Identification of bacterial infections and clinical manifestation associated with cytomegalovirus in liver transplantation patients.

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation has become the most effective therapy for the treatment of patients with end-stage liver disease. With new immunosuppressive agents the incidence of acute rejection has been significantly reduced, but infection has become a serious problem. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to correlate cytomegalovirus (CMV) positivity of antigenemia and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with clinical manifestations and bacterial infections among patients undergoing liver transplantation. METHODS: This prospective study included patients monitored for 6 months for early detection of CMV infection. Sample collections were performed at the time of surgery and weekly until the second month followed by fortnightly in the third month, and monthly in the fourth to sixth month. CMV infection was defined by positive antigenemia (>3 cells) or 2 positive PCR tests associated or not with clinical symptoms. The methodology for the diagnosis of bacterial infection was through biochemical tests and the automated VITEK/bioMérieux (identification and antibiogram) using samples of urine and blood cultures. Chi-square test was used for dicotomic variables with significant differences when P < .05. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (32%) had CMV infections, including 13 (81%) with concomitant infections. Thirty-four patients (68%) did not have CMV infections and 8 of these (24%) had bacterial infection. There was a high correlation with bacterial infections among CMV-positive patients. CONCLUSION: Bacterial infections after liver transplantation were associated with CMV infection.

Detection of cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus-6 DNA in liver biopsy specimens and their correlation with rejection after liver transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) reactivation after transplantation put patients at an increased risk of graft rejection mainly among those who receive organs that are positive in their donor biopsies. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of CMV and HHV-6 DNA in liver biopsy specimens from the donors and from their grafts for correlation with rejection after transplantation. We followed 41 liver transplantation patients whose samples were evaluated using nested-polymerase chain reactions (N-PCR). Twenty-one (51%) of the 41 studied patients experienced rejection; 4/21 (19%) were CMV positive in the donor biopsy specimens and remained positive; another 5 subjects became positive. The patients who received organs from donors with biopsies positive for CMV demonstrated a trend to develop graft rejection after transplantation (Fisher's exact test [P = .0591] with significant results on univariate and multivariate analysis [P = .042]). Eight of the 21 who experienced rejection episodes were HHV-6 positive in the donor biopsy but there was no statistical significance CMV DNA diagnosed in liver donor biopsies remained positive posttransplantation in liver biopsy recipients; it was considered a tendency to develop acute cellular rejection after transplantation.

Co-infection and clinical impact of human herpesvirus 5 and 6 in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Human herpesvirus (HHV) 5 and 6 remain latent after primary infection and can be reactivated after immunosuppression for organ transplantation. An association between HHV-5 and HHV-6 has been reported in liver transplant patients. The coinfection is associated with clinical manifestations and graft dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to monitor herpesviruses in liver transplant recipients to better understand issues involving coinfection with HHV-5/6 and correlations with acute cellular rejection episodes and bacterial infections. METHODS: Forty-five adult liver transplant patients of median age 47 years (range, 18-66), gave blood samples and liver biopsies in the first 6 months after their surgeries. Viremia was detected with the use of nested PCR and antigenemia; the Banff classification was used to detect allograft rejection. RESULTS: IgG positive for HHV-5 was observed in 94% of subjects whose main indication (67%) for transplantation was hepatitis C. Twenty-three (51.1%) displayed cytomeg virus (CMV) infections and 12 (26.7%) HHV-6 infection. There were 6 patients (13.3%) with HHV-5/6 coinfections. Eighteen of the 23 patients had CMV disease, showing a strong correlation between a positive test and CMV disease; 6 displayed an acute cellular rejection episode in the same period (χ(2) = 6.62; P < .03). Four out of 6 patients who displayed coinfections (HHV-5/6) had concomitant bacterial infections; 3/6 experienced graft rejection episodes. During follow-up, 1 patient had HHV-6 infection diagnosed as encephalitis followed by fever on the 24th day after surgery. The median 32 days for HHV-6 detection by nested PCR positivity was shorter than 38 days for HHV-5. CONCLUSIONS: HHV-5/6-infected patients displayed more allograft rejection episodes, coinfections, and concomitant bacterial infections, besides an higher risk for CMV disease.

Cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus-6, and human herpesvirus-7 in adult liver transplant recipients: diagnosis based on antigenemia.

Human herpesvirus (HHV)-6, HHV-7, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) that remain latent after primary infection can be reactivated during immunosuppression following organ transplantation in liver transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to monitor active infections for HHV-6, HHV-7, and CMV among adult liver transplantation recipients using antigenemia detected by an immunoperoxidase staining. Twenty-eight adult liver transplant patients were monitored using antigenemia in blood samples obtained at the time of transplantation, as well as weekly in the first month and once a month for 6 months. Of these patients, 28.5% showed positive CMV antigenemia; 39.2%, HHV-6 antigenemia; and 14.2%, HHV-7 antigenemia. The detection of the three viruses was considered to be independent of one another (P>.05). The results described above showed that few patients remain free of beta herpesviruses after liver transplantation. Most patients were infected sequentially and not concurrently. Antigenemia has been considered useful to detect active HHV-6 and HHV-7 infections. Antigenemia can be more efficiently interpreted when compared with polymerase chain reaction results, although other studies are necessary to establish the reference of HHV-6 and HHV-7 antigenemia.