Severe infections in Portuguese patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biologic treatment - a multicenter, nationwide study (SIPPRA-B Study).

INTRODUCTION: Despite years of experience with biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), little is known about differences in infectious risk among bDMARDs. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and type of infections in RA patients on bDMARDs and to determine possible predictors. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study that included patients registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry (Reuma.pt) with RA, and exposed to at least one bDMARD until April 2021. RA patients under bDMARD and with at least one episode of severe infection (SI), defined as infection that requires hospitalization, use of parenteral antibiotics or that resulted in death, were compared to patients with no report of SI. Demographic and clinical data at baseline and at the time of each SI were collected to establish comparisons between different groups of bDMARDs. Comparisons between different bDMARDs were assessed and logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of SI. RESULTS: We included 3394 patients, 2833 (83.5%) female, with a mean age at RA diagnosis of 45.5±13.7 years. SI was diagnosed in 142 of the 3394 patients evaluated (4.2%), totaling 151 episodes of SI. At baseline, patients with SI had a significantly higher proportion of prior orthopedic surgery, asthma, interstitial lung disease, chronic kidney disease and corticosteroid use, higher mean age and longer median disease duration at first bDMARD. Nine patients died (6.0%). Ninety-two SI (60.9%) occurred with the first bDMARD, the majority leading to discontinuation of the bDMARD within 6 months (n=75, 49.7%), while 65 (43.0%) restarted the same bDMARD and 11 (7.3%) switched to another bDMARD (6 of them to a different mechanism of action). In the multivariate analysis, we found that chronic kidney disease, asthma, infliximab, corticosteroid use, interstitial lung disease, previous orthopedic surgery, higher Health Assessment Questionnaire and DAS284V-ESR are independent predictors of SI. CONCLUSION: This study described the incidence and types of SI among Portuguese RA patients on biologics, identifying several predictors of SI, both globally and with different bDMARDs. Physicians should be aware of the real-word infectious risk in RA patients on bDMARDs when making treatment decisions.

Assessment of calcinosis in Portuguese patients with systemic sclerosis - a multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: The study aims to define the clinical and subclinical calcinosis prevalence, the sensitivity of radiographed site and clinical method for its diagnosis, and the phenotype of Portuguese systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients with calcinosis. METHOD: A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted with SSc patients fulfilling Leroy/Medsger 2001 or ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria, registered in the Reuma.pt. Calcinosis was assessed through clinical examination and radiographs of hands, elbows, knees, and feet. Independent parametric or non-parametric tests, multivariate logistic regression, and sensitivity calculation of radiographed site and clinical method for calcinosis detection were performed. RESULTS: We included 226 patients. Clinical calcinosis was described in 63 (28.1%) and radiological calcinosis in 91 (40.3%) patients, of which 37 (40.7%) were subclinical. The most sensitive location to detect calcinosis was the hand (74.7%). Sensitivity of the clinical method was 58.2%. Calcinosis patients were more often female (p = 0.008) and older (p < 0.001) and had more frequently longer disease duration (p < 0.001), limited SSc (p = 0.017), telangiectasia (p = 0.039), digital ulcers (p = 0.001), esophageal (p < 0.001) and intestinal (p = 0.003) involvements, osteoporosis (p = 0.028), and late capillaroscopic pattern (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, digital ulcers (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.02-6.78, p = 0.045) predicted overall calcinosis, esophageal involvement (OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.28-9.67, p = 0.015) and osteoporosis (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-14.2, p = 0.027) predicted hand calcinosis, and late capillaroscopic pattern (OR 7.6, 95% CI 1.7-34.9, p = 0.009) predicted knee calcinosis. Anti-nuclear antibody positivity was associated with less knee calcinosis (OR 0.021, 95% CI 0.001-0477, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical calcinosis high prevalence suggests that calcinosis is underdiagnosed and radiographic screening might be relevant. Multifactorial pathogenesis may explain calcinosis predictors' variability. Key Points • Prevalence of subclinical calcinosis in SSc patients is substantial. • Hand radiographs are more sensitive to detect calcinosis than other locations or clinical method. • Digital ulcers were associated with overall calcinosis, esophageal involvement and osteoporosis were associated with hand calcinosis, and late sclerodermic pattern in nailfold capillaroscopy was associated with knee calcinosis. • Anti-nuclear antibody positivity may be a protective factor for knee calcinosis.

