Low-Dose Metronomic Topotecan and Pazopanib (TOPAZ) in Children with Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors: A C17 Canadian Phase I Clinical Trial.

Oral metronomic topotecan represents a novel approach to chemotherapy delivery which, in preclinical models, may work synergistically with pazopanib in targeting angiogenesis. A phase I and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of this combination was performed in children with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. Oral topotecan and pazopanib were each administered daily without interruption in 28-day cycles at five dose levels (0.12 to 0.3 mg/m2 topotecan and 125 to 160 mg/m2 pazopanib powder for oral suspension (PfOS)), with dose escalation in accordance with the rolling-six design. PK studies were performed on day 1 and at steady state. Thirty patients were enrolled, with 26 evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), with median age 12 years (3-20). Toxicities were generally mild; the most common grade 3/4 adverse events related to protocol therapy were neutropenia (18%), thrombocytopenia (11%), lymphopenia (11%), AST elevation (11%), and lipase elevation (11%). Only two cycle 1 DLTs were observed on study, both at the 0.3/160 mg/m2 dose level comprising persistent grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 ALT elevation. No AEs experienced beyond cycle 1 required treatment discontinuation. The best response was stable disease in 10/25 patients (40%) for a median duration of 6.4 (1.7-45.1) months. The combination of oral metronomic topotecan and pazopanib is safe and tolerable in pediatric patients with solid tumors, with a recommended phase 2 dose of 0.22 mg/m2 topotecan and 160 mg/m2 pazopanib. No objective responses were observed in this heavily pre-treated patient population, although 40% did achieve stable disease for a median of 6 months. While this combination is likely of limited benefit for relapsed disease, it may play a role in the maintenance setting.

Characteristics of children ≤36 months of age with DIPG: A report from the international DIPG registry.

BACKGROUND: Children ≤36 months with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) have increased long-term survival (LTS, overall survival (OS) ≥24 months). Understanding distinguishing characteristics in this population is critical to improving outcomes. METHODS: Patients ≤36 months at diagnosis enrolled on the International DIPG Registry (IDIPGR) with central imaging confirmation were included. Presentation, clinical course, imaging, pathology and molecular findings were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 1183 patients in IDIPGR, 40 were eligible (median age: 29 months). Median OS was 15 months. Twelve patients (30%) were LTS, 3 (7.5%) very long-term survivors ≥5 years. Among 8 untreated patients, median OS was 2 months. Patients enrolled in the registry but excluded from our study by central radiology review or tissue diagnosis had median OS of 7 months. All but 1 LTS received radiation. Among 32 treated patients, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 68.8%, 31.2%, 15.6% and 12.5%, respectively. LTS had longer duration of presenting symptoms (P = .018). No imaging features were predictive of outcome. Tissue and genomic data were available in 18 (45%) and 10 patients, respectively. Among 9 with known H3K27M status, 6 had a mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Children ≤36 months demonstrated significantly more LTS, with an improved median OS of 15 months; 92% of LTS received radiation. Median OS in untreated children was 2 months, compared to 17 months for treated children. LTS had longer duration of symptoms. Excluded patients demonstrated a lower OS, contradicting the hypothesis that children ≤36 months with DIPG show improved outcomes due to misdiagnosis.

Avelumab in paediatric patients with refractory or relapsed solid tumours: dose-escalation results from an open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 trial.

BACKGROUND: We report dose-escalation results from an open-label, phase 1/2 trial evaluating avelumab (anti-PD-L1) in paediatric patients with refractory/relapsed solid tumours. METHODS: In phase 1, patients aged < 18 years with solid (including central nervous system [CNS]) tumours for which standard therapy did not exist or had failed were enrolled in sequential cohorts of 3-6 patients. Patients received avelumab 10 or 20 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: At data cut-off (27 July 2021), 21 patients aged 3-17 years had received avelumab 10 mg/kg (n = 6) or 20 mg/kg (n = 15). One patient had three events that were classified as a DLT (fatigue with hemiparesis and muscular weakness associated with pseudoprogression; 20 mg/kg cohort). Grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in five (83%) and 11 (73%) patients in the 10 and 20 mg/kg cohorts, respectively, and were treatment-related in one patient (7%; grade 3 [DLT]) in the 20 mg/kg cohort. Avelumab exposure in paediatric patients receiving 20 mg/kg dosing, but not 10 mg/kg, was comparable or higher compared with approved adult dosing (10 mg/kg or 800 mg flat dose). No objective responses were observed. Four patients with CNS tumours (20 mg/kg cohort) achieved stable disease, which was ongoing in two patients with astrocytoma at cut-off (for 24.7 and 30.3 months). CONCLUSION: In paediatric patients with refractory/relapsed solid tumours, avelumab monotherapy showed a safety profile consistent with previous adult studies, but clinical benefits were limited.

Accuracy of central neuro-imaging review of DIPG compared with histopathology in the International DIPG Registry.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) remains a clinico-radiologic diagnosis without routine tissue acquisition. Reliable imaging distinction between DIPG and other pontine tumors with potentially more favorable prognoses and treatment considerations is essential. METHODS: Cases submitted to the International DIPG registry (IDIPGR) with histopathologic and/or radiologic data were analyzed. Central imaging review was performed on diagnostic brain MRIs (if available) by two neuro-radiologists. Imaging features suggestive of alternative diagnoses included nonpontine origin, <50% pontine involvement, focally exophytic morphology, sharply defined margins, and/or marked diffusion restriction throughout. RESULTS: Among 286 patients with pathology from biopsy and/or autopsy, 23 (8%) had histologic diagnoses inconsistent with DIPG, most commonly nondiffuse low-grade gliomas and embryonal tumors. Among 569 patients with centrally-reviewed diagnostic MRIs, 40 (7%) were classified as non-DIPG, alternative diagnosis suspected. The combined analysis included 151 patients with both histopathology and centrally-reviewed MRI. Of 77 patients with imaging classified as characteristic of DIPG, 76 (99%) had histopathologic diagnoses consistent with DIPG (infiltrating grade II-IV gliomas). Of 57 patients classified as likely DIPG with some unusual imaging features, 55 (96%) had histopathologic diagnoses consistent with DIPG. Of 17 patients with imaging features suggestive of an alternative diagnosis, eight (47%) had histopathologic diagnoses inconsistent with DIPG (remaining patients were excluded due to nonpontine tumor origin). Association between central neuro-imaging review impression and histopathology was significant (p < 0.001), and central neuro-imaging impression was prognostic of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and important role of central neuro-imaging review in confirming the diagnosis of DIPG is demonstrated.

Characteristics of patients ≥10 years of age with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a report from the International DIPG/DMG Registry.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) generally occur in young school-age children, although can occur in adolescents and young adults. The purpose of this study was to describe clinical, radiological, pathologic, and molecular characteristics in patients ≥10 years of age with DIPG enrolled in the International DIPG Registry (IDIPGR). METHODS: Patients ≥10 years of age at diagnosis enrolled in the IDIPGR with imaging confirmed DIPG diagnosis were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) categorized as long-term survivors (LTS) (≥24 months) or short-term survivors (STS) (<24 months). RESULTS: Among 1010 patients, 208 (21%) were ≥10 years of age at diagnosis; 152 were eligible with a median age of 12 years (range 10-26.8). Median OS was 13 (2-82) months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS was 59.2%, 5.3%, and 3.3%, respectively. The 18/152 (11.8%) LTS were more likely to be older (P < .01) and present with longer symptom duration (P < .01). Biopsy and/or autopsy were performed in 50 (33%) patients; 77%, 61%, 33%, and 6% of patients tested had H3K27M (H3F3A or HIST1H3B), TP53, ATRX, and ACVR1 mutations/genome alterations, respectively. Two of 18 patients with IDH1 testing were IDH1-mutant and 1 was a LTS. The presence or absence of H3 alterations did not affect survival. CONCLUSION: Patients ≥10 years old with DIPG have a median survival of 13 months. LTS present with longer symptom duration and are likely to be older at presentation compared to STS. ATRX mutation rates were higher in this population than the general DIPG population.

