Evans syndrome: Disease awareness and clinical management in a nation-wide ITP-NET survey.

Evans syndrome (ES) is rare and mostly treated on a "case-by-case" basis and no guidelines are available. With the aim of assessing disease awareness and current management of adult ES, a structured survey was administered to 64 clinicians from 50 Italian participating centers. Clinicians had to be involved in the management of autoimmune cytopenias and were enrolled into the ITP-NET initiative. The survey included domains on epidemiology, diagnosis, and therapy of ES and was designed to capture current practice and suggested work-up and management. Thirty clinicians who had followed a median of 5 patients (1-45)/15 years responded. The combination of AIHA plus ITP was more common than the ITP/AIHA with neutropenia (p < .001) and 25% of patients had an associated condition, including lymphoproliferative syndromes, autoimmune diseases, or primary immunodeficiencies. The agreement of clinicians for each diagnostic test is depicted (i.e., 100% for blood count and DAT; only 40% for anti-platelets and anti-neutrophils; 77% for bone marrow evaluation). Most clinicians reported that ES requires a specific approach compared to isolated autoimmune cytopenias, due to either a more complex pathogenesis and a higher risk of relapse and thrombotic and infectious complications. The heterogeneity of treatment choices among different physicians suggests the need for broader harmonization.

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Plasma-Derived Von Willebrand Factor-Containing Factor VIII Concentrates in Patients With Von Willebrand Disease in Italy.

Plasma-derived von Willebrand factor-containing factor VIII concentrates (pd-VWF/FVIII-C) are the mainstay of treatment in von Willebrand disease (VWD). Real-world data on efficacy and safety of these pd-VWF/FVIII-C are required. To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of pd-VWF/FVIII-C (Fanhdi® and Alphanate®, Grifols) in clinical practice in Italy. A multicentric, observational, retrospective study at 10 Italian centers was conducted. Eligible patients diagnosed with inherited VWD (ISTH criteria) were treated with either Fanhdi® or Alphanate® for bleeding episodes, prevention of surgical bleeding and secondary long-term prophylaxis (SLTP) according to clinical practice with medical records collected from January 2007 to December 2019. Efficacy/safety of pd-VWF/FVIII-C was assessed according to FDA-agreed objective criteria following regulatory procedures. Fifty-seven patients (M/F: 21/36) were enrolled in the study with the following VWD types: VWD1 (n = 29, 52%), VWD2A (n = 10, 18%), VWD2B (n = 7, 12%), VWD2M (n = 2, 4%), VWD2N (n = 1, 2%), VWD2 unclassified (n = 1, 2%), and VWD3 (n = 7, 12%). These pd-VWF/FVIII-C were used to manage 58 bleeding episodes (n = 24 patients), 100 surgeries (n = 47 patients), and 7 SLTP (n = 6 patients). Global clinical efficacy with these pd-VWF/FVIII-C was reported to be excellent/good in 85% of bleeding episodes, 98% of surgeries, and 100% of SLTP. As far as safety, no adverse-drug-related episodes, immunogenic or thrombotic events were reported. This study confirmed that Fanhdi® and Alphanate® were effective and safe in the management of bleeding episodes, the prevention of bleeding during surgeries and for SLTP in Italian patients with inherited VWD.

Severe maternal thrombocytopenia and prenatal invasive procedures: still a grey zone.

Management of severe thrombocytopenia, particularly of ITP, in pregnancy is mainly based on expert consensus and clinical experience while there are no clear indications about the minimum platelet count requested for prenatal diagnosis invasive procedures. Since the lack of specific recommendations we reported our clinical management of a patient suffering from severe thrombocytopenia, undergoing amniocentesis. Due to the anecdotic possibility of maternal and fetal bleeding in case of severe thrombocytopenia, prophylaxis with IVIG or even corticosteroids could be considered as a safer strategy to prevent post-procedural adverse outcomes.

Laying the foundations for gene therapy in Italy for patients with haemophilia A: A Delphi consensus study.

INTRODUCTION: Current treatment for haemophilia A involves factor VIII replacement or non-replacement (emicizumab) therapies, neither of which permanently normalise factor VIII levels. Gene therapy using adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors is an emerging long-term treatment strategy for people with severe haemophilia A (PwSHA) that is likely to be available for clinical use in the near future. AIM: This article proposes practical guidelines for the assessment, treatment, and follow-up of potential PwSHA candidates for AAV-based gene therapy. METHOD: Using the Delphi method, a working group of Italian stakeholders with expertise in and knowledge of the care of adults with haemophilia A analysed literature for AAV-based gene therapy and drafted a list of statements that were circulated to a panel of Italian peers. During two rounds of voting, panel members voted on their agreement with each statement to reach a consensus. RESULTS: The Delphi process yielded 40 statements regarding haemophilia A gene therapy, across five topics: (1) organisational model; (2) multidisciplinary team; (3) patient engagement; (4) laboratory surveillance; and (5) patient follow-up and gene therapy outcomes. The consensus was reached for all 40 statements, with the second round of voting needed for five statements. CONCLUSION: Use of the hub-and-spoke organisational model and multidisciplinary teams are expected to optimise patient selection for gene therapy, as well as the management of dosing and patient follow-up, patient engagement, laboratory surveillance, and patient expectations regarding outcomes. This approach should allow the benefits of AAV-based gene therapy for haemophilia A to be maximised.

Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with cancer due to both the proinflammatory effect of neoplastic cells and to cardiotoxicity of anti-tumor therapies. Anticoagulation is still challenging in cancer patients due to increased bleeding risk related to specific neoplasms such us hematologic malignancies. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in AF patients affected by hematologic neoplasms. We included 97 patients on active anticancer treatment. The median follow-up was 25 months (range 10-108). No thromboembolic complications occurred, while 14 bleeding events were recorded: 1 major, 12 clinical relevant non major bleeding and 1 minor bleeding. Although retrospective and with a small number of enrolled patients, our data support the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients affected by hematologic malignancies suggesting caution to particular situations, such as thrombocytopenia.

Intracranial Haemorrhage in Haemophilia Patients Is Still an Open Issue: The Final Results of the Italian EMO.REC Registry.

Background: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a highly serious event in patients with haemophilia (PWH) which leads to disability and in some cases to death. ICH occurs among all ages but is particularly frequent in newborns. Aim: The primary aim was to assess the incidence and mortality due to ICH in an Italian population of PWH. Secondary aims were to evaluate the risk factors for ICH, the role of prophylaxis, and the clinical management of patients presenting ICH. Methods: A retrospective-prospective registry was established in the network of the Italian Association of Haemophilia Centers to collect all ICHs in PWH from 2009 to 2019 reporting clinical features, treatments, and outcomes. Results: Forty-six ICHs were collected from 13 Centers. The ICHs occurred in 15 children (10 < 2 years), and in 31 adults, 45.2% of them with mild hemophilia. Overall, 60.9% patients had severe haemophilia (15/15 children). Overall ICH incidence (×1000 person/year) was 0.360 (0.270−0.480 95% CI), higher in children <2 years, 1.995 (1.110−3.442 95% CI). Only 7/46 patients, all with severe haemophilia, had received a prophylactic regimen before the ICH, none with mild. Inhibitors were present in 10.9% of patients. In adult PWHs 17/31 suffered from hypertension; 85.7% of the mild subjects and 29.4% of the moderate/severe ones (p < 0.05). ICH was spontaneous in the 69.6% with lower rate in children (46.7%). Surgery was required in 21/46 patients for cerebral hematoma evacuation. Treatment with coagulation factor concentrates for at least three weeks was needed in 76.7% of cases. ICH was fatal in 30.4% of the cases. Of the survivors, 50.0% became permanently disabled. Only one-third of adult patients received long term prophylaxis after the acute treatment. Conclusion: The results from our Registry confirm the still high incidence of ICH in infants <2 years and in adults, particularly in mild PWHs presenting hypertension and its unfavorable outcomes. The majority of PWHs were treated on-demand before ICH occurred, suggesting the important role of prophylaxis in preventing such life-threatening bleeding.

Acquired haemophilia A: Italian Consensus Recommendations on diagnosis, general management and treatment of bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder due to autoantibodies to coagulation factor VIII that may be secondary to autoimmune diseases, cancer, drugs, pregnancy, infections, or be idiopathic. Recurrent bleeding, often severe, mostly in muscles and soft tissues, and isolated prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), in the absence of personal and family history of bleeding, are typical features that should raise the suspicion of AHA. Poor awareness of the disease results in diagnostic delays and inappropriate treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres (AICE) developed consensus recommendations in cooperation with the Italian Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SISET). The document was shared with scientific societies of specialist physicians, laboratory professionals and pharmacists to spread knowledge about AHA and promote appropriate diagnosis/treatment. RESULTS: Ready availability of the aPTT mixing test is crucial, although diagnostic confirmation and optimal management require prompt referral of patients to specialised centres with rapidly available diagnostic and therapeutic facilities. If immediate referral is unfeasible, treatment must be undertaken early, under guidance of specialised centres or based on shared protocols. Recommendations about diagnosis, general management and, in bleeding patients, haemostatic therapy using bypassing agents or replacement treatment, including the recently available recombinant porcine factor VIII, are provided, considering the different clinical settings and laboratory facilities. DISCUSSION: This consensus document aims to improve the overall healthcare pathways for AHA, harmonise the management and therapeutic approaches to newly diagnosed patients and reduce the still relevant complications and mortality in this setting.

Single centre experience on Acquired Haemophilia A patients: Diagnosis, clinical management and analysis of factors predictive of response and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Acquired Haemophilia A (AHA) patients show a high response rate to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) but few information about predictors of response and outcome are reported. AIMS: We describe a large single-centre AHA cohort, investigating prognostic variables for the 'best response' (BR), time to BR (TTBR) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: A total of 61 patients were included, collecting data from clinical charts. RESULTS: A progressive increase in diagnoses, from 1978 to 2019, was observed. Fifty/56 patients (89%) underwent haemostatic therapy (rFVIIa 46%, aPCC 34%) with no significant differences in the response (rFVIIa 92.3% vs aPCC 100%) and no thromboembolic events. Sixty/61 patients underwent first-line IST with an initial response rate of 58.4%. The 12-months OS was 85%, the bleeding associated mortality rate 3% (2/61). The response rates at last observation were: CR 64%, PR 8%. We evaluated the influence of age, gender, associated conditions, IST, haemoglobin levels, FVIII:C, inhibitor titre on BR, TTBR and OS: post-partum AHA achieved the BR after a longer time than AHA related to other aetiologies or idiopathic (p = .05); in univariate analysis female sex (p = .03) and the achievement of BR (p = .001) had a positive impact on the OS while AHA secondary to neoplasms showed a shorter survival (p = .04); only the BR achievement remained significant in multivariate analysis (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Our data on response and survival confirmed those from the main registries. Post-partum AHA and BR achievement were significantly associated to a longer TTBR and a longer OS, respectively. Other predictors of outcome deserve to be explored in prospective studies.

Factor XI deficiency and delayed hemorrhages after resection of choroid plexus papilloma: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Factor XI deficiency, also known as hemophilia C, is a rare inherited bleeding disorder that may leave routine coagulation parameters within normal range. Depending on the mutation subtype, prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time may occasionally be found. The disease has an autosomal transmission, with an estimated prevalence in the general population of approximately 1 in 1 million. Heterozygosis accounts for partial deficits, but the tendency to bleed is unrelated to the measured activity of factor XI. Diagnosis usually follows unexpected hemorrhages occurring spontaneously or after trauma or surgical procedures. OBSERVATIONS: Few cases have been reported in the neurosurgical literature, all occurring spontaneously or after head trauma. Owing to its subtle features, the true incidence of the disease is probably underestimated. The authors report a case of a patient with previously undiagnosed factor XI deficiency who underwent uncomplicated resection of a fourth-ventricle papilloma and experienced delayed, severe hemorrhagic complications. LESSONS: The known association between choroid plexus tumors and intracranial bleeding raised differential diagnosis issues. This report may serve to help to investigate delayed hemorrhages after cranial surgery.

Clinical and Prognostic Features of Essential Thrombocythemia: Comparison of 2001 WHO Versus 2008/2016 WHO Criteria in a Large Single-center Cohort.

BACKGROUND: According to 2008/2016 classification of the World Health Organization (WHO), a platelet (PLT) count ≥ 450 × 109/L, reduced from the previously published WHO 2001 indicated level ≥ 600 × 109/L, was considered the new PLT threshold for the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET). PATIENTS AND METHODS: To validate this important diagnostic change in a setting of current clinical practice, we retrospectively analyzed clinical and hematologic features at diagnosis and during follow-up of 162 patients with ET, diagnosed in our center from January 2008 to December 2017. We subdivided patients according to PLT value at baseline into Group A (PLT ≥ 600 × 109/L) (124 patients; 76.5%) and Group B (PLT ≥ 450 × 109/L < 600 × 109/L) (38 patients; 23.5%). RESULTS: Among clinical features, only the median value of leukocytes (P < .001) was significantly higher in Group A. Cytostatic treatment was administered in 103 patients, with a significantly higher rate in patients of group A (P < .001). After a median follow-up of 42.4 months (interquartile range, 22.1-70.6 months), 8 thrombotic events were recorded in the entire cohort, without differences between the 2 groups (P = .336). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 96.9% (95% confidence interval, 92.6%-100%), without differences between the 2 groups (P = .255). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate a substantial homogeneity among patients with ET regardless of the PLT count at diagnosis, thus confirming the usefulness of the 2008/2016 WHO diagnostic criteria.

Management of patients with severe haemophilia a without inhibitors on prophylaxis with emicizumab: AICE recommendations with focus on emergency in collaboration with SIBioC, SIMEU, SIMEUP, SIPMeL and SISET.

INTRODUCTION: The factor VIII (FVIII)-mimetic bispecific monoclonal antibody, emicizumab, previously approved for prophylaxis in haemophilia A with inhibitors, has been recently licensed in several countries also in patients with severe haemophilia A (PWSHA) without inhibitors. The introduction of this innovative agent requires the development of specific pathways at Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTC), particularly regarding laboratory testing and treatment of breakthrough bleeds and invasive procedures/surgeries, even more critical when patients are managed by non-specialist professionals. Limited literature data and clinical experience in PWSHA without inhibitors on emicizumab are currently available. AIM: To promote awareness and overcome these challenges, the Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres (AICE) issued a guidance on the management of PWSHA without inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis, focused on emergency and shared with other National Scientific Societies in the field. METHODS: The document, drafted by an AICE expert panel and approved through online consultation, was further revised by a multidisciplinary working group, including members of 5 haemostasis, laboratory and emergency scientific societies. The final version was approved by the Council of each society. RESULTS: General recommendations about use of FVIII concentrates for the treatment of bleeding or haemostatic coverage of invasive procedures/surgeries and laboratory monitoring in PWSHA without inhibitors on emicizumab are provided. Specific issues of the management in the emergency room are focused, highlighting the need for direct involvement or formalized supervision by specialist HTC physicians. CONCLUSIONS: This guidance provides a reference pathway to be implemented in the different healthcare organizations, especially for the challenging emergency management in this setting.

Rituximab for treating inhibitors in people with inherited severe hemophilia.

BACKGROUND: Hemophilia A and B are inherited coagulation disorders characterized by a reduced or absent level of factor VIII or factor IX respectively. The severe form is characterized by a factor level less than 0.01 international units (IU) per milliliter. The development of inhibitors in hemophilia is the main complication of treatment, because the presence of these antibodies, reduces or even nullifies the efficacy of replacement therapy, making it very difficult to control the bleeding. People with inhibitors continue to have significantly higher risks of morbidity and mortality, with considerable treatment costs. Given the wide 'off-label' use of rituximab for treating people with hemophilia and inhibitors, its efficacy and safety need to be evaluated. This is an update of a previously published Cochrane Review. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab for treating inhibitors in people with inherited severe hemophilia A or B. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, complied from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews and also searched for ongoing or unpublished studies. We also undertook further searches of other bibliographic databases and trial registries. Date of last search of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register: 19 March 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of rituximab for treating inhibitors in people with hemophilia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No randomized controlled trials matching the selection criteria were eligible for inclusion. MAIN RESULTS: No randomized controlled trials on rituximab for treating inhibitors in people with hemophilia were identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to identify any relevant trials on the efficacy and safety of rituximab for treating inhibitors in people with hemophilia. The research evidence available is from case reports and case series. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab for this condition. However, prior to the publication of any possible future randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis of case reports and case series may provide some evidence.

Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with hematologic malignancies.

The anticoagulant treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies is low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), which is considered the safest in this particular patients setting. Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have proven their efficacy and safety in patients with cancer, their use can be challenging in patients with hematologic malignancies due to the peculiarity of these neoplasms: high thrombotic risk, possible onset of thrombocytopenia and concomitant anticancer therapies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs for venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation in patients with hematologic malignancies and plasmatic DOACs level during anticancer therapy and at time of bleeding or thrombotic complications. We evaluated patients with hematologic malignancies treated with DOACs for venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation-therapy was maintained until the platelet count was ≥50 × 109 /L. In case of concomitant anticancer treatment and haemorrhagic or thrombotic events, we checked DOACs plasma levels (trough and peak). The patients evaluated were 135: 104/135 were on anticancer therapy. We did not observe either thrombotic or major haemorrhagic adverse events. Minor bleedings occurred in 10 patients and clinical relevant non-major (CRNM) in two patients. There was a statistically significant correlation between bleedings and myelodysplastic syndrome. DOACs resulted effective and safe in patients with hematologic malignancies. DOACs plasma level can be helpful in suggesting an early dose adjustment to prevent haemorrhagic adverse event in patients on concomitant anticancer therapy. Larger prospective studies including hematologic patients are warranted to confirm the safety and efficacy of DOACs.

Anagrelide in Essential Thrombocythemia (ET): Results from 150 patients over 25 years by the "Ph1-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Latium Group".

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anagrelide is a drug effective in reducing platelet counts in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and Ph1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life use of anagrelide in patients with ET followed over 25 years at the Haematological Institutes belonging to "Ph1-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Latium Group." PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria were diagnosis of ET and treatment with anagrelide. Data were collected through an ad hoc case report form. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients received anagrelide for a median time of 7.4 years (0.1-23.2). Anagrelide was administered as first-line therapy in 34.7% of patients, as second-line in 52% and as third-line in 13.3%: 85.4% responded to therapy. Sixty-eight/136 evaluable patients reported side effects: palpitations, peripheral vasodilation, anaemia, diarrhoea and gastric distress. Fourteen thrombotic (arterial 10, venous 4) and 51 bleeding events (minor 48, major 3) occurred. Sixteen/150 (10.6%) patients developed secondary myelofibrosis and 3/150 (2%) an acute myeloid leukaemia. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, anagrelide is an effective drug in reducing platelet levels in a high percentage of patients with ET. It is especially addressed to younger people. A careful assessment of the thrombotic risk and monitoring of cardiac function, at diagnosis and during follow-up, is mandatory.

BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis and pharmacokinetics in haemophilia A: Interim results from the TAURUS study.

OBJECTIVES: To report interim data from TAURUS, a study assessing real-world prophylactic treatment with unmodified, full-length recombinant FVIII BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry® ; Bayer) indicated for haemophilia A. METHODS: TAURUS (NCT02830477) is an international, open-label, prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study with a one-year observation period (target N = 350). Patients have moderate or severe haemophilia A (FVIII ≤5% or ≤1%) and ≥50 exposure days to any FVIII product. Clinician- and patient-reported outcomes are captured on previous product use, changes in prophylaxis dose and dosing frequency, FVIII consumption, reported bleeding rates, treatment satisfaction and adherence, pharmacokinetic (PK) data (if available) and safety data. RESULTS: At cut-off, baseline data were available from 160 patients (89 had ≥6 months of follow-up data). Most patients had severe haemophilia A (85%), infused BAY 81-8973 ≥ 3×/wk (59%) and experienced a median number of total bleeds of 2.0 (non-annualised; 246 days median documentation period). Good levels of treatment satisfaction (Hemo-SATA,P ) and adherence (VERITAS-Pro) were maintained. TAURUS demonstrated a favourable PK profile of BAY 81-8973 in comparison with other standard half-life rFVIIIs and supported the WAPPS PopPK model. No patients developed inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: TAURUS data demonstrate effective prophylaxis with BAY 81-8973 in the real world without compromising patient satisfaction or adherence.

Dental invasive procedures in von Willebrand disease outpatients treated with high purity FVIII/VWF complex concentrate (Fanhdi®): experience of a single center.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the effectiveness and safety of customized hemostatic protocols using a plasma-derived, von Willebrand Factor (VWF)-containing Factor VIII concentrate (pdVWF/FVIII) in von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients undergoing dental invasive procedures. METHODS: Protocol for each patient was drawn up by the Blood Unit based on the VWD type, disease severity, and type of treatment. pdFVIII/VWF infusions and doses were registered at 30-60 min before intervention (t0) and at 12-24-36-48-72 h after intervention (t12-t72) and up to day 7. Any peri- or postoperative bleeding, complication or adverse event was registered. RESULTS: Forty-five dental procedures were performed on 20 VWD patients (six type-1, two type-2a, six type-2b, six type-3). Most pdFVIII/VWF infusions at t0 were 60 IU/kg (n = 7) and 50 IU/kg (n = 9). Subsequent infusions were mostly 30-50 IU/kg. No bleeding complications or adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: This study supports the safety and efficacy of pdFVIII/VWF to prevent peri- and postoperative bleeding after invasive oral procedures.

PICC-related upper deep venous thrombosis in patients with hematological malignancies. Management of anticoagulant therapy according to the platelet count.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) for central venous access are frequently used in patients with hematological malignancies. Their use may be complicated by upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT). Additionally, hematological patients are frequently thrombocytopenic and the optimal management of UEDVT in patients with thrombocytopenia is challenging and poorly standardized. We retrospectively analyzed 50 adult patients affected by hematological malignancies who presented a PICC-associated UEDVT. UEDVT treatment was compared in 3 groups: patients with a platelet count ≥ 50 × 109/l (group1) who underwent a therapeutic dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux 7.5 mg; patients with a platelet count < 50 × 109/l and ≥ 30 × 109/l (group 2) who were treated with a 50% reduced dose of LMWH or fondaparinux 5 mg; patients with platelets < 30 × 109/l (group 3) were observed and treated with anticoagulants when the count was > 30 × 109//l. At the onset of thrombosis, 36 patients were in group 1, 8 in group 2 and 6 in group 3. We observed no hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications related to the anticoagulant therapy; length of treatment was comparable between groups 1 and 2 (51 days group 1 vs 50 days group 2). Reduced doses of LMWH or fondaparinux may represent a safe and effective therapeutic approach in patients with moderate thrombocytopenia (< 50 × 109/l and ≥ 30 × 109/l) and a PICC-associated UEDVT.

Antithrombotic prophylaxis for surgery-associated venous thromboembolism risk in patients with inherited platelet disorders. The SPATA-DVT Study.

Major surgery is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), thus the application of mechanical or pharmacologic prophylaxis is recommended. The incidence of VTE in patients with inherited platelet disorders (IPD) undergoing surgical procedures is unknown and no information on the current use and safety of thromboprophylaxis, particularly of low-molecular-weight-heparin in these patients is available. Here we explored the approach to thromboprophylaxis and thrombotic outcomes in IPD patients undergoing surgery at VTE-risk participating in the multicenter SPATA study. We evaluated 210 surgical procedures carried out in 155 patients with well-defined forms of IPD (VTE-risk: 31% high, 28.6% intermediate, 25.2% low, 15.2% very low). The use of thromboprophylaxis was low (23.3% of procedures), with higher prevalence in orthopedic and gynecological surgeries, and was related to VTE-risk. The most frequently employed thromboprophylaxis was mechanical and appeared to be effective, as no patients developed thrombosis, including patients belonging to the highest VTE-risk classes. Low-molecular-weight-heparin use was low (10.5%) and it did not influence the incidence of post-surgical bleeding or of antihemorrhagic prohemostatic interventions use. Two thromboembolic events were registered, both occurring after high VTE-risk procedures in patients who did not receive thromboprophylaxis (4.7%). Our findings suggest that VTE incidence is low in patients with IPD undergoing surgery at VTE-risk and that it is predicted by the Caprini score. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis may be of benefit in patients with IPD undergoing invasive procedures at VTE-risk and low-molecular-weight-heparin should be considered for major surgery.

Emergency management in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors on prophylaxis with emicizumab: AICE practical guidance in collaboration with SIBioC, SIMEU, SIMEUP, SIPMeL and SISET.

Emicizumab has been approved in several countries for regular prophylaxis in patients with congenital haemophilia A and FVIII inhibitors because it substantially reduces their bleeding risk and improves quality of life. However, although significantly less frequent, some breakthrough bleeds may still occur while on emicizumab, requiring treatment with bypassing or other haemostatic agents. Thrombotic complications have been reported with the associated use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates. In addition, when surgery/invasive procedures are needed while on emicizumab, their management requires multidisciplinary competences and direct supervision by experts in the use of this agent. Given this, and in order to expand the current knowledge on the use of emicizumab and concomitant haemostatic agents, and reduce the risk of complications in this setting, the Italian Association of Haemophilia Centres (AICE) here provides guidance on the management of breakthrough bleeds and surgery in emergency situations in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis. This paper has been shared with other National Scientific Societies involved in the field.