were similar between the cohorts. EBV reactivation at day 180 occurred in 23 (53%) patients without prior rituximab exposure versus 0 patients with pre-HSCT rituximab exposure (P < .0001). Similarly, 6 patients without prior rituximab exposure developed PTLD at 1 year compared to no cases of PTLD among patients receiving pre-HSCT rituximab. There was no difference in neutrophil engraftment, incidence of infections, or aGVHD at day 180 between the 2 cohorts. There was a delay in time to platelet engraftment in the rituximab cohort (median 16 [IQR 15-20] days versus 15 [IQR 14-17] days; P = .04). Administration of pre-HSCT rituximab before allo-HSCT in patients receiving T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab was associated with a significant decrease in the risk for EBV reactivation and EBV-PTLD, without increasing aGVHD or infection rates.

Use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in solid organ transplantation: A systematic review.

The use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased secondary to the mounting evidence for comparable efficacy and potentially superior safety to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the general population. However, insufficient data regarding DOAC use in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and numerous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations limit their use in this highly selected patient population. A systematic review of recent clinical evidence on the safety and efficacy of DOACs compared to VKAs in SOT recipients was conducted. Additional considerations including transplant-specific strategies for DOAC reversal and common pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concerns were also reviewed. Although current evidence is limited to single-center retrospective analyses, DOACs, especially apixaban, appear to be a safe and effective alternative to VKAs for SOT recipients with stable graft function and without drug-drug interactions. Reliable data on DOAC reversal at the time of transplant surgery are lacking, and clinicians should consider idarucizumab, andexanet alfa, and other non-specific reversal agents on an individual patient basis. There is no evidence supporting deviations from the Food and Drug Administration labeling recommendations for DOAC dosing in the setting of drug-drug interactions, obesity, and renal function, especially in patients on hemodialysis.

Utilization of direct-acting oral anticoagulation in solid organ transplant patients: A national survey of institutional practices.

The safety and efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and reversal strategies are not well established in the solid organ transplant population. This was a survey of pharmacists to assess DOAC and urgent reversal practices among adult transplant programs in the United States. A 27-question survey was distributed to members of transplant pharmacy organization listservs between 5/28/19 and 6/30/19. A total of 115 responses were received from kidney (43.5%), heart (20.0%), lung (18.3%), liver (13.9%), and pancreas (4.4%) transplant programs. DOAC use prior to transplant was mostly prohibited in thoracic programs (77.3%) but more permissive in kidney transplant programs (64.0%). If permitted, apixaban (57.8%) was most preferred. At transplant surgery, reversal of DOAC was performed "as needed" (20.9%) or was not routine (18.3%). DOAC use post-transplant was more permissive (94.3%). A majority of responders follow FDA recommended dosing in the setting of drug-drug interactions (51.1%). Major factors influencing DOAC prescribing decisions included renal function, drug-drug interactions, and insurance. High clinical practice variability exists regarding DOAC utilization and urgent reversal strategies in pre-, peri-, and post-transplant stages. While more research is needed to refine the clinical landscape, many institutions are using DOAC therapy under the perception that they pose a similar risk of bleeding compared to a non-transplant population.

Delayed calcineurin inhibitor introduction and renal outcomes in liver transplant recipients receiving basiliximab induction.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of delayed calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) initiation in liver transplant recipients (LTR) with peri-operative renal insufficiency receiving basiliximab induction, we compared renal outcomes of LTR stratified by the degree of achieved post-operative renal recovery (RR) prior to CNI initiation. METHODS: All adult LTR transplanted between 01/2007 and 12/2015 who received basiliximab were included. Patients who received multi-organ transplantations, were repeat transplant recipients, or expired prior to post-operative day (POD) 90 were excluded. The primary outcome of our retrospective analysis was renal function at POD 90. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were included in our final analysis. Most patients were Caucasian males undergoing liver transplantation for liver disease secondary to hepatitis C virus. Baseline characteristics were similar among the evaluable population. Estimated GFR was significantly higher among patients with the greatest degree of post-operative renal recovery at POD 90; however, this difference did not persist at POD 180. There was no significant difference in incidence or severity of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at any measured time point. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed CNI initiation following liver transplantation in patients with post-operative renal insufficiency who receive basiliximab induction does not adversely affect the incidence of BPAR or long-term renal outcomes.

Direct oral anticoagulant considerations in solid organ transplantation: A review.

For more than 60 years, warfarin was the only oral anticoagulation agent available for use in the United States. In many recent clinical trials, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) demonstrated similar efficacy with an equal or superior safety profile, with some other notable benefits. The DOACs have lower inter- and intrapatient variability, much shorter half-lives, and less known drug-drug and drug-food interactions as compared to warfarin. Despite these demonstrated benefits, the use of DOACs has not gained uniform acceptance because of lack of supportive data in special patient populations, including recipients of solid organ transplants maintained on immunosuppression. This review describes the properties of several novel DOACs including their pharmacology and mechanisms of action as they relate to use among solid organ transplant recipients. We have particularly focused on (i) dosing in patients with impaired renal and hepatic function; (ii) considerations for drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressive medications; and (iii) management of the anticoagulated patients at the time of unplanned surgery. The risks and benefits of the use of DOACs in solid organ transplant recipients should be carefully evaluated prior to the introduction of these agents in this highly distinct patient population.

HES1-mediated inhibition of Notch1 signaling by a Gemini vitamin D analog leads to decreased CD44(+)/CD24(-/low) tumor-initiating subpopulation in basal-like breast cancer.

Tumor-initiating cells (also known as cancer stem cells) are the subpopulation of cells shown to be responsible for tumor initiation, maintenance and recurrence. In breast cancer, CD44(+)/CD24(-/low) cells were identified as tumor-initiating cells. We previously reported that a Gemini vitamin D analog, 1,25-dihydroxy-20R-21(3-hydroxy-3-deuteromethyl-4,4,4-trideuterobutyl)-23-yne-26,27-hexafluoro-cholecalciferol (BXL0124), reduced CD44(+)/CD24(-/low) cells in MCF10DCIS basal-like breast cancer cells. Since Notch has been identified as one of the key signaling pathways involved in breast cancer stem cells, the effect of BXL0124 on the Notch signaling pathway was investigated in breast cancer. The CD44(+)/CD24(-/low) subpopulation of MCF10DCIS cells showed elevated Notch1 signaling and increased cell proliferation compared to the CD44(+)/CD24(high) subpopulation. Treatment with the Gemini vitamin D analog BXL0124 decreased the level of activated Notch1 receptor. In addition, mRNA and protein levels of the Notch ligands, Jagged-1, Jagged-2 and DLL1, were significantly reduced by treatment with BXL0124, which was followed by repression of c-Myc, a key downstream target of Notch signaling. Interestingly, HES1, a known downstream target of Notch signaling, was rapidly induced by treatment with BXL0124. The inhibitory effect of BXL0124 on Notch signaling was reversed by knockdown of HES1. Overexpression of HES1 inhibited Notch1 signaling and reduced the CD44(+)/CD24(-/low) subpopulation, confirming a role of HES1 in Notch1 signaling. In conclusion, the Gemini vitamin D analog, BXL0124, represses the tumor-initiating subpopulation by HES1-mediated inhibition of Notch1 signaling. The present study demonstrates BXL0124 as a potent inhibitor of Notch signaling to target tumor-initiating cells in basal-like breast cancer. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "17th Vitamin D Workshop".

Targeting CD44-STAT3 signaling by Gemini vitamin D analog leads to inhibition of invasion in basal-like breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: CD44, a transmembrane glycoprotein, is a major receptor for extracellular proteins involved in invasion and metastasis of human cancers. We have previously demonstrated that the novel Gemini vitamin D analog BXL0124 [1α,25-dihydroxy-20R-21(3-hydroxy-3-deuteromethyl-4,4,4-trideuterobutyl)-23-yne-26,27-hexafluro-cholecalciferol] repressed CD44 expression in MCF10DCIS.com basal-like human breast cancer cells and inhibited MCF10DCIS xenograft tumor growth. In the present study, we investigated potential factors downstream of CD44 and the biological role of CD44 repression by BXL0124 in MCF10DCIS cells. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The treatment with Gemini vitamin D BXL0124 decreased CD44 protein level, suppressed STAT3 signaling, and inhibited invasion and proliferation of MCF10DCIS cells. The interaction between CD44 and STAT3 was determined by co-immunoprecipitation. CD44 forms a complex with STAT3 and Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) to activate STAT3 signaling, which was inhibited by BXL0124 in MCF10DCIS cells. The role of CD44 in STAT3 signaling and invasion of MCF10DCIS cells was further determined by the knockdown of CD44 using small hairpin RNA in vitro and in vivo. MCF10DCIS cell invasion was markedly decreased by the knockdown of CD44 in vitro. The knockdown of CD44 also significantly decreased mRNA expression levels of invasion markers, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), in MCF10DCIS cells. In MCF10DCIS xenograft tumors, CD44 knockdown decreased tumor size and weight as well as invasion markers. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identifies STAT3 as an important signaling molecule interacting with CD44 and demonstrates the essential role of CD44-STAT3 signaling in breast cancer invasion. It also suggests that repression of CD44-STAT3 signaling is a key molecular mechanism in the inhibition of breast cancer invasion by the Gemini vitamin D analog BXL0124.