Functional inhibition of c-Myc using novel inhibitors identified through "hot spot" targeting.

Protein-protein interactions drive various biological processes in healthy as well as disease states. The transcription factor c-Myc plays a crucial role in maintaining cellular homeostasis, and its deregulated expression is linked to various human cancers; therefore, it can be considered a viable target for cancer therapeutics. However, the structural heterogeneity of c-Myc due to its disordered nature poses a major challenge to drug discovery. In the present study, we used an in silico alanine scanning mutagenesis approach to identify "hot spot" residues within the c-Myc/Myc-associated factor X interface, which is highly disordered and has not yet been systematically analyzed for potential small molecule binding sites. We then used the information gained from this analysis to screen potential inhibitors using a conformation ensemble approach. The fluorescence-based biophysical experiments showed that the identified hit molecules displayed noncovalent interactions with these hot spot residues, and further cell-based experiments showed substantial in vitro potency against diverse c-Myc-expressing cancer/stem cells by deregulating c-Myc activity. These biophysical and computational studies demonstrated stable binding of the hit compounds with the disordered c-Myc protein. Collectively, our data indicated effective drug targeting of the disordered c-Myc protein via the determination of hot spot residues in the c-Myc/Myc-associated factor X heterodimer.

Repositioning antispasmodic drug Papaverine for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Papaverine is a benzylisoquinoline alkaloid from the plant Papaver somniferum (Opium poppy). It is approved as an antispasmodic drug by the US FDA and is also reported to have anti-cancer properties. Here, Papaverine's activity in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is explored using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mammalian cancer cell lines, and in silico studies. METHODS: The sensitivity of wild-type and mutant (anti-oxidant defense, apoptosis) strains of S. cerevisiae to the drug Papaverine was tested by colony formation, spot assays, and AO/EB staining. In vitro cytotoxic effect was investigated on HCT15 (colon), A549 (lung), HeLa (cervical), and K562 (Bcr-Abl positive CML), and RAW 264.7 cell lines; cell cycle, mitochondrial membrane potential, ROS detection analyzed in K562 cells using flow cytometry and apoptotic markers, Bcr-Abl signaling pathways examined by western blotting. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation of Papaverine against the target Bcr-Abl were also carried out. RESULTS: Investigation in S. cerevisiae evidenced Papaverine induces ROS-mediated apoptosis. Subsequent in vitro examination showed that CML cell line K562 was more sensitive to the drug Papaverine. Papaverine induces ROS generation, promotes apoptosis, and inhibits Bcr-Abl downstream signaling. Papaverine acts synergistically with the drug Imatinib. Furthermore, the docking and molecular dynamic simulation studies supported that Papaverine binds to the allosteric site of Bcr-Abl. CONCLUSION: The data presented here have added support to the concept of polypharmacology of existing drugs and natural compounds to interact with more than one target. This study provides a proof-of-concept for repositioning Papaverine as an anti-CML drug.

BIRC5/Survivin is a novel ATG12-ATG5 conjugate interactor and an autophagy-induced DNA damage suppressor in human cancer and mouse embryonic fibroblast cells.

BIRC5/Survivin is known as a dual cellular functions protein that directly regulates both apoptosis and mitosis in embryonic cells during embryogenesis and in cancer cells during tumorigenesis and tumor metastasis. However, BIRC5 has seldom been demonstrated as a direct macroautophagy/autophagy regulator in cells. ATG7 expression and ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 complex formation are crucial for the phagophore elongation during autophagy in mammalian cells. In this study, we observed that the protein expression levels of BIRC5 and ATG7 were inversely correlated, whereas the expression levels of BIRC5 and SQSTM1/p62 were positively correlated in normal breast tissues and tumor tissues. Mechanistically, we found that BIRC5 negatively modulates the protein stability of ATG7 and physically binds to the ATG12-ATG5 conjugate, preventing the formation of the ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 protein complex in human cancer (MDA-MB-231, MCF7, and A549) and mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells. We also observed a concurrent physical dissociation between BIRC5 and ATG12-ATG5 (but not CASP3/caspase-3) and upregulation of autophagy in MDA-MB-231 and A549 cells under serum-deprived conditions. Importantly, despite the fact that upregulation of autophagy is widely thought to promote DNA repair in cells under genotoxic stress, we found that BIRC5 maintains DNA integrity through autophagy negative-modulations in both human cancer and MEF cells under non-stressed conditions. In conclusion, our study reveals a novel role of BIRC5 in cancer cells as a direct regulator of autophagy. BIRC5 may act as a "bridging molecule", which regulates the interplay between mitosis, apoptosis, and autophagy in embryonic and cancer cells. ABBREVIATIONS: ACTA1: actin; ATG: autophagy related; BIRC: baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing; BAF: bafilomycin A1; CQ: chloroquine; CASP3: caspase 3; HSPB1/Hsp27: heat shock protein family B (small) member 1/heat shock protein 27; IAPs: inhibitors of apoptosis proteins; IP: immunoprecipitation; MAP1LC3/LC3: microtubule associated protein 1 light chain 3; PLA: proximity ligation assay; SQSTM1/p62: sequestosome 1; siRNA: small interfering RNA.

The Two Sides of YY1 in Cancer: A Friend and a Foe.

Yin Yang 1 (YY1), a dual function transcription factor, is known to regulate transcriptional activation and repression of many genes associated with multiple cellular processes including cellular differentiation, DNA repair, autophagy, cell survival vs. apoptosis, and cell division. Owing to its role in processes that upon deregulation are linked to malignant transformation, YY1 has been implicated as a major driver of many cancers. While a large body of evidence supports the role of YY1 as a tumor promoter, recent reports indicated that YY1 also functions as a tumor suppressor. The mechanism by which YY1 brings out opposing outcome in tumor growth vs. suppression is not completely clear and some of the recent reports have provided significant insight into this. Likewise, the mechanism by which YY1 functions both as a transcriptional activator and repressor is not completely clear. It is likely that the proteins with which YY1 interacts might determine its function as an activator or repressor of transcription as well as its role as a tumor suppressor or promoter. Hence, a collection of YY1-protein interactions in the context of different cancers would help us gain an insight into how YY1 promotes or suppresses cancers. This review focuses on the YY1 interacting partners and its target genes in different cancer models. Finally, we discuss the possibility of therapeutically targeting the YY1 in cancers where it functions as a tumor promoter.

Cloning, expression, and purification of the recombinant pro-apoptotic dominant-negative survivin T34A-C84A protein in Escherichia coli.

Survivin is a well-known inhibitor-of-apoptosis proteins family member and a promising molecular target for anti-cancer treatment. However, it is widely accepted that survivin is only a "semi-druggable" target and development of survivin-specific small molecule inhibitors has shown to be difficult. In this study, we demonstrated that a histidine-tagged survivin T34A-C84A mutated protein (T34A-C84A-dNSur-His) can be produced using a bacterial recombinant protein expression system [E. coli ArcticExpress (DE3) cells] and solubilized using 1% (w/v) Sarkosyl. In addition, we showed that the purified T34A-C84A-dNSur-His protein formed dimers as predicted by in silico protein structure and molecular dynamics analysis. Importantly, results of the MTT assay revealed that the purified recombinant protein was biologically active in decreasing the viability of the human MDA-MB-231 breast adenocarcinoma and MIA-PaCa pancreatic carcinoma cells in vitro. Furthermore, the purified T34A-C84A-dNSur-His protein, but not of the histidine-peptide, induced apoptosis (i.e. caspase-9 activation and DNA fragmentation) in MDA-MB-231 cells at concentrations from 50 to 400 nM. In conclusion, our study provides a protocol of producing a biologically active survivin-targeting macromolecule, T34A-C84A-dNSur-His, which can be used as a tool for studying the molecular and cellular roles of survivin in cells. T34A-C84A-dNSur-His is also a potential therapeutic agent for augmenting cancer therapy.

Identification of natural inhibitors of Bcr-Abl for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative disorder of the hematopoietic stem cells, characterized at the molecular level by the bcr/abl gene rearrangement. Even though targeting the fusion gene product Bcr-Abl protein is a successful strategy, development of drug resistance and that of drug intolerance are currently the limitations for Bcr-Abl-targeted CML therapy. With an aim to develop natural Bcr-Abl inhibitors, we performed virtual screening (VS) of ZINC natural compound database by docking with Abl kinase using Glide software. Two natural inhibitors ZINC08764498 (hit1) and ZINC12891610 (hit2) were selected by considering their high Glide docking score and critical interaction with the hinge region residue Met-318 of Abl kinase. The reactivity of the two molecules was assessed computationally by density functional theory calculations. Further, the conformational transition, hydrogen bond interactions, and the binding energies were investigated during 10-ns molecular dynamics simulation of the Abl-hit complex. When tested in vitro, hit1 compared to hit2 showed selective inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis in Bcr-Abl-positive K-562 leukemia cells. In summary, our results demonstrate that ZINC08764498, a coumarin derivative identified through VS, is a potential natural inhibitor for the treatment of CML.

Therapeutic polymeric nanoparticles and the methods of making and using thereof: a patent evaluation of WO2015036792.

Evaluation of the patent application WO2015036792 claiming therapeutic polymeric nanoparticles loaded with AZD1152-hqpa (aurora kinase inhibitor), and methods of making and using same for the treatment of cancer, is described. The claimed polymeric nano-formulations containing hydrophobic acid significantly improved the pharmacokinetic profiles (slow/sustained drug release profile) of the drug AZD1152-hqpa, as compared to the control agent (AZD1152). Drug efficacy and tolerability were also improved, and toxicity decreased in in vivo animal experiments, resulting in a better therapeutic index for the nano-formulation. Hence, the nano-formulated AZD1152-hqpa could be tested in the clinic at a dose level similar to, or higher than, that used for AZD1152, with lower incidence of toxicity.

Structural Biology Insight for the Design of Sub-type Selective Aurora Kinase Inhibitors.

Aurora kinase A, B and C, are key regulators of mitosis and are over expressed in many of the human cancers, making them an ideal drug target for cancer chemotherapy. Currently, over a dozen of Aurora kinase inhibitors are in various phases of clinical development. The majority of the inhibitors (VX-680/MK-0457, PHA-739358, CYC116, SNS-314, AMG 900, AT-9283, SCH- 1473759, ABT-348, PF-03814735, R-763/AS-703569, KW-2449 and TAK-901) are pan-selective (isoform non-selective) and few are Aurora A (MLN8054, MLN8237, VX-689/MK5108 and ENMD 2076) and Aurora B (AZD1152 and GSK1070916) sub-type selective. Despite the intensive research efforts in the past decade, no Aurora kinase inhibitor has reached the market. Recent evidence suggests that the sub-type selective Aurora kinase A inhibitor could possess advantages over pan-selective Aurora inhibitors, by avoiding Aurora B mediated neutropenia. However, sub-type selective Aurora kinase A inhibitor design is very challenging due to the similarity in the active site among the isoforms. Structural biology and computational aspects pertaining to the design of Aurora kinase inhibitors were analyzed and found that a possible means to develop sub-type selective inhibitor is by targeting Aurora A specific residues (Leu215, Thr217 and Arg220) or Aurora B specific residues (Arg159, Glu161 and Lys164), near the solvent exposed region of the protein. Particularly, a useful strategy for the design of sub-type selective Aurora A inhibitor could be by targeting Thr217 residue as in the case of MLN8054. Further preclinical and clinical studies with the sub-type selective Aurora inhibitors could help bring them to the market for the treatment of cancer.

Identification of ligand efficient, fragment-like hits from an HTS library: structure-based virtual screening and docking investigations of 2H- and 3H-pyrazolo tautomers for Aurora kinase A selectivity.

Furanopyrimidine 1 (IC50 = 273 nM, LE = 0.36, LELP = 10.28) was recently identified by high-throughput screening (HTS) of an in-house library (125,000 compounds) as an Aurora kinase inhibitor. Structure-based hit optimization resulted in lead molecules with in vivo efficacy in a mouse tumour xenograft model, but no oral bioavailability. This is attributed to "molecular obesity", a common problem during hit to lead evolution during which degradation of important molecular properties such as molecular weight (MW) and lipophilicity occurs. This could be effectively tackled by the right choice of hit compounds for optimization. In this regard, ligand efficiency (LE) and ligand efficiency dependent lipophilicity (LELP) indices are more often used to choose fragment-like hits for optimization. To identify hits with appropriate LE, we used a MW cut-off <250, and pyrazole structure to filter HTS library. Next, structure-based virtual screening using software (Libdock and Glide) in the Aurora A crystal structure (PDB ID: 3E5A) was carried out, and the top scoring 18 compounds tested for Aurora A enzyme inhibition. This resulted in the identification of a novel tetrahydro-pyrazolo-isoquinoline hit 7 (IC50 = 852 nM, LE = 0.44, LELP = 8.36) with fragment-like properties suitable for further hit optimization. Moreover, hit 7 was found to be selective for Aurora A (Aurora B IC50 = 35,150 nM) and the possible reasons for selectivity investigated by docking two tautomeric forms (2H- and 3H-pyrazole) of 7 in Auroras A and B (PDB ID: 4AF3) crystal structures. This docking study shows that the major 3H-pyrazole tautomer of 7 binds in Aurora A stronger than in Aurora B.

Aurora kinase inhibitor patents and agents in clinical testing: an update (2011 - 2013).

INTRODUCTION: Aurora kinase A, B and C, members of serine/threonine kinase family, are key regulators of mitosis. As Aurora kinases are overexpressed in many of the human cancers, small-molecule inhibitors of Aurora kinase have emerged as a possible treatment option for cancer. AREAS COVERED: In 2009 and 2011, the literature pertaining to Aurora kinase inhibitors and their patents was reviewed. Here, the aim is to update the information for Aurora kinase inhibitors in clinical trials and the patents filed between the years 2011 and 2013. Pubmed, Scopus®, Scifinder®, USPTO, EPO and www.clinicaltrials.gov databases were used for searching the literature and patents for Aurora kinase inhibitors. EXPERT OPINION: Even though both Aurora sub-type selective as well as pan-selective inhibitors show preclinical and clinical efficacy, so far no Aurora kinase inhibitor has been approved for clinical use. Particularly, dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia) is a key issue that needs to be addressed. Preliminary evidence suggests that the use of selective Aurora A inhibitors could avoid Aurora B-mediated neutropenia in clinical settings. Also, use of adjunctive agents such as granulocyte stimulating factor to overcome neutropenia associated with Aurora B inhibition could be an answer to overcome the toxicity and bring Aurora inhibitors to market in the future.

Treat cancers by targeting survivin: just a dream or future reality?

Since the discovery of survivin (BIRC5) as a cancer-related molecule by Grazia Ambrosini and Dario C. Altieri at 1997, our knowledge related to the function of this molecule has been extended from simple apoptosis inhibition to complicated, interlinked processes that involve interference of mitosis, apoptosis, autophagy, and even DNA repair recently. However, despite the growing amount of knowledge related to survivin in the last ten years, the development of survivin inhibitors or survivin-related molecular therapies is surprisingly and relatively slow as compared to other therapeutic inhibitors for cancer treatment. Here, the molecular functions of survivin and the progress of development of survivin-targeting therapies are discussed in detail. Functional differences between different survivin-specific inhibitors are discussed from both structural and biochemical point of views. This review also reveals different challenges that scientists are currently facing in the development of survivin inhibitors for clinical application. Finally, future directions for the development of survivin-targeted therapies are discussed in this review.