Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Indigenous People of the Northern Great Plains of the United States.

BACKGROUND: Indigenous people experience higher rates of end-stage renal disease as well as negative predictive factors that undermine kidney transplantation (KT) success. Despite these inequalities, data suggest that short-term outcomes are comparable to those of other groups, but few studies have examined this effect in the Northern Great Plains (NGP) region. METHODS: We performed a retrospective database review to determine outcomes of KT in Indigenous people of the NGP. White and Indigenous people receiving a KT between 2000 and 2018 at a single center were examined. RESULTS: A total of 622 KT recipients were included (117 Indigenous and 505 White). Indigenous patients were more likely to smoke, have diabetes, have higher immunologic risk, receive fewer living donor kidneys, and have longer waitlist times. In the 5 years after KT there were no significant differences in renal function, rejection events, cancer, graft failure, or patient survival. At 10 years posttransplant, Indigenous patients had twice the all-cause graft failure (odds ratio = 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-3.39) and half the survival rate (odds ratio = 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.76); however, this effect was not maintained once the effects of race, sex, smoking status, diabetes, preemptive transplant, high panel reactive antibody status, and transplant type were adjusted for. CONCLUSIONS: KT outcomes in Indigenous patients in the NGP region are similar to those of White patients 5 years posttransplant, with differences emerging at 10 years that could be diminished with greater emphasis on correcting modifiable risk factors.

Utility of fiber-optic bronchoscopy in pulmonary infections among abdominal solid-organ transplant patients: A comprehensive review.

Pulmonary infections are frequent complications in abdominal solid-organ transplantation (aSOT) which may threaten patient and allograft survival. Accurate diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary infections in this population can be challenging. Immunosuppressive therapy not only increases the risk of acquiring opportunistic and non-opportunistic infections, but it also impairs the inflammatory responses associated with microbial invasion which in an otherwise normal host produce clinical and radiologic responses that allow for early identification of the offending pathogen. Serologic testing is not a reliable diagnostic modality. Direct microbiological sampling is often necessary to make a definitive diagnosis early in the clinical course to optimize timely, targeted therapy while reducing the risk of developing antimicrobial resistance, and minimize adverse effects of therapy, if any. Fiber-optic bronchoscopy (FOB) with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or transbronchial lung biopsy (TBB) offers such diagnostic advantage and possesses a potential therapeutic value too. This comprehensive review discusses the potential benefits of FOB alongside its risks and complications, indications and contraindications, and techniques. Additionally, the essay highlights FOB's utility and yield specifically with regard to type and timing of infections in aSOT patients.