Establishment of standards for the referral of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: an international expert consensus using a modified Delphi process.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Resection of colorectal polyps has been shown to decrease the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. Large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps are often referred to expert centers for endoscopic resection, which requires relevant information to be conveyed to the therapeutic endoscopist to allow for triage and planning of resection technique. The primary objective of this study was to establish minimum expected standards for the referral of large nonpedunculated colonic polyps for potential endoscopic resection. METHODS: A Delphi method was used to establish consensus on minimum expected standards for the referral of large colorectal polyps among a panel of international endoscopy experts. The expert panel was recruited through purposive sampling, and 3 rounds of surveys were conducted to achieve consensus. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed for each round. RESULTS: A total of 24 international experts from diverse continents participated in the Delphi study, resulting in consensus on 19 statements related to the referral of large colorectal polyps. The identified factors, including patient demographic characteristics, relevant medications, lesion factors, photodocumentation, and the presence of a tattoo, were deemed important for conveying the necessary information to therapeutic endoscopists. The mean scores for the statements, which were scored on a scale of 1 to 10, ranged from 7.04 to 9.29, with high percentages of experts considering most statements as a very high priority. Subgroup analysis according to continent revealed some variations in consensus rates among experts from different regions. CONCLUSIONS: The identified consensus statements can aid in improving the triage and planning of resection techniques for large colorectal polyps, ultimately contributing to the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.

Artificial intelligence improves adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy (AIAC) has gained attention as a tool to assist with polyp detection during colonoscopy. Uncertainty remains as to the clinical benefit, given limited publications using different modules. METHOD: A single-centre retrospective study was performed at Waitemata Endoscopy, a private endoscopy centre in Auckland, New Zealand. An Olympus Endo-AID module was utilised for the first time by 13 experienced endoscopists. Outcomes from AIAC between 10 March 2021 to 23 April 2021 were compared to a subsequent non-AI conventional colonoscopy (CC) control group from 27/4/21 to 20/6/21. RESULTS: A total of 213 AIACs were compared with 213 CCs. Baseline patient age, gender, indication for procedure, bowel preparation scores and specialty of proceduralist (gastroenterologist or surgeon) were well matched (p>0.05). The withdrawal time was significantly longer in the AIAC group compared to CC controls (15 vs 13 minutes; p<0.001). The adenoma detection rate (ADR) was significantly higher in the AIAC group compared to CC group (47.9% vs 38.5%; odds ratio 1.59; 95% CI [1.05-2.41]; p=0.03). The overall polyp detection rate (PDR) was similar between groups (70% vs 70%; p=0.79). Analysis by polyp size, location and other histology was not significant between groups. CONCLUSION: AI-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved ADR compared with conventional colonoscopy. Further research is required to understand its utility and impact on long-term clinical outcomes.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection: the first reported experience from a New Zealand centre.

AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is internationally accepted as a minimally invasive procedure to treat early gastrointestinal cancers endoscopically. Uptake of this procedure in the West is limited. No published data are available in New Zealand. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of this procedure at North Shore Hospital, Auckland. METHODS: Following an overseas fellowship training period, we prospectively collected clinical outcomes, complications and defined quality indicators for patients undergoing ESD referred following a multidisciplinary meeting. RESULTS: Between January 2020 until July 2021, 29 ESD procedures were performed in 27 patients, including 14 gastric, five oesophageal and 10 colorectal cases. The mean age was 72 (standard deviation (SD) 10.6). The majority of cases (62%) were done under general anaesthesia. The median lesion size resected was 30mm (interquartile range (IQR) 20-58mm). The pre-endoscopic diagnosis was accurate as confirmed on final histology in 93% of cases. Thirty-four percent of lesions were T1 adenocarcinoma and completely resected. The median total duration of the procedure was 90 minutes (IQR 55-180). 86% of lesions were resected en-bloc. R0 resection was achieved in 72% of cases. All cases with R0 resection were curative except one. Muscular defects without perforation were seen and clipped at the time of endoscopy in 34% of cases. Two perforations were identified and sealed at the time of endoscopy. There were no cases of delayed bleeding, perforation or mortality. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate clinical success, efficacy and safety of ESD at our centre. A larger study, comparison with other centres and longer clinical follow-up is required to confirm findings and further improve outcomes.

Outcomes of patients with delayed surveillance colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance colonoscopy has been shown to be an effective tool for prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) in high-risk populations, if adhered to. AIM: To discover the sequelae of late surveillance in a cohort of patient's overdue for colonoscopy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on all patients from the Bay of Plenty District Health Board region, New Zealand, placed on the colonoscopy surveillance waitlist from 2006 onwards who had their procedure completed between 1 November 2016 and 31 January 2018. Patients with overdue surveillance, defined as done later than 90 days after the recommended due date, were compared with patients who were done either early or on time. RESULTS: A total of 786 patients was recorded as overdue for surveillance colonoscopy and 386 were completed early or on time. The median time overdue was 22 months. Three (0.4%) cases of CRC were found in overdue patients compared with four (1%) cases for those done on time (adjusted P = 0.24). There were 86 (11%) advanced adenomas (AA) in patients overdue compared with 27 (7%) in those not overdue (odds ratio (OR) 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-2.5; P = 0.04). Surveillance of 180 high-risk post-polypectomy patients identified 2 CRC and 8/43 AA in those overdue compared with no CRC and 9/137 AA (18.6% vs 6.6%; OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.07-2.0; unadjusted P = 0.03) in those done on time. CONCLUSION: While overdue surveillance is not predictive of increased CRC, it is associated with an increase in expected number of AA, particularly in patients having surveillance for previous high-risk polypectomy.

Quality of life after oesophageal stenting in patients with palliative oesophageal cancer.

AIM: Patients with incurable oesophageal cancer have poor outcomes, with disabling symptoms and a poor quality of life (QOL), which may be improved by oesophageal stenting. We aimed to measure change in symptoms related specifically to oesophageal cancer and overall QOL before and 30 days after stent insertion, to measure adverse effects and to define any patient factors that may be significant in predicting patients who may benefit most. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients in an observational study at Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand, and administered validated QOL- and symptomatology-based questionnaires before and 30 days after stent insertion. Additional patient-related demographics, procedural characteristics, adverse events and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Between 31 March 2014 and 3 July 2020, 57 patients were initially recruited. Four patients withdrew from the study, and 13 patients died before 30 days. Forty patients (29 males; mean±SD age, 72±12 years) completed the study. A significant improvement was noted at one-month post stent insertion in the overall global QOL score (mean 35 to 46, p=0.01). The most significant score improvements were seen in dysphagia, trouble eating, trouble swallowing saliva and dry mouth (p<0.001). Physical, emotional, cognitive and social functioning did not change. Post-procedural adverse events occurred in 17 patients (43%). A poorer initial level of functioning was associated with reduced improvement in global QOL (p≤0.04). Patients followed-up died a mean of 2.8 months after insertion. CONCLUSION: In patients surviving longer than 30 days, there is significant improvement of overall QOL and dysphagia one-month post oesophageal stent insertion for malignant, palliative dysphagia. Multiple psychosocial facets were unchanged with this intervention. Stent-related adverse events were common.

Increasing burden of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in New Zealand-the need for better surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Regular surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection and hepatitis C (HCV) cirrhosis improves survival by earlier detection of the cancer at an earlier stage when curative intervention may still be possible. We compared patient characteristics, surveillance history and outcomes in patients presenting with advanced HCC secondary to HBV and HCV. METHOD: In this retrospective study, clinical databases and notes were reviewed in all cases of advanced HCC related to HBV or HCV referred to the tertiary HCC service in Auckland, New Zealand between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2017. RESULTS: Over the 15-year period, 368 patients were referred with advanced HCC secondary to HBV (HBV-HCC) and 278 secondary to HCV (HCV-HCC), representing over 50% of all cases of HCC cases secondary to viral hepatitis. Of these 646 patients with advanced HCC, 75% of patients were not receiving guideline-recommended surveillance. More patients with advanced HBV-HCC were diagnosed with HCC prior to the diagnosis of HBV, compared to patients with advanced HCV-HCC (40% vs 28%, p<0.01). Fewer patients with previously diagnosed HBV infection were undergoing HCC surveillance than patients with previously diagnosed HCV infection (26% vs 42%, p<0.01). Late diagnosed patients had the worst outcomes, with 88% receiving palliative care and surviving on average only seven months (HBV five months vs HCV eight months, p=0.05). CONCLUSION: Survival in New Zealanders with hepatocellular carcinoma remains poor because the cancer is incurable in most patients at the time of detection. Because most cases are secondary to chronic hepatitis B and C infections, improved screening and linkage to antiviral therapy and HCC surveillance should improve outcomes.

Surveillance factors change outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma due to chronic hepatitis C virus infection in New Zealand.

