National and International Comparisons of Gynecological Research in Germany Based on a Bibliometric Analysis of Publications.

Background: Recent years have seen a considerable shift from male doctors to female doctors in the field of gynecology. Female doctors are traditionally more involved with planning and maintaining their family. For gynecology, this could be associated with a risk that research activities will decrease, particularly if results are published in scientific journals. Methods: In view of this shift, a comparative observational study was carried for 2022 in which 1306 publications were matched to 1786 female and male doctors reported on the websites of the 44 locations of university gynecology departments in Germany. In addition, the volume of publications issued between 2014 and 2022 was compared for Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In Germany, the volume of publications in Gynecology was additionally compared with the publication outputs of the specialties Urology and Trauma Surgery. Results: Since 2014, the increase in the numbers of publications in the field of Gynecology in Germany was lower (225%) than that of the countries with which it was compared (238%/252%/260% for F/UK/USA). When Gynecology was compared with other medical specialties in Germany, the number of publications in Urology were found to have increased at a lower rate (196%) while the number of publications in the field of Trauma Surgery increased by more (286%) than that of Gynecology. At the start of 2023, the percentage of women who were working as doctors at the lowest hierarchical level (junior doctor) was 81%. The publication output per capita of female doctors working at lower levels in the medical hierarchy, i.e., working as junior doctors and senior physicians, was between 40% and 80% lower than that of male doctors working at the same level. However, female directors published as much as male directors did. In the lower hierarchy levels, men were up to 14% more likely to be without an academic title. Predictors for more extensive publication activities by young female and male doctors include the extent and quality of publications by doctors in senior positions, the presence of a comprehensive cancer center or an institute for human genetics at the location where the young doctors were working, and joint publications with foreign authors. Conclusion: For the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the results suggest a number of approaches to promote young researchers. The support provided to young female doctors is especially important as this should help to retain them as junior researchers over the long term.

Treatment in Certified Breast Cancer Centers Improves Chances of Survival of Patients with Breast Cancer: Evidence Based on Health Care Data from the WiZen Study.

Introduction: Certified breast cancer centers offer specific quality standards in terms of their structure, diagnostic and treatment approaches with regards to breast surgery, drug-based cancer therapy, radiotherapy, and psychosocial support. Such centers aim to improve treatment outcomes of breast cancer patients. The question investigated here was whether patients with primary breast cancer have a longer overall survival if they are treated in a certified breast cancer center compared to treatment outside these centers. Methods: We used patient-specific data (demographics, diagnoses, treatments) obtained from data held by mandatory health insurance companies ( gesetzliche Krankenversicherung , GKV) and clinical cancer registries (KKR) for the period 2009-2017 as well as hospital characteristics recorded in standardized quality reports. Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, we investigated differences in survival between patients treated in hospitals certified as breast cancers centers by the German Cancer Society (DKG) and patients treated in hospitals which had not been certified by the DKG. Results: The sample population consisted of 143720 (GKV data) and 59780 (KKR data) patients with breast cancer, who were treated in 1010 hospitals across Germany (280 DKG-certified, 730 not DKG-certified). 63.5% (GKV data) and 66.7% (KKR data) of patients, respectively, were treated in DKG-certified breast cancer centers. Cox regression analysis for overall survival which included patient and hospital characteristics found a significantly lower mortality risk for patients treated in DKG-certified breast cancer centers (GKV data: HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.74-0.81; KKR data: HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.85-0.92). This result remained stable even after several sensitivity analyses including stratified estimates for subgroups of patients and hospitals. The effect was even more pronounced for recurrence-free survival (KKR data: HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.74-0.82). Conclusions: Patients who are treated by an interdisciplinary team in a DKG-certified breast cancer had clear and statistically significantly better survival rates. Certification is therefore an effective means of improving the quality of care, and more patients should be treated in certified breast cancer centers.

Guideline concordant therapy improves survival in high-grade endometrial cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Data from randomized controlled trials in high-grade endometrial cancer are scarce due to its low prevalence. Therefore, guideline recommendations in this cancer subtype rely on relatively few randomized trials and data from retrospective studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits from guideline-concordant therapy in high-grade endometrial cancer in a real-world patient group. METHODS: The effect of treatment according to German S3 guidelines and the former S2k guideline on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated in a cohort of 293 high-grade endometrial cancer patients. RESULTS: Treatment concordant with the S3 guideline significantly improved OS (HR 0.623, CI 0.420-0.923, p = 0.018) and RFS (HR 0.578, CI 0.387-0.863, p = 0.007). Treatment concordant with the S2k guideline did not result in a significantly higher OS (HR 0.783, CI 0.465-1.316, p = 0.335) or RFS (HR 0.741, CI 0.347-1.740, p = 0.242). CONCLUSION: Therapy according to the German S3 guideline improved OS and RFS in univariate as well as multivariate analysis in this cohort of high-grade endometrial cancer patients.

