Evaluation of androgen receptor and androgen receptor splice-variant 7 in bladder cancer; a novel approach into an ancient topic.

PURPOSE: The contribution of androgen receptors (AR) on bladder cancer has been demonstrated in pre-clinical studies, however in clinical studies, only the canonical AR (AR-FL) protein was measured by immunohistochemistry and conflicting results were obtained. To get better insight into the alterations of AR signalling, we used western blotting (WB) method and simultaneously measured both mRNA and protein levels of AR-FL and AR-V7. METHODS: 23 naive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients and 12 healthy individuals were included. AR-FL protein, AR-FL mRNA, AR-V7 protein and AR-V7 mRNA levels were quantitatively measured by WB and qRT-PCR. RESULTS: While AR-FL protein and AR-V7 mRNA were significantly higher in bladder cancer, AR-FL mRNA and AR-V7 protein were lower. AR-V7 mRNA level was higher in patients with tumour size over 3 cm and AR-FL protein was higher in single tumours (p < 0,005). The small sampling size and the inclusion of only male participants were the main limitations. CONCLUSIONS: The increase of AR-FL protein in bladder cancer supports the contribution of the AR pathway in bladder cancer. The presence of high AR-FL protein despite low mRNA levels may be due to a disruption in post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. AR-V7 was demonstrated for the first time in bladder tissue and found significantly different in bladder cancer tissues. Our study reached new and valuable findings and will shed light on the studies that aim to clarify the role of the AR pathway in bladder cancer.

Low-cord orchidectomy for testicular cancer: what would be different?

INTRODUCTION: High cord radical orchidectomy (HRCO) is accepted as the standard surgical approach in testicular cancer, however low cord orchidectomy (LCRO) can reduce the morbidity of operation without worsening the oncological outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively re-examined the specimens of men to determine the level of spermatic cord invasion (SCI). Men who had proximal SCI with negative surgical margins after HRCO were assumed to have de-novo residual tumour if LCRO was performed. Others were assumed as oncologically similar. We examined the relation between pre-operative variables and SCI and proximal SCI to determine whether prediction of proximal SCI is possible. RESULTS: 196 patients were included. 22 (11%) had SCI and ten (5%) had proximal SCI. Four patients with proximal SCI had positive surgical margins even after HRCO and didn't require additional local treatment. Six patients were assumed to have de-novo residual tumour if LCRO was performed. All six patients were metastatic and had systemic chemotherapy. High platelet count, tumour size, N stage, S stage and M stage were all significantly related with both SCI and proximal SCI (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Due to low probability of SCI, we think LCRO can safely be performed to reduce morbidity in Stage 1 patients. Although there is a risk for residual tumour in Stage 2-3 patients, currently there is no data that residual tumour would impair the success of systemic chemotherapy. Therefore we can not assume that these patients would be negatively affected. Pre-operative data can be useful to predict the presence of proximal SCI and select appropriate patients for LCRO.

Nation-wide analysis of the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on daily urology practice in Turkey.

OBJECTIVE: To present a nation-wide analysis of the workload of urology departments in Turkey week-by-week during Covid-19 pandemic. METHODOLOGY: The centres participating in the study were divided into three groups as tertiary referral centres, state hospitals and private practice hospitals. The number of outpatients, inpatients, daily interventions and urological surgeries were recorded prospectively between 9-March-2020 and 31-May-2020. All these variables were recorded for the same time interval of 2019 as well. The weekly change of the workload of urology during pandemic period was evaluated, also the workload of urology and the distributions of certain urological surgeries were compared between the pandemic period and the same time interval of the year 2019. RESULTS: A total of 51 centres participated in the study. The number of outpatients, inpatients, urological surgeries and daily interventions were found to be dramatically decreased by the 3rd week of pandemics in state hospitals and tertiary referral centres; however, the daily urological practice were similar in private practice hospitals throughout the pandemic period. When the workload of urology in pandemic period and the same time interval of the year 2019 were compared, a huge decrease was observed in all variables during pandemic period. However, temporary measures like ureteral stenting, nephrostomy placement and percutaneous cystostomy have been found to increase during Covid-19 pandemic compared with normal life. CONCLUSIONS: Covid-19 pandemic significantly affected the routine daily urological practice likewise other subspecialties and priority was given to emergent and non-deferrable surgeries by urologists in concordance with published clinical guidelines.