Rural-Urban Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survivorship Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Rural residents have a higher prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality compared to urban individuals. Policies have been aimed at improving access to CRC screening to reduce these outcomes. However, little attention has been paid to other determinants of CRC-related outcomes, such as stage at diagnosis, treatment, or survivorship care. The main objective of this analysis was to evaluate literature describing differences in CRC screening, stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship care between rural and urban individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases using a combination of MeSH and free-text search terms related to CRC screening, stage at diagnosis, treatment, survivorship care, and rurality. We identified 921 studies, of which 39 were included. We assessed methodological quality using the ROBINS-E tool and summarized findings descriptively. A meta-analysis was performed of studies evaluating CRC screening using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Seventeen studies reported disparities between urban and rural populations in CRC screening, 12 on treatment disparities, and 8 on staging disparities. We found that rural individuals were significantly less likely to report any type of screening at any time period (pooled odds ratio = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.76-0.86). Results were inconclusive for disparities in staging at diagnosis and treatment. One study reported a lower likelihood of use of CRC survivorship care for rural individuals compared to urban individuals. CONCLUSION: There remains an urgent need to evaluate and address CRC disparities in rural areas. Investigators should focus future work on assessing the quality of staging at diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship care in rural areas.

Vaccine response after pneumococcal vaccination in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Current guidelines for vaccination in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients recommend initiation of pneumococcal vaccination series three to six months post-HCT, with most data supporting initiation at six months due to a more robust immune response. This single-center, retrospective, observational chart review aimed to evaluate the impact of initiating the pneumococcal vaccine series at three months post-HCT compared to six months post-HCT. The primary endpoints were defined as a percentage of patients with a serologic response of >1 and >1.3 µg/mL for over 50% of the defined serotypes. Outcomes showed no difference in immunologic response between the two groups.

Characterization of direct oral anticoagulants use in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment are of interest in oncology due to ease of administration and lack of need for therapeutic monitoring compared to other anticoagulants. Data supporting their use in patients with hematologic malignancies post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) are limited. The purpose of the study is to characterize DOAC use in HCT patients. This multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis included allogeneic and autologous HCT recipients. The primary outcome was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB)/minor bleeding and VTE recurrence. Of 126 patients, 91 (72.2%) patients received an autologous HCT, and 35 (27.8%) patients received an allo-HCT. No major bleeding occurred in either transplant recipient groups. In autologous HCT recipients, CRNMB/minor bleeding occurred in four (4.4%) patients and VTE recurrence occurred in one (1.1%) patient. For allogeneic HCT recipients, CRNMB/minor bleeding occurred in five (14.3%) patients and VTE recurrence occurred in two (5.7%) patients. For patients that experienced a CRNMB, five (100%) of the allogeneic HCT and two (50%) of the autologous HCT recipients were thrombocytopenic at the time of bleeding. Only 38.5% of patients who experienced a drug-drug interaction requiring DOAC dose adjustment received the appropriate dose adjustment. DOACs were associated with low rates of recurrent VTE and no major bleeding events, similar to published data on DOAC use in the general cancer patient population. This suggests that DOACs may be safe therapeutic options with proactive management of drug interactions and careful monitoring for bleeding events, especially in the allogeneic HCT population where minor bleeding rates were slightly higher.

Evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants versus low molecular weight heparins for venous thromboembolism treatment in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) has increased due to updates in recent guidelines and literature. However, select guidelines caution against DOAC use in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies due to reported increased bleeding events. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for CA-VTE treatment in patients with GI malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with primary GI malignancies who received therapeutic anticoagulation with a DOAC or LMWH for CA-VTE between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of bleeding events (major, clinically relevant non-major, or minor bleeding events) within a 12-month period following the initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation. The secondary endpoint was the incidence rate of recurrent VTE events within a 12-month period following the start of therapeutic anticoagulation. RESULTS: After screening, 141 patients met inclusion criteria. The incidence rate of all bleeding events significantly differed between DOAC (4.98 events/100 person-months) and LWMH (10.2 events/100 person-months) recipients. The corresponding incidence rate ratio (IRR) with the DOAC group serving as the reference was 2.05 (p = 0.01), with the majority of bleeds in both groups presenting as minor bleeds. No difference was found between the incidence rate of recurrent VTE within a 12-month period of starting therapeutic anticoagulation between groups (IRR 3.08, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that DOACs do not pose an additional bleeding risk compared to LMWH in patients with certain GI malignancies. Careful selection of DOAC therapy with respect to bleeding risk is still warranted.

Effectiveness of letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A global systematic review.

OBJECTIVE(S): Letermovir (LET), a novel antiviral, has largely supplanted more traditional preemptive therapy (PET) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) patients. Use of LET demonstrated efficacy against placebo in phase III randomized controlled trials, but is considerably more expensive than PET. This review aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of LET in preventing clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) for allo-HCT recipients and related outcomes. DESIGN: A systematic literature review was performed using an a priori protocol using PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2010 to October 2021. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Studies were included if they met the following criteria: LET compared with PET, CMV-related outcomes, patients aged 18 years or older, and English language-only articles. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize study characteristics and outcomes. OUTCOME MEASURES: CMV viremia, csCMVi, CMV end-organ disease, graft-versus-host-disease, all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 233 abstracts were screened, with 30 included in this review. Randomized trials demonstrated efficacy of LET prophylaxis in preventing csCMVi. Observational studies demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness of LET prophylaxis compared with use of PET alone. All studies with a comparator group resulted in lower rates of csCMVi for patients using LET. Included studies varied widely by CMV viral load threshold cutoff and CMV test units, limiting synthesis of results owing to high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: LET reduces risk of csCMVi, but lack of standardized clinical definitions on how to evaluate csCMVi and related outcomes largely prevent synthesis of results. Clinicians must consider this limitation in the context of evaluating the effectiveness of LET to other antiviral therapies, especially for patients at risk of late-onset CMV. Future studies should focus on prospective data collection through registries and concordance of diagnostic definitions to mitigate study heterogeneity.

Predictors of lenalidomide maintenance duration after autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: For patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have undergone autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT), the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide is a first-line option for maintenance therapy. Because longer durations of lenalidomide maintenance are associated with improved survival, identifying strategies to avoid premature cessation of maintenance is an important priority in the post-transplant setting. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this analysis was to identify specific clinical predictors of lenalidomide treatment duration that could guide optimal medication management. Key secondary objectives included predictors of intolerable toxicity, rationale for lenalidomide dose reduction/discontinuation, and characterization of dose adjustments. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective, multi-center cohort study included adults with MM who underwent auto-SCT and initiated maintenance lenalidomide between 01/01/2012 and 02/28/2021. Variables assessed as potential predictors of maintenance duration or intolerable toxicity included age, body mass index (BMI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at time of auto-SCT, renal function, initial lenalidomide dose, use of combination maintenance therapy, and cytogenetic risk category. RESULTS: Among 299 patients included, the median age at time of auto-SCT was 62 years (range 30-77). The majority of patients had standard-risk cytogenetics (64%) and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 (72%). In the overall population, the median duration of maintenance was 1.3 years (range 0.3-8.6 years). The median initial dose of lenalidomide was 10 mg daily (range 2.5-25 mg). During the study period, 35% of patients had a dose reduction due to toxicity, 21% stopped lenalidomide due to disease progression, and 19% stopped due to toxicity. Multivariate linear regression analyses did not identify any significant predictors of lenalidomide duration or discontinuation due to intolerable toxicity. The most frequently reported toxicities leading to discontinuation were cytopenias, rash, and fatigue. CONCLUSION: This analysis did not identify any significant risk factors to predict the duration of lenalidomide maintenance or discontinuation for toxicity following auto-SCT in patients with MM. While limited by the retrospective design and relatively small sample size, our findings suggest that a priori lenalidomide dose reductions based on patient co-morbidities or performance status may not substantially affect the duration of lenalidomide maintenance.

Cost Effectiveness of Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis Compared with Pre-Emptive Therapy in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients in the United States.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of letermovir prophylaxis with the option for subsequent pre-emptive therapy (PET) for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection compared with a PET-only scenario in adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients in the United States over a 10-year time horizon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A publicly available decision tree model was constructed using a commercial third-party payer perspective to simulate an allo-HCT recipient's clinical trajectory in the first-year post-transplant, followed by entry to a Markov model to simulate years 2 through 10. Clinical inputs and utility estimates were derived from published literature. Costs were derived from published literature and US Department of Veterans Affairs Federal Supply Schedule drug pricing. Outcomes assessed included life expectancy, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), direct medical costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to test the robustness of the findings. RESULTS: Compared with PET alone, letermovir prophylaxis was projected to increase life-years per person (4.99 vs. 4.70 life-years), and increase QALYs (3.29 vs. 3.08) and costs (US$83.411 vs. US$70,698), yielding an ICER of US$59,356 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated our model was sensitive to mortality (ICER: $164,771/QALY) and utility (letermovir ICER: $117,447/QALY; PET ICER: $107,290/QALY) in the first-year post-transplant. In 57.1% of the PSA simulations, letermovir was a cost-effective option using a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Letermovir prophylaxis is cost effective compared with PET alone with a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100,000 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis results indicate future research is required to understand the impact of mortality and quality of life in the first-year post-transplant to arrive at a conclusive decision on letermovir adoption.

Effects of financial toxicity on prescription drug use and mental well-being in cancer patients.

Background: In the US, medical costs for cancer patients have grown from $27 billion in 1990 to $174 billion in 2020. The increased financial strain that cancer patients and survivors endure is referred to as financial toxicity. Objective: To quantify the relationship between indicators of financial toxicity and health utilization and quality of life in patients ever diagnosed with cancer. Methods: Adult cancer patients and survivors in 2017 were identified using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Multiple logistic regression models were used to quantify the relationship between three financial toxicity exposures (concern for keeping an income, paying large medical bills, and going into debt or borrowing money) and two discrete outcomes of being able to purchase prescriptions and often worrying that cancer would worsen or come back. Results: This study assessed 609 respondents. After survey weighting was applied, that represented 16,215,673 individuals. Patients who reported concern for keeping an income were at 2.91 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.16 to 7.31) and 2.97 (95% CI, 2.01 to 2.67) times increased odds to report avoiding purchase of prescriptions and worry of cancer status, respectively, versus those who did not. Patients who reported worry about paying large medical bills were at 4.46 (95% CI, 2.15 to 9.24) and 2.80 (95% CI, 1.98 to 3.96) times increased odds to report avoiding purchase of prescriptions and worry of cancer status, respectively, versus those who did not. Patients who reported borrowing money or going into debt were at 3.04 (95% CI, 1.19 to 7.76) and 2.42 (95% CI, 1.54 to 3.18) times increased odds to report avoiding purchase of prescriptions and worry of cancer status, respectively, versus those who did not. Conclusions: Financial toxicity is associated with decreased prescription utilization and quality of life in the form of excessive worry among cancer patients including cancer survivors.

Characterisation of infections in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia receiving venetoclax and a hypomethylating agent.

We investigated the incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and other infectious complications in patients receiving venetoclax and hypomethylating agent therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This retrospective, multicentre cohort study included adult patients with AML who received at least one cycle of venetoclax and either azacitidine or decitabine between January 2016 and August 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of probable or confirmed IFI. Secondary outcomes included antifungal prophylaxis prescribing patterns, incidence of bacterial infections, and incidence of neutropenic fever hospital admissions. Among 235 patients, the incidence of probable or confirmed IFI was 5.1%. IFI incidence did not differ significantly according to age, antifungal prophylaxis use, or disease status. In the subgroup of patients with probable or confirmed IFIs, six (50%) were receiving antifungal prophylaxis at the time of infection. The overall incidence of developing at least one bacterial infection was 33.6% and 127 (54%) patients had at least one hospital admission for febrile neutropenia. This study demonstrated an overall low risk of developing probable or confirmed IFI as well as a notable percentage of documented bacterial infections and hospital admissions due to neutropenic fever.

Myocarditis occurrence with cancer immunotherapy across indications in clinical trial and post-marketing data.

Antibodies targeting the PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint axis have been used in a variety of tumor types. They achieve anti-tumor activity through activating the patient's own immune system to target immune response evading cancer cells. However, this unique mechanism of action may cause immune-related adverse events, irAEs. One of these irAEs is myocarditis which is associated with an alarming mortality rate. In this study we presented clinical cases of myocarditis from safety trial datasets submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA. Additionally, we analyzed over fourteen million FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, FAERS, submissions. The statistical analysis of the FAERS data provided evidence of significantly increased reporting of myocarditis in patients administered immune checkpoint inhibitors alone, in combination with another immune checkpoint inhibitor, the kinase inhibitor axitinib, or chemotherapy, for all cancer types, when compared to patients administered chemotherapy. All combination therapies led to further increased reporting odds ratios of myocarditis. We further analyzed the occurrence of myocarditis by stratifying the reports into sub-cohorts based on specific cancer types and treatment/control groups in major cancer immunotherapy efficacy trials and confirmed the observed trend for each cohort.

Characterization of relapse patterns in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with blinatumomab.

INTRODUCTION: Blinatumomab is a CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody that simultaneously binds CD19 on the surface of B-cells and CD3 on the surface of T-cells, resulting in tumor cell lysis. It is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and in patients with minimal residual disease after intensive induction chemotherapy. Relapse patterns after treatment with blinatumomab have not been well characterized. METHODS: We reviewed patients treated with blinatumomab with relapsed, refractory or minimal residual disease-positive B-ALL from 1 December 2014 to 31 December 2018 at a single academic medical center. Patient demographics, blast percentage prior to blinatumomab initiation, prior lines of therapy, blinatumomab treatment duration, sites of relapse, progression free survival, and overall survival were collected. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were identified. Four (20%) patients developed extramedullary relapse following blinatumomab. The median time from treatment initiation to extramedullary relapse was 179 days (range 47-241). Sites of extramedullary relapse included the pancreas, adrenal gland, kidneys, liver, parotid gland, and brain. CONCLUSION: Extramedullary relapse occurs frequently following treatment of B-ALL with blinatumomab. Further studies aimed at preventing extramedullary relapse following blinatumomab treatment are warranted.

Long-term Follow-up of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors: A Focus on Screening, Monitoring, and Therapeutics.

Annually, ~50,000 patients undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) worldwide with almost 22,000 of these patients receiving HCT in the United States. HCT is a curative option for a wide range of hematologic malignancies, and advances in transplantation medicine have resulted in an increase in HCT survivors. It is anticipated that the number of HCT survivors will more than double from 242,000 in 2020 to ~500,000 in 2030. Survivors of HCT are at an increased risk of developing late complications due to exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiation in the pre-, peri-, and post-HCT phases and these cumulative exposures have the potential to damage normal tissue. This tissue damage leads to the early onset of chronic health conditions resulting in premature mortality in HCT survivors, who have a 15-year cumulative incidence of severe or life-threatening chronic health conditions exceeding 40%. Due to the significant burden of morbidity in HCT survivors and the delay in the development of long-term complications, this delicate patient population requires life-long monitoring due to the risk for neuropsychological, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, ocular, skeletal, cardiac, endocrine, fertility, and sexual health complications, as well as secondary neoplasms. This review will focus on recent advances in screening, monitoring, and therapeutics for late-occurring or long-term complications in HCT survivors.

Real-World Toxicity Experience with BRAF/MEK Inhibitors in Patients with Erdheim-Chester Disease.

BACKGROUND: Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. The BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with ECD harboring a BRAF V600E mutation. Successful treatment has also been reported with MEK-targeted therapies, likely because of the fact that BRAF mutant-negative patients harbor MEK pathway alterations. In our Rare Tumor Clinic, we noted that these patients have frequent drug-related toxicity, consistent with previous reports indicating the need to markedly lower doses of interferon-alpha when that agent is used in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a review of ten patients with ECD seen at the Rare Tumor Clinic at University of California San Diego receiving 16 regimens of targeted BRAF, MEK, or combined therapies. RESULTS: The median age of the ten patients with ECD was 53 years (range, 29-77); seven were men. The median dose percentage (percent of FDA-approved dose) tolerated was 25% (range, 25%-50%). The most common clinically significant adverse effects resulting in dose adjustments of targeted therapies were rash, arthralgias, and uveitis. Renal toxicity and congestive heart failure were seen in one patient each. In spite of these issues, eight of ten patients (80%) achieved a partial remission on therapy. DISCUSSION: Patients with ECD appear to require substantially reduced doses of BRAF and MEK inhibitors but are responsive to these lower doses.

Evaluation of pharmacist interventions in a head and neck medical oncology clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Head and neck cancers (HNC) are a complex and heterogeneous group of cancers, often necessitating a multidisciplinary approach across the care continuum. Oncology pharmacists are uniquely qualified to play a vital role on a multidisciplinary team and provide specialized care to optimize medication therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review evaluating the role of a board-certified oncology pharmacist in the head and neck oncology clinic at an academic, comprehensive cancer center from April 2017 through March 2018. The primary objective of the study was to describe the types of interventions made by the oncology pharmacists. Secondary objectives included quantifying time spent on patient education and number of prescriptions sent to pharmacies. RESULTS: The pharmacist had 873 encounters with 151 patients, resulting in 2080 interventions. Approximately 57% of the interventions were performed in the clinic. Patient education (58%), facilitation of new prescriptions or refill requests (49.9%), and supportive care management (32.6%) were the most frequent interventions. The oncology pharmacist spent 154.1 h on patient education and sent 811 prescriptions to pharmacies, with 63.6% of prescriptions sent to the institution's cancer center pharmacy. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of an oncology pharmacist in the HNC team optimized patient care through comprehensive and timely interventions across the care continuum. Our study is the first to highlight the vital role oncology pharmacists have in improving the overall quality of care of HNC patients. Future directions include exploring the impact of oncology pharmacist interventions on select Quality Oncology Practice Initiative measures by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Pegaspargase-induced hypertriglyceridemia in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Pegaspargase, a long acting formulation of L-asparaginase, is an asparagine specific enzyme that selectively kills leukemic cells by depleting plasma asparagine. Pegaspargase is FDA approved for the first-line treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia and is a critical component of numerous multi-chemotherapeutic regimens. Pegaspargase is associated with well-described toxicities including hypersensitivity reactions, hepatotoxicity, and thrombosis. However, hypertriglyceridemia is a much rarer complication of pegaspargase and has only been described in a limited number of reports. We present a case of severe hypertriglyceridemia after a single dose of pegaspargase. The patient was re-challenged with pegaspargase and again developed hypertriglyceridemia which was complicated by pancreatitis. Here, we summarize published reports and a literature review describing the incidence of pegaspargase-induced hypertriglyceridemia in common acute lymphoblastic leukemia protocols.

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism and stroke prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies.

PURPOSE: Low-molecular-weight heparins are currently the recommended antithrombotic therapy for treatment and prevention of malignancy-related venous thromboembolism. Currently, the evidence evaluating direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins or a vitamin K antagonist in cancer patients with hematologic malignancies is limited. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism treatment or stroke prevention for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients with hematologic malignancies. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of adult patients with hematologic malignancies who received at least one dose of the Food and Drug Administration-approved direct oral anticoagulant for venous thromboembolism treatment or stroke prevention. We determined the frequency of major bleeding events, non-major bleeding events, stroke, systemic embolism, appropriateness of initial direct oral anticoagulant doses, holding practices prior to procedures, and the rate of all-cause mortality. An analysis was also performed to compare the incidence of bleeding between patients with a history of hematopoietic stem cell transplant to non-transplant patients. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were identified, with the majority of patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism treatment. Major bleeding events occurred in four patients and no fatal bleeding events occurred. Non-major bleeding occurred in 29 patients, most commonly epistaxis and bruising. Two patients experienced a systemic embolism while on direct oral anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSION: Direct oral anticoagulants may be a safe and effective alternative for anticoagulation therapy in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, larger prospective studies comparing direct oral anticoagulants to low-molecular-weight heparins or vitamin K antagonists are warranted to compare efficacy and safety outcomes in this patient population.

Emerging Challenges to the Safe and Effective Use of Methadone for Cancer-Related Pain in Paediatric and Adult Patient Populations.

Methadone continues to be an important medication for the treatment of paediatric and adult cancer-related pain. Appropriate patient selection to ensure safe and effective treatment by a team of clinicians who appreciate and are familiar with methadone and its unique pharmacology is crucial. Unlike morphine and other more common opioids, methadone is purported to have involvement with delta-opioid receptor and higher affinity as an N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antagonist. Clinically this gives it the advantage of being effective for both nociceptive and neuropathic pain, but also may be useful in the setting of tolerance to other opioids. Methadone also comes in multiple available formulations that can be administrated through a variety of routes beyond the oral route. Challenges with methadone in treating cancer-related pain include drug interactions specifically as it relates to new targeted cancer therapies. Recent guidelines recommend electrocardiogram monitoring with methadone and there is potential for additive cardiac toxicity in the oncology setting. Appropriate dosing of methadone for pain management given age, organ dysfunction, and patients who are on methadone maintenance therapy are also key factors. This article aims to provide clinicians with evidence and clinical practice guidelines for safe and appropriate use of methadone including indication, initiation, and monitoring given its complexity for management of pain in the dynamic oncology setting.

Phenotypic and Genomic Determinants of Immunotherapy Response Associated with Squamousness.

Advanced and metastatic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) are common and difficult-to-treat malignancies. We assessed 75 immunotherapy-treated patients with SCC from a clinically annotated database of 2,651 patients, as well as 9,407 patients from a deidentified database for molecular features that might influence checkpoint blockade response. SCCs had higher tumor mutational burdens (TMB) than non-SCCs (P < 0.0001). Cutaneous SCCs had the highest TMB (P < 0.0001), with 41.3% demonstrating a very high TMB (≥50 mutations/Mb). In immunotherapy-treated patients with SCC, higher TMB (≥12 mutations/Mb) correlated with a trend to higher clinical benefit rate [stable disease ≥ 6 months or partial/complete remission; 60% vs. 29%; (high vs. low TMB); P = 0.06] and significantly longer median time-to-treatment failure (TTF; 9.9 vs. 4.4 months; P = 0.0058). Cutaneous SCCs had the highest clinical benefit [11/15 patients (73%) vs. 20/60 (33%) non-cutaneous (P = 0.008)], TTF (P = 0.0015), and overall survival (P = 0.06) with immunotherapy treatment. In conclusion, among a diverse set of SCCs, higher TMB and cutaneous disease associated with better immunotherapy outcome.

Characterization of collaborative practice agreements held by hematopoietic stem cell transplant pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Current workforce shortages within the hematopoietic stem cell transplant field necessitate capitalizing on the role of oncology-trained pharmacists. Working within an agreed-upon protocol, pharmacists are able to expand patient care delivery through optimal medication therapy management. METHODS: An electronic survey was developed by the Advocacy & Policy Working Committee of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Pharmacy Special Interest Group and distributed to pharmacists involved in the care of hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. The primary objective was to assess the current state of collaborative practice agreements in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant setting. RESULTS: Forty-eight responses representing 41 institutions were returned. Respondents were mostly female (67%) and practiced in the adult setting (83%). Reponses represented a range of practice experience in hematopoietic stem cell transplant with the majority of the hematopoietic stem cell transplant positions (83%) funded by the department of pharmacy at an academic medical center. Of the 48 responses, 22 (46%) respondents reported having collaborative practice agreements in place; 10 (21%) respondents did not currently have collaborative practice agreements, but were planning to implement them; and 16 (33%) respondents did not have collaborative practice agreements at their institution. Clinical activities performed under a collaborative practice agreement included medication selection and dosing modifications, therapeutic drug monitoring, supportive care management, and management of comorbid conditions and chronic diseases. The most commonly cited barrier to establishing collaborative practice agreements was the inability to secure reimbursement for services provided. No respondents reported a negative impact on job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide the pharmacy community with a robust understanding of the current landscape of hematopoietic stem cell transplant pharmacy collaborative practice agreements.