Peritoneal Lymphomatosis in a Pediatric Patient: A Peruvian Case Report.

While NHL commonly affects lymph nodes, peritoneal lymphomatosis causing ascites is rare in pediatric patients. We present a unique case of DLBC lymphoma in a Peruvian child presenting as ascites associated with peritoneal lymphomatosis. The 11-year-old boy was admitted with ascites and dyspnea. Physical examination revealed collateral circulation, abdominal distension, and diminished breath sounds. Investigations led to a suspected diagnosis of peritoneal tuberculosis; however, a laparoscopic biopsy showed granulomatous infiltration consistent with high-grade diffuse B-cell lymphoma. The peritoneal lymphomatosis causing ascites is uncommon, and its initial presentation as peritoneal symptoms is even rarer. Differential diagnosis between peritoneal tuberculosis and DLBCL involvement can be challenging due to both shared signs and symptoms. Staging systems, such as the International Pediatric NHL Staging System, aid in determining the extent of the disease. DLBCL has a good prognosis, with treatment regimens such as the LMB-89 protocol showing high overall survival rates. Awareness of DLBCL's atypical presentations is crucial for timely diagnosis and management in the pediatric population. To conclude, children with ascites represent a diagnostic challenge posed by overlapping symptoms with other conditions, such as tuberculosis, and the need for a comprehensive approach to rule out different etiologies. Additionally, it is important the prompt treatment to avoid complications.

Lipschütz acute vulvar ulcer related to COVID-19 vaccination: first case report in South America / Úlcera vulvar aguda de Lipschütz relacionada con la vacunación por COVID-19: primer caso notificado en Sudamérica

Lipschütz ulcer is a non-sexually transmitted genital lesion of unknown etiology, which presents as a painful vulvar ulcer. Lipschütz ulcers have been described in most continents. This is the first case reported in Peru and South America. We present the case of a 33-year-old female patient with a Lipschütz ulcer after being vaccinated with the second dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. She reported having had only one sexual partner in her lifetime. Laboratory results were negative for herpes simplex 2, Cytomegalovirus, Toxoplasma gondii, Epstein-Barr virus, and syphilis. The patient received symptomatic treatment. Ten days after the onset, the patient was significantly better during follow-up. This case report displays a potential adverse effect of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine as a Lipschütz ulcer triggered by the host humoral immune response. However, further research is needed to establish the causal relationship between these two.

La úlcera de Lipschütz es una lesión genital no transmitidas por vía sexual de etiología desconocida, se presenta como una úlcera vulvar muy dolorosa. Las úlceras de Lipschütz se han descrito en la mayoría de los continentes. Este es el primer caso que se reporta en Perú y Sudamérica. En este reporte de caso se presentauna paciente de 33 años con una úlcera de Lipschütz luego de haber sido vacunada con la segunda dosis de la vacuna AstraZeneca COVID-19. Refirió haber tenido una sola pareja sexual a lo largo de su vida. Los resultados de laboratorio fueron negativos para herpes simplex 2, Citomegalovirus, Toxoplasma gondii, virus de Epstein-Barr y sífilis. La paciente recibió tratamiento sintomático. Diez días después, durante el seguimiento, la paciente estaba significativamente mejor. Este reporte de caso expone un potencial efecto adverso de la vacuna AstraZeneca COVID-19, en forma de úlcera de Lipschütz, desencadenado por la respuesta inmune humoral del huésped. Sin embargo, es necesario realizar más investigación para establecer la relación causal entre ambos.

Association of lifetime e-cigarette and/or tobacco use and last year cannabis use among university students: A cross-sectional secondary analysis of a national survey.

BACKGROUND: The accelerated increase in the use of e-cigarette by university students in recent years has incremented nicotine use in addition to tobacco, but it is not known whether the use of cannabis is related to these alternatives. This study analyzes the association between the use of electronic cigarettes and/or tobacco and the use of cannabis in the last 12 months. An analytical cross-sectional study conducted based on the III Andean epidemiological study on drug consumption among university students in 2016. A multivariate analysis performed using a generalized linear family model and the log Poisson link option. The results were shown as Prevalence Ratios (PR) in raw (PRc) and adjusted (PRa) models, and the analysis also employed 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the percentages. SETTING: Ten Peruvian universities. PARTICIPANTS: University students' lifetime. EXPOSURE: Participants' e-cigarette and/or tobacco consumption, based on questions about consumption of tobacco and e-cigarettes. Participants were categorized into those consuming: only e-cigarettes, only tobacco, both, or neither. OUTCOME: The use of cannabis by participants in the last 12 months. Among the university students who met the inclusion criteria (n = 3981), the prevalence of using both e-cigarettes and tobacco (dual) throughout life was 11.6% (95% CI: 10.1 to 13.3), and only e-cigarettes was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7 to 1.8). The use of cannabis in the last 12 months was 5.2% (95% CI: 4.1 to 6.5). Results of this study found a sequential probability gradient of cannabis use, where those with dual use had 58.5 times more probability of having used cannabis in the last 12 months (PRa 58.5, 95% CI: 20.9 to 163.7, p <0.001) compared to those who used none; whereas those who used only tobacco were 33.3 times more likely to have used cannabis in the last 12 months (PRa 33.3, 95% CI: 11.9 to 93.2, p <0.001), those who reported using only e-cigarette had 9.8 times more probability of having used cannabis in the last 12 months (PRa 9.8, 95% CI: 1.6 to 60.4, p = 0.014). We found an increase in the probability of having used cannabis in the last 12 months among university students who reported tobacco and/or e-cigarettes use. A sequential probability gradient was found and it showed that, in comparison to students who informed being nonusers of tobacco and/or e-cigarette, university students who were lifetime dual users were most likely to having used cannabis in the last 12 months, followed by those reporting an exclusive lifetime use of tobacco, as well as those students who reported an exclusive lifetime use of e-cigarettes. It is necessary to raise awareness of the association of tobacco and e-cigarette use with an increased possibility of using cannabis. Studies are needed in different cultural contexts to investigate the progression of electronic cigarette and/or tobacco use, as well as their dosage, intensity of use, concurrent use, and neurological and behavioral mechanisms that are related to the use of cannabis and other illegal drugs that may increase dependence and mental health problems.

Prácticas de prevención y control frente a la infección por Sars-Cov2 en la población peruana / Prevention and control practices against Sars-Cov2 infection in the peruvian population

Objetivo: Describir las prácticas de prevención y control para la infección por SARS-CoV2 en la población peruana. Material y Métodos: Estudio observacional de tipo descriptivo. Se evaluó una muestra no probabilística de adultos residentes en algún departamento de Perú. Las prácticas preventivas fueron evaluadas en personas sin antecedente de COVID-19 y las prácticas de control en personas que lo habían padecido. Resultados: Se evaluó un total de 3630 peruanos (edad media 25,4 ± 9,5) de los cuales el 3231 no indicaban el antecedente de COVID-19 y 399 refirieron haberlo padecido. Las medidas de prevención y control que se realizaron a menudo o siempre con mayor frecuencia fueron el utilizar mascarilla al salir de casa (97,9% vs 87,7), cubrirse su nariz y boca al estornudar o toser (95,4% vs 89,9%), guardar distancia de los demás en la calle (91,4% vs 74,7%), realizar el lavado de manos con agua y jabón al volver a casa (92,5% vs 88,7%), y desinfectar las superficies de objetos y lugares personales (82,6% vs 77,4%). El 22,1% y 83,7%, el 59,7% y 80,2, y el 8,0% y 16,8% consumieron algún tipo de medicamento, planta medicinal y dióxido de cloro para la prevención y control de la infección de COVID-19, respectivamente. Conclusiones: En general, menos del 50% de los participantes realizaron prácticas de prevención y control frente a la COVID-19 a menudo o siempre.

Objective: To describe prevention and control practices for SARS-CoV2 infection in the Peruvian population. Material and Methods: Observational descriptive study. A non-probabilistic sample of adults residing in a Peruvian department was evaluated. Preventive practices were evaluated in people with no history of COVID-19 and control practices in people who had had COVID-19. Results: A total of 3630 Peruvians were evaluated (mean age 25.4 ± 9.5) of whom 3231 did not indicate a history of COVID-19 and 399 reported having suffered from it. The prevention and control measures most frequently or always performed were using a mask when leaving home (97.9% vs 87.7%), covering their nose and mouth when sneezing or coughing (95.4% vs 89.9%), keeping their distance from others in the street (91.4% vs 74.7%), washing hands with soap and water when returning home (92.5% vs 88.7%), and disinfecting surfaces of objects and personal places (82.6% vs 77.4%). 22.1% and 83.7%, 59.7% and 80.2, and 8.0% and 16.8% consumed some type of medication, medicinal plant, and chlorine dioxide for prevention and control of COVID-19 infection, respectively. Conclusions: Overall, less than 50% of the participants performed prevention and control practices against COVID-19 often or always.