Using the Medical Audit to Improve Practice Performance.

Feedback to physicians on their clinical performance is critical to continuous learning and maintenance of skills as well as maintaining patient safety. However, it is fraught with challenges around both implementation and acceptance. Additionally, rewarding of performance improvement is not often done, putting into question the efficacy of the process. Physician audit and feedback have been studied extensively and shown to be beneficial in many fields of medicine. Documenting physician performance and sharing individual and group data have been positively linked to changing physician behavior, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. Although casual review of one's own performance is often the easiest approach, it is frequently over- or underestimated by self-evaluation. Objective measures are therefore important to provide concrete data on which physicians can act. A fundamental question remains in mammography: Is reporting the information to the physician and accreditation bodies enough, or should there be consequences for the radiologist and/or facility if there is outlier behavior?

Lymph node wire localization post-chemotherapy: Towards improving the false negative sentinel lymph node biopsy rate in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the disease status of the pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) core biopsied lymph node (preNACBxLN) in patients with node positive breast cancer corresponds to nodal status of all surgically retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) post-NAC and whether wire localization of this LN is feasible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HIPPA compliant IRB approved retrospective study including breast cancer patients (a.) with preNACBxLN confirmed metastases, (b.) who received NAC, and (c.) underwent wire localization of the preNACBxLN. Electronic medical records were reviewed. Fisher's exact test was used to compare differences in residual disease post-NAC among breast cancer subtypes. RESULTS: 28 women with node positive breast cancer underwent ultrasound guided wire localization of the preNACBxLN, without complication. There was no evidence of residual nodal disease for 16 patients, with mean 4.4 (median 4) LNs resected. 12 patients had residual nodal metastases, with mean 9.2 (median 7) LNs resected and mean 2.3 (median 2) LNs with tumor involvement. 11 patients had metastases detected within the localized LN. One patient had micrometastasis in a sentinel LN, despite no residual disease in the preNACBxLN. Patients with luminal A/B breast cancer more often had residual nodal metastases (86%) at pathology, as compared to patients with HER2+ (20%) and Triple Negative breast cancer (50%), though not quite achieving statistical significance (p=0.055). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guided wire localization of the preNACBxLN is feasible and may improve detection of residual tumor in patients post-NAC.

Value of breast MRI for patients with a biopsy showing atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in predicting malignant upgrade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3T DCE-MRI was performed for 17 patients with ADH (median age 52, range 42-76) proven by stereotactic biopsy (n = 15), and ultrasound-guided biopsy (n = 2) from January 2011 to April 2015. All patients underwent surgical excision after the MRI. Two radiologists prospectively reviewed the MRI to determine the presence or absence of suspicious findings at the site of biopsy, and evaluated the MR features of any lesion present according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon. MRI findings and clinical information were correlated with the final surgical pathology by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Nine of 17 lesions were upgraded to malignancy. MRI demonstrated suspicious nonmass enhancement (NME) at the site of biopsy in all upgraded patients. The median size was 19.5 mm (range, 9-44 mm). In the eight patients without upgrade, no enhancement (n = 2), linear enhancement along the biopsy track (n = 4), thin rim enhancement around hematoma (n = 1), and a focal NME (n = 1) were seen. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI findings were 100, 87.5, 90, and 100%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of suspicious enhancement on MRI was the most significant predictor of upgrade to malignancy (P = 0.0006) CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a high NPV of DCE-MRI for patients with ADH in terms of malignant upgrade at subsequent surgery. This suggests that patients with ADH without suspicious enhancement on DCE-MRI might be followed with DCE-MRI rather than undergoing surgical excision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1738-1747.

Kinetic Analysis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions With Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Comparison With Standard Kinetic Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate diagnostic parameters measured with ultrafast MRI acquisition and with standard acquisition and to compare diagnostic utility for differentiating benign from malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ultrafast acquisition is a high-temporal-resolution (7 seconds) imaging technique for obtaining 3D whole-breast images. The dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI protocol consists of an unenhanced standard and an ultrafast acquisition that includes eight contrast-enhanced ultrafast images and four standard images. Retrospective assessment was performed for 60 patients with 33 malignant and 29 benign lesions. A computer-aided detection system was used to obtain initial enhancement rate and signal enhancement ratio (SER) by means of identification of a voxel showing the highest signal intensity in the first phase of standard imaging. From the same voxel, the enhancement rate at each time point of the ultrafast acquisition and the AUC of the kinetic curve from zero to each time point of ultrafast imaging were obtained. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant lesions in enhancement rate and kinetic AUC for ultrafast imaging and also in initial enhancement rate and SER for standard imaging. ROC analysis showed no significant differences between enhancement rate in ultrafast imaging and SER or initial enhancement rate in standard imaging. CONCLUSION: Ultrafast imaging is useful for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. The differential utility of ultrafast imaging is comparable to that of standard kinetic assessment in a shorter study time.

Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and advantages of a combined high temporal and high spatial resolution protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with enhancing lesions were imaged at 3T. The acquisition protocol consisted of a series of bilateral, fat-suppressed "ultrafast" acquisitions, with 6.9- to 9.9-second temporal resolution for the first minute following contrast injection, followed by four high spatial resolution acquisitions with 60- to 79.5-second temporal resolution. All images were acquired with standard uniform Fourier sampling. A filtering method was developed to reduce noise and detect significant enhancement in the high temporal resolution images. Time of arrival (TOA) was defined as the time at which each voxel first satisfied all the filter conditions, relative to the time of initial arterial enhancement. RESULTS: Ultrafast images improved visualization of the vasculature feeding and draining lesions. A small percentage of the entire field of view (<6%) enhanced significantly in the 30 seconds following contrast injection. Lesion conspicuity was highest in early ultrafast images, especially in cases with marked parenchymal enhancement. Although the sample size was relatively small, the average TOA for malignant lesions was significantly shorter than the TOA for benign lesions. Significant differences were also measured in other parameters descriptive of early contrast media uptake kinetics (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrafast imaging in the first minute of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast has the potential to add valuable information on early contrast dynamics. Ultrafast imaging could allow radiologists to confidently identify lesions in the presence of marked background parenchymal enhancement.

Evaluation of Kinetic Entropy of Breast Masses Initially Found on MRI using Whole-lesion Curve Distribution Data: Comparison with the Standard Kinetic Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify kinetic heterogeneity of breast masses that were initially detected with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, using whole-lesion kinetic distribution data obtained from computer-aided evaluation (CAE), and to compare that with standard kinetic curve analysis. METHODS: Clinical MR images from 2006 to 2011 with breast masses initially detected with MRI were evaluated with CAE. The relative frequencies of six kinetic patterns (medium-persistent, medium-plateau, medium-washout, rapid-persistent, rapid-plateau, rapid-washout) within the entire lesion were used to calculate kinetic entropy (KE), a quantitative measure of enhancement pattern heterogeneity. Initial uptake (IU) and signal enhancement ratio (SER) were obtained from the most-suspicious kinetic curve. Mann-Whitney U test and ROC analysis were conducted for differentiation of malignant and benign masses. RESULTS: Forty benign and 37 malignant masses comprised the case set. IU and SER were not significantly different between malignant and benign masses, whereas KE was significantly greater for malignant than benign masses (p = 0.748, p = 0.083, and p < 0.0001, respectively). Areas under ROC curve for IU, SER, and KE were 0.479, 0.615, and 0.662, respectively. CONCLUSION: Quantification of kinetic heterogeneity of whole-lesion time-curve data with KE has the potential to improve differentiation of malignant from benign breast masses on breast MRI. KEY POINTS: • Kinetic heterogeneity can be quantified by computer-aided evaluation of breast MRI • Kinetic entropy was greater in malignant masses than benign masses • Kinetic entropy has the potential to improve differentiation of breast masses.

Using quantitative image analysis to classify axillary lymph nodes on breast MRI: a new application for the Z 0011 Era.

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of computer extracted feature analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance images (MRI) of axillary lymph nodes. To determine which quantitative features best predict nodal metastasis. METHODS: This institutional board-approved HIPAA compliant study, in which informed patient consent was waived, collected enhanced T1 images of the axilla from patients with breast cancer. Lesion segmentation and feature analysis were performed on 192 nodes using a laboratory-developed quantitative image analysis (QIA) workstation. The importance of 28 features were assessed. Classification used the features as input to a neural net classifier in a leave-one-case-out cross-validation and evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values for features in the task of distinguishing between positive and negative nodes ranged from just over 0.50 to 0.70. Five features yielded AUCs greater than 0.65: two morphological and three textural features. In cross-validation, the neural net classifier obtained an AUC of 0.88 (SE 0.03) for the task of distinguishing between positive and negative nodes. CONCLUSION: QIA of DCE MRI demonstrated promising performance in discriminating between positive and negative axillary nodes.

Importance of a personal history of breast cancer as a risk factor for the development of subsequent breast cancer: results from screening breast MRI.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to assess the importance of a personal history of breast cancer as a risk factor for patients referred for screening breast MRI and to evaluate the importance of this risk factor compared with family history. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of screening breast MRI performed from 2004 to 2012 included a total of 702 patients, 465 of whom had undergone annual MRI and 237 of whom had undergone MRI every 6 months as part of a research protocol. RESULTS: Of the patients screened, 208 had a personal history of breast cancer, and 345 had a family history as the sole risk factor. An additional 97 patients had both risk factors. The absolute risk for detection of breast cancer at screening MRI among patients with a personal history of cancer was 2.8% (95% CI, 0.6-5.2%). The absolute risk for patients with a strong family history of cancer was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.5-3.5%). The relative risk for detection of breast cancer given a personal history was 1.42 (95% CI, 0.48-4.17) compared with family history. The relative risk when both risk factors were present compared with having only a family history was 3.04 (95% CI, 1.05-8.86). CONCLUSION: A personal history of breast cancer is an important risk factor for the development of subsequent breast cancer. Given the results, consideration should be given to MRI screening of patients with a personal history of breast cancer.