Although surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with 6 monthly imaging is recommended for patients with cirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, international studies report poor adherence and there is paucity of data on its effect on patient outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to review cases of HCC secondary to HCV to determine the impact of adherence with HCC surveillance on survival. A total of 520 patients with confirmed HCC secondary to chronic HCV from 31 January 2001 to 31 May 2018 were identified from a prospective national HCC database. Computerized clinical records, general practitioner referral letters and secondary care clinic letters were subsequently retrospectively analysed for methods of HCC detection. HCC was detected through routine surveillance in only 224 patients (44%). HCC was detected either incidentally or following the onset of symptoms in nonadherent (12%), suboptimal surveyed (3%), undiagnosed cirrhotic (12%) or recently diagnosed HCV patients (21%) or were never offered surveillance (2%). Routine surveillance improved overall survival, OR 0.41 (95% CI [0.32, 0.53], P < .0001), with an overall mean survival of 91.5 months (95% CI 76.4, 106.6) compared to 43.0 (95% CI 34.2, 51.9) for those patients not receiving regular surveillance Outcome following diagnosis of HCC secondary to chronic HCV is determined by early detection when curative intervention is possible. Lack of diagnosis of HCV and nonadherence to HCC surveillance results in late diagnosis and poor outcomes. Under-diagnosis of HCV infection and lack of diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients known to have HCV infection reduce the benefit of current HCC surveillance strategies.

Video or verbal? A randomised trial of the informed consent process prior to endoscopy.

AIM: Informed consent (IC) prior to endoscopy is often inconsistently and poorly performed. We compared use of video-assisted consent to standard verbal consent for enhancing patients' recollection of procedural risks, understanding and fulfilment of expectation. METHOD: Two hundred patients attending for gastroscopy or colonoscopy were randomised to either video-assisted consent (n=100) or verbal consent (n=100). The primary outcomes measured via a questionnaire were the recollection of procedural risks (sum of all correct answers for risk recall items) and patient experience compared to information provided in the consent process. Secondary outcomes included reported patient understanding and staff satisfaction between groups. RESULTS: There was no difference between video or verbal groups in terms of risk recall scores (p=0.46), with less than half the patients able to recall more than two risks. There was a signal towards improved recall of bleeding as a potential risk in the video as compared to the verbal arm but it did not reach statistical significance (p=0.059). Patients' perceived understanding and fulfilment of expectation was high (>96%) in both groups. Seventy-one percent of the staff preferred using the video over the verbal IC. CONCLUSION: Video-assisted consent made no significant difference to the IC process in terms of patient recollection or experience compared to usual verbal IC. Despite very poor recollection of procedural risks, patients in both the video and verbal groups reported understanding of the procedure and satisfaction with the IC process. Reasons for this mismatch are unclear. Further action to prioritise information delivery during IC is required. Future studies in this field should include patient-centred outcomes as a measure of success.

Chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for detection of nonpolypoid dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

AIM: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Studies show that chromoendoscopy (CE) can increase the detection of dysplasia at surveillance colonoscopy, compared to standard white light endoscopy (WLE). We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare standard WLE to CE with targeted biopsies in detecting nonpolypoid dysplasia in IBD patients undergoing surveillance colonoscopy at a single tertiary centre. METHOD: Data was collected on 110 consecutive patients with IBD who underwent surveillance colonoscopy from 1 August 2015 to 31 July 2017 at Counties Manukau District Health Board, Auckland. Patients had either WLE or CE. Patient characteristics, endoscopic and histologic descriptions were reviewed. Rates of dysplasia detection by the different endoscopic techniques were compared using an exact Poisson test. RESULTS: 76/110 (69%) had WLE (mean age 56y; median disease duration 18y) and 34/110 (31%) had CE (median age 59y; median disease duration 19y). Nonpolypoid dysplasia was detected in 0/76 (0%) patients who had WLE. Seven nonpolypoid dysplastic lesions were detected in 4/34 (11.8%) patients who had CE. Dysplasia pick up rate was significantly higher in the CE group with a risk difference of 11.8%, 95% confidence interval (0.93, 22.59), p=0.008. Dysplasia detection rate per patient was also significantly higher in the CE group with a rate difference of 20.6 lesions per 100 patients, 95% confidence interval (5.3, 35.8), p=0.0003. As expected, there was no difference between the number of polypoid dysplastic lesions found between the two groups (p=0.12). CONCLUSION: In our cohort of IBD patients undergoing surveillance colonoscopy, CE with targeted biopsy is associated with a significantly increased nonpolypoid dysplasia detection rate when compared to WLE. These results are comparable to studies performed in the rest of the world.