Intermittent nicotine access is as effective as continuous access in promoting nicotine seeking and taking in rats.

RATIONALE: Nicotine is a principal psychoactive agent in tobacco, contributing to tobacco's addictive potential. Preclinical studies on the effects of voluntary nicotine intake typically use self-administration procedures that provide continuous nicotine access during each self-administration session. However, many smokers consume cigarettes intermittently rather than continuously throughout each day. For drugs including cocaine and opioids, research in laboratory rats shows that intermittent intake can be more effective than continuous intake in producing patterns of drug use relevant to addiction. OBJECTIVE: We determined how intermittent versus continuous nicotine self-administration influences nicotine seeking and taking behaviours. METHODS: Female and male rats had continuous (i.e., Long Access; LgA, 6 h/day) or intermittent (IntA; 12 min ON, 60 min OFF, for 6 h/day) access to intravenous nicotine (15 µg/kg/infusion), for 12 daily sessions. We then assessed intake, responding for nicotine under a progressive ratio schedule of drug reinforcement and cue- and nicotine-induced reinstatement of drug seeking. We also estimated nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters during LgA and IntA self-administration. RESULTS: Overall, LgA rats took twice more nicotine than did IntA rats, yielding more sustained increases in estimated brain concentrations of the drug. However, the two groups showed similar motivation to seek and take nicotine, as measured using reinstatement and progressive ratio procedures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent nicotine use is just as effective as continuous use in producing addiction-relevant behaviours, despite significantly less nicotine exposure. This has implications for modeling nicotine self-administration patterns in human smokers and resulting effects on brain and behaviour.

Unpredictable, intermittent access to sucrose or water promotes increased reward pursuit in rats.

Reward uncertainty can sensitize reward pathways, promoting increased reward-seeking and -taking behaviours. This is relevant to human conditions such as pathological gambling, eating disorders and drug addiction. In the context of addiction, preclinical self-administration procedures have been developed to model the intermittency of human drug use. These intermittent-access (IntA) procedures involve intermittent but predictable access to drug during self-administration sessions. However, human drug use typically involves intermittent and unpredictable drug access. We introduce a new procedure modeling unpredictable, intermittent access (UIntA) to a reinforcer, and we compare it to procedures that provide predictable reinforcer availability; continuous (ContA) or intermittent (IntA) access. Female rats self-administered water or liquid sucrose in daily hour-long sessions. IntA and ContA rats had access to a fixed volume of water or sucrose (0.1 ml), under a fixed ratio 3 schedule of reinforcement. IntA rats had predictable 5-min reinforcer ON and 25-min reinforcer OFF periods. ContA rats had 60 min of reinforcer access during each session. For UIntA rats, variation in the length of ON and OFF periods (1, 5 or 9 min/period), response requirement (variable ratio 3 schedule of reinforcement), reinforcer probability (50%) and quantity (0, 0.1 or 0.2 ml) introduced reward uncertainty. Following 14 daily self-administration sessions, UIntA rats showed the highest levels of responding for water or sucrose under progressive ratio conditions, responding under extinction conditions, and cue-induced reinstatement of sucrose seeking. Thus, unpredictable, intermittent reward access promotes increased reward pursuit. This has implications for modeling addiction and other disorders of increased reward seeking.

Intermittent intake of rapid cocaine injections promotes robust psychomotor sensitization, increased incentive motivation for the drug and mGlu2/3 receptor dysregulation.

The choice between smoking, injecting or swallowing a drug influences the risk of addiction, as this determines both how much drug gets into the brain and how fast. Most animal studies on addiction focus on how much drug it takes to produce pathological drug use. How fast drugs get to the brain is generally ignored. A few studies have examined the influence of the speed of drug onset, but speed varied along with cumulative intake. Here we held average cumulative intake constant and determined whether variation in the speed of cocaine onset alone predicts outcome. Two groups of rats self-administered intravenous cocaine (0.25 mg/kg/injection) during daily sessions. Cocaine was available intermittently during each session. This produces the spikes and troughs in brain levels of cocaine thought to model how addicts take the drug. To vary the speed of cocaine onset, each injection was delivered over 5 s to one group, and over 90 s to the other. Average cumulative cocaine intake was the same in the two groups. However, rapid injections promoted robust psychomotor sensitization and potentiated incentive motivation for cocaine (0.063-0.25 mg/kg/injection). This addiction-relevant phenotype was accompanied by enhanced functional activity of metabotropic glutamate group II receptors (mGluR2/3s) in the prelimbic cortex and nucleus accumbens. Pharmacological activation of mGluR2/3s with LY379268 also preferentially decreased the motivation to take cocaine in rats previously exposed to rapid drug injections. Thus, varying the speed of drug onset can be used to parse the neurobiology of addiction from that of mere drug taking.

Prior haloperidol, but not olanzapine, exposure augments the pursuit of reward cues: implications for substance abuse in schizophrenia.

Drug abuse and addiction are excessively common in schizophrenia. Chronic antipsychotic treatment might contribute to this comorbidity by inducing supersensitivity within the brain's dopamine system. Dopamine supersensitivity can enhance the incentive motivational properties of reward cues, and reward cues contribute to the maintenance and severity of drug addiction. We have shown previously that rats withdrawn from continuous haloperidol (HAL) treatment (via subcutaneous minipump) develop dopamine supersensitivity and pursue reward cues more vigorously than HAL-naive rats following an amphetamine (AMPH) challenge. Atypical antipsychotic drugs are thought to be less likely than typicals to produce dopamine supersensitivity. Thus, we compared the effects of HAL and the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine (OLZ) on the pursuit of reward cues. Rats were trained to associate a light-tone cue with water then treated with HAL or OLZ. Following antipsychotic withdrawal, we assessed AMPH-induced enhancement of lever pressing for the cue. Withdrawal from HAL, but not from OLZ, enhanced this effect. HAL, but not OLZ, also enhanced AMPH-induced psychomotor activation and c-fos mRNA expression in the caudate-putamen. Thus, prior HAL, but not OLZ, enhanced conditioned reward following an AMPH challenge, and this was potentially linked to enhanced behavioral sensitivity to AMPH and AMPH-induced engagement of the caudate-putamen. These findings suggest that HAL, but not an atypical like OLZ, modifies reward circuitry in ways that increase responsiveness to reward cues. Because enhanced responsiveness to reward cues can promote drug-seeking behavior, it should be investigated whether atypical antipsychotics might be a preferential option in schizophrenic patients at risk for drug abuse or addiction.

Less is more: antipsychotic drug effects are greater with transient rather than continuous delivery.

BACKGROUND: Most studies on the effects of antipsychotics focus on achieving threshold levels of the drug. The speed and frequency with which drug concentrations reach threshold levels and rise and fall within the day are generally ignored. Based on prior data, we predicted that variations in the within-day kinetics of antipsychotic drug delivery would produce different outcomes, even if we held achieved dose, route, and total duration of treatment constant. METHODS: We compared the effects of within-day continuous (via minipump) versus transient (via subcutaneous injection) haloperidol treatment (n = 4-9/condition/experiment) at doses that yield equivalent peak levels of striatal D2 receptor occupancy (approximately 74%). RESULTS: Over time, transient haloperidol gained efficacy, while continuous haloperidol lost efficacy in two animal models of antipsychotic-like effects (the suppression of amphetamine-induced locomotion and conditioned avoidance responding). This was related to the fact that continuous treatment led to a greater increase in striatal D2 receptor numbers--particularly D2 receptors in a high-affinity state for dopamine--relative to transient treatment and produced behavioral dopamine supersensitivity (as indicated by an enhanced locomotor response to amphetamine following antipsychotic treatment cessation). Treatment kinetics also influenced the postsynaptic response to haloperidol. Transient treatment increased striatal c-fos messenger RNA (mRNA) expression, while continuous treatment did not. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to continuous antipsychotic exposure, within-day transient exposure is more efficacious behaviorally and is associated with a distinct molecular and gene expression profile. Thus, differences in the within-day kinetics of antipsychotic treatment can have different efficacy, and the potential clinical implications of this should be explored further.

Rapid delivery of nicotine promotes behavioral sensitization and alters its neurobiological impact.

BACKGROUND: Nicotine is highly addictive when it is inhaled from tobacco smoke, whereas nicotine replacement products, which usually deliver nicotine orally or transdermally, rarely lead to addiction. It has been proposed that this is due in part to differences in the rate of nicotine delivery to the brain under the two conditions. However, the mechanism by which rapid nicotine delivery facilitates the transition to addiction is not known. The ability of drugs to alter gene regulation and to produce sensitization has been implicated in addiction. We hypothesized, therefore, that varying the rate of nicotine administration may modulate its ability to elicit this form of plasticity. METHODS: Animals were treated with repeated intravenous infusions of nicotine over 5, 25, or 100 sec, and their locomotor responses were monitored over treatment days. RESULTS: We found that increasing the rate of intravenous nicotine infusion potentiated its ability to produce locomotor sensitization, and to induce c-fos and arc mRNA expression in mesocorticolimbic structures. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that rapid administration may increase vulnerability to addiction by altering the neurobiological impact of nicotine and promoting a form of neurobehavioral plasticity (i.e., sensitization) that can lead to pathological incentive motivation for drugs.

Why does the rapid delivery of drugs to the brain promote addiction?

It is widely accepted that the more rapidly drugs of abuse reach the brain the greater their potential for addiction. This might be one reason why cocaine and nicotine are more addictive when they are smoked than when they are administered by other routes. Traditionally, rapidly administered drugs are thought to be more addictive because they are more euphorigenic and/or more reinforcing. However, evidence for this is not compelling. We propose an alternative (although not mutually exclusive) explanation based on the idea that the transition to addiction involves drug-induced plasticity in mesocorticolimbic systems, changes that are manifested behaviourally as psychomotor and incentive sensitization. Recent evidence suggests that rapidly administered cocaine or nicotine preferentially engage mesocorticolimbic circuits, and more readily induce psychomotor sensitization. We conclude that rapidly delivered drugs might promote addiction by promoting forms of neurobehavioural plasticity that contribute to the compulsive pursuit of drugs.

The rate of cocaine administration alters gene regulation and behavioral plasticity: implications for addiction.

The rapid delivery of drugs of abuse to the brain is thought to promote addiction, but why this occurs is unknown. In the present study, we characterized the influence of rate of intravenous cocaine infusion (5-100 sec) on three effects thought to contribute to its addiction liability: its ability to block dopamine (DA) uptake, to activate immediate early gene expression, and to produce psychomotor sensitization. Rapid infusions potentiated the ability of cocaine to block DA reuptake, to induce c-fos and arc mRNA expression, especially in mesocorticolimbic regions, and to produce psychomotor sensitization. Thus, the rate at which cocaine is delivered influences both its neurobiological impact and its ability to induce a form of drug experience-dependent plasticity implicated in addiction. We propose that rapidly delivered cocaine may be more addictive, in part, because this more readily induces forms of neurobehavioral plasticity that lead to the compulsive pursuit of drugs.