Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiography (Lond) ; 27(2): 419-424, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33092995

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Imaging is essential for the initial diagnosis and monitoring of the novel coronavirus, which emerged in Wuhan, China. This study aims to assess the insight of radiographers on how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected their work routine and if protective measures are applied. METHOD: A prospective observational study was conducted among radiographers registered in the Cyprus Society of Registered Radiologic Technologists & Radiation Therapy Technologists. A questionnaire composed of 28 multiple choice questions was utilised, and the data analysis was performed using SPSS software with the statistical significance assumed as p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: Out of 350 registered radiographers, 101 responses were received. The results showed that there are statistically significant differences regarding the working hours, the feeling of stress, the work effectiveness, the average examination time, the presence of a protocol used among the different workplaces of the participants; a private radiology centre, a private hospital or a public hospital, with a p-value 0.0022, 0.015, 0.027, 0.001, 0.0001 respectively. Also, statistically significant differences were observed in the decontamination methods used for equipment (p-value 0.007), for air (p-value 0.04) and when decontamination takes place (p-value 0.00032) among the different workplaces of the participants. Nonetheless, the majority of radiographers believe that their workplace is sufficiently provided with PPE, cleaning supplies, equipment, and with cleaning personnel and are optimistic regarding the adequacy of these provisions in the next three months. CONCLUSION: This study showed that in the Republic of Cyprus, there are protocols regarding protective measures against COVID-19, and the radiographers are adequately trained on how to face an infectious disease outbreak. However, work is needed in order to develop protocols that reassure the safety of patients and medical personnel while managing the excess workload effectively. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study indicates the importance of applying protective measures and protocols in the radiology departments in order to minimise the spread of the virus.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Protocolos Clínicos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pandemias , Radiografia/psicologia , Radiografia/normas , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , COVID-19/transmissão , Teste Sorológico para COVID-19 , Chipre/epidemiologia , Descontaminação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estresse Ocupacional , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , Prática Privada , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia/instrumentação , Serviço Hospitalar de Radiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários , Carga de Trabalho , Adulto Jovem
2.
Radiography (Lond) ; 26(2): e88-e93, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052768

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Radiation protection knowledge is essential for medical personnel in ensuring that the possible risks do not outweigh the benefits of diagnostic imaging. This study aimed to assess the radiation protection knowledge of radiographers in Cyprus. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out among radiographers in Cyprus through the Cyprus Society of Registered Radiologic Technologists & Radiation Therapy Technologists. The study was a quantitative descriptive analysis, using a questionnaire with 22 multiple-choice questions. Analysis of the data was done using the statistical software Stata, by performing mean knowledge score comparisons by different participants' characteristics, using t-test and analysis of variance test. Statistical significance was assumed as a p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: The answers provided for each question indicate that some areas of radiation protection are less known compared to others, as there is quite a wide range of correct-to-incorrect ratios. The analysis based on participant characteristics in relation to overall radiation effects knowledge, identified important determinants, namely the workplace of the participant (p = 0.006), the type of work licence the participant held at the time of the questionnaire (p = 0.024), and the years of clinical experience of the participant (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: The study showed that the levels of knowledge in radiation protection are of a very good standard. However, work is needed to clarify the specifics of dose limits and the national radiation protection legislation with regards to informing patients about the possible effects of ionising radiation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The study results indicate the importance of educating radiographers about the requirements of national radiation protection legislation and how this new knowledge can be linked with practise.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Proteção Radiológica/normas , Tecnologia Radiológica/normas , Estudos Transversais , Chipre , Humanos , Proteção Radiológica/legislação & jurisprudência , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tecnologia Radiológica/legislação & jurisprudência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA