Cost-Utility Analysis of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

PURPOSE: To perform a post hoc cost-utility analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing prostatic artery embolization (PAE) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cost-utility analysis over a 5-year period to compare PAE versus TURP from a Spanish National Health System perspective. Data were collected from a randomized clinical trial performed at a single institution. Effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was derived from the cost and QALY values associated with these treatments. Further sensitivity analysis was performed to account for the impact of reintervention on the cost-effectiveness of both procedures. RESULTS: At the 1-year follow-up, PAE resulted in mean cost per patient of €2904.68 and outcome of 0.975 QALYs per treatment. In comparison, TURP had cost €3846.72 per patient and its outcome was 0.953 QALYs per treatment. At 5 years, the cost for PAE and TURP were €4117.13 and €4297.58, and the mean QALY outcome was 4.572 and 4.487, respectively. Analysis revealed an ICER of €2121.15 saved per QALY gained when comparing PAE to TURP at long-term follow-up. Reintervention rate for PAE and TURP was 12% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TURP, in short term, PAE could be considered a cost-effective strategy within the Spanish healthcare system for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, in long term, the superiority is less apparent due to higher reintervention rates.

Clinical course of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia treated with remdesivir: A real-life study.

BACKGROUND: There is currently much uncertainty regarding the most optimal treatment for COVID-19. This study analyze the change in the clinical condition of patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 pneumonia and treated with remdesivir in a real-life setting, based on the WHO Ordinal Scale. Clinical complications, treatment safety, and impact of other associated drugs were also analyzed. METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective study including patients treated with remdesivir. The need for admission to the ICU, the length of ICU and hospital stay, and the need for ventilatory support were analyzed. The laboratory parameters, drugs administered concomitantly, and difference in the length of hospital stay according to the concomitant treatment received were also evaluated. A univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to analyze associated factors. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were included. The mean length of hospital stay was 15 days, and 90% of the patients had been discharged from the hospital 28 days after starting treatment with remdesivir. The likelihood of hospital discharge among patients not presenting with hypertension as a comorbidity was significantly higher than that of those with this condition (HR = 3.19, P = 0.008). Nineteen patients had to be admitted to the ICU (mean of 18 days). Approximately 11% required invasive mechanical ventilation (mean of 22 days). Almost 37% of the patients received high-flow oxygen therapy and 14% non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Four deaths were recorded within the first week. Main adverse events were increases in transaminase and creatinine levels. Nosocomial infections were more frequent when remdesivir was combined with immunosuppressive drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and treated with remdesivir require relatively prolonged hospital stays, many with a need for ventilatory support and, in a considerable proportion of cases, admission to the ICU. However, the observed survival rate is high, and the drug is well tolerated.

Survival and clinical events related to end-stage liver disease associated with HCV prior to the era of all oral direct-acting antiviral treatments.

Background: The aim of this study was to describe the natural long-term course of end-stage liver disease associated with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection by measuring survival and complication rates in the era prior to the arrival of new direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study was designed to establish the follow-up of patients hospitalized for a decompensated cirrhotic event or hepatocellular carcinoma using electronic records from hospital discharge databases from 2009 to 2015. Their survival was compared with a sex, age and non-liver mortality excess matched simulation of the general Spanish population. Results: A total of 253 patients were included in the study. Among those with decompensated cirrhosis (n = 151) the hospital admission rate was 1.88 per patient-year with a mortality rate of 0.16 per patient-year. Mean survival was 4.10 years for patients with decompensated cirrhosis, and 1.75 for non-transplanted hepatocellular carcinoma, compared to 18.39 years for the general population. Conclusion: Our results show the complexity and rapid progression of end-stage liver disease associated with HCV infection. The considerable loss of life expectancy associated with the development of decompensated cirrhosis in patients with chronic HCV infection in the absence of viral clearance through treatment is acutely evident.

Comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors in an aged cohort of HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral treatment in a Spanish hospital in 2016.

OBJECTIVES: The increased survival of HIV-infected individuals has resulted in a premature aging of this population, with the consequent development of premature age-related comorbidities and risk factors. We aimed to describe the prevalence of age-related comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors in older adults with HIV infection on antiretroviral therapy (ART). METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was undertaken in a cohort of HIV patients aged ≥50 years on ART in September 2016 in Spain. The prevalence of comorbidities (liver cirrhosis, respiratory diseases, cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes, and kidney and bone disorders) and risk factors (smoking, dyslipidemia, and arterial hypertension) was captured. RESULTS: Among the 339 patients included in the study, any comorbidity was present in 52%, the most common being cirrhosis (19%), chronic lung disease (13%), and diabetes mellitus (11%). Over three quarters (78%) had any risk factor: dyslipidemia (55%) and smoking (44%). A higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease was seen in patients ≥60 years in comparison to those aged 50-59 years (23% vs 8%, p = 0.001). Of all study patients, 44% took more than three drugs in addition to their ART, while 29% received no additional pharmacological interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities and risk factors for chronic diseases are very common in HIV-infected patients aged ≥50 years and increase with age, so they should be early considered in the clinical management of these patients. It is important to encourage healthy lifestyles to prevent comorbidities and to control risk factors. Concomitant treatments with ART should be carefully monitored to prevent drug interactions, adverse effects, and patient adherence failures.