Factors influencing treatment decision and guideline conformity in high-grade endometrial cancer patients: a population-based study.

PURPOSE: Treatment according to guidelines has been demonstrated to improve survival in a number of different cancer entities. Deviations from guidelines depend on several factors, including the patient's preferences, age and comorbidities. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence to guideline recommendations concerning surgical and adjuvant treatment in endometrial cancer. Furthermore, we sought to evaluate the reasons for non-adherence to guidelines by further examining the influence of comorbidities and age. METHODS: The influence of age, comorbidities, tumor stage and histological subtype on guideline adherence was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression in a cohort of 353 high-grade endometrial cancer patients. High-grade endometrial cancer was defined as carcinosarcoma, Type II (serous, clear cell, mixed cell carcinoma) and Type I G3 histology. RESULTS: Extensive surgical procedures, particularly systematic LNE, were less frequently applied in patients with comorbidities (p = 0.015) or higher age (p < 0.01). Guideline adherence was not affected by comorbidities (p = 0.563), but was significantly reduced with higher age (p < 0.01). In a multivariable model, higher age (p < 0.01), obesity (p = 0.011), higher FIGO Stage (p < 0.01) and histologic subtype (p < 0.01) significantly decreased OS. Surgery (p < 0.001), chemotherapy (p < 0.01) and systematic LNE (p = 0.011) were associated with higher OS. CONCLUSION: Age seems to be the strongest independent factor leading to guideline deviation. Comorbidities were associated with less aggressive treatment, but not with deviations from guidelines.

Comparison of survival outcomes and effects of therapy between subtypes of high-grade endometrial cancer - a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Similarities in outcome between grade 3 endometrioid cancer and non-endometrioid histologies have been reported by a number of studies. Other reports, however, stated a significantly better prognosis for G3 endometrioid compared to type II histology. In this population-based study, we compared the outcome and treatment approaches of high-grade endometrial cancer patients with FIGO stages I-III depending on their histology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 284 high-grade endometrial cancer patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and recurrence rates were compared depending on histology. RESULTS: Type I G3 patients had a statistically significant OS advantage over women suffering from type II carcinoma (HR 1.527, 95%-CI 1.024-2.276; p = 0.038) and carcinosarcoma (HR 2.106, 95%-CI 1.270-3.493; p = 0.004) in univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analysis. RFS in Type I G3 was significantly superior compared to patients with carcinosarcoma (HR 1.719, 95%-CI 1.018-2.901; p = 0.043) and not significantly superior to type II patients (HR 1.368, 95%-CI 0.920-2.036; p = 0.122). Cumulative recurrence rates were significantly higher in carcinosarcoma compared to type I G3 (HR 2.217, 95%-CI 1.096-4.485; p = 0.027) in univariable analysis, but not after risk adjustment (HR of 1.472, 95%-CI 0.654-3.311; p = 0.350). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of patients with type I G3 endometrial cancer patients seems to be significantly superior to patients with type II cancer and particularly carcinosarcoma. Systematic LND seemed to be beneficial in all of the three subtypes. The benefit of adjuvant treatment methods may differ between histologies.

Is there a benefit for adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in early cervical cancer? Results from a population-based study.

PURPOSE: Due to insufficient and conflicting prospective evidence, the recommendations on when to apply adjuvant radiochemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer vary between international guidelines. In this population-based study, we evaluated the outcome of patients with early-stage cervical cancer based on risk factors and the adjuvant therapy they received. METHODS: The effect of primary therapy (surgery and radiochemotherapy RCT, surgery and radiotherapy RT, and surgery alone) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated in the complete cohort of 442 patients and in subgroups according to risk profile and nodal status. RESULTS: In low-risk patients, there was no difference in OS (p = 0.276) depending on whether patients received adjuvant therapy or not. Concerning RFS, patients with RT (including one patient with RCT) exhibited a significantly worse outcome compared to the group with surgery alone (p = 0.015). In intermediate-risk patients, the administration of adjuvant RT significantly benefited RFS when compared to surgery only in multivariate analysis (p = 0.031). Concerning OS, no significant influence for adjuvant treatment could be seen (p = 0.354). Though trends towards better OS and RFS could be observed in patients of the high-risk group-both in RCT and RT groups compared to surgery alone-the effects did not prove to be significant. CONCLUSION: Our study reaffirms the evidence against the use of adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. In intermediate-, and less pronounced in high-risk patients, however, it seems to be beneficial. The role of adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy in early cervical cancer should be further investigated in prospective randomized trials.

Sentinel lymph node detection by means of indocyanine green using the Karl Storz VITOM® fluorescence camera: a comparison between primary sentinel lymph node biopsy versus sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The usage of radioactive Technetium99m (Tc99m) colloid for the purpose of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in early breast cancer is considered the gold standard in Germany. However, new tracers, such as near-infrared (NIR) imaging agents like indocyanine green (ICG) could offer an alternative in future, as they overcome drawbacks associated with radioactive Technetium99m (Tc99m) like limited availability, high costs and radioactivity exposure for both patients and surgeons. METHODS: In this double-arm retrospective study, we sought to establish the usefulness of indocyanine green as an alternative or an addition to the conventional Technetium99m (Tc99m) in the identification of the SLN in early breast cancer. RESULTS: Among the 161 patients who underwent primary SLNB, 34 patients had at least 1 SLN with metastasis. Among these patients with SLN metastasis, 33 had the SLN detected by ICG; while 31 had the SLN detected by Tc99m. The conventional Technetium99m radiotracer failed to detect 2 patients with metastasis in this Arm of the study. Among the 87 patients who underwent SLNB after NACT, 13 patients had at least 1 SLN with metastasis. Among these 13 patients with SLN metastasis, ICG and Tc99m had detected the SLN among 12 patients, while 1 patient had been detected by ICG alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that ICG is as effective as the radioisotope for SLNB even among patients who have undergone NACT. This trial is registered with the German Clinical Trial Register, ID: DRKS00013606.

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Testing prior to Treatment with 5-Fluorouracil, Capecitabine, and Tegafur: A Consensus Paper.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (FU) is one of the most commonly used cytostatic drugs in the systemic treatment of cancer. Treatment with FU may cause severe or life-threatening side effects and the treatment-related mortality rate is 0.2-1.0%. SUMMARY: Among other risk factors associated with increased toxicity, a genetic deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of FU, is well known. This is due to variants in the DPD gene (DPYD). Up to 9% of European patients carry a DPD gene variant that decreases enzyme activity, and DPD is completely lacking in approximately 0.5% of patients. Here we describe the clinical and genetic background and summarize recommendations for the genetic testing and tailoring of treatment with 5-FU derivatives. The statement was developed as a consensus statement organized by the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology in cooperation with 13 medical associations from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Key Messages: (i) Patients should be tested for the 4 most common genetic DPYD variants before treatment with drugs containing FU. (ii) Testing forms the basis for a differentiated, risk-adapted algorithm with recommendations for treatment with FU-containing drugs. (iii) Testing may optionally be supplemented by therapeutic drug monitoring.

Value of indocyanine green pelvic lymph node mapping in the surgical approach of cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis is a significant predictive factor for disease recurrence and survival in cervical cancer patients and relevant for therapeutic strategies. We evaluated the clinical value of indocyanine green (ICG) by measuring the sensitivity and negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node mapping compared with the gold standard of complete lymphadenectomy in detecting lymph node metastases for cervical cancer. METHODS: We utilized the near-infrared imaging agent ICG to detect tumor-infested lymph nodes in the pelvis analogue to a classical sentinel lymph node procedure by analyzing data from 20 patients who had undergone surgery for cervical cancer at our institution. A laparoscopic lymph node mapping procedure by means of ICG, followed by a complete pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without paraaortic lymphadenectomy was done in all patients. RESULTS: Histological examination identified seven patients with tumor-positive pelvic nodes, whereas mapping with ICG identified only five of these patients. Detection rate of positive nodes by ICG mapping and false negative rate was 71.4% and 28.6%, respectively; bilateral detection rate was 83.3%. One of the two false negative patients additionally suffered from deep infiltrating endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that ICG can identify the relevant pelvic nodes independent of tumor size, provided bilateral detection is achieved and additional, related diseases are excluded. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered within the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00014692).

Long-term outcome of patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer after pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: a comparison of laparoscopic vs. open procedure.

OBJECTIVE: The primary therapy for intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer includes pelvic and paraaortic lymph node evaluation. Laparoscopic surgery is an increasingly popular intervention due to decreased risk and better short-term morbidity; however, a recent study casts doubt on the benefit of this approach in terms of oncological safety. In this cancer registry study, we sought to evaluate the benefit of laparoscopy versus laparotomy and retrospectively compared overall survival, recurrence rates, and recurrence-free survival among patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent either laparoscopic or open surgery. METHODS: This observational study included 419 patients who have been treated from 2011 to 2017. We employed Kaplan-Meier method, and univariable and multivariable Cox-regression to compare overall survival, recurrence rates, and recurrence-free survival in 110 patients, who underwent laparoscopic, with 309 patients, who underwent open surgery. To address the confounding bias in this retrospective study, we also performed a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis including 357 patients (laparoscopy: n = 107; open surgery: n = 250). RESULTS: We found a benefit for laparoscopic over open surgery in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer for overall survival in both univariable (p = 0.002; PSM: p = 0.016) and multivariable analyses (p = 0.019; PSM: p = 0.007). In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference between both patient groups regarding the cumulative recurrence rates. A univariable analysis identified a significant benefit for laparoscopy regarding recurrence-free survival (p = 0.003; PSM: p = 0.029) but a multivariable analysis failed to confirm this finding (p = 0.108; PSM: p = 0.118). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence that laparoscopic systematic lymphadenectomy does not present a lower oncological efficacy than open surgery in the treatment of patients with endometrial cancer.

Impact of nodal status and treatment strategy on overall survival in advanced stage cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: The lack of prognostic data impedes implementation of optimal therapy for cervical cancer. For instance, recommended therapy for FIGO IIB cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy or radiochemotherapy. To enlighten different therapeutic approaches, we investigated the benefit of individual therapies or combination thereof in patients with or without infested lymph nodes. METHODS: The German Tumor Centre Regensburg registered 389 patients with FIGO IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA cervical cancer between 2002 and 2015. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival against different therapies using univariable and multivariable cox regression. After risk adjustment with respect to clinicopathological parameters, we performed model selection using conditional stepwise reverse selection. RESULTS: We demonstrated the need for thorough assessment of the nodal status to obtain reliable data for treatment strategy. Our analysis showed significant differences for overall survival in FIGO IIB depending on therapy and nodal status. Outcome was inferior with radiochemotherapy without surgery for patients with N0 compared to surgery and radiochemotherapy combined (HR 3.012; 95% CI 1.075-8.441; p = 0.036); however, for N1, radiochemotherapy without surgery resulted in comparable outcome (HR 0.808; 95% CI 0.189-3.403; p = 0.765), whereas surgery alone yielded in poor outcome (HR 2.889; 95% CI 1.356-6.156; p = 0.006). Regardless of the nodal status, chemotherapy was superior in advanced stage cervical cancer FIGO III to IVA. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that in terms of oncological outcome FIGO IIB cervical cancer patients benefit from a combination of surgery and radiochemotherapy. However, in the presence of lymph node infestation, surgery does not add substantial benefit to the patient.

Quality of life and oncological outcome in endometrial cancer patients after vaginal brachytherapy: comparison of two dosing schemes.

PURPOSE: Vaginal brachytherapy reduces the risk of local recurrence and was shown to be equieffective in preventing vaginal vault recurrence, but less toxic compared to external-beam radiotherapy in a subset of high intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients and is administered as single adjuvant treatment in those patients. Different radiotherapeutic approaches with various dosing schemes exist toward brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome and long-term quality of life after brachytherapy with two different high-dose-rate dosing schemes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted of the recurrence and survival rates of 104 patients with endometrial cancer FIGO stage I-II that underwent adjuvant brachytherapy with three times 5 Gy or four times 5 Gy to the upper two-thirds of the vaginal vault in two different institutions between January 2010 and December 2013. Quality of life was assessed by EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire and EN 24 module. RESULTS: The vaginal vault recurrence rates were 4.9% and 5.0% for patients treated with 3 × 5 Gy and 4 × 5 Gy, respectively (p = 0.98). We did not observe a difference in pelvic recurrence (p = 0.96), overall survival (p = 0.33) or quality of life between the different radiotherapy regimens. Metastatic recurrence and the use of chemotherapy contribute to impairment on quality of life. Younger patients (< 70 years) reported worse emotional functioning (p = 0.02) and higher symptom scales of diarrhea (p = 0.01) and financial problems (p = 0.03). Sexual activity was lower in patients younger than 70 years (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effect of dosing schemes on recurrence rates and quality of life. Younger patients (< 70 years) seem to experience greater reduction in quality of life due to endometrial cancer diagnosis.

Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) - Part 2 with Recommendations for the Therapy of Primary, Recurrent and Advanced Breast Cancer.

Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Method The process of updating the S3 guideline published in 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines. They were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and with the results of a systematic search of literature databases followed by the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point and used them to develop suggestions for recommendations and statements, which were then modified and graded in a structured consensus process procedure. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the therapy of primary, recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Loco-regional therapies are de-escalated in the current guideline. In addition to reducing the safety margins for surgical procedures, the guideline also recommends reducing the radicality of axillary surgery. The choice and extent of systemic therapy depends on the respective tumor biology. New substances are becoming available, particularly to treat metastatic breast cancer.

Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) - Part 1 with Recommendations for the Screening, Diagnosis and Therapy of Breast Cancer.

Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Methods The process of updating the S3 guideline dating from 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines which were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and the results of a systematic search of literature databases and the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point to develop recommendations and statements which were modified and graded in a structured consensus procedure. Recommendations Part 1 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the screening, diagnosis and follow-up care of breast cancer. The importance of mammography for screening is confirmed in this updated version of the guideline and forms the basis for all screening. In addition to the conventional methods used to diagnose breast cancer, computed tomography (CT) is recommended for staging in women with a higher risk of recurrence. The follow-up concept includes suggested intervals between physical, ultrasound and mammography examinations, additional high-tech diagnostic procedures, and the determination of tumor markers for the evaluation of metastatic disease.

Is there a benefit of lymphadenectomy for overall and recurrence-free survival in type I FIGO IB G1-2 endometrial carcinoma? A retrospective population-based cohort analysis.

PURPOSE: The recommended therapy for type I FIGO IB endometrial cancer (EC) is hysterectomy and adnexectomy, but the therapeutic benefits of additional pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection (LND) are still under discussion. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated overall survival (OAS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) among patients with type I FIGO IB EC who did undergo systematic or elective lymphadenectomy or none at all. METHODS: We selected 299 individuals from the database of the German Tumor Centre Regensburg who were diagnosed between 1998 and 2015 with endometrial adenocarcinoma of the uterus type I FIGO IB. We applied multivariable Cox regression to the selected patient data and estimated hazard ratios for OAS and RFS against the performed intervention. Further, we carried out risk adjustments with respect to clinicopathological parameters, and performed model selection using conditional stepwise forward selection. RESULTS: We observed significant benefits of LND in the unadjusted survival analysis; however, we did not confirm this effect in multivariable regression analysis upon risk adjustment. In this case, hazard ratio (HR) for OAS in patients without LND versus patients with LND is reduced to 1.214 (95% CI 0.771-1.911; p = 0.402), HR for RFS is 1.059 (95% CI 0.689-1.626; p = 0.795). Similarly, we were also able to eliminate the statistical benefit of systematic versus elective LND by risk adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous observations in high-grade EC, our study provides compelling evidence that LND, in particular systematic lymphadenectomy, is not beneficial for patients with type I FIGO IB EC in terms of long-term OAS and RFS.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients by Means of Indocyanine Green Using the Karl Storz VITOM® Fluorescence Camera.

Currently, the use of radioisotope and blue dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for axillary staging in breast cancer is common. Recently, indocyanine green (ICG) has been proposed as an alternative sentinel lymph node (SLN) tracking agent. We evaluated the clinical value of ICG as an additional tracer in combination with Technetium99m and as an alternative to Technetium99m for the identification of SLN in 104 breast cancer patients. 21 patients had at least 1 histologically tumor-positive SLN. All 21 patients were detected by ICG; in one of these 21 sentinel-positive patients, Technetium99m was unable to identify lymph node involvement. Our results show that ICG is as effective as the radioisotope for SLNB. In addition, as a near-infrared dye, it has the advantages of real-time visualization, lower cost, and wider availability, since no radioactive material needs to be handled. This trial is registered with German Clinical Trial Register Main ID: DRKS00013606.

The Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. The German S3 guideline of 2012 has now been updated to take account of advances in the early detection, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and follow-up care of this disease. METHODS: The updating process was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines and on reviews of the scientific evidence. A systematic search in multiple literature databases was carried out, and the full texts of the selected articles were evaluated. Suggested recommendations were then proposed by interdisciplinary working groups and modified and graded in a nominal consensus procedure. RESULTS: The value of mammographic screening is confirmed in the updated guideline. As for the diagnostic evaluation of breast cancer, computed tomography is recommended for staging in patients with a high risk of recurrence, in addition to conventional methods. As for surgical treatment, the evidence supporting locoregional surgery for primary breast cancer now affords an opportunity for de-escalation: complete resection yields the best outcome, but a safety margin of several millimeters is not necessary. Axillary dissection is no longer recommended except in certain defined situations. Radiotherapeutic approaches consist of hypofractionated applications. Adjuvant systemic therapy is indicated for patients in certain high-risk situations defined by a constellation of factors including tumor grade, patient age, node status, Ki-67 antigen expression, hormone receptor status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. All patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer should receive endocrine therapy. The indication for chemotherapy and/or anti-HER2 therapy should be determined in consideration of the expected benefit and side effects. CONCLUSION: Consistent implementation of the recommendations in the newly updated guideline can help lessen morbidity and mortality from breast cancer. The actual extent to which breast cancer guidelines are implemented should be a topic of future research.

Does post-operative radiochemotherapy improve survival in high-grade endometrial cancer patients? Results of a population-based cohort analysis of a cancer registry.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant treatment of high-grade endometrial cancer varies greatly due to the lack of definitive results from controlled randomized trials on the subject. In a retrospective study, we sought to investigate the influence of post-operative radio-, chemo, and radiochemotherapy on survival time and recurrence rates among high-grade endometrial cancer patients. METHODS: 284 high-grade endometrial cancer patients (FIGOI-III, or unknown classification) diagnosed between 1998 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent surgery. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and recurrence rates were compared for post-operative treatment modalities of radiotherapy alone (RT), chemotherapy alone (CTX), radiochemotherapy (RCT), and observation (OBS). RESULTS: Post-operative RCT and RT resulted in a significantly improved 5-year OS of 94.1% (HR 0.104, CI 0.013-0.809) and 62.1% (HR 0.615, CI 0.390-0.969), respectively, compared to 43.6% for OBS. CTX did not significantly improve OS leading to a 5-year OS of 56.5% (HR 0.783, CI 0.224-2.740). 5-year recurrence rate was lowest for patients treated with RCT (5.3%). 5-year RFS was 94.1% for the RCT group and proved to be significantly superior to 58.8% for RT (HR 9.034, CI 1.184-68.948), 56% for CTX (HR 12.738, CI 1.337-121.346), and 37.4% for OBS (HR 16.407, CI 2.127-126.575), respectively. In comparison with OBS, RT alone resulted in a significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.551, CI 0.354-0.856). CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective population-based study indicates a survival benefit from treating high-grade endometrial cancer with post-operative RCT. Randomized controlled trials are needed to minimize potential confounding parameters and further clarify the subject.

Shifting cancer care towards Multidisciplinarity: the cancer center certification program of the German cancer society.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decades numerous initiatives have been set up that aim at translating the best available medical knowledge and treatment into clinical practice. The inherent complexity of the programs and discrepancies in the terminology used make it difficult to appreciate each of them distinctly and compare their specific strengths and weaknesses. To allow comparison and stimulate dialogue between different programs, we in this paper provide an overview of the German Cancer Society certification program for multidisciplinary cancer centers that was established in 2003. MAIN BODY: In the early 2000s the German Cancer Society assessed the available information on quality of cancer care in Germany and concluded that there was a definite need for a comprehensive, transparent and evidence-based system of quality assessment and control. This prompted the development and implementation of a voluntary cancer center certification program that was promoted by scientific societies, health-care providers, and patient advocacy groups and based on guidelines of the highest quality level (S3). The certification system structures the entire process of care from prevention to screening and multidisciplinary treatment of cancer and places multidisciplinary teams at the heart of this program. Within each network of providers, the quality of care is documented using tumor-specific quality indicators. The system started with breast cancer centers in 2003 and colorectal cancer centers in 2006. In 2017, certification systems are established for the majority of cancers. Here we describe the rationale behind the certification program, its history, the development of the certification requirements, the process of data collection, and the certification process as an example for the successful implementation of a voluntary but powerful system to ensure and improve quality of cancer care. CONCLUSION: Since 2003, over 1 million patients had their primary tumors treated in a certified center. There are now over 1200 sites for different tumor entities in four countries that have been certified in accordance with the program and transparently report their results from multidisciplinary treatment for a substantial proportion of cancers. This led to a fundamental change in the structure of cancer care in Germany and neighboring countries within one decade.