RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Vorinostat, an orally active histone deacetylase inhibitor, was approved in October 2006 by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients with progressive, persistent, or recurrent disease during or after treatment with 2 systemic therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, open-label phase IIb trial evaluated the activity and safety of vorinostat 400 mg orally daily in patients with > or = stage IB, persistent, progressive, or treatment-refractory mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome CTCL subtypes. We report the safety and tolerability of long-term vorinostat therapy in patients who experienced clinical benefit in the previous phase IIb study. RESULTS: As of December 11, 2008, 6 of 74 patients enrolled in the original study had received vorinostat for > or = 2 years: median age, 65 years; median number of previous therapies, 2.5; median time from diagnosis to enrollment, 1.8 years. At enrollment into the continuation phase, 5 of the 6 patients had achieved an objective response, and 1 patient had prolonged stable disease. During the follow-up study, the most common drug-related grade 1-4 adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and alopecia (6, 5, 4, and 3 patients, respectively). Incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was low: anorexia (n = 1), increased creatinine phosphokinase (n = 1), pulmonary embolism (n = 1), rash (n = 1), and thrombocytopenia (n = 1). Five patients have discontinued the study drug, and 1 patient is continuing therapy. CONCLUSION: This post hoc subset analysis provides evidence for the long-term safety and clinical benefit of vorinostat in heavily pretreated patients with CTCL, regardless of previous treatment failures.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Histona Desacetilases/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hidroxâmicos/uso terapêutico , Linfoma Cutâneo de Células T/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Ácidos Hidroxâmicos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , VorinostatRESUMO
The BCR-ABL T315I mutation represents a major mechanism of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The objectives of this retrospective observational study were to estimate overall and progression-free survival for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic-phase (CP), accelerated-phase (AP), or blastic-phase (BP) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph)(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients with T315I mutation. Medical records of 222 patients from 9 countries were reviewed; data were analyzed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard models. Median age at T315I mutation detection was 54 years; 57% cases were men. Median time between TKI treatment initiation and T315I mutation detection was 29.2, 15.4, 5.8, and 9.1 months, respectively, for CP, AP, BP, and Ph(+) ALL patients. After T315I mutation detection, second-generation TKIs were used in 56% of cases, hydroxyurea in 39%, imatinib in 35%, cytarabine in 26%, MK-0457 in 11%, stem cell transplantation in 17%, and interferon-alpha in 6% of cases. Median overall survival from T315I mutation detection was 22.4, 28.4, 4.0, and 4.9 months, and median progression-free survival was 11.5, 22.2, 1.8, and 2.5 months, respectively, for CP, AP, BP, and Ph(+) ALL patients. These results confirm that survival of patients harboring a T315I mutation is dependent on disease phase at the time of mutation detection.
Assuntos
Genes abl/genética , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/genética , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/mortalidade , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/genética , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Vorinostat (Zolinza), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in October 2006 for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who have progressive, persistent or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. This review summarizes evidence on the use of vorinostat in solid and hematologic malignancies and collated tolerability data from the vorinostat clinical trial program. Pooled vorinostat clinical trial data from 498 patients with solid or hematologic malignancies show that vorinostat was well tolerated as monotherapy or combination therapy. The most commonly reported drug-related adverse events (AEs) associated with monotherapy (n = 341) were fatigue (61.9%), nausea (55.7%), diarrhea (49.3%), anorexia (48.1%), and vomiting (32.8%), and Grade 3/4 drug-related AEs included fatigue (12.0%), thrombocytopenia (10.6%), dehydration (7.3%), and decreased platelet count (5.3%). The most common drug-related AEs observed with vorinostat in combination therapy (n = 157, most of whom received vorinostat 400 mg qd for 14 days) were nausea (48.4%), diarrhea (40.8%), fatigue (34.4%), vomiting (31.2%), and anorexia (20.4%), with the majority of AEs being Grade 2 or less. In Phase I trials, combinations with vorinostat were generally well tolerated and preliminary evidence of anticancer activity as monotherapy or in combination with other systemic therapies has been observed across a range of malignancies. Ongoing and planned studies will further evaluate the potential of vorinostat in combination therapy, including combinations with radiation, in patients with diverse malignancy types, including non-small-cell lung cancer, glioblastoma multiforme, multiple myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndrome.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Ácidos Hidroxâmicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Ácidos Hidroxâmicos/efeitos adversos , Modelos Biológicos , VorinostatRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fusarium spp. is being isolated with increasing frequency as a pathogen in oncohematologic patients. Caspofungin and amphotericin B have been reported to have synergistic activity against Fusarium spp. CASE PRESENTATION: We herein report a case of disseminated fusariosis diagnosed by chest CT scan and positive blood cultures to Fusarium spp. Because the patient's clinical condition deteriorated, CRP levels increased, and blood cultures continued to yield Fusarium spp. despite liposomal amphotericin B monotherapy up to 5 mg/kg daily, treatment with caspofungin was added. Within 2 weeks of onset of combined antifungal therapy, the chest CT scan demonstrated a progressive resolution of the pulmonary lesions. Upon discontinuation of intravenous antifungals, the patient received suppressive therapy with oral voriconazole. Three months later, a chest CT scan showed no abnormalities. Twenty-five months after discontinuation of all antifungal therapy, the patient remains in complete remission of her neoplastic disease with no signs of clinical activity of the Fusarium infection. CONCLUSION: This is the first description of successful treatment of disseminated fusariosis in a pediatric patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia with caspofungin and amphotericin B followed by oral suppressive therapy with voriconazole.
Assuntos
Anfotericina B/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Fusarium/efeitos dos fármacos , Micoses/tratamento farmacológico , Peptídeos Cíclicos/uso terapêutico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/complicações , Anfotericina B/administração & dosagem , Antifúngicos/administração & dosagem , Caspofungina , Criança , Quimioterapia Combinada , Equinocandinas , Feminino , Fusarium/classificação , Humanos , Lipopeptídeos , Micoses/complicações , Micoses/microbiologia , Peptídeos Cíclicos/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Triazóis/administração & dosagem , Triazóis/uso terapêutico , VoriconazolRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Combinations of beta-lactams plus aminoglycosides have become standard therapy for suspected infections in patients with profound neutropenia. However, it is not clear whether such combinations are advantageous over therapy with a broad-spectrum antibiotic. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness ratio of empirical therapy of febrile neutropenia with imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) versus piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin (P/T+A). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective, multicenter observational study with 2 matched parallel cohorts treated with I/C (500 mg/6 h iv) or P/T+A (P/T: 4 g/6 h iv; A: 20 mg/kg/day iv). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Therapeutic success was defined as the resolution of fever following > or = 7 days of unchanged antibiotic treatment. An economic comparison was conducted focusing on the daily treatment costs, and the management of its toxicity. RESULTS: There were 343 eligible patients (180 I/C, 163 P/T+A), of whom 290 were evaluable for the primary clinical effectiveness analysis. Follow-up information beyond 7 days of study inclusion was only available for 52% of all evaluable patients. Treatment success was observed in 42% of I/C patients compared with 31% of P/T+A patients (95% CI: -0.01, 21.4). The incidence of drug-related adverse experiences was 13% for I/C and 6% for P/T+A, with no differences in moderate or severe adverse experiences nor in those causing discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Treatment costs were 189.55 euros (95% CI: 127.46-251.46) lower per episode of febrile neutropenia for patients treated with I/C. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical effectiveness of I/C was similar to that of P/T+A. In both treatment groups toxicity was low and did not limit antibiotic therapy. Resource consumption was lower with I/C.
Assuntos
Amicacina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cilastatina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Imipenem/uso terapêutico , Neutropenia/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Penicilânico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Penicilânico/uso terapêutico , Piperacilina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteases/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Amicacina/economia , Antibacterianos/economia , Cilastatina/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Quimioterapia Combinada , Inibidores Enzimáticos/economia , Feminino , Febre/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imipenem/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia/fisiopatologia , Ácido Penicilânico/economia , Piperacilina/economia , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores de Proteases/economia , Espanha , Tazobactam , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The role of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DPB1 as a transplantation antigen is controversial. A higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) has been described after unrelated donor bone marrow transplant when both HLA-DPB1 alleles were mismatched. METHODS: We investigated the impact of a single HLA-DPB1 mismatch after HLA-A-B-DRB1 identical sibling donor transplantation on aGVHD. We analyzed 627 adult patient-donor pairs and identified 30 pairs without HLA-DPB1 identity (4.78%). In 17 cases, the patient had an allele that was not shared by the donor. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of grades II-IV aGVHD was higher in the HLA-DPB1 mismatched group (66.7% vs. 35.7%, p=0.012). The HLA-DPB1 mismatch was identified by multivariate analysis as an independent risk factor for aGVHD (p=0.020, RR=2.68, 95% CI: 1.73-3.62). CONCLUSIONS: HLA-DPB1 can mediate alloreactive responses. A single HLA-DPB1 mismatch increases the risk of aGVHD after sibling donor stem cell transplantation.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Antígenos HLA-A/imunologia , Antígenos HLA-B/imunologia , Antígenos HLA-DP/imunologia , Antígenos HLA-DR/imunologia , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Transplante de Células-Tronco/efeitos adversos , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Cadeias beta de HLA-DP , Cadeias HLA-DRB1 , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doadores de TecidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The population of elderly patients with hematologic malignancies is increasing and so will the activity of stem cell transplantation (SCT) in this population. The aim of this study was to analyze the toxicity and survival of allogeneic SCT in patients 50 years and older (elderly group), and compare the results with a standard adult population (young group). DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-two elderly patients (median age 52.5, range 50-59 years) and 97 young patients (median 32, range 20-40) received a myeloablative, allogeneic SCT from HLA-identical siblings at a single institution, and formed the basis of this retrospective study. The majority of transplants in both groups were performed with non-T-cell-depleted bone marrow, conditioned with busulfan + cyclophosphamide and received cyclosporine + methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The percentage of high-risk patients was nearly double in the elderly group (41% vs. 23%, p = 0.06). RESULTS: We observed a low incidence of toxicities in the elderly group, including veno-occlusive disease, acute and chronic GVHD, transplant-related mortality, time to engraftment, and relapse incidence, without significant differences compared within the young group. The 3-year survival rates were not statistically different between the elderly and young groups: 51% vs. 55% for all patients; 87% vs. 69% in chronic myeloid leukemia; 79% vs. 62% in standard risk patients and 13% vs. 31% in high risk ones. In multivariate analyses no significant difference in overall survival was found between age groups. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: According to our experience, age alone (between 50-59), should not be considered a contraindication to a conventional HLA identical sibling transplant.