Ventricular Tachycardia and ICD Therapy Burden With Catheter Ablation Versus Escalated Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation improves ventricular tachycardia (VT) event-free (time to event) survival in patients with antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VT and previous myocardial infarction (MI). The effects of ablation on recurrent VT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy (burden) have yet to be investigated. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the VT and ICD therapy burden following treatment with either ablation or escalated AAD therapy among patients with VT and previous MI in the VANISH (Ventricular tachycardia AblatioN versus escalated antiarrhythmic drug therapy in ISchemic Heart disease) trial. METHODS: The VANISH trial randomized patients with previous MI and VT despite initial AAD therapy to either escalated AAD treatment or catheter ablation. VT burden was defined as the total number of VT events treated with ≥1 appropriate ICD therapy. Appropriate ICD therapy burden was defined as the total number of appropriate shocks or antitachycardia pacing therapies (ATPs) delivered. The Anderson-Gill recurrent event model was used to compare burden between the treatment arms. RESULTS: Of the 259 enrolled patients (median age, 69.8 years; 7.0% women), 132 patients were randomized to ablation and 129 patients were randomized to escalated AAD therapy. Over 23.4 months of follow-up, ablation-treated patients had a 40% lower shock-treated VT event burden and a 39% lower appropriate shock burden compared with patients who received escalated AAD therapy (P <0.05 for all). A reduction in VT burden, ATP-treated VT event burden, and appropriate ATP burden among ablation patients was only demonstrated in the stratum of patients with amiodarone-refractory VT (P <0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AAD-refractory VT and a previous MI, catheter ablation reduced shock-treated VT event burden and appropriate shock burden compared with escalated AAD therapy. There was also lower VT burden, ATP-treated VT event burden, and appropriate ATP burden among ablation-treated patients; however, the effect was limited to patients with amiodarone-refractory VT.

Recent Insights Into Mechanisms and Clinical Approaches to Electrical Storm.

Electrical storm, characterized by repetitive ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation over a short period, is becoming more common with widespread use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Electrical storm, sometimes called "arrhythmic storm" or "ventricular tachycardia storm," is usually a medical emergency requiring hospitalization and expert management, and significantly affects short- and long-term outcomes. This syndrome typically occurs in patients with underlying structural heart disease (ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy) or inherited channelopathies. Triggers for electrical storm should be sought but are often unidentifiable. Initial management is dictated by the hemodynamic status, whereas subsequent management typically involves ICD interrogation and reprogramming to reduce recurrent shocks, identification and management of triggers like electrolyte abnormalities, myocardial ischemia, or decompensated heart failure, and antiarrhythmic drug therapy or catheter ablation. Sympathetic nervous system activation is central to the initiation and maintenance of arrhythmic storm, so autonomic modulation is a cornerstone of management. Sympathetic inhibition can be achieved with medications (particularly ß-adrenoreceptor blockers), deep sedation, or cardiac sympathetic denervation. More definitive management targets the underlying ventricular arrhythmia substrate to terminate and prevent recurrent arrhythmia. Arrhythmia targeting can be achieved with antiarrhythmic medications, catheter ablation, or more novel therapies, such as stereotactic radiation therapy, that target the arrhythmic substrate. Mechanistic studies point to adrenergic activation and other direct consequences of ICD shocks in promoting further arrhythmogenesis and hypocontractility. In this report, we review the pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical features, prognosis, and therapeutic options for electrical storm. We also outline a clinical approach to this challenging and complex condition, along with its mechanistic basis.

Newer Methods for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation and When to Use Them.

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has long been an important therapy for ventricular tachycardia and frequent symptomatic premature ventricular beats and nonsustained arrhythmias when antiarrhythmic drugs fail to suppress the arrhythmias. It is increasingly used in preference to antiarrhythmic drugs, sparing the patient adverse effects of drugs. Success of ablation varies with the underlying heart disease and type of arrhythmia: very effective for patients without structural heart disease, less effective in structural heart disease. Failure occurs when a target for ablation cannot be identified or ablation lesions fail to reach and abolish the arrhythmia substrate that may be extensive, intramural, or subepicardial in location. Approaches to improving ablation lesion creation are modifications to RF ablation and emerging investigational techniques. Easily- implemented modifications to RF methods include manipulating the size and location of the cutaneous dispersive electrode, increasing duration of RF delivery, and use of lower-tonicity catheter irrigation (usually 0.45% saline). When catheters can be placed on either side of culprit substrate, RF can be delivered in a bipolar or simultaneous unipolar configuration that can be successful. Catheters with extendable and retractable irrigated needles for delivery of RF are under investigation in clinical trials. Cryoablation is potentially useful with specific situations in which maintaining contact is difficult. Transvascular ethanol ablation and stereotactic radioablation have both shown promise for arrhythmias that fail other ablation strategies. Although substantial clinical progress has been achieved, further improvement is clearly needed. With ability to increase ablation lesion size, continued careful evaluation of safety, which has been excellent for standard RF ablation, remains important.

The effect of revascularization on mortality and risk of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: There is clear evidence that patients with prior myocardial infarction and a reduced ejection fraction benefit from implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). It is unclear whether this benefit is altered by whether or not revascularization is performed prior to ICD implantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study following patients who underwent ICD implantation from 2002 to 2014. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and either primary or secondary prevention ICDs were selected for inclusion. Using the electronic medical record, cardiac catheterization data, revascularization status (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass surgery) were recorded. The outcomes were mortality and ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: There were 606 patients included in the analysis. The mean age was 66.3 ± 10.1 years, 11.9% were women, and the mean LVEF was 30.5 ± 12.0, 58.9% had a primary indication for ICD, 82.0% of the cohort had undergone coronary catheterization prior to ICD implantation. In the overall cohort, there were fewer mortality and ventricular arrhythmia events in patients who had undergone prior revascularization. In patients who had an ICD for secondary prevention, revascularization was associated with a decrease in mortality (HR 0.46, 95% CI (0.24, 0.85) p = 0.015), and a trend towards fewer ventricular arrhythmia (HR 0.62, 95% CI (0.38, 1.00) p = 0.051). There was no association between death or ventricular arrhythmia with revascularization in patients with primary prevention ICDs. CONCLUSION: Revascularization may be beneficial in preventing recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, and should be considered as adjunctive therapy to ICD implantation to improve cardiovascular outcomes.

Ablation compared with drug therapy for recurrent ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: Results from a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy vs ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We compared outcomes of AAD and/or ß-blocker (BB) therapy with those of VT ablation (with AAD/BB) in patients with ARVC who had recurrent VT. METHODS: In a multicenter retrospective study, 110 patients with ARVC (mean age 38 ± 17 years; 91[83%] men) with a minimum of 3 VT episodes were included; 77 (70%) were initially treated with AAD/BB and 32 (29%) underwent ablation. Subsequently, 43 of the 77 patients treated with AAD/BB alone also underwent ablation. Overall, 75 patients underwent ablation. RESULTS: When comparing initial AAD/BB therapy (n = 77) and VT ablation (n = 32) after ≥3 VT episodes, a single ablation procedure rendered 35% of patients free of VT at 3 years compared with 28% of AAD/BB-only-treated patients (P = .46). Of the 77 AAD/BB-only-treated patients, 43 subsequently underwent ablation. For all 75 patients who underwent ablation, 56% were VT-free at 3 years after the last ablation procedure. Epicardial ablation was used in 40/75 (53%) and was associated with lower VT recurrence after the last ablation procedure (endocardial/epicardial vs endocardial-only; 71% vs 47% 3-year VT-free survival; P = .05). Importantly, there was no difference in survival free of death or transplantation between the ablation- and AAD/BB-only-treated patients (P = .61). CONCLUSION: In patients with ARVC and a high VT burden, mortality and transplantation-free survival are not significantly different between drug- and ablation-treated patients. These patients have a high risk of recurrent VT despite drug therapy. Combined endocardial/epicardial ablation is associated with reduced VT recurrence as compared with endocardial-only ablation.

Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in patients taking TSH suppression therapy for management of thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: Suppression of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) below the normal range with administration of L-thyroxine has been shown to improve survival in patients treated for thyroid cancer (TC). Although most TC patients require long-term TSH suppression therapy, the effect of this treatment on cardiac rhythm remains unknown. A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TC patients on TSH suppressive therapy. METHODS: All TC patients seen between June 2009 and March 2010 through a multidisciplinary thyroid oncology clinic, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, for whom TSH suppressive therapy had previously been recommended, were recruited into the study. Each patient underwent an electrocardiogram and filled out a questionnaire relevant to causes, signs/symptoms of AF and/or its complications. The prevalence of AF in this population then was compared against the published prevalence of AF in general populations. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were seen in the thyroid clinic of which 136 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. The mean age was 52 years, 85% were female, and mean follow-up duration prior to recruitment was 11 years. The mean TSH was 0.17 mIU/L (Normal: 0.35 - 5.5 mIU/L). There were 14 patients found to have AF (two patients had long-standing persistent AF and 12 patients had paroxysmal AF). The mean ages of patients with and without AF were 61.6 years and 51.4 years, respectively (P = 0.01). Prevalence of AF in the study group was 10.3%; the rate of AF in the TC patients aged 60 years and over (17.5%) was higher than the rate of AF in published data in people 60 years and over (P < 0.001). AF was diagnosed after the initiation of the TSH suppression therapy in all except one patient. CONCLUSION: TSH suppression in thyroid cancer is associated with a high prevalence of AF, particularly in older individuals.

Body-surface potential mapping to aid ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia.

We investigated whether body-surface potential mapping (BSPM) during catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) could assist with the identification of VT exit sites. The study population consisted of 9 patients who underwent catheter ablation for VT, among whom 12 induced VTs with known exit sites were identified by entrainment criteria, pace mapping, or site of successful ablation. Paced activation was initiated at various intracardiac sites (20 +/- 4 sites per patient, a total of 180) documented by nonfluoroscopic electroanatomic mapping. During all episodes of VT and pacing, patients had a 120-lead electrocardiogram recorded, and we analyzed these electrocardiographic data--by means of a similarity coefficient (SC) calculated over 100 milliseconds after the initiation of depolarization--to assess the similarity between the BSPM sequences occurring during VTs and those induced by pacing. Based on 245 observations, the relationship between the SC and the distance of the pacing site from the VT exit site was then obtained for each individual VT by linear regression analysis: the distance D (in millimeters) from the VT exit site was related to SC by the regression equation D = slope (1 - SC2) + intercept. The parameters in this equation varied widely for the 12 VTs, but, in general, the nearer the pacing site was to the exit site, the better the goodness of match. This suggests that, although there is no universally applicable relationship between D and SC, BSPM could provide a useful adjunct to standard pace mapping, although additional processing--namely, an inverse calculation of epicardial potentials/isochrones--may be needed to reliably identify VT exit sites from body-surface electrocardiograms.

Subxiphoid surgical approach for epicardial catheter-based mapping and ablation in patients with prior cardiac surgery or difficult pericardial access.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous epicardial mapping and ablation are successful in some patients with ventricular epicardial reentry circuits but may be impossible when pericardial adhesions are present, such as from prior cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of direct surgical exposure of the pericardial space to allow catheter epicardial mapping and ablation in the electrophysiology laboratory when percutaneous access is not feasible. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 6 patients with prior cardiac surgery or failed percutaneous pericardial access, a subxiphoid pericardial window was attempted. In all 6 patients, manual lysis of adhesions exposed the epicardial surface of the heart through a small subxiphoid incision and allowed placement of an 8F sheath into the pericardial space under direct vision. Access to the diaphragmatic surface of the heart with ablation catheters was achieved in all patients, and catheter manipulation to the lateral and anterior walls was possible in 4 patients. Three-dimensional electroanatomic voltage maps revealed low-amplitude regions in the inferior or posterior left ventricular epicardium. A total of 16 ventricular tachycardias were induced, and 14 were abolished by radiofrequency ablation. Ablation was limited by intrapericardial defibrillator patches adherent to the likely target region in 2 patients. All patients had chest pain consistent with pericarditis early after the procedure that resolved within a few days. There were no other complications. CONCLUSIONS: A direct surgical subxiphoid epicardial approach in the electrophysiology laboratory is feasible for patients with difficult pericardial access who require ablation of epicardial arrhythmia foci.