A Clinical Workflow for Cost-Saving High-Rate Diagnosis of Genetic Kidney Diseases.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: To optimize the diagnosis of genetic kidney disorders in a cost-effective manner, we developed a workflow based on referral criteria for in-person evaluation at a tertiary center, whole-exome sequencing, reverse phenotyping, and multidisciplinary board analysis. This workflow reached a diagnostic rate of 67%, with 48% confirming and 19% modifying the suspected clinical diagnosis. We obtained a genetic diagnosis in 64% of children and 70% of adults. A modeled cost analysis demonstrated that early genetic testing saves 20% of costs per patient. Real cost analysis on a representative sample of 66 patients demonstrated an actual cost reduction of 41%. This workflow demonstrates feasibility, performance, and economic effect for the diagnosis of genetic kidney diseases in a real-world setting. BACKGROUND: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) increases the diagnostic rate of genetic kidney disorders, but accessibility, interpretation of results, and costs limit use in daily practice. METHODS: Univariable analysis of a historical cohort of 392 patients who underwent WES for kidney diseases showed that resistance to treatments, familial history of kidney disease, extrarenal involvement, congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract and CKD stage ≥G2, two or more cysts per kidney on ultrasound, persistent hyperechoic kidneys or nephrocalcinosis on ultrasound, and persistent metabolic abnormalities were most predictive for genetic diagnosis. We prospectively applied these criteria to select patients in a network of nephrology centers, followed by centralized genetic diagnosis by WES, reverse phenotyping, and multidisciplinary board discussion. RESULTS: We applied this multistep workflow to 476 patients with eight clinical categories (podocytopathies, collagenopathies, CKD of unknown origin, tubulopathies, ciliopathies, congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, syndromic CKD, metabolic kidney disorders), obtaining genetic diagnosis for 319 of 476 patients (67.0%) (95% in 21 patients with disease onset during the fetal period or at birth, 64% in 298 pediatric patients, and 70% in 156 adult patients). The suspected clinical diagnosis was confirmed in 48% of the 476 patients and modified in 19%. A modeled cost analysis showed that application of this workflow saved 20% of costs per patient when performed at the beginning of the diagnostic process. Real cost analysis of 66 patients randomly selected from all categories showed actual cost reduction of 41%. CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic workflow for genetic kidney diseases that includes WES is cost-saving, especially if implemented early, and is feasible in a real-world setting.

Reverse Phenotyping after Whole-Exome Sequencing in Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nephrotic syndrome is a typical presentation of genetic podocytopathies but occasionally other genetic nephropathies can present as clinically indistinguishable phenocopies. We hypothesized that extended genetic testing followed by reverse phenotyping would increase the diagnostic rate for these patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: All patients diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome and referred to our center between 2000 and 2018 were assessed in this retrospective study. When indicated, whole-exome sequencing and in silico filtering of 298 genes related to CKD were combined with subsequent reverse phenotyping in patients and families. Pathogenic variants were defined according to current guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients (64 steroid-resistant and 47 steroid-sensitive) were included in the study. Not a single pathogenic variant was detected in the steroid-sensitive group. Overall, 30% (19 out of 64) of steroid-resistant patients had pathogenic variants in podocytopathy genes, whereas a substantial number of variants were identified in other genes, not commonly associated with isolated nephrotic syndrome. Reverse phenotyping, on the basis of a personalized diagnostic workflow, permitted to identify previously unrecognized clinical signs of an unexpected underlying genetic nephropathy in a further 28% (18 out of 64) of patients. These patients showed similar multidrug resistance, but different long-term outcome, when compared with genetic podocytopathies. CONCLUSIONS: Reverse phenotyping increased the diagnostic accuracy in patients referred with the diagnosis of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.

Heterogeneous genetic alterations in sporadic nephrotic syndrome associate with resistance to immunosuppression.

In children, sporadic nephrotic syndrome can be related to a genetic cause, but to what extent genetic alterations associate with resistance to immunosuppression is unknown. In this study, we designed a custom array for next-generation sequencing analysis of 19 target genes, reported as possible causes of nephrotic syndrome, in a cohort of 31 children affected by sporadic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and 38 patients who exhibited a similar but steroid-sensitive clinical phenotype. Patients who exhibited extrarenal symptoms, had a familial history of the disease or consanguinity, or had a congenital onset were excluded. We identified a genetic cause in 32.3% of the children with steroid-resistant disease but zero of 38 children with steroid-sensitive disease. Genetic alterations also associated with lack of response to immunosuppressive agents in children with steroid-resistant disease (0% of patients with alterations versus 57.9% of patients without alterations responded to immunosuppressive agents), whereas clinical features, age at onset, and pathologic findings were similar in steroid-resistant patients with and without alterations. These results suggest that heterogeneous genetic alterations in children with sporadic forms of nephrotic syndrome associate with resistance to steroids as well as immunosuppressive treatments. In these patients, a comprehensive screening using such an array may, thus, be useful for genetic counseling and may help clinical decision making in a fast and cost-efficient manner.