Central and peripheral steady-state visual evoked potentials in children with optic pathway gliomas.

PURPOSE: Treatment of optic pathway gliomas is prompted by neuroradiological evidence of tumor growth, usually associated with progressive visual loss. Despite therapy, approximately 40% will show visual deterioration. Treatment outcome is largely based on the preservation of vision. However, current visual function assessment is often unreliable in children with optic pathway gliomas who have limited collaboration. Thus, there is a need for new clinical tools to evaluate visual functions in these children. The aim of the study was to assess the value of steady-state visual evoked potentials as a tool to assess function in the central and peripheral visual fields of children with optic pathway gliomas. METHOD: Ten patients with optic pathway gliomas and 33 healthy controls (ages 3 to 18 years) were tested using steady-state visual evoked potentials. The dartboard stimulus consisted of one central circle alternating at 16 reversals/s and one peripheral hoop alternating at 14.4 reversals/s, separated by a hoop of gray space. It was presented monocularly at 30% and 96% contrasts. RESULTS: Results indicated that central signal-to-noise ratios were significantly lower in children with optic pathway gliomas compared to controls. However, no significant group difference was detected in the peripheral visual field. CONCLUSION: Steady-state visual evoked potentials could eventually be implemented in the clinical assessment and follow-up of central visual field deficits in uncooperative or nonverbal children but seem to have limited usefulness for evaluation of peripheral visual field deficits. Additional studies are needed to identify testing parameters for full visual field assessment.

Molecular Profiling of Hard-to-Treat Childhood and Adolescent Cancers.

Importance: Little progress in pediatric cancer treatment has been noted in the past decade, urging the development of novel therapeutic strategies for adolescents and children with hard-to-treat cancers. Use of comprehensive molecular profiling in the clinical management of children and adolescents with cancer appears a suitable approach to improve patient care and outcomes, particularly for hard-to-treat cases. Objective: To assess the feasibility of identifying potentially actionable mutations using next-generation sequencing-based assays in a clinically relevant time frame. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study reports the results of the TRICEPS study, a prospective genome sequencing study conducted in Québec, Canada. Participants, aged 18 years or younger at diagnosis, with refractory or relapsed childhood and adolescent cancers were enrolled from April 2014 through January 2018. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) of matched tumor normal samples and RNA sequencing of tumor were performed to identify single-nucleotide variants, fusion transcripts, differential gene expression, and copy number alterations. Results reviewed by a team of experts were further annotated, synthesized into a report, and subsequently discussed in a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board. Main Outcomes and Measures: Molecular profiling of pediatric patients with hard-to-treat cancer, identification of actionable and targetable alteration needed for the management of these patients, and proposition of targeted and personalized novel therapeutic strategies. Results: A total of 84 patients with hard-to-treat cancers were included in the analysis. These patients had a mean (range) age of 10.1 (1-21) years and a similar proportion of male (45 [54%]) and female (39 [46%]). Sixty-two patients (74%) had suitable tissues for multimodal molecular profiling (WES and RNA sequencing). The process from DNA or RNA isolation to genomic sequencing and data analysis steps took a median (range) of 24 (4-41) days. Potentially actionable alterations were identified in 54 of 62 patients (87%). Actions were taken in 22 of 54 patients (41%), and 18 (33%) either were on a second or third line of treatment, were in remission, or had stable disease and thus no actions were taken. Conclusions and Relevance: Incorporating genomic sequencing into the management of hard-to-treat childhood and adolescent cancers appeared feasible; molecular profiling may enable the identification of potentially actionable alterations with clinical implications for most patients, including targeted therapy and clinically relevant information of diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring significance.

Phase I dose-finding study for melatonin in pediatric oncology patients with relapsed solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Melatonin is a natural health product used for sleep disturbances. In preliminary studies of adults with advanced cancer, 20 mg of melatonin daily was associated with reduction in anorexia and weight loss-symptoms that also impact pediatric oncology patients. High doses of melatonin have not been studied in pediatrics. METHODS: This was a multicenter single-arm phase I dose-escalation study utilizing a 3 + 3 design to determine the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of melatonin in pediatric oncology patients with relapsed solid tumors. Melatonin was given for 8 weeks at three dose levels-0.075 mg/kg (maximum 5 mg), 0.15 mg/kg (maximum 10 mg), and 0.3 mg/kg (maximum 20 mg). RESULTS: Melatonin was well tolerated at all three dose levels with no significant adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. The only grade 3/4 toxicities were myelosuppression, which was attributed to the concomitant chemotherapy and occurred at all dose levels. Weight gain occurred in seven of nine patients, with a median increase of 1.1 kg (range -3.3 to 4.5) or 3.4% (range -10.2 to 8.7), with two patients losing weight (one in dose level 1 and one level 3). CONCLUSIONS: Melatonin is well tolerated at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg (maximum 20 mg), in the pediatric population. This study provides the background for further study of high-dose melatonin in pediatric oncology patients.

Phase I study of vinblastine and temsirolimus in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: Canadian Cancer Trials Group Study IND.218.

Combining mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and vinca alkaloids has shown therapeutic synergy in xenograft models of pediatric cancers. This phase I study assessed safety and toxicity of temsirolimus in combination with vinblastine in children. PROCEDURE: Patients ≥ 1 and ≤ 18 years with recurrent/refractory solid or CNS tumors were eligible. Vinblastine (4 mg/m2 ) and temsirolimus (15 mg/m2 ) were administered i.v. weekly, with planned dose escalation of vinblastine using a rolling six phase I design. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were collected. RESULTS: Seven patients with median age 12 years (range, 8-18 years) were enrolled; all were evaluable for toxicity and six for response. At dose level 1, four of six patients developed grade 3 mucositis, of which one met duration criteria for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Four patients required dose omissions for grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity, including one prolonged neutropenia DLT. A subsequent patient was enrolled on dose level -2 (temsirolimus 10 mg/m2 , vinblastine 4 mg/m2 ) with no protocol-related toxicity > grade 1, except grade 2 neutropenia. Two serious adverse events (SAE) occurred-an allergic reaction to temsirolimus (grade 2) and an intracranial hemorrhage in a CNS tumor patient (grade 3)-unlikely related to study therapy. Soluble VEGFR2 was reduced at cycle 1, day 36 in keeping with inhibition of angiogenesis. Four patients achieved prolonged stable disease for a median of 5.0 months (range, 3.1-8.3 months). CONCLUSION: The combination of weekly temsirolimus (15 mg/m2 ) and vinblastine (4 mg/m2 ) exceeds the maximum tolerated dose in children, with frequent oral mucositis and hematologic toxicity.

Carboplatin and vincristine neurotoxicity in the treatment of pediatric low-grade gliomas.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric low-grade gliomas (LGG) represent 30-50% of central nervous system pediatric tumors. Over the last decades, the combination of carboplatin and vincristine (CV) has become the first line of treatment in most centers. In a large clinical trial where the efficacy of CV was compared to another regimen, 19% presented grade III neurotoxicity. Despite the fact that CV therapy is widely used for pediatric patients with LGG, no study has reported detailed neurological adverse events and outcome with this treatment regimen. The purpose of this retrospective study is to better understand neurotoxicity associated with CV. PROCEDURE: We conducted a retrospective study to better evaluate the incidence and evolution of neurotoxicity associated with CV in patients with LGG. RESULTS: Twenty-one pediatric patients were treated with CV at our single institution over 16 years. Most patients had optic glioma. Peripheral neuropathy was present in most patients (86%). Eight patients (38%) had a dose reduction of vincristine due to grade III toxicity (three motor neuropathies, three sensory neuropathies, one constipation, and one dysphagia). Most neurotoxicity occurred during induction or the first maintenance cycle. No ototoxicity was observed during treatment or follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, neurotoxicity with vincristine occurred two times more frequently than in previously published literature. Careful neurological assessment is important to detect neurotoxicity, especially during induction. The high incidence of neurotoxicity should be considered when selecting a chemotherapy regimen for pediatric LGG.

[All large necrotic and hemorrhagic kidney tumors in children are not necessarily malignant: A case of a 7-month-old child]. / Les volumineuses tumeurs rénales nécrotiques et hémorragiques ne sont pas toutes malignes même en pédiatrie : à propos d'un cas chez un enfant de 7 mois.

We report the case of a large tumor in the left kidney with necrotic and hemorrhagic features in a 7-month-old child, which was clinically and radiologically suggestive of a nephroblastoma. The tumor was a nodular mass measuring 8cm in diameter occupying two thirds of the kidney and presenting areas of necrosis and hemorrhage. No capsular rupture or renal sinus infiltration were found. Adjacent renal parenchyma appeared mascroscopically normal. Histologically, the tumor showed a strictly tubulopapillary architectural pattern with numerous psammomas. The initial hypothesis was a purely epithelial nephroblastoma. However, this hypothesis was rejected due to some immunohistochemical and histological characteristics and the final diagnosis was a metanephric adenoma. Metanephric adenoma is an exceptionally rare benign renal tumor in children. However, pathologists need to keep it in mind because simple surgical excision is curative.

Clinical Presentation and Outcome of Patients With Optic Pathway Glioma.

BACKGROUND: Optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) occur sporadically or in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical presentation at diagnosis and at progression of patients with OPGs. METHODS: We conducted a chart review of patients with OPGs diagnosed in a single center over a period of 15 years. Demographic data including age, sex, NF1 status, clinical presentation, and outcome were collected. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients who were identified, 23 had sporadic tumors (57.5%) and 17 had NF1-related tumors (42.5%). Among the children with NF1, there was a significant overrepresentation of girls (82.3%) (P = 0.02), while among the children without NF1, there were slightly more boys (56.5%) than girls (43.5%). The presence of nystagmus was strongly associated with sporadic optic pathway gliomas. Poor visual outcome was related to tumor affecting both optic pathways, hydrocephalus at diagnosis, and optic nerve atrophy. Of the 40 patients, five died of OPG complications (12.5%) and all had sporadic tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Our cohort is one of the largest with OPGs and a detailed description of the clinical presentation both at diagnosis and at progression. We observed a significant difference between sporadic and NF1 optic pathway gliomas in terms of demographics, clinical presentation, and outcome.

Stability and Repeatability of the Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-r) with Parents of Childhood Cancer Survivors.

OBJECTIVE: Parents report psychological distress in association with their child's cancer. Reliable tools are needed to screen parental distress over the cancer trajectory. This study aimed to estimate the stability and repeatability of the Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Depression and Anxiety items of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r-D; -A) in parents of children diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: Fifty parents (28 mothers, median age = 44) of clinically stable survivors of childhood solid and brain tumours completed questionnaires about their own distress (DT, ESAS-r-D; -A, Brief Symptom Inventory-18: BSI-18, Patient Health Questionnaire-9: PHQ-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7: GAD-7) and their children's quality of life (QoL; Peds Quality of Life: PedsQL) twice, with a month interval between the two assessments. At retest, parents also evaluated life events that occurred between the two time points. Hierarchical regressions explored moderators for the temporal stability of test measures. RESULTS: Stability estimates were ICC = .78 for the DT, .55 for the ESAS-r-D, and .47 for the ESAS-r-A. Caseness agreement between test and retest was substantial for the DT, fair for the ESAS-r-D, and slight for the ESAS-r-A. Repeatability analyses indicated that the error range for the DT was more than 2 pts below/above actual measurement, whereas it was more than 3 pts for the ESAS-r-A, and 2.5 for the ESAS-r-D. Instability of the DT could be explained by changes in children's physical QoL, but not by other components of QoL or life events. No moderators of stability could be identified for the ESAS-r items. CONCLUSIONS: The DT appears to be a fairly stable measure when the respondent's condition is stable yet with a relatively wide error range. Fluctuations in distress-related constructs may affect the temporal stability of the DT. The lower stability of ESAS-r items may result from shorter time-lapse instructions resulting in a greater sensitivity to change. Findings support future research on the DT as a reliable instrument in caregivers.