Gender differences in clinical features and outcomes of a Portuguese systemic sclerosis cohort.

Evidence for the role of sex in the clinical manifestations of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients is emerging. Some multicenter cohorts have shown that male SSc patients have more severe disease and worse survival. To assess the differences in clinical manifestations and survival in Portuguese SSc patients according to gender. Data from male and female adult SSc patients included in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt) were analysed and compared. Survival was calculated for patients included in Reuma.pt. within the first two years of diagnosis (inception cohort). In total, 1054 adult patients with SSc were included, 12.5% males. No differences in demographic features and comorbidities were found between the sexes, except for a higher rate of cigarette smokers among men. Diffuse cutaneous SSc and anti-topoisomerase antibodies were more prevalent in males than females. Additionally, male patients presented significantly more myositis, interstitial lung disease and gastric involvement. There were no differences in the patterns of drug use between the sexes. During follow-up, more deaths were reported in men than women (12.1% vs 7.3%, p = 0.04). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals from diagnosis of the inception cohort (N = 469) for men vs women were 96.4% vs 98.2%, 93% vs 95.9%, and 75.8% vs 93.2%, respectively, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.01). This study confirms the existence of gender differences in clinical and immunological SSc features. Although SSc is less common in men than women, men have a more severe expression of skin and internal organ involvement and worse survival. Key Points • There are differences in SSc disease manifestations between sexes. • Males more commonly have diffuse cutaneous SSc, anti-topoisomerase antibodies, pulmonary and musculoskeletal involvement. • In the inception cohort, men had worse survival rates than women.

The role of opioid analgesics in rheumatic disorders: a position paper from the Portuguese Rheumatology Society.

Pain is a common feature of most rheumatic diseases and it is often the main reason for the patient to seek for a clinical appointment. Chronic pain has a major impact on patient's quality of life, being frequently associated with functional incapacity, sleep and mood disorders. This leads to absenteeism and heavy consumption of health resources, both representing huge burdens on national economy. Managing musculoskeletal pain is pivotal but can be challenging. The use of the available pharmaceutical armamentarium should be parsimonious. Opioids are strong analgesic drugs that mostly act through their agonist action on µ-receptors in the central nervous system. Opioid-related side effects are not negligible and are mediated through both central and peripheral opioid receptors. The use of opioids is well established in the treatment of oncologic pain but their role in the management of musculoskeletal pain is still controversial. Inflammatory rheumatic diseases, osteoarthritis, osteoporotic fractures, chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia represent diverse major rheumatic conditions that frequently lead to chronic pain. In order to standardize and optimize management of musculoskeletal chronic pain in these prevalent diseases, the Portuguese Rheumatology Society elaborated this position paper. The objectives were: a) to define the importance of pain assessment and classification; b) to guide patient selection, appropriate choice of opioids, their management, and raise awareness of their adverse effects; c) to review the existent data on possible indications of opioid therapy on rheumatic diseases.

2011 Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with biological therapies, endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology. METHODS: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists based on literature evidence and consensus opinion. A draft of the recommendations was first circulated to all Portuguese rheumatologists and their suggestions were incorporated in the draft. At a national meeting the recommendations were discussed and all attending rheumatologists voted on the level of agreement for each recommendation. A second draft was again circulated before publication. RESULTS: A consensus was achieved regarding the initiation, assessment of response and switching biological therapies in patients with PsA. Specific recommendations were developed for several disease domains: peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis and dactylitis. CONCLUSION: These recommendations may be used for guidance in deciding which patients with PsA should be treated with biological therapies. They cover a rapidly evolving area of therapeutic intervention. As more evidence becomes available and more biological therapies are licensed, these recommendations will have to be updated.

Portuguese guidelines for the use of biological agents in rheumatoid arthritis - October 2011 update.

The authors present the revised version of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology (SPR) guidelines for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) with biological therapies. In these guidelines the criteria for introduction and maintenance of biological agents are discussed as well as the contraindications and procedures in the case of nonresponders. Biological treatment (with a tumour necrosis factor antagonist, abatacept or tocilizumab) should be considered in RA patients with a disease activity score 28 (DAS 28) equal to or greater than 3.2 despite treatment with at least 20mg-weekly-dose of methotrexate (MTX) for at least 3 months or, if such treatment is not possible, after 3 months of other conventional disease modifying drug or combination therapy. A DAS 28 score between 2.6 and 3.2 with a significant functional or radiological deterioration under treatment with conventional regimens could also constitute an indication for biological treatment. The treatment goal should be remission or, if that is not achievable, at least a low disease activity, defined by a DAS28 lower than 3.2, without significative functional or radiological worsening. The response criteria, at the end of the first 3 months of treatment, are a decrease of at least 0.6 in the DAS28 score. After 6 months of treatment res­ponse criteria is defined as a decrease greater than 1.2 in the DAS28 score. Non-responders, in accordance to the Rheumatologist's clinical opinion, should try a switch to another biological agent (tumour necrosis factor antagonist, abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab).

Portuguese guidelines for the use of biological agents in rheumatoid arthritis - March 2010 update.

The authors present the revised version of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology (SPR) guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with biological therapies. In these guidelines the criteria for introduction and maintenance of biological agents are discussed as well as the contraindications and procedures in the case of non-responders. Biological treatment should be considered in RA patients with a disease activity score 28 (DAS 28) superior to 3.2 despite treatment with 20mg/week of methotrexate (MTX) for at least 3 months or, if such treatment is not possible, after 6 months of other conventional disease modifying drug or combination therapy. A DAS 28 score between 2.6 and 3.2 with a significant functional or radiological deterioration under treatment with conventional regimens could also constitute an indication for biological treatment. The treatment goal should be remission or, if that is not achievable, at least a low disease activity, characterized by a DAS28 lower than 3.2, without significative functional or radiological worsening. The response criteria, at the end of the first 3 months of treatment, are a decrease of 0.6 in the DAS28 score. After 6 months of treatment response criteria is defined as a decrease of more than 1.2 in the DAS28 score. Non-responders, in accordance to the Rheumatologist's clinical opinion, should try a switch to another biological agent (tumour necrosis factor antagonist, abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab).

[Health-related quality of life and chronic pain experience in rheumatic diseases]. / Qualidade de vida e vivência da dor crónica nas doenças reumáticas.

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences among health-related quality of life, pain threshold and perception,and passive coping strategies with chronic pain(specifically retreating, worrying, and resting), as well as associations among variables in three groups of rheumatic patients - fibromyalgia (FM),rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and osteoarthritis (OA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 86 participants diagnosed with FM (n = 25), RA (n = 31) and OA (n = 30) completed the following measures: Clinical and Sociodemographic Questionnaire (QSDC), Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36v2), Pain Coping Inventory (PCI), visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain, and dolorimeter for threshold pain. SPSS software was used to perform statistical analyses. RESULTS: FM patients reported the lowest levels of quality of life and threshold pain, as well as the highest levels of pain perception and passive coping with chronic pain. Associations between variables support that experience with chronic pain is managed more successfully in OA patients, followed by RA patients and, finally, by FM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the adoption ofa biopsychosocial model for assessment and intervention with rheumatic patients, considering specificities associated to each illness.

[Secondary amyloidosis and systemic lupus erythematosus]. / Amiloidose secundária e lúpus eritematoso sistémico.

The authors report a clinical case of a 57 years old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosed 25 years before and secondary amyloidosis. Secondary amyloidosis can be associated with inflammatory or infectious chronic diseases, however the association with systemic lupus erythematosus is rare. We discuss the association between the two entities.

[An unusual case of generalized pain: paramyloidosis simulating fibromyalgia]. / Um caso invulgar de dor generalizada: paramiloidose simulando fibromialgia.

The authors report a case of a 52-year old female previously followed at the Outpatient Rheumatology Clinic with the diagnosis of Fibromyalgia (FM). Approximately 2 years after this diagnosis, she presents with a 2nd degree burn in a hand, as a result of thermal hypoesthesia. The patient described hipostesia of the distal upper and lower limbs, incontinence of the anal sphincter and chronic diarrhoea with progressive worsening. The electromiography showed sensory-motor axonal polyneuropathy, chronic, moderate to severe. The muscle and nerve biopsy showed deposition of amyloid substance. The search for TTR Met 30 was positive, confirming the diagnosis of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. This is the first reported case of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy as part of the differential diagnosis of fibromyalgia.