Impact of microscopic incomplete resection for colorectal liver metastases on surgical margin recurrence: R1-Contact vs R1 < 1 mm margin width.

BACKGROUND: Several studies highlighted an inferior outcome of R1 resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM); it is still unclear whether directly involved margins (R1-contact) are associated with a poorer outcome compared to R1 < 1 mm. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact on surgical margin recurrence (SMR) of R1-contact vs R1 < 1 mm patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for CRLM between 2009-2018 with both R1 resections on final histology were included and compared in terms of recurrence and survival. Factors associated with SMR were assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Out of 477, 77 (17.2%) patients showed R1 resection (53 R1-Contact and 24 R1 < 1 mm). Overall recurrence rate was 79.2% (R1 < 1 mm = 70.8% vs R1-contact group = 83%, P = .222). Median disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were significantly higher in R1 < 1 mm vs R1-contact group (93 vs 55 months; P = .025 and 69 vs 46 months; P = .038, respectively). The SMR rate was higher in R1-contact compared to R1 < 1 mm group (30.2% vs 8.3%; P = .036). At univariate analysis, age, number of metastases, open surgical approach, RAS status, and R1-contact were associated with SMR. At multivariate analysis, R1-contact margin was the only factor independently associated with higher SMR (OR = 5.6; P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: R1-contact margin is independently associated with SMR after liver resection for CRLM. Patients with R1-contact margin will also experience poorer DFS and DSS.

Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: comprehensive comparison of complications and costs at 90 days using a propensity method.

Laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LHH) may offer advantages over open hemihepatectomy (OHH) in blood loss, recovery, and hospital stay. The aim of this study is to evaluate our recent experience performing hemihepatectomy and compare complications and costs up to 90 days following laparoscopic versus open procedures. Retrospective evaluation of patients undergoing hemihepatectomy at our center 01/2010-12/2018 was performed. Patient, tumor, and surgical characteristics; 90-day complications; and costs were analyzed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates. A total of 141 hemihepatectomies were included: 96 OHH and 45 LHH. While operative times were longer for LHH, blood loss and transfusions were less. At 90 days, there were similar rates of liver-specific and surgical complications but fewer medical complications following LHH. Medical complications that arose with greater frequency following OHH were primarily pulmonary complications and urinary and central venous catheter infections. Complications at 90 days were lower following LHH (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III OHH 23%, LHH 11%, p = 0.130; Comprehensive Complication Index OHH 20.0 ± 16.1, LHH 10.9 ± 14.2, p = 0.001). While operating costs were higher, costs for hospital stay and readmissions were lower with LHH. Patients undergoing LHH experience a significant reduction in postoperative medical complications and costs, resulting in 90-day cost equity compared with OHH.

An unusual case of repeated splenectomy: traumatic rupture of an accessory spleen in a previously splenectomized patient.

The traumatic rupture of an accessory spleen is a very rare condition and only few cases have been reported in the literature. We describe the case of a 51-year-old man undergone splenectomy for trauma several years before, who developed hemoperitoneum due to a laceration of a voluminous accessory spleen, following an accidental two-meter fall. As a conservative management of the injury was not possible, an accessory splenectomy was then required. Thus, a briefly review of the literature about this uncommon topic was perfomed. KEY WORDS: Accessory spleen, Laparotomy, Trauma.

Hollow viscus injury due to blunt trauma. Epidemiology and outcome in a large urban area.

INTRODUCTION: Hollows viscus injury (HVI) is a rare occurrence and represents a clinical challenge because of its subtle and nonspecific clinical findings. The specific aims of this study were to determine the overall frequency of HVI in blunt trauma patients occurring in large urban area, the relative frequency of various hollow organ injuries, and the outcomes of such injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective trauma registry review was performed by analysing data from the University Hospital Sant' Andrea in Rome and data from the Emergency Surgery and Trauma Care Unit of S. Filippo Neri Hospital in Rome The clinical records of all blunt abdominal trauma observed between January 2006 and December 2014 were blind analysed. Variables considered for analysis were: sex, age, time/type of trauma, associated injuries, timing/characteristics of operative treatment, ISS, AIS, length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Seventy-one, 7.5% of all abdominal trauma recorded, were coded having 89 HVI. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 29.6% (n=21/71) and 19.7% (n=14/71) respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that only WBC (p=0.007) was significant independent predictor of morbidity whereas preoperative transfusion (p=0.010) and ISS (p<0.001) were significant risk factors for mortality. DISCUSSION: HVI is rarely found in patients with blunt abdominal trauma and it can be fatal and life-threatening, particularly in patients for whom a pertinent diagnosis is delayed. CONCLUSION: It appears clearly that during an ER evaluation of a blunt abdominal trauma an HIV has nowadays always to be considered to reach a quick diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention. KEY WORDS: Emergency, Hollow Viscus Injury, Surgery, Trauma.