Transformation of a primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumor of infancy to an undifferentiated sarcoma: a first reported case.

An 8-month-old girl underwent surgical resection of a cervical mass with histologic diagnosis of a primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumor of infancy (PMMTI). More than 5 years after the initial surgical intervention, the tumor recurred locally, with numerous distant metastases. The histologic morphology of this tumor was compatible with a diagnosis of an undifferentiated high-grade sarcoma. PMMTI is a recently described poorly differentiated fibroblastic soft-tissue tumor of infancy, of at least borderline biological behavior, characterized by local recurrence and a potential to metastasize. We present here the first case of a transformation of a PMMTI into an undifferentiated high-grade sarcoma.

Phase I study of vinblastine and sirolimus in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The combination of vinblastine and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor sirolimus inhibits the growth of neuroblastoma xenografts through pro-apoptotic and anti-angiogenic mechanisms. This phase I study aimed to explore the safety and toxicity of this combination in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors. PROCEDURE: Patients ≤21 years of age with recurrent/refractory solid tumors (including CNS) were eligible. Sirolimus was administered daily by mouth or nasogastric (NG) tube, with doses adjusted to achieve a target trough concentration of 10-15 ng/ml, with weekly intravenous vinblastine (dose escalated 4-6 mg/m(2)/dose according to 3 + 3 phase I design). RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled (median age 8.7 years; range 2.3-19) of whom 12 were evaluable for toxicity and 11 for response. One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 mucositis) at the highest vinblastine dose level. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. Dose-adjusted sirolimus trough concentrations were significantly lower in patients receiving drug via NG tube (1.50 ± 0.75 ng/ml/mg vs. 2.25 ± 1.07 ng/ml/mg for oral administration). Correlative biomarker analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in serum concentration of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (sVEGFR2) at 28 days compared to baseline consistent with inhibition of angiogenesis. One patient had a partial response and three had stable disease for more than 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of mTOR inhibitor and vinblastine given over an extended continuous schedule is safe, associated with a reduction in circulating angiogenic factor (CAF) VEGFR2 and resulted in clinical responses. Future studies using the intravenously administered mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus are planned.

A phase I study of histone deacetylase inhibitor, pracinostat (SB939), in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors: IND203 a trial of the NCIC IND program/C17 pediatric phase I consortium.

BACKGROUND: Pracinostat (SB939) is a potent oral inhibitor of class 1, 2, and 4 histone deacetylases (HDAC). The adult recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is 60 mg po three times per week (t.i.w.) for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. This study assessed the toxicities and pharmacokinetics of pracinostat and determined the RP2D in children with refractory solid tumors. METHODS: Pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors were treated with oral pracinostat t.i.w. for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by 1 week off dosing. Three dose levels-25, 35, and 45 mg/m(2) were evaluated using a standard 3 + 3 cohort design. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were optional. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled. The most common diagnosis was Ewing sarcoma. Most adverse events (AEs) were hematological with five (40%) patients experiencing grade 3 neutropenia. Non-hematological AEs were generally grade 1. No dose limiting toxicities occurred. More hematological and non-hematological AEs occurred at 45 mg/m(2) : Two of five patients experienced Grade 3 neutropenia and one each Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and leucopenia, Grade 1 fatigue and anorexia occurred in three. The RP2D was declared to be 45 mg/m(2) (comparable to an adult dose of 80 mg). One patient had a best response of stable disease (duration of 2.9 months). Three patients on 25 mg/m(2) and one each on 35 and 45 mg/m(2) participated in the PK study. No dose related changes in Cmax or AUC occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Pracinostat is reasonably well tolerated in children with refractory solid tumors. The RP2D is 45 mg/m(2) .

Assessment of dexrazoxane as a cardioprotectant in doxorubicin-treated children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Doxorubicin chemotherapy is associated with cardiomyopathy. Dexrazoxane reduces cardiac damage during treatment with doxorubicin in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). We aimed to establish the long-term effect of dexrazoxane on the subclinical state of cardiac health in survivors of childhood high-risk ALL 5 years after completion of doxorubicin treatment. METHODS: Between January, 1996, and September, 2000, children with high-risk ALL were enrolled from nine centres in the USA, Canada, and Puerto Rico. Patients were assigned by block randomisation to receive ten doses of 30 mg/m² doxorubicin alone or the same dose of doxorubicin preceded by 300 mg/m² dexrazoxane. Treatment assignment was obtained through a telephone call to a centralised registrar to conceal allocation. Investigators were masked to treatment assignment but treating physicians and patients were not; however, investigators, physicians, and patients were masked to study serum cardiac troponin-T concentrations and echocardiographic measurements. The primary endpoints were late left ventricular structure and function abnormalities as assessed by echocardiography; analyses were done including all patients with data available after treatment completion. This trial has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00165087. FINDINGS: 100 children were assigned to doxorubicin (66 analysed) and 105 to doxorubicin plus dexrazoxane (68 analysed). 5 years after the completion of doxorubicin chemotherapy, mean left ventricular fractional shortening and end-systolic dimension Z scores were significantly worse than normal for children who received doxorubicin alone (left ventricular fractional shortening: -0·82, 95% CI -1·31 to -0·33; end-systolic dimension: 0·57, 0·21-0·93) but not for those who also received dexrazoxane (-0·41, -0·88 to 0·06; 0·15, -0·20 to 0·51). The protective effect of dexrazoxane, relative to doxorubicin alone, on left ventricular wall thickness (difference between groups: 0·47, 0·46-0·48) and thickness-to-dimension ratio (0·66, 0·64-0·68) were the only statistically significant characteristics at 5 years. Subgroup analysis showed dexrazoxane protection (p=0·04) for left ventricular fractional shortening at 5 years in girls (1·17, 0·24-2·11), but not in boys (-0·10, -0·87 to 0·68). Similarly, subgroup analysis showed dexrazoxane protection (p=0·046) for the left ventricular thickness-to-dimension ratio at 5 years in girls (1·15, 0·44-1·85), but not in boys (0·19, -0·42 to 0·81). With a median follow-up for recurrence and death of 8·7 years (range 1·3-12·1), event-free survival was 77% (95% CI 67-84) for children in the doxorubicin-alone group, and 76% (67-84) for children in the doxorubicin plus dexrazoxane group (p=0·99). INTERPRETATION: Dexrazoxane provides long-term cardioprotection without compromising oncological efficacy in doxorubicin-treated children with high-risk ALL. Dexrazoxane exerts greater long-term cardioprotective effects in girls than in boys. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health, Children's Cardiomyopathy Foundation, University of Miami Women's Cancer Association, Lance Armstrong Foundation, Roche Diagnostics, Pfizer, and Novartis.

A multi-centre Canadian pilot study of metronomic temozolomide combined with radiotherapy for newly diagnosed paediatric brainstem glioma.

PURPOSE: Survival rates for paediatric diffuse intrinsic brainstem glioma (DIBSG) are dismal. Metronomic dosing of temozolomide (TMZ) combined with standard radiotherapy may improve survival by increasing the therapeutic index and anti-angiogenic effect of TMZ. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this regimen in paediatric DIBSG patients. METHODS: Children aged 18 years or younger with newly diagnosed DIBSG were treated with standard radiotherapy and concomitant metronomic TMZ at 85 mg/m(2)/day for 6 weeks, followed by metronomic TMZ monotherapy at the same dose. Treatment was continued until tumour progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Primary endpoints included overall survival and toxicities. For patients who consented, plasma and urine samples were collected at diagnosis, post-induction and prior to each course of maintenance therapy for the quantification of angiogenesis markers. RESULTS: Fifteen eligible patients were enrolled, with a median age of 6.4 years. The most common toxicities were myelosuppression, most notably prolonged lymphopaenia and thrombocytopaenia. The only dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopaenia. Intratumoural haemorrhage was confirmed in one patient. Median time to progression was 5.13 months (95% CI = 6.4, 10.8) and median overall survival (OS) was 9.8 months (95% CI = 6.4, 10.8). Six-months OS was 80% ± 10.3%, with a 1-year OS of 20% ± 10.3%. Serum levels of both VEGF and endoglin tended to decrease during the first two cycles of therapy. CONCLUSION: Chemoradiotherapy with metronomic dosing of TMZ showed similar toxicity to previous TMZ regimens, and does not appear to improve survival in paediatric DIBSG.

Do children undergoing cancer procedures under pharmacological sedation still report pain and anxiety? A preliminary study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to quantify children's levels of pain and fear during needle puncture procedures in a context where intravenous sedation-analgesia seems to be effective for pain and anxiety relief. The relevance of a nonpharmacological intervention in the pharmacological regimen was evaluated. DESIGN: Fear and pain were assessed by children, parents and physicians, on a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10 cm), before and during puncture procedures. Higher scores represented more intense pain/fear. RESULTS: During 4 consecutive months, 18 children were recruited, but four were excluded from analyses because they did not receive the full sedation regimen (midazolam/ketamine) (N = 14, mean age +/- SD: 9.9 +/- 3.4 years). Parents self-reported their own anxiety before the procedure (4.69 +/- 3.17), but no correlation was found with their children's self-reported fear. Before procedures, the children's fear was self-reported on a VAS by children (2.93 +/- 2.93), parents (4.45 +/- 2.87), and physicians (3.67 +/- 2.48). During procedures under sedation, the children's pain (1.71 +/- 2.74) did not correlate with the parents' (4.01 +/- 3.23) and physicians' (1.83 +/- 2.32) ratings. Children anticipating high levels of pain and fear on the VAS experienced higher levels of pain (r = 0.65, P < 0.05) and fear (r = 0.59, P < 0.05) during the procedures. Sixteen parents (16/18) agreed to participate with their children if a study evaluating hypnosis for pain and anxiety was conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Sedation is effective in lowering levels of fear and pain in children during procedures, but they still anticipate fear before the procedures. Parents are anxious for their children. Future hypnotic intervention could be helpful for children as well as parents to cope with anxiety during procedures.

Clinical and genetic analysis of unclassifiable inherited bone marrow failure syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: Unclassified inherited bone marrow failure syndromes are a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders that represent either new syndromes or atypical clinical courses of known inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. The relative prevalence of the unclassified inherited bone marrow failure syndromes and their characteristics and the clinical and economic challenges that they create have never been studied. METHODS: We analyzed cases of inherited bone marrow failure syndrome in the Canadian Inherited Marrow Failure Registry that were deemed unclassifiable at study entry. RESULTS: From October 2001 to March 2006, 39 of the 162 patients enrolled in the Canadian Inherited Marrow Failure Registry were registered as having unclassified inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. These patients presented at a significantly older age (median: 9 months) than the patients with classified inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (median: 1 month) and had substantial variation in the clinical presentations. The hematologic phenotype, however, was similar to the classified inherited bone marrow failure syndromes and included single- or multiple-lineage cytopenia, severe aplastic anemia, myelodysplasia, and malignancy. Grouping patients according to the affected blood cell lineage(s) and to the presence of associated physical malformations was not always sufficient to characterize a condition, because affected members from several families fit into different phenotypic groups. Compared with the classified inherited bone marrow failure syndromes, the patients with unclassified inherited bone marrow failure syndromes had 3.2 more specific diagnostic tests at 4.5 times higher cost per evaluated patient to attempt to categorize their syndrome. At last follow-up, only 20% of the unclassified inherited bone marrow failure syndromes were ultimately diagnosed with a specific syndrome on the basis of the development of new clinical findings or positive genetic tests. CONCLUSIONS: Unclassified inherited bone marrow failure syndromes are relatively common among the inherited bone marrow failure syndromes and present a major diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma.