Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis from cholangiocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Accounting for approximately 15% of primary liver cancers and 3% of gastrointestinal malignancies, cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) poses a serious health concern given its high mortality rate. Managing brain metastases (BMs) from CCA is challenging because of their rarity and poor prognosis, with little guidance on treatment from the literature. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in managing BMs from CCA. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 13 CCA patients with 41 BMs treated with SRS from October 2006 to April 2022 at eight institutions affiliated with the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Inclusion criteria were a CCA diagnosis, an age over 18 years, no other malignancies, single-fraction SRS treatment for BMs, and at least one follow-up image. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes were collected. The primary endpoints were local control (LC), intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was the development of adverse radiation effects (AREs). RESULTS: The median radiological follow-up was 5 months (range 1-18 months). At the last follow-up, LC was achieved in 39 (95.1%) of 41 BMs. New distant metastases were observed in 3 patients (23.1%), and the mean intracranial PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI 6.5-12.3 months). Six-month and 1-year OS rates were 38.5% and 11.5%, respectively, and the median OS was 6 months (95% CI 4.9-7.2 months). Concurrent immunotherapy was associated with a high risk of local failure (HR 29.665, 95% CI 1.799-489.206, p = 0.018), and the absence of systemic chemotherapy before SRS was linked to reduced OS (HR 6.658, 95% CI 1.173-37.776, p = 0.032). Regarding AREs, only 1 patient (7.7%) experienced right hemiparesis and was treated with corticosteroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: SRS is an effective option for managing BMs in CCA patients, showing promise in LC and a high safety profile.

Improved outcomes for triple negative breast cancer brain metastases patients after stereotactic radiosurgery and new systemic approaches.

PURPOSE: Although ongoing studies are assessing the efficacy of new systemic therapies for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the overwhelming majority have excluded patients with brain metastases (BM). Therefore, we aim to characterize systemic therapies and outcomes in a cohort of patients with TNBC and BM managed with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and delineate predictors of increased survival. METHODS: We used our prospective patient registry to evaluate data from 2012 to 2023. We included patients who received SRS for TNBC-BM. A competing risk analysis was conducted to assess local and distant control. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with 262 tumors were included. The median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95% CI 13-19 months). Predictors of increased OS after initial SRS include Breast GPA score > 1 (p < 0.001) and use of immunotherapy such as pembrolizumab (p = 0.011). The median time on immunotherapy was 8 months (IQR 4.4, 11.2). The median time to new CNS lesions after the first SRS treatment was 17 months (95% CI 12-22). The cumulative rate for development of new CNS metastases after initial SRS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was 23%, 40%, and 70%, respectively. Thirty patients (70%) underwent multiple SRS treatments, with a median time of 5 months (95% CI 0.59-9.4 months) for the appearance of new CNS metastases after second SRS treatment. CONCLUSIONS: TNBC patients with BM can achieve longer survival than might have been previously anticipated with median survival now surpassing one year. The use of immunotherapy is associated with increased median OS of 23 months.

Impact of Cerebral Revascularization on Pial Collateral Flow in Patients With Unilateral Moyamoya Disease Using Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a chronic steno-occlusive disease of the intracranial circulation that depends on neoangiogenesis of collateral vessels to maintain cerebral perfusion and is primarily managed with cerebral revascularization surgery. A quantitative assessment of preoperative and postoperative collateral flow using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography with noninvasive optimal vessel analysis (NOVA) was used to illustrate the impact of revascularization on cerebral flow distribution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with unilateral MMD who underwent direct, indirect, or combined direct/indirect cerebral revascularization surgery was conducted between 2011 and 2020. Using NOVA, flow was measured at the anterior cerebral artery (ACA), ACA distal to the anterior communicating artery (A2), middle cerebral artery (MCA), posterior cerebral artery (PCA), and PCA distal to the posterior communicating artery (P2). Pial flow (A2 + P2) and collateral flow (ipsilateral [A2 + P2])-(contralateral [A2 + P2]) were measured and compared before and after revascularization surgery. Total hemispheric flow (MCA + A2 + P2) with the addition of the bypass graft flow postoperatively was likewise measured. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with unilateral MMD underwent cerebral revascularization. Median collateral flow significantly decreased from 68 to 39.5 mL/min (P = .007) after bypass. Hemispheres with maintained measurable bypass signal on postoperative NOVA demonstrated significant reduction in median collateral flow after bypass (P = .002). Median total hemispheric flow significantly increased from 227 mL/min to 247 mL/min (P = .007) after bypass. Only one patient suffered an ipsilateral ischemic stroke, and no patients suffered a hemorrhage during follow-up. CONCLUSION: NOVA measurements demonstrate a reduction in pial collateral flow and an increase in total hemispheric flow after bypass for MMD, likely representing a decrease in leptomeningeal collateral stress on the distal ACA and PCA territories. Further studies with these measures in larger cohorts may elucidate a role for NOVA in predicting the risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic events in MMD.

Upfront stereotactic radiosurgery versus adjuvant radiosurgery for parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Parafalcine and parasagittal (PFPS) are common locations for meningiomas. Surgical resection for these tumors, the first-line treatment, poses challenges due to their proximity to critical structures. This systematic review investigates the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as a treatment for PFPS meningiomas, aiming to elucidate its safety and efficacy. The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria involved studies on SRS for PFPS meningiomas, reporting procedure outcomes and complications. Tumors were presumed or confirmed to be WHO grade 1. Data was systematically extracted. Meta-analysis was performed where applicable. The review included data from eight studies, 821 patients with 878 lesions. Tumor control was achieved in greater than 80% of cases. Adverse radiation effects were reported in 7.3% of them. Recurrence and further surgical approach were observed in 17.1% and 9.2% of cases, respectively. Symptom improvement was noted in 33.2% of patients. Edema occurred in approximately 25.1% of patients. A subgroup of 283 patients had upfront SRS, achieving tumor control in approximately 97% of such cases. SRS is a safe and effective treatment for PFPS meningiomas, both as an adjuvant therapy and as an upfront treatment for often smaller tumors. Post-SRS edema can typically be managed medically and usually does not require further surgical intervention. Further studies should provide more specific data on PFPS meningiomas. The use of single and hypofractionated SRS for larger volume PFPS meningiomas should be more explored to better define the risks and benefits.