In pancreatic cancer patients, chemotherapy reshapes the gene expression profile and antigen receptor repertoire of T lymphocytes and enhances their effector response to tumor-associated antigens.

Introduction: Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDA) is one of the most aggressive malignancies with a 5-year survival rate of 13%. Less than 20% of patients have a resectable tumor at diagnosis due to the lack of distinctive symptoms and reliable biomarkers. PDA is resistant to chemotherapy (CT) and understanding how to gain an anti-tumor effector response following stimulation is, therefore, critical for setting up an effective immunotherapy. Methods: Proliferation, and cytokine release and TCRB repertoire of from PDA patient peripheral T lymphocytes, before and after CT, were analyzed in vitro in response to four tumor-associated antigens (TAA), namely ENO1, FUBP1, GAPDH and K2C8. Transcriptional state of PDA patient PBMC was investigated using RNA-Seq before and after CT. Results: CT increased the number of TAA recognized by T lymphocytes, which positively correlated with patient survival, and high IFN-γ production TAA-induced responses were significantly increased after CT. We found that some ENO1-stimulated T cell clonotypes from CT-treated patients were expanded or de-novo induced, and that some clonotypes were reduced or even disappeared after CT. Patients that showed a higher number of effector responses to TAA (high IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio) after CT expressed increased fatty acid-related transcriptional signature. Conversely, patients that showed a higher number of regulatory responses to TAA (low IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio) after CT significantly expressed an increased IRAK1/IL1R axis-related transcriptional signature. Conclusion: These data suggest that the expression of fatty acid or IRAK1/IL1Rrelated genes predicts T lymphocyte effector or regulatory responses to TAA in patients that undergo CT. These findings are a springboard to set up precision immunotherapies in PDA based on the TAA vaccination in combination with CT.

Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Biliary Tract Cancer: a Real-World Retrospective, Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit with the anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated for the first time the impact on survival of adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine compared with cisplatin/gemcitabine in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analyzed population included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine or with cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. The impact of adding durvalumab to chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 563 patients were included in the analysis: 213 received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, 350 received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. At the univariate analysis, the addition of durvalumab was found to have an impact on survival, with a median OS of 14.8 months versus 11.2 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.80, p = 0.0002] in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab compared to those who received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. At the univariate analysis for PFS, the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine demonstrated a survival impact, with a median PFS of 8.3 months and 6.0 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47-0.70, p < 0.0001) in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab and cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, respectively. The multivariate analysis confirmed that adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS, with patients > 70 years old and those affected by locally advanced disease experiencing the highest survival benefit. Finally, an exploratory analysis of prognostic factors was performed in the cohort of patients who received durvalumab: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and disease stage were to be independent prognostic factors in terms of OS. The interaction test highlighted NLR ≤ 3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) = 0, and locally advanced disease as positive predictive factors for OS on cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. CONCLUSION: In line with the results of the TOPAZ-1 trial, adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine has been confirmed to confer a survival benefit in terms of OS and PFS in a real-world setting of patients with advanced BTC.