Efficacy and Safety of Intraoperative Radiotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive tumors of the central nervous system that cause significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in surgery and radiation therapy (RT), HGG still has a high incidence of recurrence and treatment failure. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach to achieve local tumor control while sparing normal brain tissue from radiation-induced damage. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the use of IORT for HGG. Eligible studies were included based on specific criteria, and data were independently extracted. Outcomes of interest included complications, IORT failure, survival rates at 12 and 24 months, and mortality. RESULTS: Sixteen studies comprising 436 patients were included. The overall complication rate after IORT was 17%, with significant heterogeneity observed. The IORT failure rate was 77%, while the survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 74% and 24%, respectively. The mortality rate was 62%. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that IORT may be a promising adjuvant treatment for selected patients with HGG. Despite the high rate of complications and treatment failures, the survival outcomes were comparable or even superior to conventional methods. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation through prospective randomized controlled trials to better understand the specific patient populations that may benefit most from IORT. However, the limitations of the study, such as the lack of a control group and small sample sizes, warrant further investigation. Notably, the ongoing RP3 trial (NCT02685605) is currently underway, with the aim of providing a more comprehensive understanding of IORT. Moreover, future research should focus on managing complications associated with IORT to improve its safety and efficacy in treating HGG.

Early ambulation versus prolonged bed rest for incidental durotomies in spine procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Incidental durotomies are frequent complications of spine surgery associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak-related symptoms. Management typically involves prolonged bed rest to reduce CSF pressure at the durotomy site. However, early ambulation may be a safer, effective alternative. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies comparing early ambulation (bed rest ≤ 24 h) with prolonged bed rest (> 24 h) for patients with incidental durotomies in spine surgeries. The outcomes of interest were CSF leak, hypotensive headache, additional surgical repair, pseudomeningocele, and pulmonary complications. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis were performed following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We included a total of 704 patients from 6 studies. There was a significant reduction in the incidence of pulmonary complications (RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08-0.67; p = 0.007) in the early mobilization group. The incidence of CSF leak (RR 1.34; 95% CI 0.83-2.14; p = 0.23), hypotensive headache (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.27-1.90; p = 0.50), additional repair surgery (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.76-2.2; p = 0.35), and pseudomeningocele (RR 1.29; 95% CI 0.20-8.48; p = 0.79) did not differ significantly. In patients with incidental durotomy following spinal surgery, early mobilization was associated with a lower incidence of pulmonary complications as compared with prolonged bed rest. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of CSF leak, need for additional repair, pseudomeningocele, and hypotensive headache.

Safety of withholding perioperative steroids for patients with pituitary resection with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Several observational studies have evaluated the effects of pre-operative steroids (STER) for transsphenoidal pituitary removal in patients with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. However, a consensus built upon randomized studies has not been previously performed. PURPOSE: To comprehensively evaluate the clinical effects of patients receiving STER when compared to those not receiving steroids (NOSTER) in transsphenoidal pituitary resection, a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) was conducted. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature of RCTs comparing STER and NOSTER was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were queried. The primary outcomes were adrenal insufficiency (AI) and diabetes insipidus (DI) post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 4 final studies were included, in which 530 total patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis suggested that there was no significant difference between STER and NOSTER groups post-operatively related to transient AI (RR= 0.83, 95% CI [0.51-1.35], p = 0.45; I² = 52%), permanent AI (RR= 0.97, 95% CI [0.41-2.31], p = 0.95; I² = 0%), and permanent DI (RR= 0.62, 95% CI [0.16-2.33], p = 0.48; I² = 0%). Nevertheless, STER group had significantly lower rates of transient DI (RR= 0.60, 95% CI [0.38-0.95], p = 0.03; I² = 5%), and post-op hyponatremia (RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.28-0.87], p = 0.02; I² = 0%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates evidence from RCTs that patients receiving pre-operative STER are both safe and effective pre-operatively for resection of pituitary adenomas with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis.