Immediate Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery in Patients with Bilateral Visually Significant Cataracts.

Purpose: To report our experience of performing immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) in patients with visually significant cataracts and reduced preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Methods: Data of patients who underwent ISBCS for visually significant cataracts and had preoperative CDVA ≤20/32 (≤0.2 logMAR) in each eye were retrospectively reviewed. Refractive and visual outcomes were evaluated for the last available postoperative visit. Intraoperative and serious postoperative adverse events occurring within the first three months of surgery were reviewed. Results: A total of 1335 patients (2670 eyes) were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 71.9 ± 9.5 years. On the last visit, 50.2% and 89.1% of eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥20/20 (0.0 logMAR) and ≥20/32 (0.2 logMAR), respectively. Of all eyes, 83.8% were within ±0.50D, and 96.4% were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia. Ten patients had postoperative bilateral ametropia of more than 1.00D in each eye, but eight of them still achieved binocular UDVA ≥20/40. Intraoperative events occurred in 14 eyes of 13 patients (per-eye incidence: 0.524% or 1 in 191 eyes). A total of 86 postoperative adverse events occurred in 80 eyes of 53 patients (per-eye incidence 2.996% or 1 in 33 eyes), of which cystoid macular edema was the most common. Only three eyes had CDVA reduced by more than two Snellen lines compared to preoperative CDVA, two of which were not related to cataract surgery. There was no patient with bilateral CDVA loss. Conclusion: In our cohort of patients with visually significant cataracts, ISBCS resulted in good refractive predictability and a low incidence of serious adverse events.

Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a New Enhanced Monofocal IOL and a Conventional Monofocal IOL.

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of the Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 IOL, designed to enhance intermediate vision, to a conventional Tecnis Monofocal ZCB00 IOL. Methods: This retrospective analysis compared two cohorts of patients undergoing lens replacement surgery with bilateral implantation of the Tecnis ICB00 or the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL (383 patients in each group). Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA; 66cm), and near (UNVA; 40cm) visual acuities, refractive predictability, and patient-reported outcomes were compared. A sub-analysis of patients with the Eyhance IOL was performed to compare patients who achieved bilateral emmetropia to those with mini-monovision. One-month postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Both groups had comparable UDVA outcomes. On average, both monocular and binocular UIVAs were approximately one Snellen line better in patients implanted with Eyhance IOL (monocular UIVA: ICB00 0.23 ± 0.18 logMAR, ZCB00 0.33 ± 0.19 logMAR; binocular UIVA: ICB00 0.18 ± 0.18 logMAR, ZCB00 0.26 ± 0.20 logMAR, p < 0.01). Likewise, the mean UNVA was also one Snellen line better with the ICB00 model (monocular UNVA: ICB00 0.51 ± 0.20 logMAR, ZCB00 0.61 ± 0.18 logMAR; binocular UNVA: ICB00 0.42 ± 0.19 logMAR, ZCB00 0.51 ± 0.22 logMAR, p < 0.01). There was no difference between the two groups in overall satisfaction or visual phenomena. A subgroup of patients who achieved mini-monovision with Eyhance IOL had, on average, one Snellen line better UIVA and UNVA compared to patients with bilateral emmetropia. Conclusion: Patients receiving the enhanced monofocal IOL had better intermediate and near vision compared to those receiving the conventional monofocal IOL, with similar levels of patient-reported photic phenomena in both groups.

A survey of perceptions of exposure to new technology in residents and practicing ophthalmologists.

BACKGROUND: Incorporation of the rapid advances in ophthalmologic surgical and diagnostic techniques inherent in the field poses a challenge to residency training programs. This study investigates exposure to new technologies during residency and perception of its impact on practice patterns. METHODS: Ophthalmology residents at various training levels and practicing ophthalmologists who had completed their training were invited to participate in a survey study assessing exposure to various technologies in residency and in practice. Data collection occurred from December 2022 to June 2023. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: The study received 132 unique responses, including 63 ophthalmology residents and 69 practicing ophthalmologists. 65.2% (n = 45) of practicing ophthalmologists and 47.6% (n = 30) of current residents reported discussion/training on newly developed products on the market (e.g. premium IOLS, MIGS), was "minimally discussed but not emphasized" or "not discussed at all" in residency. 55.1% (n = 38) of practicing ophthalmologists reported that exposure to new technologies during residency did influence types of technologies employed during practice. The majority resident physicians reported enjoying being trained on newer technology and feeling more prepared for future changes in the field (95.2%, n = 60) and felt that having industry partnerships in residency enhances education and training (90.5%, n = 57). CONCLUSIONS: Considering how to maximize exposure to newer technologies/devices during residency training is important, and may contribute to training more confident, adaptable surgeons, who are more likely to critically consider new technologies and adopt promising ones into their future clinical practice.

Angle Kappa is Not Correlated with Patient-Reported Outcomes After Multifocal Lens Implantation.

Purpose: To examine the effect of preoperative angle kappa on patient-reported outcomes after multifocal lens placement during cataract surgery and determine if it is an effective measure for preoperative patients screening for multifocal lens placement. Setting: Private refractive surgery clinics. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: All patients undergoing bilateral cataract or refractive lens exchange surgery with a target of emmetropia between 2013 and 2017 at Optical Express (Glasgow, UK) with multifocal lens placement for whom preoperative angle kappa measurement and a postoperative month 1 patient-reported outcomes measures were available were included. Results: A total of 1368 patients were identified. Median preoperative angle kappa was 0.41mm with an interquartile range of 0.30mm to 0.53mm. Preoperative angle kappa did not have a significant association with patient-reported satisfaction with vision (correlation coefficient 0.15, 95% confidence interval -0.081 to 0.39, P = 0.20) nor with patient-reported photic phenomena (P > 0.09 for all comparisons). A receiver-operator characteristic analysis did not yield a viable cutoff predictive of patient-reported satisfaction. Conclusion: Angle kappa was not predictive of patient-reported satisfaction in this study. This study did not find evidence that it should be used as a screening test for patients considering multifocal intraocular lens placement.

Effect of residual sphere on uncorrected visual acuity and satisfaction in patients with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of residual sphere on vision and satisfaction in pseudophakic patients. SETTING: Private clinics, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: A multivariate model evaluated the effect of 1-month residual sphere on outcomes of pseudophakic patients. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to assess the relative risk of not achieving ≥20/20 monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), ≥20/50 uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and not being satisfied with vision. ORs were assessed for residual sphere -1.00 to +1.00 diopter (D) in quarter-diopter steps, using 0.00 D as a reference. RESULTS: The analysis included 38 828 multifocal and 11 571 monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). The residual myopic sphere ≤-0.25 D and hyperopic sphere ≥+0.50 D had a clinically meaningful effect on UDVA. Although monofocal IOLs had an improvement in UNVA with every additional 0.25 D of myopia, the change in ORs with increasing myopia was not significant for multifocal IOLs. The mean improvement in UNVA comparing eyes with 0.00 D and -1.00 D sphere was 0.26 logMAR for monofocal and 0.03 logMAR for multifocal IOLs. Low near-addition IOLs had a slightly higher gain in UNVA with increasing myopia, but the gain was not as substantial as with monofocal IOLs. The effect of ametropia on satisfaction was more pronounced for multifocal IOLs. For every 0.25 D of residual myopia, there was >25% increase in dissatisfied patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although myopia improved UNVA in eyes with monofocal IOL, multifocal IOLs did not benefit from residual myopia. Multifocal IOL patients desiring distance vision should be targeted closest to emmetropia, even if it means targeting slight hyperopia.

Bilaterally subluxed diffractive intraocular lenses: big expectations and even bigger comorbidities.

A 78-year-old woman with an ocular history of cataract surgery with a diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) in each eye has developed fluctuating vision, greater in the right eye than the left eye, after 4 years. She has a history of inactive central serous retinopathy and a vision potential of 20/25 + 2 in the right eye and 20/25 in the left eye. She has well-controlled diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. She has enjoyed her spectacle independence for some time and wishes to have her vision restored. On examination, her uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/50 in the right eye and 20/25 in the left eye and her uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) was J3 in the right eye and J1 in the left eye. Intraocular pressures (IOPs) measured 22 mm Hg in the right eye and 18 mm Hg in the left eye. Pupils had limited reactivity with irregularity in the right eye but no obvious relative afferent pupillary defect. Motility and confrontation visual fields were unremarkable in both eyes. Retinal acuity meter was 20/20 in both eyes, and manifest refraction was plano -1.25 × 105 20/40, J3 in the right eye and +0.50 × 20/25, J1 in the left eye. Pertinent findings on slitlamp examination included temporal iris atrophy and transillumination defects greater in the right eye than the left eye, peripupillary pseudoexfoliative changes in both eyes, significant inferior subluxation of a diffractive 3-piece posterior chamber IOL in the capsular bag with lens-pitting peripherally and few central, moderate pseudophacodonesis, and an open posterior capsule in the right eye. In the left eye, she had mild inferior subluxation of a single-piece acrylic diffractive IOL in the capsular bag with moderate pseudophacodonesis and an open posterior capsule (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202403000-00019/figure1/v/2024-02-20T193212Z/r/image-tiff). All other anterior segment findings were unremarkable. On dilated posterior examination, she had a cup-to-disc ratio of 0.50 in the right eye and 0.65 in the left eye without edema hemorrhage or pallor. There were attenuated vessels in both eyes, posterior vitreous detachment in both eyes, and a few small drusen peripherally in both eyes. There was retinal pigment epithelium irregularity and dropout parafoveal in the right eye and subfoveal in the left eye (Figure 2). There was no evidence of macular edema, subretinal fluid, choroidal thickening, or neovascular membranes. The periphery was unremarkable in both eyes.JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202403000-00019/figure2/v/2024-02-20T193212Z/r/image-tiff What testing would you obtain preoperatively to help guide your decision-making? How would you counsel the patient regarding comorbid conditions and expectations?

Toric Monofocal Intraocular Lenses for the Correction of Astigmatism during Cataract Surgery: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the published literature evaluating the visual and refractive outcomes and rotational stability of eyes implanted with toric monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) for the correction of keratometric astigmatism during cataract surgery and to compare those outcomes with outcomes of eyes implanted with nontoric monofocal IOLs and other astigmatism management methods performed during cataract surgery. This assessment was restricted to the toric IOLs available in the United States. METHODS: A literature search of English-language publications in the PubMed database was last conducted in July 2022. The search identified 906 potentially relevant citations, and after review of the abstracts, 63 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one studies ultimately were determined to be relevant to the assessment criteria and were selected for inclusion. The panel methodologist assigned each a level of evidence rating; 12 studies were rated level I and 9 studies were rated level II. RESULTS: Eyes implanted with toric IOLs showed excellent postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), reduction of postoperative refractive astigmatism, and good rotational stability. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was better and postoperative cylinder was lower with toric IOLs, regardless of manufacturer, when compared with nontoric monofocal IOLs. Correcting pre-existing astigmatism with toric IOLs was more effective and predictable than using corneal relaxing incisions (CRIs), especially in the presence of higher magnitudes of astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: Toric monofocal IOLs are effective in neutralizing pre-existing corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery and result in better UCDVA and significant reductions in postoperative refractive astigmatism compared with nontoric monofocal IOLs. Toric IOLs result in better astigmatic correction than CRIs, particularly at high magnitudes of astigmatism. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Early Clinical Experience with a New Hydrophobic Acrylic Single-Piece Monofocal Intraocular Lens.

Purpose: To evaluate early clinical outcomes and adverse events (AEs) in cataract patients following implantation of a monofocal hydrophobic acrylic IOL with a new optimized non-constant aberration-correcting design (CT LUCIA 621P). Methods: This retrospective study included patients with visually significant cataracts who underwent implantation of the CT LUCIA 621P IOL. Refraction, corrected (CDVA) and uncorrected (UDVA) visual acuity of the last available visit were used in the analysis. Intraoperative and postoperative AEs of the cohort were reviewed. Results: A total of 191 eyes of 133 patients with the mean age of 70.2±11.2 years were included in this study. The mean follow-up time of the last available visit was 1.7±1.3 months. The mean postoperative monocular UDVA was 0.09±0.16 logMAR (≈20/25), and 74.9% (143/191) eyes achieved ≥20/25 UDVA. The percentage of eyes with manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) within ±0.50D and ±1.00D of emmetropia was 84.8% (162/191) and 98.4% (188/191), respectively. Linear regression of attempted vs achieved MSE showed a tight relationship, with the coefficient of determination close to 1 (R2=0.99), indicating a very predictable refractive correction. The reported AEs were those typically expected after cataract surgery. There were no AEs related to intraoperative manipulation with the IOL/injector or to postoperative stability of the IOL in the capsular bag. No eye lost ≥2 lines of CDVA. Conclusion: The implantation of CT LUCIA 621P resulted in good refractive predictability and visual outcomes. No IOL-related adverse events were reported.

Immediate Sequential Bilateral Surgery in Refractive Lens Exchange Patients: Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events.

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients who underwent bilateral same-day refractive lens exchange (RLE). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Patients of a private intraocular surgery provider in the United Kingdom who underwent RLE in both eyes on the same day with treatment dates between March 2018 and December 2021. METHODS: Clinical outcomes and AEs were collected for a continuous cohort of patients undergoing bilateral same-day RLE (in the absence of visually significant cataracts) or had mild cataracts (corrected visual acuity ≥ 20/40). One-month clinical outcomes were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Refractive outcomes and visual acuity, intraoperative and postoperative AEs, and secondary surgical interventions recorded within the first month after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 17 330 patients (34 660 eyes) were included in the analysis. Of these, 28 827 eyes received a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL), and 5833 eyes had a monofocal IOL. The percentage of eyes within ±0.50 diopters (D) of intended refraction was 85.5% and 86.2% for monofocal and multifocal IOL eyes, respectively. There was a total of 55 intraoperative AEs recorded in 55 eyes of 54 patients (per-eye incidence: 0.159%). Posterior capsule tear was the most common intraoperative event occurring in 37 eyes (0.107%). The number of AEs recorded within the first postoperative month was 267, occurring in 263 eyes of 177 patients (per-eye incidence: 0.759%). These included cystoid macular edema (CME) (172 eyes; 0.496%), significant corneal edema (28 eyes; 0.081%), persistent inflammation (27 eyes; 0.078%), significantly raised intraocular pressure (27 eyes; 0.078%), toxic anterior segment syndrome (8 eyes; 0.023%), wound leak (3 eyes; 0.009%), retinal detachment (1 eye; 0.003%), and retinal tear (1 eye; 0.003%). There were 56 secondary surgical interventions recorded within the first month of surgery, occurring in 54 eyes of 47 patients (per-eye incidence: 0.156%). The most common secondary intervention was the rotation of a misaligned toric IOL (24 eyes; 0.069%). CONCLUSIONS: Elective same-day bilateral RLE had a low incidence of serious AEs, and high refractive predictability. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Management of Pain after Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current best practices for postoperative photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) pain control. METHODS: Literature searches in the PubMed database were last conducted in October 2021 and were restricted to publications in English. This search identified 219 citations, of which 84 were reviewed in full text for their relevance to the scope of this assessment. Fifty-one articles met the criteria for inclusion; 16 studies were rated level I, 33 studies were rated level II, and 2 studies were rated level III. RESULTS: Systemic opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); topical NSAIDs; postoperative cold patches; bandage soft contact lenses (BCLs), notably senofilcon A contact lenses; and topical anesthetics were demonstrated to offer significantly better pain control than comparison treatments. Some other commonly reported pain mitigation interventions such as systemic gabapentinoids, chilled intraoperative balanced salt solution (BSS) irrigation, cycloplegia, and specific surface ablation technique strategies offered limited improvement in pain control over control treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic NSAIDs and opioid medications, topical NSAIDs, cold patches, BCLs, and topical anesthetics have been shown to provide improved pain control over alternative strategies and allow PRK-associated pain to be more tolerable for patients.

Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To evaluate refractive outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) compared with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS). METHODS: A PubMed search of FLACS was conducted in August 2020. A total of 727 abstracts were reviewed and 33 were selected for full-text review. Twelve articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this assessment. The panel methodologist assigned a level of evidence rating of I to all 12 studies. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in mean uncorrected distance visual acuity, best-corrected distance visual acuity, or the percentage of eyes within ± 0.5 and ± 1 diopter of intended refractive target between FLACS and PCS. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were similar between the 2 groups, and most studies showed no difference in endothelial cell loss between FLACS and PCS at various time points between 1 and 6 months. In large randomized controlled studies in the United Kingdom and France, FLACS was less cost-effective than PCS. CONCLUSIONS: Both FLACS and PCS have similar excellent safety and refractive outcomes. At this time, one technique is not superior to the other, but economic analyses performed in some populations have shown that FLACS is less cost-effective.

Keratoprosthesis, silicone oil placement, and fluocinolone acetonide implant for treatment of uveitis-associated hypotony and keratopathy.

PURPOSE: To describe a case series of combined Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis with pars plana vitrectomy, silicone oil placement, and fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal 0.59 mg implant (RETISERT®), and report its safety and efficacy in preventing phthisis bulbi in patients with uveitis-associated hypotony and concurrent corneal edema. FINDINGS: A retrospective review of patients with chronic uveitis, corneal decompensation and concurrent hypotony who underwent the combined approach described here between 2015 and 2020 was conducted. Three patients were treated using the combined approach. Post-operative recovery was unremarkable in all cases and the patients' corneal condition remained stable on follow up. No patient developed phthisis, retroprosthetic membrane, or infectious endophthalmitis. Average intraocular pressure one year after intervention was 2.7 to 6.4 mmHg higher compared to a year prior. CONCLUSIONS: The approach described is potentially safe and effective in preventing phthisis and membrane formation in uveitis-associated hypotony and keratopathy.

Effect of residual astigmatism on uncorrected visual acuity and patient satisfaction in pseudophakic patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of residual astigmatism on postoperative visual acuity and satisfaction after intraocular lens (IOL) surgery. SETTING: Private practice, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Postoperative data of patients who had previously undergone refractive lens exchange or cataract surgery were used in a multivariate regression model to assess the effect of residual astigmatism on 3 months postoperative monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and patient satisfaction. The analysis was based on residual refraction in the dominant eye of each patient. Odds ratios were calculated to demonstrate the effect of increasing residual astigmatism on UDVA and satisfaction with separate calculations for monofocal and multifocal IOLs. RESULTS: Three months postoperative outcomes of 17 152 dominant eyes were used in multivariate regression analysis. Compared with eyes with 0.00 diopter (D) residual astigmatism, the odds of not achieving 20/20 vision in eyes with 0.25 to 0.50 D residual astigmatism increased by a factor of 1.7 and 1.9 (P < .0001) in monofocal and multifocal IOLs, respectively. For the residual astigmatism 0.75 to 1.00 D, the odds ratio for not achieving 20/20 vision compared with eyes with no astigmatism was 6.1 for monofocal and 6.5 for multifocal IOLs (P < .0001). The effect of residual astigmatism on satisfaction was more evident at the 0.75 to 1.00 D level, where the odds of not being satisfied with vision increased by a factor of 2.0 and 1.5 in patients with monofocal and multifocal IOLs, respectively (P < .0001). The orientation of astigmatism was not a significant predictor in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Multivariate analysis in a large population of patients demonstrated that low levels of residual astigmatism can degrade visual acuity. Corneal astigmatism of 0.50 D or greater should be included in surgical planning.

One-Year Outcomes in a Large Series of Patients Following Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes 1 year after implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL) in a large series of patients. METHODS: Outcomes of patients who underwent refractive lens exchange or cataract surgery with the implantation of the AT LARA 829MP IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) were retrospectively reviewed. The near (40 cm), intermediate (66 cm), and distance visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and cumulative rate of adverse events and secondary procedures were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 1,894 eyes of 977 patients were implanted with the AT LARA 829MP IOL, with 62.1% of eyes available for the 12-month visit. The overall secondary procedure rate for the whole cohort was: Nd:YAG = 7.8%, laser vision correction = 7.5%, and IOL explantation = 0.63%. The reasons for IOL exchange were intraoperative complications (3 eyes/0.16%) and quality of vision issues (9 eyes/0.48%). Of all eyes available for the 12-month visit that did not undergo laser vision correction or an IOL exchange, 72.0% had monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better and the percentage of eyes with monocular uncorrected intermediate and near visual acuity of 20/50 or better was 96.2% and 81.0%, respectively. At 12 months postoperatively, 87.6% of eyes were within ±0.50 diopters of emmetropia. No change in refraction occurred between the 6- and 12-month postoperative visits. CONCLUSIONS: The AT LARA 829MP extended depth of focus IOL is able to provide functional distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity. Complications related to the platform of the IOL were uncommon. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(6):380-388.].

Multifocal and Accommodating Intraocular Lenses for the Treatment of Presbyopia: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the published literature assessing the efficacy and safety of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) for the treatment of presbyopia after cataract removal. METHODS: Literature searches were undertaken in January 2018 and September 2020 in the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases. This yielded 761 articles, of which 34 met the criteria for inclusion in this assessment and were assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist. Thirteen studies were rated level I and 21 studies were rated level II. RESULTS: Presbyopia-correcting lenses were effective at improving distance and near visual acuity after cataract surgery. Near acuity at different focal lengths was related directly to the effective add power of multifocal and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs. Most multifocal and EDOF lenses that were compared with a control monofocal lens demonstrated that patient-reported spectacle independence was superior to the monofocal lens. All patients who had multifocal and EDOF lenses implanted showed decreased contrast sensitivity and reported more visual phenomena as compared with control participants who received monofocal lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Presbyopia-correcting lenses improve uncorrected near and distance visual acuity and decrease spectacle dependence after cataract surgery. Mesopic contrast sensitivity is decreased compared with monofocal lenses, and patient-reported visual phenomena are more likely in patients receiving multifocal or EDOF lenses.

Impact of Refractive Outcomes on Bias in Follow-up and Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Laser Vision Correction.

PURPOSE: To examine factors contributing to completion of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in patients undergoing laser vision correction. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based study. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who underwent primary laser vision correction with a target of plano from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016, at a large refractive surgery center. METHODS: Patients were asked to complete a PRO measure at the time of their preoperative and months 1 and 3 postoperative visits. Characteristics between patients who attended and did not attend the follow-up visits and completed and did not complete the PRO measure were compared. A logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with likelihood of follow-up and completion of PRO measure. An inverse probability censoring weighted model was created to account for selective loss to follow-up and used to adjust the PRO satisfaction measure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Completion of the PRO measure at 1 and 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 37 043 patients were identified. Of these, 20 501 completed a 1-month postoperative PRO measure and 10 474 completed a 3-month postoperative PRO measure. Patients completing a PRO measure were more likely to be older, be female, have had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), have completed a preoperative PRO measure, and have had a preoperative hyperopic correction (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). For every line of postoperative uncorrected acuity worse than 20/16, the odds ratio of completing a PRO measure was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.36, P < 0.001) at 1 month and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.26-1.33, P < 0.001) at 3 months. At 1 month, there was no difference between the raw and model-adjusted rates of satisfaction with vision, but at 3 months the adjusted rate was significantly higher than the raw rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with worse objective visual outcomes were more likely to complete PRO measures in this population-based study. In a setting with loss to follow-up, PRO measures require methods to address missing data for correct interpretation.

Multifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Comparison of Data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval Trials.

PURPOSE: To review and compare the results of unpublished premarket approval studies for recent multifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses. METHODS: Lenses without previously published pre-market approval trials were identified and clinical and patient-reported outcomes were reviewed and compared. RESULTS: Lenses included the DFT/DAT (Acrysof Vivity) EDOF lens, the TFNT/TFAT (PanOptix) trifocal lens, and the SV25T (ReStor ActiveFocus) lens (all from Alcon Laboratories, Inc), as well as the ZXR/ZXT (Tecnis Symfony and Symfony Toric), the ZLB00 (Tecnis Multifocal +3.25), and the ZKB00 (Tecnis Multifocal +2.75, all Tecnis lenses from Johnson & Johnson Vision). All lenses produced equivalent distance vision and superior intermediate and near vision compared to monofocal controls. Patient-reported difficulty with glare, halos, and starbursts was higher in the multifocal and EDOF lens cohort compared to monofocal controls. Spectacle independence was higher in the multifocal and EDOF cohort with the exception of the SV25T (ActiveFocus) lens, which was not significantly different than the control lens. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trial data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration premarket approval studies supports multifocal and EDOF lenses as an effective treatment for aphakia and presbyopia. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(2):98-104.].

Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Eyes with Previous Excimer Laser Surgery for Myopia: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the literature to evaluate the outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes with a history of myopic LASIK or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in the PubMed database in January 2020. Separate searches relevant to cataract surgery outcomes and corneal refractive surgery returned 1169 and 162 relevant citations, respectively, and the full text of 24 was reviewed. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for this assessment; all were assigned a level III rating of evidence by the panel methodologist. RESULTS: When automated keratometry was used with a theoretical formula designed for eyes without previous laser vision correction, the mean prediction error (MPE) was universally positive (hyperopic), the mean absolute errors (MAEs) and median absolute errors (MedAEs) were relatively high (0.72-1.9 diopters [D] and 0.65-1.73 D, respectively), and a low (8%-40%) proportion of eyes were within 0.5 D of target spherical equivalent (SE). Formulas developed specifically for this population requiring both prerefractive surgery keratometry and manifest refraction (i.e., clinical history, corneal bypass, and Feiz-Mannis) produced a proportion of eyes within 0.5 D of target SE between 26% and 44%. Formulas requiring only preoperative keratometry or no history at all had lower MAEs (0.42-0.94 D) and MedAEs (0.30-0.81 D) and higher (30%-68%) proportions within 0.5 D of target SE. Strategies that averaged several methods yielded the lowest reported MedAEs (0.31-0.35 D) and highest (66%-68%) proportions within 0.5 D of target SE. Even after using the best-known methods, refractive outcomes were less accurate in eyes that had previous excimer laser surgery for myopia compared with those that did not have it. CONCLUSIONS: Calculation methods requiring both prerefractive surgery keratometry and manifest refraction are no longer considered the gold standard. Refractive outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes that had previous excimer laser surgery are less accurate than in eyes that did not. Patients should be advised of this refractive limitation when considering cataract surgery in the setting of previous corneal refractive surgery. Conclusions are limited by the small sample sizes and retrospective nature of nearly all existing literature in this domain.