[Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence, practical aspects and future perspectives]. / L'angioplastica coronarica robotica: evidenze scientifiche, aspetti pratici e prospettive future.

Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) is an emerging technology designed to improve operator safety and procedural precision. The interventional cardiologist is able to manipulate guidewires, catheters and devices from a specific cockpit. A number of studies evaluating R-PCI have shown high procedural success rates with low complications. R-PCI advantages include the possibility to perform an accurate stent positioning, to reduce the operator radiation exposure and orthopedic injuries. However, there is a limited experience regarding R-PCI in complex anatomies, that may still require manual assistance. Moreover, the technique is limited by current incompatibility with specific materials, the lack of tactile feedback and the possibility to robotically manage only one wire/device at the same time. Globally, R-PCI is a novel approach with future interesting implications, but further investigations are necessary to overcome current limitations.

Limb salvage in diabetic patients with no-option critical limb ischemia: outcomes of a specialized center experience.

Objective: To describe the characteristics, the management and the outcome of a consecutive series of patients with diabetic foot lesions (DF) and no-option critical limb ischemia (CLI) treated with a multidimensional, interdisciplinary approach in a dedicated center. Research Design and Methods: The prospective database of the Diabetic Foot Unit of the Maria Cecilia Hospital (Cotignola, Italy) collects medical history, risk factors, chemistry values, angiographic data, characteristic of foot lesions, medical and surgical therapies of all patients admitted with a diagnosis of DF and CLI. All patients were followed-up for at least 1 year and/or total recovery. The primary endpoint was 1-year amputation-free survival (AFS), secondary endpoints were limb salvage and survival. Results: Between October 2014 and October 2017, 1024 patients with DF and CLI were admitted to the center. Eighty-four of them (8.2%) fulfilled the criteria for no-option CLI. At 1 year, AFS, limb salvage, and survival rates were 34%, 34%, and 83%, respectively. Lesions located proximal to the Lisfranc joint were associated with major amputation (HR 2.1 [1.2-3.6]). One-year survival of patients treated with minor procedures was significantly higher compared to patients treated with major amputation (96% vs 76%, log-rank p = 0.019). Major amputation was independently associated with mortality (HR 7.83 [1.02-59.89]). Conclusions: The application of dedicated and standardized strategies permitted limb salvage in one-third of patients with no-option CLI. Patients with stable lesions limited to the forefoot and without ischaemic pain had a greater probability to successfully receive conservative treatments. Limb salvage was associated with subsequent higher one-year survival.

[Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: clinical experience of the Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy]. / Scaffold bioriassorbibile: l'esperienza clinica della Regione Emilia-Romagna.

BACKGROUND: The bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) technology constitutes the new revolution of the coronary artery disease interventional treatment. Currently, three distinct types of BRSs are available but only one, the Absorb BVS, was on the market in 2013 when the Regional Commission for Medical Devices and the Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Commission of the Emilia-Romagna Region drew up a technical and scientific essay to provide guidance for the introduction of BRS in public and affiliated health facilities. Five preferential indications were given for use: long coronary lesions (>28 mm), ostial lesions (left main stem excluded), complete revascularization in patients aged <50 years, diffuse disease (>40 mm) or involving the mid/distal left anterior descending (LAD) branch in patients <70 years, spontaneous coronary artery dissection. METHODS: This survey analyzed data from all the catheterization laboratories in the Emilia-Romagna Region, merged in a unified database. RESULTS: In a 3-year study period, 546 BRS were implanted in 328 patients, corresponding to 1.5% of the drug-eluting stents (DES) used, with a trend towards a progressive increase over time. Initial indications were followed in 200/328 (61.0%) patients (about one third fitting more indications), mainly for treatment of long lesions in vessels >2.5 mm (67%), young patients (31.5%) and mid/distal LAD (28%). In 22.6% of cases the clinical scenario was a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, in 39.3% a non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Intracoronary imaging was infrequently used (intravascular ultrasound in 24.7% of cases). In 85 patients (25.9%) a hybrid procedure (BVS/DES) was performed. CONCLUSIONS: BRS use has resulted lower than expected, with discrete variability among centers, but according to the initial indications of the Emilia-Romagna Region in the majority of cases. The underuse might have been due to operators' caution in their initial experience. However, the increasing trend may reveal a greater confidence in the implantation technique and the whole amount of safety and efficacy data.

Carotid artery stenting with a new-generation double-mesh stent in three high-volume Italian centres: clinical results of a multidisciplinary approach.

AIMS: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is still associated with higher periprocedural cerebrovascular events (CEs) compared to vascular surgery. The Roadsaver carotid artery stent is a double layer micromesh stent which reduces plaque prolapse and embolisation by improving plaque coverage. Its clinical impact on neurological outcome was unknown. The aim of this study was therefore to report the clinical results of a large real-world population from three different centres receiving a Roadsaver stent to treat carotid artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and fifty (150) patients (age 74±8 yrs, 75% male, symptomatic 29%) treated with CAS using the Roadsaver carotid stent in three high-volume Italian centres were included in the study. Intraprocedural optical coherence tomography (OCT) evaluation was performed in 26 patients, with an off-line analysis by a dedicated core laboratory. All patients underwent duplex ultrasound and neurological evaluation at 24 hours and at 30 days. CAS was technically successful in all cases (stent diameter: 8.6±0.8 mm, stent length: 25.0±4.5 mm). No in-hospital or 30-day CEs were observed. OCT evaluation detected a low rate of plaque prolapse (two patients, 7.7%). Duplex ultrasound showed stent and external carotid artery patency in all cases both before discharge and at 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The Roadsaver stent is a safe and promising technology for CAS, with a low percentage of plaque prolapse and good short-term clinical outcome. Larger studies with longer follow-up are necessary to confirm this favourable clinical outcome.

[SICI-GISE position paper on the requirements for diagnostic and interventional procedures in patients with peripheral arterial disease]. / Documento di posizione SICI-GISE sui requisiti di processo diagnostico ed interventistico riferiti a pazienti affetti da patologia vascolare periferica.

Interventional procedures on peripheral vessels are the field of a novel specialty dedicated to the diagnosis and minimally invasive endovascular treatment of diseases involving the cerebral, thoracic and abdominal arteries (including renal and visceral arteries), as well as the peripheral arteries (femoro-popliteal arteries and the arteries below the knee). At present, physicians with three different types of medical training, each involving particular strengths and characteristics, specialize in endovascular treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease: vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists and interventional cardiologists. Treatment of high-risk patients in terms of anatomical and clinical (serious comorbidities) complexity raised the need for the interventional cardiologist to face issues related to technical aspects of the procedure, multilevel pathology management and adequate indication. To achieve this goal, interventional cardiologists require particular facilities and clinical skills. The objectives of this position paper from the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE) are (i) to define the theoretical background and practical training required to ensure that interventional cardiologists maintain high-quality standards also in the field of treatment of peripheral arterial disease, by establishing shared rules and drafting papers; (ii) to standardize the procedures of interventional cardiology operational units that treat patients with peripheral arterial disease in Italy on the basis of scientific evidence, and (iii) to establish common requirements in terms of facilities and regulations.

Long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with occlusive in-stent restenosis treated with (32P) beta-brachytherapy.

The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of (32)P beta-brachytherapy in totally occlusive in-stent restenosis (ISR). Patients with occlusive ISR were generally excluded from the randomized clinical trials on intracoronary brachytherapy (utilizing either gamma- or beta-sources) that have shown reductions in restenosis rate and need for revascularization procedures. We analyzed short- and long-term effects of (32)P beta-brachytherapy (20 Gy) in 27 patients (28 lesions) with occlusive ISR and 84 (99 lesions) patients with nonocclusive high-risk ISR. The primary outcome measure was frequency of in-lesion angiographic binary restenosis at 7 months. Secondary endpoints were rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), clinically driven TVR, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). (32)P beta-brachytherapy was feasible and safe and provided similar postprocedural angiographic results in the two clinically comparable groups. However, the 7-month binary restenosis rate was higher in the occlusive group, as were the MACE and late total occlusion rates. Multivariate logistic analysis of the overall population indicated occlusive pattern to be the only independent predictor of angiographic restenosis. In both groups, recurrent lesions most often showed a focal pattern with significant reduction of length. Although safe and effective in high-risk ISR, (32)P brachytherapy at 20 Gy does not appear to be sufficient to avoid long-term restenosis in patients with occlusive lesions. Further studies should determine the most suitable source and dosage of brachytherapy for patients with occlusive ISR.

Predictors of 32P beta brachytherapy failure in patients with high-risk in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of coronary radiation therapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has been established in several randomized clinical trials. The efficacy of this treatment in the general population is less well established. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We report our experience in 118 consecutive patients with nonselected high-risk ISR who had undergone successful percutaneous coronary intervention and brachytherapy with (32)P beta-irradiation and who were prospectively enrolled in a quantitative angiographic and clinical follow-up protocol at 7 months after the index procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the independent predictor of angiographic restenosis after (32)P brachytherapy treatment. RESULTS: Of the patients, 28.8% were diabetics. The mean lesion and mean radiated lengths were, respectively, 30.1 +/- 17.2 and 43.8 +/- 16.9 mm. The ISR pattern was diffuse in 96% of the treated lesions; in particular, 22.1% presented an occlusive pattern and 37.1% a proliferative pattern. At follow-up angiographic, restenosis and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates were, respectively, 20.8% and 29.6%. The univariate predictors of angiographic restenosis were procedural geographic miss, pattern IV ISR, manual pullback maneuver of the radiation source, preprocedural lesion percentage stenosis and preprocedural lesion MLD. At logistic regression analysis, only geographic miss and pattern IV ISR were independent predictors of post intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) angiographic restenosis. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that 7-month angiographic restenosis after (32)P IRT in complex patients with ISR is not a frequent event and is predicted mainly by an occlusive lesion at baseline and by procedural geographical miss.

Clinical relevance of homocysteine levels in patients receiving coronary stenting for unstable angina.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively investigated whether plasma homocysteine (HCY) concentrations are related to target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates in patients with unstable angina undergoing stenting. METHODS: We enrolled 196 consecutive patients with at least one successful coronary stent implantation for unstable angina. RESULTS: The mean vessel diameter was 3.1 +/- 0.5 mm. At follow-up (17.8 +/- 7.5 months), patients with higher HCY levels (> 17 micromol/l, 4th quartile) had similar TLR rates to the rest of the sample (11.1 vs 13.2%, p = 0.90). On the other hand, high HCY levels did seem to be associated with higher total (13.3 vs 0.7%, p = 0.001) and cardiac (6.7 vs 0%, p = 0.01) mortality rates. At multivariate analysis, only target vessel diameter independently predicted TLR, while both HCY levels and target vessel size predicted late total mortality. CONCLUSIONS: At least in patients with a mean vessel diameter > 3 mm, HCY levels cannot be taken as a prognostic indicator of in-stent restenosis for patients with unstable angina. However, in spite of successful percutaneous revascularization, HCY values do seem to strongly influence late mortality.

[Intracoronary beta-radiotherapy in high-risk in-stent restenosis. Prospective results of a single center registry]. / Efficacia a lungo termine della brachiterapia endocoronarica beta (32P) nel trattamento delle ristenosi intrastent ad elevato rischio. Risultati prospettici di un registro monocentrico.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate, on single center prospective data, long-term angiographic and clinical results of intracoronary beta (32P) brachytherapy in "real world" patients with high-risk in-stent restenosis lesions. METHODS: Sixty-nine consecutive patients (77 lesions) with high-risk in-stent restenosis (mean lesion length 30.3 +/- 16.1 mm, pattern III-IV 57.2%, diabetes 33.3%) treated with percutaneous dilation procedures and beta-radiation therapy, underwent 7-month clinical and angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: One patient (1.4%) presented with procedural non-Q wave myocardial infarction. At a mean follow-up of 7 +/- 1.5 months, death was observed in 1 patient (1.4%) and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in 3 (4.3%) (in 2 patients, who prematurely discontinued antiplatelet therapy, caused by late coronary thrombosis). Seven-month binary angiographic restenosis occurred in 20 lesions (25.9%) (in-stent restenosis 11.6%). Target lesion and target vessel revascularization occurred in 20 (28.9%) and 21 (30.4%) patients. At follow-up only 12 (17.3%) patients presented with CCS class III-IV angina. After intracoronary beta brachytherapy angiographic restenosis occurred regardless of the vessel size, lesion length and ostial location. On the contrary a high restenosis rate was documented in obstructive lesions. CONCLUSIONS: As applied in routine clinical practice, radiation therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of high-risk in-stent restenosis. In spite of all that, total occlusion at baseline predicts late angiographic restenosis.