Mechanism Matters: Differential benefits of cold-stored whole blood for trauma resuscitation from a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation with cold-stored low-titre whole blood (LTOWB) has increased despite the paucity of robust civilian data. Most studies are in predominately blunt trauma and lack analysis of specific subgroups or mechanism of injury. We sought to compare outcomes between patients receiving LTOWB vs. balanced component therapy (BCT) after blunt (BL) and penetrating (PN) trauma. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study of patients receiving either LTWOB-containing or BCT resuscitation was performed. Patients were grouped by mechanism of injury (BL vs PN). A generalized estimated equations model using inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed. Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary complications, and bleeding complications. Additional analyses were performed on non-traumatic brain injury (TBI), severe torso injury, and LTOWB-only resuscitation patients. RESULTS: 1617 patients (BL 47% vs PN 54%) were identified; 1175 (73%) of which received LTOWB. PN trauma patients receiving LTOWB demonstrated improved survival compared to BCT (77% vs. 56%; p<0.01). Interval survival was higher at 6 hrs (95% vs. 88%), 12 hrs (93% vs. 80%) and 24 hrs (88% vs. 57%) (all p<0.05). The survival benefit following LTOWB was also seen across PN non-TBI (83% vs. 52%), and severe torso injuries (75% vs. 43%) (all p <0.05). After controlling for age, sex, injury severity, and trauma center, LTWOB was associated with decreased odds of death (OR .31, p<.05) in PN trauma. However, no difference in overall mortality was seen across the BL groups. Both PN and BL patients receiving LTOWB had more frequent AKI compared to BCT (19% vs. 7% and 12% vs 6%, respectively; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LTOWB resuscitation was independently associated with decreased mortality following PN trauma, but not BL trauma. Further analysis in BL trauma is required to identify subgroups that may demonstrate survival benefit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, III.

Is Barbed Better? Evaluation of Triclosan-Coated Barbed Suture on Wound Complications Following Emergency Laparotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Emergent laparotomy is associated with significant wound complications including surgical site infections (SSI) and fascial dehiscence (FD). Triclosan-coated barbed suture (TCB) for fascial closure has been shown to reduce local complications but primarily in elective settings. We sought to evaluate the effect of TCB emergency laparotomy fascial closure on major wound complications. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were prospectively evaluated over 1-year. Patients were grouped into TCB vs polydioxanone (PDS) for fascial closure. Subanalysis was performed on patients undergoing single-stage laparotomy. Primary outcomes were SSI and FD. Multivariate analysis identified independent factors associated with SSI and FD. RESULTS: Of the 206 laparotomies, 73 (35%) were closed with TCB and 133 (65%) were closed with PDS. Trauma was the reason for laparotomy in 73% of cases; damage control laparotomy (DCL) was performed in 27% of cases. The overall rate of SSI and FD was 18% and 10%, respectively. Operative strategy was similar between groups, including DCL, wound vac use, skin closure, and blood products. SSI events trended lower with TCB vs PDS closure (11% vs. 21%; p = .07), and FD was significantly lower with TCB versus PDS (4% vs. 14%; p < .05, Fig 1). Subanalysis of trauma and non-trauma cases showed no difference in SSI or FD. Multivariable analysis found that TCB decreased the likelihood of FD (OR .07; p < .05, Fig 2) following emergency laparotomy. Increased odds of FD were seen in DCL (OR 3.1; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency laparotomy fascial closure with TCB showed significantly decreased rates of FD compared to closure with PDS, and a strong trend toward lower SSI events. TCB was independently associated with decreased FD rates after emergency laparotomy.

Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score: A Simple and Reliable Predictor of Mortality in Trauma Patients Undergoing Urgent/Emergent Surgery.

Objective: Many current trauma mortality prediction tools are either too intricate or rely on data not readily available during a trauma patient's initial evaluation. Moreover, none are tailored to those necessitating urgent or emergent surgery. Our objective was to design a practical, user-friendly scoring tool using immediately available variables, and then compare its efficacy to the widely-known Revised Trauma Score (RTS). Methods: The adult 2017-2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database was queried to identify patients ≥18 years old undergoing any urgent/emergent operation (direct from Emergency Department to operating room). Patients were divided into derivation and validation groups. A three-step methodology was used. First, multiple logistic regression models were created to determine risk of death using only variables available upon arrival. Second, the weighted average and relative impact of each independent predictor was used to derive an easily calculated Immediate Operative Trauma Assessment Score (IOTAS). We then validated IOTAS using AUROC and compared it to RTS. Results: From 249 208 patients in the derivation-set, 14 635 (5.9%) died. Age ≥65, Glasgow Coma Scale score <9, hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg), and tachycardia (>120/min) on arrival were identified as independent predictors for mortality. Using these, the IOTAS was structured, offering scores between 0-8. The AUROC for this was .88. A clear escalation in mortality was observed across scores: from 4.4% at score 1 to 60.5% at score 8. For the validation set (250 182 patients; mortality rate 5.8%), the AUROC remained consistent at .87, surpassing RTS's AUROC of .83. Conclusion: IOTAS is a novel, accurate, and now validated tool that is intuitive and efficient in predicting mortality for trauma patients requiring urgent or emergent surgeries. It outperforms RTS, and thereby may help guide clinicians when determining the best course of action in patient management as well as counseling patients and their families.

Bile Duct Injuries During Urgent Cholecystectomy at a Safety Net Teaching Hospital: Attending Experience and Time of Day May Matter.

Background: Bile duct injury (BDI) is one of the most severe complications during cholecystectomy. Early identification of risk factors for BDI may permit risk reduction strategies and inform patient consent.Objective: This study aimed to define patient, provider, and systemic factors associated with BDI; BDI incidence; and short-term outcomes of BDI after urgent cholecystectomy.Methods: Patients who underwent urgent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were retrospectively screened (2020-2022). All patients who sustained BDI were included without exclusions. Demographics, clinical data, and outcomes were collected and compared with descriptive statistics.Results: During the study period, BDI occurred in 4 (0.5%) of 728 patients who underwent urgent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Most BDI cases (75%) took place overnight or during the weekend. The attending surgeon was almost exclusively (75%) in their first year of practice. BDI was recognized during index operation in 2 cases (50%). Hepatobiliary surgery performed the bile duct repair in all 4 cases. Two complications occurred (50%). All patients were followed by hepatobiliary surgery in the outpatient setting and returned to their baseline level of function within 2 months of hospital discharge.Conclusion: Most BDI occurred in procedures attended by first-year faculty during after hours cholecystectomies, suggesting a role for increased proctorship in early career attendings in addition to in-hours cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The timely return to baseline function experienced by these patients emphasizes the favorable outcomes associated with early recognition of BDI and involvement of hepatobiliary surgery. Further examination with multicenter evaluation would be beneficial to validate these study findings.

Outcomes of severely injured pregnant trauma patients: a multicenter analysis.

Nearly 10% of pregnant women suffer traumatic injury. Clinical outcomes for pregnant trauma patients (PTPs) with severe injuries have not been well studied. We sought to describe outcomes for PTPs presenting with severe injuries, hypothesizing that PTPs with severe injuries will have higher rates of complications and mortality compared to less injured PTPs. A post-hoc analysis of a multi-institutional retrospective study at 12 Level-I/II trauma centers was performed. Patients were stratified into severely injured (injury severity score [ISS] > 15) and not severely injured (ISS < 15) and compared with bivariate analyses. From 950 patients, 32 (3.4%) had severe injuries. Compared to non-severely injured PTPs, severely injured PTPs were of similar maternal age but had younger gestational age (21 vs 26 weeks, p = 0.009). Penetrating trauma was more common in the severely injured cohort (15.6% vs 1.4%, p < 0.001). The severely injured cohort more often underwent an operation (68.8% vs 3.8%, p < 0.001), including a hysterectomy (6.3% vs 0.3%, p < 0.001). The severely injured group had higher rates of complications (34.4% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001), mortality (15.6% vs 0.1%, p < 0.001), a higher rate of fetal delivery (37.5% vs. 6.0%, p < 0.001) and resuscitative hysterotomy (9.4% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Only approximately 3% of PTPs were severely injured. However, severely injured PTPs had a nearly 40% rate of fetal delivery as well as increased complications and mortality. This included a resuscitative hysterotomy rate of nearly 10%. Significant vigilance must remain when caring for this population.

Clinical factors and outcomes of spleen-conserving surgery versus total splenectomy in splenic injuries: A nationwide database study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with the use of spleen-conserving surgeries, as well as patient outcomes, on a national scale. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study (2010-2015) included patients (age≥16 years) with splenic injury in the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients who received a total splenectomy or a spleen-conserving surgery were compared for demographics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 18,425 received a total splenectomy and 1,825 received a spleen-conserving surgery. Total splenectomy was more likely to be performed for patients with age>65 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.63, p â€‹< â€‹0.001), systolic blood pressure<90 (OR: 0.63, p â€‹< â€‹0.001), heart rate>120 (OR: 0.83, p â€‹= â€‹0.007), and high-grade injuries (OR: 0.18, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Penetrating trauma patients were more likely to undergo a spleen-conserving surgery (OR: 3.31, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). The use of spleen-conserving surgery was associated with a lower risk of pneumonia (OR: 0.79, p â€‹= â€‹0.009) and venous thromboembolism (OR: 0.72, p â€‹= â€‹0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Spleen-conserving surgeries may be considered for patients with penetrating trauma, age<65, hemodynamic stability, and low-grade injuries. Spleen-conserving surgeries have decreased risk of pneumonia and venous thromboembolism.

A Collaborative Multidisciplinary Trauma Program Improvement Team Improves VTE Chemoprophylaxis Guideline Compliance In Non-Operative Stable TBI.

BACKGROUND: Delays in initiating venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) persist despite guidelines recommending early initiation. We hypothesized that the expansion of a Trauma Program Performance Improvement (PI) team will improve compliance of early (24-48 hour) initiation of VTE prophylaxis and will decrease VTE events in TBI patients. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective review of all TBI patients admitted to a Level I trauma center before (2015-2016,) and after (2019-2020,) the expansion of the Trauma Performance Improvement and Patient Safety (PIPS) team and the creation of trauma process and outcome dashboards. Exclusion criteria included discharge or death within 48 hours of admission, expanding intracranial hemorrhage on CT scan, and a neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy, pressure monitor, or drains) prior to chemoprophylaxis initiation. RESULTS: A total of 1,112 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 54% (n = 604) were admitted after Trauma PIPS expansion. Following the addition of a dedicated PIPS nurse in the trauma program and creation of process dashboards, the time from stable CT to VTE prophylaxis initiation decreased (52 hours to 35 hours; p < 0.001) and more patients received chemoprophylaxis at 24-48 hours (59% from 36%, p < 0.001) after stable head CT. There was no significant difference in time from first head CT to stable CT (9 vs 9 hours; p = 0.15). The Contemporary group had a lower rate of VTE events (1% vs 4%; p < 0.001) with no increase in bleeding events (2% vs 2%; p = 0.97). On multivariable analysis, being in the Early cohort was an independent predictor of VTE events (aOR: 3.74; 95%CI: 1.45-6.16). CONCLUSION: A collaborative multidisciplinary Trauma PIPS team improves guideline compliance. Initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis within 24-48 hours of stable head CT is safe and effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic/Care Management.

Early venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in traumatic brain injury requiring neurosurgical intervention: Safe and effective.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury patients who require neurosurgical intervention are at the highest risk of worsening intracranial hemorrhage. This subgroup of patients has frequently been excluded from prior research regarding the timing of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of early venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in patients with traumatic brain injuries requiring neurosurgical interventions. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review (2016-2020) of traumatic brain injury patients requiring neurosurgical intervention admitted to a level I trauma center. Interventions included intracranial pressure monitoring, subdural drain, external ventricular drain, craniotomy, and craniectomy. Exclusion criteria included neurosurgical intervention after chemoprophylaxis initiation, death within 5 days of admission, and absence of chemoprophylaxis. The total population was stratified into Early (≤72 hours of intervention) versus Late (>72 hours after intervention) chemoprophylaxis initiation. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 204 (58%) had early chemoprophylaxis initiation. Overall, there were no significant differences in baseline and admission characteristics between cohorts. The Early chemoprophylaxis cohort had a statistically significant lower venous thromboembolism rate (5% vs 13%, P < .001) with no increased risk of worsening intracranial hemorrhage (10% vs 13%, P = .44) or neurosurgical reintervention (8% vs 10%, P = .7). On subgroup analysis, a total of 169 patients required either a craniotomy or a craniectomy before chemoprophylaxis. The Early chemoprophylaxis cohort had statistically significant lower venous thromboembolism rates (2% vs 11%, P < .001) with no increase in intracranial hemorrhage (8% vs 11%, P = .6) or repeat neurosurgical intervention (8% vs 10%, P = .77). CONCLUSION: Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis initiation within 72 hours of neurosurgical intervention is safe and effective. Further prospective research is warranted to validate the results of this study.

Disruption of trauma research: an analysis of the top cited versus disruptive trauma research publications.

Introduction: The analysis of surgical research using bibliometric measures has become increasingly prevalent. Absolute citation counts (CC) or indices are commonly used markers of research quality but may not adequately capture the most impactful research. A novel scoring system, the disruptive score (DS) has been found to identity academic work that either changes paradigms (disruptive (DIS) work) or entrenches ideas (developmental (DEV) work). We sought to analyze the most DIS and DEV versus most cited research in civilian trauma. Methods: The top papers by DS and by CC from trauma and surgery journals were identified via a professional literature search. The identified publications were then linked to the National Institutes of Health iCite tool to quantify total CC and related metrics. The top 100 DIS and DEV publications by DS were analyzed based on the area of focus, citation, and perceived clinical impact, and compared with the top 100 papers by CC. Results: 32 293 articles published between 1954 and 2014 were identified. The most common publication location of selected articles was published in Journal of Trauma (31%). Retrospective reviews (73%) were common in DIS (73%) and top CC (67%) papers, while DEV papers were frequently case reports (49%). Only 1 publication was identified in the top 100 DIS and top 100 CC lists. There was no significant correlation between CC and DS among the top 100 DIS papers (r=0.02; p=0.85), and only a weak correlation between CC and DS score (r=0.21; p<0.05) among the top 100 DEV papers. Conclusion: The disruption score identifies a unique subset of trauma academia. The most DIS trauma literature is highly distinct and has little overlap with top trauma publications identified by standard CC metrics, with no significant correlation between the CC and DS. Level of evidence: Level IV.

Predictors of fetal delivery in pregnant trauma patients: A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant trauma patients (PTPs) undergo observation and fetal monitoring following trauma due to possible fetal delivery (FD) or adverse outcome. There is a paucity of data on PTP outcomes, especially related to risk factors for FD. We aimed to identify predictors of posttraumatic FD in potentially viable pregnancies. METHODS: All PTPs (≥18 years) with ≥24-weeks gestational age were included in this multicenter retrospective study at 12 Level-I and II trauma centers between 2016 and 2021. Pregnant trauma patients who underwent FD ((+) FD) were compared to those who did not deliver ((-) FD) during the index hospitalization. Univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of FD. RESULTS: Of 591 PTPs, 63 (10.7%) underwent FD, with 4 (6.3%) maternal deaths. The (+) FD group was similar in maternal age (27 vs. 28 years, p = 0.310) but had older gestational age (37 vs. 30 weeks, p < 0.001) and higher mean injury severity score (7.0 vs. 1.5, p < 0.001) compared with the (-) FD group. The (+) FD group had higher rates of vaginal bleeding (6.3% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.002), uterine contractions (46% vs. 23.5%, p < 0.001), and abnormal fetal heart tracing (54.7% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors for (+) FD included abdominal injury (odds ratio [OR], 4.07; confidence interval [CI], 1.11-15.02; p = 0.035), gestational age (OR, 1.68 per week ≥24 weeks; CI, 1.44-1.95; p < 0.001), abnormal FHT (OR, 12.72; CI, 5.19-31.17; p < 0.001), and premature rupture of membranes (OR, 35.97; CI, 7.28-177.74; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The FD rate was approximately 10% for PTPs with viable fetal gestational age. Independent risk factors for (+) FD included maternal and fetal factors, many of which are available on initial trauma bay evaluation. These risk factors may help predict FD in the trauma setting and shape future guidelines regarding the recommended observation of PTPs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

When is it safe to start venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after blunt solid organ injury? A prospective American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal time to initiate venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis (VTEp) after blunt solid organ injury remains controversial, as VTE mitigation must be balanced against bleeding promulgation. Evidence from primarily small, retrospective, single-center work suggests that VTEp ≤48 hours is safe and effective. This study was undertaken to validate this clinical practice. METHODS: Blunt trauma patients presenting to 19 participating trauma centers in North America were screened over a 1-year study period beginning between August 1 and October 1, 2021. Inclusions were age older than 15 years; ≥1 liver, spleen, or kidney injury; and initial nonoperative management. Exclusions were transfers, emergency department death, pregnancy, and concomitant bleeding disorder/anticoagulation/antiplatelet medication. A priori power calculation stipulated the need for 1,158 patients. Time of VTEp initiation defined study groups: Early (≤48 hours of admission) versus Late (>48 hours). Bivariate and multivariable analyses compared outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 1,173 patients satisfied the study criteria with 571 liver (49%), 557 spleen (47%), and 277 kidney injuries (24%). The median patient age was 34 years (interquartile range, 25-49 years), and 67% (n = 780) were male. The median Injury Severity Score was 22 (interquartile range, 14-29) with Abbreviated Injury Scale Abdomen score of 3 (interquartile range, 2-3), and the median American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade of solid organ injury was 2 (interquartile range, 2-3). Early VTEp patients (n = 838 [74%]) had significantly lower rates of VTE (n = 28 [3%] vs. n = 21 [7%], p = 0.008), comparable rates of nonoperative management failure (n = 21 [3%] vs. n = 12 [4%], p = 0.228), and lower rates of post-VTEp blood transfusion (n = 145 [17%] vs. n = 71 [23%], p = 0.024) when compared with Late VTEp patients (n = 301 [26%]). Late VTEp was independently associated with VTE (odd ratio, 2.251; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Early initiation of VTEp was associated with significantly reduced rates of VTE with no increase in bleeding complications. Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis initiation ≤48 hours is therefore safe and effective and should be the standard of care for patients with blunt solid organ injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic and Care Management; Level III.

Witnessed prehospital traumatic arrest: predictors of survival to hospital discharge.

PURPOSE: Trauma patients are rapidly transported to the hospital for definitive care. Nonetheless, some are alive upon Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrival but arrest on-scene or during transport. The study objective was to examine EMS-witnessed traumatic arrests to define patients who survived hospital discharge. METHODS: Patients sustaining EMS-witnessed traumatic arrest and entered into the National Trauma Data Bank were included (2007-2018). Mortality defined groups: survival to hospital discharge vs. in-hospital death vs. death in ED/declared dead on arrival (DOA). ANOVA/Chi-square compared cohorts. Multivariable analysis established factors associated with survival out of ED and to hospital discharge. RESULTS: After exclusions, 14,177 patients met the criteria: 10% survived, 22% died in hospital, and 68% died in ED/DOA. Survivors tended to be female (33% vs. 23% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), blunt traumas (71% vs. 56% vs. 60%, p < 0.001), have higher scene GCS (15 [7-15] vs. 3 [3-11] vs. 3 [3-7], p < 0.001), and lower injury severity (ISS 13 [7-26] vs. 27 [18-41] vs. 25 [10-30], p < 0.001), particularly of the head (AIS 0 [0-2] vs. 0 [0-4] vs. 1 [0-4], p < 0.001). Survival to hospital discharge was independently associated with higher field GCS (OR 1.252, p < 0.001) and SBP (OR 1.006, p < 0.001), and Head AIS scores (OR 1.073, p < 0.001). Increasing age (OR 0.984, p < 0.001), higher ISS (OR 0.975, p < 0.001), male sex (OR 0.695, p < 0.001), and penetrating mechanism of injury (OR 0.537, p < 0.001) were associated with reduced survival to discharge. CONCLUSION: After EMS-witnessed traumatic cardiac arrest, survivors were more likely to be young, female, injured by blunt trauma, and less hypotensive/comatose on-scene. These findings may have implications for ED resuscitation or declaration of care futility and should be further investigated with a prospective multicenter study.

Effects of prone positioning on ARDS outcomes of trauma and surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prone position is an option for rescue therapy for acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, there are limited relevant data among trauma and surgical patients, who may be at increased risk for complications following position changes. This study aimed to identify the benefits and risks of proning in this patient subgroup. METHODS: Follow the PRISMA 2020, MEDLINE and EMBASE database searches were conducted. Additional search of relevant primary literature and review articles was also performed. A random effects model was used to estimate the PF ratio, mortality rate, mechanical ventilator days, and intensive care unit length of stay using Review Manager 5.4.1 software. RESULTS: Of 1,128 studies, 15 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The prone position significantly improved the PF ratio compared with the supine position (mean difference, 79.26; 95% CI, 53.38 to 105.13). The prone position group had a statistically significant mortality benefit (risk ratio [RR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.67). Although there was no significant difference in the intensive care unit length of stay, the prone position significantly decreased mechanical ventilator days (-2.59; 95% CI, -4.21 to -0.97). On systematic review, minor complications were frequent, especially facial edema. There were no differences in local wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: The prone position has comparable complications to the supine position. With its benefits of increased oxygenation and decreased mortality, the prone position can be considered for trauma and surgical patients. A prospective multicenter study is warranted.

Mild traumatic brain injury: not always a mild injury.

PURPOSE: In general, risk of mortality after trauma correlates with injury severity. Despite arriving in relatively stable clinical condition, however, some patients are at risk of death following mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study objective was delineation of patients who die in-hospital following mild isolated TBI in order to inform Emergency Department (ED) disposition and care discussions with patients and families. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) (2007-2018) were included if they were injured by blunt trauma and sustained a mild TBI (defined as Head Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score of 1 or 2 and arrival Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score of 13-15). Exclusions were severe associated injuries (extracranial AIS > 2); transfers; and missing data. Patients were defined by in-hospital mortality: Survivors vs. Mortalities. Demographics, clinical/injury data, and the outcomes were collected and compared with univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis established independent factors associated with in-hospital mortality following mild TBI. RESULTS: In total, 932,107 patients (10% of NTDB population) met study criteria: 928,542 (99.6%) Survivors and 3,565 (0.4%) Mortalities. In general, comorbidities (including home anticoagulation, cardiac disease, and diabetes mellitus) were significantly more common among patients who died (p < 0.001), although drug and alcohol intoxication on arrival were more common among Survivors (16% vs. 7%, p < 0.001; 13% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). In terms of insurance status, Private/Commercial insurance was more common among Survivors (39% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) while Governmental Insurance was more common among Mortalities (55% vs. 36%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 was most strongly associated with death (OR 26.43, p < 0.001), followed by ED intubation (OR 10.08, p < 0.001), admission hypotension (OR 4.55, p < 0.001), and comorbidities, particularly end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (OR 3.03, p < 0.001) and immunosuppression (OR 2.18, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Survivors differed substantially from Mortalities after mild TBI in terms of comorbidities, intoxicants, and insurance status. Independent variables most strongly associated with in-hospital death following mild head injury included age ≥ 65, intubation in the ED, admission hypotension, and comorbidities (particularly ESRD and immunosuppression). Increased clinical vigilance, including a mandatory period of clinical observation, for patients with these risk factors should be considered to optimize outcomes and potentially mitigate death after mild TBI.

Development and Validation of a Novel Hollow Viscus Injury Prediction Score for Abdominal Seatbelt Sign: A Pacific Coast Surgical Association Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: High-quality CT can exclude hollow viscus injury (HVI) in patients with abdominal seatbelt sign (SBS) but performs poorly at identifying HVI. Delay in diagnosis of HVI has significant consequences necessitating timely identification. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, prospective observational study conducted at 9 trauma centers between August 2020 and October 2021 included adult trauma patients with abdominal SBS who underwent abdominal CT before surgery. HVI was determined intraoperatively and physiologic, examination, laboratory, and imaging findings were collected. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator- and probit regression-selected predictor variables and coefficients were used to assign integer points for the HVI score. Validation was performed by comparing the area under receiver operating curves (AUROC). RESULTS: Analysis included 473 in the development set and 203 in the validation set. The HVI score includes initial systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg, abdominal tenderness, guarding, and select abdominal CT findings. The derivation set has an AUROC of 0.96, and the validation set has an AUROC of 0.91. The HVI score ranges from 0 to 17 with score 0 to 5 having an HVI risk of 0.03% to 5.36%, 6 to 9 having a risk of 10.65% to 44.1%, and 10 to 17 having a risk of 58.59% to 99.72%. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study developed and validated a novel HVI score incorporating readily available physiologic, examination, and CT findings to risk stratify patients with an abdominal SBS. The HVI score can be used to guide decisions regarding management of a patient with an abdominal SBS and suspected HVI.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Nontraumatic Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in the US.

This cohort study describes the use of and outcomes for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for managing nontraumatic gastrointestinal bleeding.

Understanding the Impact of Trauma Admissions to Nonsurgical Services.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS COT) delineates trauma center standards, one of which limits the number of injured patients admitted to nonsurgical services. Performance improvement review of nonsurgical admissions (NSAs), particularly those with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 9, is required. OBJECTIVE: To examine trauma patients with NSA for appropriateness of admission and any potential clinical effect as a result of NSA. METHODS: All trauma patients presenting to our ACS COT-verified level 1 trauma center in Southern California (05/2021-04/2022) were retrospectively screened. Nonsurgical admissions with ISS > 9 were included without exclusions. Appropriateness and clinical impact of NSA were assessed by the Trauma Medical Director (TMD) and Associate TMD. RESULTS: Forty patients met study criteria, with a mean age of 54 years (range 5 d-99 y). The mean ISS was 19 (range 10-30). Nonsurgical admissions most commonly sustained traumatic brain injury (TBI) (n = 27, 68%) after ground level falls (GLF) (n = 32, 80%). All NSAs were evaluated by ≥1 surgical service, commonly neurosurgery (n = 33, 83%) and trauma surgery (n = 13, 33%). Sixteen patients (40%) died, 75% (n = 12) of which were secondary to catastrophic TBI. Upon detailed review, all NSAs were deemed appropriate and without potential clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS: All NSAs in this study were appropriate admissions without clinical effect from lack of surgical admission. Nonsurgical admissions were typically elderly patients with head injuries after GLF. With the anticipated increase in geriatric trauma due to our aging population, NSA with surgical consultation may be an important way to manage trauma admissions without compromising care of injured patients.