RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas otitidis belongs to the genus Pseudomonas and causes various infections, including ear, skin, and soft tissue infections. P. otitidis has a unique susceptibility profile, being susceptible to penicillins and cephalosporins but resistant to carbapenems, due to the production of the metallo-ß-lactamase called POM-1. This revealed genetic similarities with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which can sometimes lead to misidentification. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 70-year-old Japanese male who developed cellulitis and bacteremia during chemotherapy for multiple myeloma. He was initially treated with meropenem, but blood culture later revealed gram-negative bacilli identified as P. otitidis using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Carbapenem resistance was predicted from previous reports; therefore, we switched to dual therapy with levofloxacin and cefepime, and favorable treatment results were obtained. CONCLUSION: This is the first reported case of P. otitidis cellulitis and bacteremia in an immunocompromised patient. Carbapenems are typically used in immunocompromised patients and P. otitidis is often resistant to it. However, its biochemical properties are similar to those of Pseudomonas aeruginosa; therefore, its accurate identification is critical. In the present study, we rapidly identified P. otitidis using MALDI-TOF MS and switched from carbapenems to an appropriate antimicrobial therapy, resulting in a successful outcome.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Celulite (Flegmão)/diagnóstico , Celulite (Flegmão)/tratamento farmacológico , Pseudomonas , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodosRESUMO
Exophiala dermatitidis is a black fungus that rarely causes respiratory infection. We report a case of E. dermatitidis pneumonia with bronchiectasis that relapsed after 11 months of voriconazole (VRCZ) treatment in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient with bronchiectasis. A 65-year-old woman with RA and abnormal findings on chest radiography was referred for assessment of chronic cough and increased sputum production. She underwent bronchoscopy, and E. dermatitidis was identified from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Exophiala dermatitidis chronic lower respiratory tract infection and pneumonia were diagnosed. Although her condition improved after 11 months of VRCZ treatment, chest computed tomography (CT) images showed worsening at five months after the cessation of VRCZ treatment and E. dermatitidis was again detected in BALF. Re-administration of VRCZ for two years improved symptoms and chest CT images, and her condition is currently stable. In patients with bronchiectasis, E. dermatitidis pneumonia might require prolonged antifungal treatment.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The rapid and accurate detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is required to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This study evaluated the utility of two SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection methods. METHODS: We evaluated two types of antigen detection methods using immunochromatography (Espline) and quantitative chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Lumipulse). RT-PCR was performed as a standard procedure for COVID-19 diagnosis. Lumipulse and RT-PCR were performed for all 486 nasopharyngeal swabs and 136 saliva samples, and the Espline test was performed for 271 nasopharyngeal swabs and 93 saliva samples. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the Espline test were 10/11 and 260/260 (100%), respectively for the nasopharyngeal swabs and 3/9 and 84/84 (100%), respectively for the saliva samples. High sensitivities for both saliva (8/9) and nasopharyngeal swabs (22/24) were observed in the Lumipulse test. The specificities of the Lumipulse test for nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples were 460/462 (99.6%) and 123/127 (96.9%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The Espline test is not effective for saliva samples but is useful for simple and rapid COVID-19 tests using nasopharyngeal swabs because it does not require special devices. The Lumipulse test is a powerful high-throughput tool for COVID-19 diagnosis because it has high detection performance for nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples.