RESUMO
Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a valid indicator of the healthcare quality. This study described the preliminary results of one-year active surveillance program on colon surgeries in a hospital in Molise region, central Italy. Patients who had undergone colon surgery according to National Healthcare Safety Network were included. Data on intervention, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and SSIs occurrence were collected. Chi-square and Fisher's Exact test were used to evaluate any association between risk factors and SSIs. Sixty-eight patients (mean age 70.6 years) were included, and 44 (64.7%) were males. The most frequent interventions were right (n = 17, 25.0%) and left (n = 15, 22.0%) hemicolectomy. Surgical interventions were largely elective (n = 43, 63.2%) and with laparotomy (n = 56, 82.4%). During hospital stay, 10 (14.7%) SSIs were detected, including five superficial, three deep and two organ/space infections. Three (4.4%) additional SSIs were detected at post-discharge follow-up, for 13 (19.1%; CI95%: 9.7%-28.5%) total cases detected. Metronidazole plus Ceftriaxone (third generation cephalosporin) was the antibiotics combination mostly used (n = 36, 52.9%) for the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis within 60 minutes of incision. The study underlines the need of improvements of the practices currently adopted, since SSIs could be significantly reduced through a multimodal strategy generating bundles. As third generation cephalosporins may facilitate resistant strains emergence, for perioperative prophylaxis in clean-contaminated interventions with entry into gastrointestinal tract, Cefazolin plus Metronidazole or only second generation cephalosporin are recommended. Due to the large variability of post-intervention antibiotic therapy, antimicrobial stewardship approach is strictly necessary.
Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente , Metronidazol , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Feminino , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Alta do Paciente , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Cefazolina/uso terapêutico , Hospitais , ColoRESUMO
Introduction: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a major global public health concern, increasing the transmission of drug-resistant infections. This point prevalence survey investigated HAIs occurrence and antimicrobial consumption (AMC) in pre-COVID-19 era in the public hospitals of a region of Central Italy. Methods: Data were collected using the protocol standardised by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Results: Three-hundred and sixty-four patients were included (59.3% male) in the study. Overall, HAIs prevalence was 6.6% (95%CI 4.4-9.5), ranging from 5.2% to 7.1% within the surveyed hospitals, with at least one infection in 24 patients (ten each in medical and surgical specialties wards, and four in intensive care). Risk factors for HAIs were advanced age, having undergone surgery and wearing invasive devices. At time of the survey, 44.7% (95%CI 39.7-49.9) of patients was under treatment with at least one antibiotic, and AMC varied between 43% and 48% within hospitals. In all hospitals, a prevalence higher than 10% was found for the prescription reasons other than prophylaxis or therapy. Conclusions: The results revealed a HAIs prevalence lower than that estimated compared to the most recent national data, in contrast to higher antimicrobial usage. These findings highlight the need to reinforce hygiene practices and develop bundles for HAIs, as a broad implementation of infection prevention and control practices extensively applied to both hub and spoke hospitals could significantly reduce their occurrence, as well as to implement antimicrobial stewardship for prescriptive appropriateness.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Prevalência , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Hospitais Públicos , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Itália/epidemiologia , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: to provide an outline of the factors mainly influencing severe disease and fatal outcome among Italian COVID-19 patients in the pre-vaccination phase, also describing the impact of the scenarios driven by variants, vaccines, and available therapies. DESIGN: a literature search was carried out for peer-reviewed articles searching for COVID-19 and prognosis, including severe disease and death. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Italian patients with COVID-19. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: the association between risk factors and severe disease and death as the main outcomes was assessed through epidemiological measures, including relative risk, odds ratio, and hazard ratio. RESULTS: advanced age, obesity, overweight, non-0 blood group, and male gender were the factors more associated with severe disease. Fatal outcome mostly correlated with old age, non-0 blood group, and obesity, together with cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, hypertension, cancer, chronic kidney disease, and acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the Italian population, integrated with omics data, could be highly valuable to stratify risk of worse prognosis among patients, and to address targeted prevention and treatment interventions.
Assuntos
Antígenos de Grupos Sanguíneos , COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Medicina de Precisão , Prognóstico , Saúde Pública , SARS-CoV-2 , VacinaçãoRESUMO
General Practitioners (GPs) have good knowledge of health status and sociocultural backgrounds of their patients, thus could be decisive in early detection of cases of asbestos-related diseases (ARDs). In this cross-sectional pilot study, we investigated perception and knowledge on asbestos risk amongst a sample of GPs practicing in Molise region, central Italy, who have anonymously completed a 29-items questionnaire specifically developed for this research. Based on GPs' answers, we obtained scores and classified awareness and knowledge into four percentage quartile classes including inadequate (0-24%), poor (25-49%), moderate (50-74%) and high (75-100%), and scarce (0-24%), sufficient (25-49%), good (50-74%) and optimal (75-100%), respectively. Twenty-eight GPs (median age 63 years; 82% male) participated. Perception and knowledge among participants varied from 62 to 84% and from 18 to 42%, respectively, with 65 and 42% showing an adequate level, respectively. Our survey revealed a satisfactory perception and knowledge of general features about this topic, while a poor awareness of detailed aspects, underlining the need of continuing medical education in the field of occupational medicine. The study remarks that criteria for ARDs diagnosis should be better specified, introducing a detailed list to harmonize medical protocols for symptoms identification and patients' examination. Hence, increasing awareness of asbestos risk and ARDs among GPs represents a crucial opportunity, because of their prominent position to promptly take care of patients and provide targeted information.