Evaluation of combined Gd-EOB-DTPA and gadobutrol magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma grading.

BACKGROUND: Tumor biopsy is not essential for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, grading remains important for the prognosis. PURPOSE: To investigate whether combined Gd-EOB-DTPA and gadobutrol liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict HCC grading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty patients (66.6 ± 7.3 years) with histologically confirmed HCC (grade 1, n = 5; grade 1-2, n = 6; grade 2, n = 13; grade 2-3, n = 2; grade 3, n = 4) underwent two liver MRIs, one with gadobutrol and one with Gd-EOB-DTPA, on consecutive days. Blinded to grading, two radiologists reviewed the gadobutrol and Gd-EOB-DTPA images in consensus with respect to: (i) HCC hyper-/iso-/hypointensity in the arterial, portal-venous/delayed, and Gd-EOB-DTPA hepatocellular phase; and (ii) morphologic tumor features (encapsulated growth, vessel invasion, heterogeneity, liver capsule infiltration, satellite metastases). RESULTS: A significant correlation with grading was not found for either the combined dynamic information of all gadobutrol phases (r = -0.187, P = 0.331) or all the Gd-EOB-DTPA phases (r = 0.052, P = 0.802). No correlation with grading was found for a combination of arterial and hepatocellular phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI (r = 0.209, P = 0.305), a combination of both arterial phases (gadobutrol and Gd-EOB-DTPA) with the Gd-EOB-DTPA hepatocellular phase (r = 0.240, P = 0.248), or a combination of all available gadobutrol and Gd-EOB-DTPA phases (r = 0.086, P = 0.691). For all gadobutrol information (dynamic phases and morphology; r = 0.049, P = 0.801) and for all Gd-EOB-DTPA information (r = 0.040, P = 0.845), no correlation with grading was found. Hepatocellular Gd-EOB-DTPA phase iso-/hyperintensity never occurred in grade 3 HCCs. CONCLUSION: Histological HCC grading cannot be predicted by combined Gd-EOB-DTPA/gadobutrol MRI. However, Gd-EOB-DTPA hepatocellular phase iso-/hyperintensity was never detected in grade 3 HCCs.

Therapy response assessment after radioembolization of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma--comparison of MR imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid and gadobutrol.

PURPOSE: To compare the utility of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA), a liver-specific magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agent, versus gadobutrol for treatment response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radioembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 50 patients with HCC undergoing radioembolization. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and MR imaging with gadobutrol and Gd-EOB-DTPA on 2 consecutive days before radioembolization and 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, and 270 days after radioembolization. The standard of reference indicating tumor progression was CT combined with either α-fetoprotein or γ-glutamyltransferase. Gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging without late phase imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-), and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging with late phase imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA+) were evaluated by 2 radiologists in consensus using a 4-point scale: 1 = definitely no tumor progression; 2 = probably no tumor progression; 3 = probably tumor progression; 4 = definitely tumor progression. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Tumor progression was detected in 14 of 82 study visits according to the reference standard. Pairwise comparison of the area under the curve showed a tendency toward a larger area under the curve for Gd-EOB-DTPA+ compared with gadobutrol (P = .056). Sensitivity and specificity were higher in Gd-EOB-DTPA+ (0.929 and 0.971) than in Gd-EOB-DTPA- (0.786 and 0.941) or gadobutrol (0.643 and 0.956). In 2 cases, tumor progression was detected by Gd-EOB-DTPA+ and by an increase in α-fetoprotein, but not by CT, gadobutrol, or Gd-EOB-DTPA-. CONCLUSIONS: Gd-EOB-DTPA+ MR imaging was not inferior to gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging in therapy response evaluation after radioembolization and may allow a more accurate detection of early HCC recurrence in single cases.

A single-center experience in radioembolization as salvage therapy of hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Overall survival (OS) of patients with hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma is strongly linked with hepatic tumor control. Due to the lack of an effective systemic chemotherapy, locoregional therapies like radioembolization should play an increasingly important role. PURPOSE: To report complications and response rates of radioembolization as salvage therapy for hepatic uveal melanoma metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 2006 and January 2014, eight patients (age, 59.1 ± 15.3 years; 5 men) with histologically proven uveal melanoma and hepatic metastases received radioembolization with glass microspheres at a single center. All patients had been heavily pretreated with multiple systemic/locoregional therapies resulting in a long median interval between diagnosis of hepatic metastases and radioembolization (17.1 months; range, 6.4-23.2 months). Follow-up consisted of clinical assessment, laboratory tests and tri-phasic computed tomography (CT) before and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after radioembolization. Response to therapy was evaluated by CT using RECIST version 1.1 and by survival time. Safety (laboratory and clinical toxicity) was rated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.03. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis time to progression of hepatic metastases (hTTP) and OS were calculated. RESULTS: One month after radioembolization 50% of patients presented with stable and 50% with progressive disease. Median hTTP and OS after radioembolization were 4.3 weeks (range, 3.4-28.6 weeks) and 12.3 weeks (range, 3.7-62.6 weeks), respectively. Median OS after diagnosis of hepatic metastases was 19.9 months (range, 7.3-31.4 months). Radioembolization was tolerated well in all patients without toxicity higher than grade 2. CONCLUSION: Radioembolization is a safe salvage therapy even in heavily pretreated hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma.

Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging in the assessment of cardiac masses: a pilot study.

UNLABELLED: The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging could improve the diagnostic workup in patients with cardiac masses. METHODS: Twenty patients were prospectively assessed using integrated cardiac (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging: 16 patients with cardiac masses of unknown identity and 4 patients with cardiac sarcoma after surgical therapy. All scans were obtained on an integrated 3-T PET/MR device. The MR protocol consisted of half Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence, cine, and T2-weighted images as well as T1-weighted images before and after injection of gadobutrol. PET data were acquired simultaneously with the MR scan after injection of 199 ± 58 MBq of (18)F-FDG. Patients were prepared with a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet in a period of 24 h before the examination, and 50 IU/kg of unfractionated heparin were administered intravenously 15 min before (18)F-FDG injection. RESULTS: Cardiac masses were diagnosed as follows: metastases, 3; direct tumor infiltration via pulmonary vein, 1; local relapse of primary sarcoma after surgery, 2; Burkitt lymphoma, 1; scar/patch tissue after surgery of primary sarcoma, 2; myxoma, 4; fibroelastoma, 1; caseous calcification of mitral annulus, 3; and thrombus, 3. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in malignant lesions was significantly higher than in nonmalignant cases (13.2 ± 6.2 vs. 2.3 ± 1.2, P = 0.0004). When a threshold of 5.2 or greater was used, SUVmax was found to yield 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity for the differentiation between malignant and nonmalignant cases. T2-weighted hyperintensity and contrast enhancement both yielded 100% sensitivity but a weak specificity of 54% and 46%, respectively. Morphologic tumor features as assessed by cine MR imaging yielded 86% sensitivity and 92% specificity. Consent interpretation using all available MR features yielded 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity. A Boolean 'AND' combination of an SUVmax of 5.2 or greater with consent MR image interpretation improved sensitivity and specificity to 100%. CONCLUSION: In selected patients, (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging can improve the noninvasive diagnosis and follow-up of cardiac masses.

Does diffusion-weighted imaging improve therapy response evaluation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after radioembolization? comparison of MRI using Gd-EOB-DTPA with and without DWI.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether additional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) improves therapy response evaluation by Gd-EOB magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radioembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with radioembolization for HCC underwent gadobutrol and Gd-EOB MRI with DWI prior to and 30, 90, and 180 days after radioembolization. A combination of gadobutrol MRI, alpha-fetoprotein, and imaging follow-up served as the reference standard. Two radiologists reviewed Gd-EOB alone (Gd-EOB), DWI alone (DWI), and the combination of both (Gd-EOB+DWI) separately and in consensus using a 4-point-scale: 1 = definitely no tumor progression (TP), 2 = probably no TP, 3 = probably TP, 4 = definitely TP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and kappa analysis were performed. RESULTS: Kappa values for Gd-EOB, DWI, and Gd-EOB+DWI ranged between 0.712 and 0.892 (P < 0.001). 30 days after radioembolization three out of 38 patients showed TP, which was missed by DWI in one case. No significant area under the curve (AUC) difference between Gd-EOB (1.0, P = 0.004), DWI (0.881, P = 0.030), and Gd-EOB+DWI (1.0, P = 0.004) was found (P = 0.320). 90 days after radioembolization six out of 28 patients showed TP, which was detected in one patient only by DWI and Gd-EOB+DWI. The AUC did not differ significantly (P = 0.319) between Gd-EOB (0.890, P = 0.004), DWI (1.0, P < 0.001), and Gd-EOB+DWI (1.0, P < 0.001). 180 days after radioembolization five patients showed TP, which in one case was missed by DWI. The AUC did not differ significantly (P1 = 0.322, P2 = 0.369, P3 = 0.350) between Gd-EOB (1.0, P = 0.003), DWI (0.913, P = 0.016), and Gd-EOB+DWI (0.963, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Additional DWI does not substantially improve therapy response evaluation by Gd-EOB MRI in HCC after radioembolization but proved helpful in single cases.

Selective internal radiation therapy of hepatic tumors: procedural implications of a patent hepatic falciform artery.

Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using 90-yttrium is a local therapy for unresectable liver malignancies. Non-targeted 90-yttrium diversion via a patent hepatic falciform artery (HFA) is seen as risk for periprocedural complications. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of a patent HFA on SIRT. 606 patients with SIRT between 2006 and 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. SIRT preparation was performed by digital subtraction angiography including (99m)Tc-HSAM administration and subsequent SPECT/CT. Patients with an angiographically patent HFA were analyzed for procedural consequences and complications. 19 of 606 patients (3%) with an angiographically patent HFA were identified. Only 11 of these 19 patients received 90-yttrium in the hepatic vessel bed containing the HFA. Initial coil embolization of the HFA succeeded only in three of 11 patients. Out of the eight remaining patients four had no abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation. The other four patients presented with an abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation, for those a reattempt of HFA embolization was performed or ice packs were administered on the abdominal wall during SIRT. In summary, all patients tolerated SIRT well. A patent HFA should not be considered a SIRT contraindication. In patients with abdominal wall (99m)Tc-HSAM accumulation HFA embolization or ice pack administration seems to prevent complications.

Diagnosis of focal liver lesions suspected of metastases by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): systematic comparison favors free-breathing technique.

Two echo planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) techniques [one breath hold (DWI(bh)), repetition time/echo time (TR/TE) 2100/62 ms; one at free breathing (DWI(fb)), TR/TE 2000/65 ms] were compared regarding diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs) in 45 patients with suspected liver metastasis without prior treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient values of 46 benign and 67 malignant FLLs were analyzed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. DWI(fb) detected more malignant lesions than DWI(bh) (P=.002). Lesion size ≤10 mm was associated with FLLs missed by DWI(bh) (P=.018). Area under the ROC curve of DWI(fb) (0.801) was higher compared to that of DWI(bh) (0.669, P<.0113), demonstrating the diagnostic superiority of DWI(fb).

Diffusion weighted imaging of liver lesions suspect for metastases: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and lesion contrast are independent from Gd-EOB-DTPA administration.

PURPOSE: Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced liver MRI is widely used for detection and differentiation of focal liver lesions. Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements is increasingly utilised as a fast and, with limitations, quantitative method for liver lesion detection and characterisation. Herein we investigate whether the administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA affects DWI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 31 consecutive patients referred to standardised liver MRI (1.5T, Gd-EOB-DTPA, 0.025mmol/kg) were retrospectively reviewed. All underwent a breathhold DWI sequence before and after contrast agent administration (EPI-DWI, TR/TE (effective): 2100/62ms, b-values: 0 and 800s/mm(2)). Patients with previously treated liver lesions were excluded. Signal intensity of lesion, parenchyma and noise on DWI images as well as the ADC value were measured after identification by two observers in consensus using manually placed regions of interest. The reference standard was imaging follow-up determined separately by two radiologists. Data analysis included signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) calculations, comparisons were drawn by employing multiple Bonferroni corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: 50 malignant and 39 benign lesions were identified. Neither SNR, CNR nor ADC values showed significant differences between pre- and postcontrast DWI. Both pre- and postcontrast ADC values differed significantly between benign and malignant lesions (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: We did not identify a significant influence of Gd-EOB-DTPA on DWI of liver lesions. This allows for individual tailoring of imaging protocols according to clinical needs.