Evaluation and Management of Bing-Neel Syndrome.

Bing-Neel syndrome is a rare manifestation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), which is caused by infiltration of the malignant lymphoplasmacytic cells in the central nervous system. Patients can present with a diverse range of neurologic symptoms, and differentiation with other comorbidities seen in WM, such as immunoglobulin M-related polyneuropathy, can be challenging. Both the rarity of this disorder and the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation often cause a significant diagnostic delay with the risk of permanent neurologic damage. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Bing-Neel syndrome.

Treatment of acquired hemophilia A, a balancing act: results from a 27-year Dutch cohort study.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a severe auto-immune bleeding disorder. Treatment of AHA is burdensome and optimal management is still unresolved. Therefore a retrospective nationwide multi-center cohort study (1992-2018) was performed to evaluate clinical presentation and treatment efficacy and safety of AHA in the Netherlands. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis was used to study independent associations between patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. A total of 143 patients (median age 73 years; 52.4% male) were included with a median follow-up of 16.8 months (IQR 3.6-41.5 months). First-line immunosuppressive treatment was mostly steroid monotherapy (67.6%), steroids/cyclophosphamide (11.9%) and steroids/rituximab (11.9%), with success rates of 35.2%, 80.0% and 66.7% respectively, P < .05. Eventually 75% of patients achieved complete remission (CR). A high anti-FVIII antibody titer, severe bleeding and steroid monotherapy were associated with lower CR rates. Infections, the most important adverse event, occurred significantly more often with steroid combination therapy compared to steroids alone (38.7% vs 10.6%; P = .001). Overall mortality was 38.2%, mostly due to infections (19.2%) compared to 7.7% fatal bleeds. Advanced age, underlying malignancy and ICU admission were predictors for mortality. This study showed that AHA is characterized by significant disease-related and treatment-related morbidity and mortality. A high anti-FVIII titer, severe bleeding and steroid monotherapy were associated with a lower CR rate. The efficacy of steroid combination therapies however, was overshadowed by higher infection rates and infections represented the most important cause of death. The challenging and delicate balance between treatment effectivity and safety requires ongoing monitoring of AHA and further identification of prognostic markers.

An update on the 'danger theory' in inhibitor development in hemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, one of the most serious treatment complications in hemophilia A is the formation of neutralizing antibodies against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). These so-called inhibitors develop in about 30% of all patients with severe hemophilia A. Once formed, inhibitors reduce FVIII efficacy in blood coagulation, which has a negative impact on patients' health and quality of life and significantly increases hemophilia A treatment costs. The pathophysiology of inhibitor development is a complex and multi-causal process, in which both genetic factors as well as environmental factors participate. So-called 'danger signals' are considered contributors to inhibitor formation, and can be triggered by surgery, joint bleeds or infections. A pro-inflammatory tissue micro-environment is thereby established, which is characterized by the upregulation of costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells (APCs), that can facilitate the alloimmunization to FVIII and thereby inhibitor formation. Here, the authors will discuss evidence from (pre)clinical studies about this theory in hemophilia A. Areas covered: In this review, the current knowledge regarding the 'danger theory' with regard to inhibitor development in hemophilia A is summarized. Expert opinion: Danger signals might contribute to inhibitor development; however, the evidence is scarce and not conclusive. Future studies, like multinational registries, are warranted but challenging.